Assignment -1 mini case study

Question1. Are Salvos statements feeble and irrelevant?

In my thinking Salvos statements are not feeble and irrelevant because

1. He is likewise right at the announcement proportion examination directed

in negligent way is hazardous on the grounds that they are just worried
about turnover might be there are costs on something which they are not
considering.
2. Solvo was judged by performance measured on a higher inventory
turnover

Question2. Are there other reasons Solvo could have cited to

strengthen his defence?

Yes, because Bayshore is impacted by both the general economic issues

and negative regional conditions. Organization is working together in
eastern part just they can expand their business in western part also and
Current deals were demonstrating slow down pattern

Question3. Did Bayshore management use acceptable performance

criteria to evaluate Scott Salvo?

I suspect as much organization has picked satisfactory execution criteria

to assess Scott on the grounds that they basically utilize the earlier year's
numbers to his residency number to assess his execution. There was no
change in Return on speculation (ROI).

Question4. Even using turnover as a criterion, how should its analysis

be extended?

Date of stocking arrangement of materials to keep up stocks for few days

of utilization. Amendment of requesting strategy for things according to
lead time and EOQ of procurement division. To lessen the figure fluctuation
of promoting. Data on outline and sort changes with legitimate lead time
and clear activity to weaken existing stocks.