Taking Female Sexuality Out of the “Male” Box

http://www.lilithland.net

I just finished reading some of the posts at the apparently

defunct blog “Ways Women Orgasm Forum”, and I was
deeply moved by some of the things that the author, Jane, had
to say. Probably, because I have experienced some of these
issues myself.

She describes herself as “bitterly disappointed when sex did

not deliver the easy arousal portrayed in erotic fiction.” In
spite, of the fact that she was able to have orgasms during
masturbation, she found sex with a partner to be a real
challenge and reported that she “never felt anything like the
same sexual arousal during sex with a lover.”

For many years, I suffered the same problem - and apparently so have many other women.
According to David Buss and Cindy Meston in their book Why Women Have Sex, women are
twice as likely to orgasm during masturbation as they are with a partner. In my case, I was easily
orgasmic alone but had to really work at with a lover – plus, the orgasm left much to be desired
(the big bang felt more like a little hiccup).

At least, I am orgasmic. Over 20% of women never come at all – under any circumstance. Which
is to say the least, a big whopping problem. Within the last few years, the politically correct term
for this whopper is female sexual dysfunction (which sounds better than the old one, frigidity).

 Women’s “elusive” satisfaction has provided a huge pond for Big Pharma to fish in and has
papered the wallets of countless book and magazine writers.  But in spite of all this interest,
women still remain horny and frustrated or maybe, more appropriately, “not horny” and
"frustrated".

Jane goes on to describe some of the reasons she believes are behind this mess, and I agree with
her thinking about the "effects" but not about the “causes” of women's sexual woes. She writes:

Unfortunately, although only a relatively small sample of women exhibited sexual desire,
the popular message was that all women could potentially be as strongly driven by sex
and orgasm as men are....Women who did not enjoy sexual arousal and orgasm during
sex as easily as men did were now considered to be abnormal, either ‘inhibited’ or even
‘frigid’ (terms never applied to men).This new definition of female sexuality implied that,
once relieved of the old-fashioned female inhibition, truly modern and liberated women’s
minds and bodies would respond just the same as men’s had always done. Women were
pressured into exaggerating both their sexual desire and their sexual arousal as well as
faking orgasm.

I agree with much of what she says here. I think that our culture puts a tremendous amount of
pressure on women to be sexy and sexually responsive. Not enjoying sex has now become the
taboo that being a slut was for earlier generations. Nobody wants to be considered a prude - or
God, forbid hung-up. The problem I have is that she later goes on and says that:

Sex is fundamentally about male sex drive. A man’s erect penis is the symbol of this
hormonal drive to thrust until ejaculation. If women have a reproductive drive at all then
it is an emotional drive to raise their children. They certainly do not have the same
biological drive to reach orgasm during sex that men experience.

This is precisely the same argument that Joan Sewell makes in I'd Rather Eat Chocolate , her
memoir about learning to accept her low sex drive. And I think that it reflects a common view of
female sexuality: That women are inherently less sexual than men, and our supposed "problems"
are all the result of our hormonal makeup. Jane, at least, takes into consideration that how
women process sex may be a contributing factor. But still comes to the conclusion that this is just
the natural order of things. 

Well, yes and no.

Yes, women often put up with bad sex, and yes, we don’t process our sexuality the same as men.
But no, our hormones don’t render us incapable of climbing the same erotic heights as men. Our
cultural conditioning does. If you want to see just how far we haven’t come in regards to gender
equality, take a look at our sexual norms. Forty years after the women’s movement, we still
define sex in male terms, as vaginal intercourse, an act that most women don’t and can't come
from.

Let me repeat this one more time because our concepts of sexual normalcy make it hard to see
the truth or the injustice. Kind of like how a battered child doesn’t see herself as an abuse victim
because being beaten black and blue is her view of normal.

We define sex by an act that most women don’t come from – in some cases – ever.

Plus, this act is considered to be practically mandatory for heterosexuals. If we look at sexuality
from an objective perspective, our fixation on intercourse is not only unfair to women but just
plain weird. After all, intercourse is not a risk free act – especially for a woman. There’s not only
the danger of an unplanned pregnancy, but STDs, and HIV to think about.  Meanwhile, we’re not
getting off. So, where’s the payback here?

Now, I’m not opposed to bonking, after all, it is the reason we’re all here. But let’s face facts, the
clitoris is the primary female sex organ – it develops out of the same exact embryonic tissue as
the penis. For most women, it is the clearest route to nirvana, and the only reason for its
existence is to send the female body into the pleasure zone.

And yet, we still continue to treat clitoral play as an appetizer to a main meal.  Too often, the clit
is regulated to foreplay with the expectation that orgasm will arrive from intercourse - which is a
little like expecting a man to climax from having his balls played with. Culturally speaking,
we're trying to fit female sexuality into the “male” box and then wondering why many women
would rather eat chocolate than fuck.  

Yes, some women manage to orgasm hand-free from intercourse (around 15-35%).  And many
women (me included) love penetration, which stimulates the internal parts of the clitoris. As far
as I'm concerned, nothing on this planet feels better than a combination of clitoral and vaginal
stimulation. That's why the rabbit vibe is so popular. However, not everyone feels this way.
Some women find the two together distracting. And frankly, they should be able to define sex
however it works best for them. Unfortunately, our view of heterosexual sex doesn't leave a lot
of wiggle room for self-definition. And that's the problem.

Anthropologist Margaret Mead wrote in Male and Female that how orgasmic women were in a
given culture was correlated with how much that society valued female pleasure. Societies that
love orgasmic women usually have a broad sexual menu where even the fussiest female can find
a way to enjoy herself. Societies that don't value female satisfaction restrict sex to what men
enjoy.

Case in point, the island of Mangaia. Anthropologist Donald Marshall found that most Mangaian
women were multi-orgasmic and had numerous lovers from an early age. Both boys and girls
were educated by their elders in the art of lovemaking from the time they first began having sex
at puberty. Anorgasmia in women was unheard of. While on the Inis Beag, a small rural
community off the coast of Ireland, female orgasm just didn't happen - and if it did, it was
considered weird.

The social status of women is highly correlated with their sexual satisfaction. A study conducted
by researchers at the University of Chicago found that gender equality was associated with
greater sexual satisfaction for both men and women. The researchers looked at 29 countries, and
compared them on sexual satisfaction levels. They found that in highly male dominated
countries, like the Middle East, only 38% of women reported that sex was gratifying, while about
70% of westerner's reported satisfaction.

Western society still suffers from clitaphobia though, and it takes many forms. For one, there is
the widespread verbal circumcision of the female anatomy. We don't talk about the clitoris, and
we call the female genitals by the wrong name, (i.e., vagina). The clitoris, not vagina, is the
equivocal organ to the penis. When I was 14, l learned where my clitoris was and how to orgasm
(thank you, Shere Hite). Somehow, I can’t imagine a 14 year old boy not knowing what or where
his dick is.

In a study conducted jointly by Minnesota State and Royal Roads Universities on clitoral
knowledge, researchers found that most of the participants had never heard of the world clitoris
until they were well into their teens - often after becoming sexually active. One young woman
said "I don’t remember ever being told that a clitoris is a normal part of a female’s body." I'm
with you, sister. I never heard the word as a child.

This was also true in a 1998 study that looked at students in a human sexuality class; only 1% of
participants had heard their mothers mention the word clitoris. Most had learned that "vagina"
referred to the entire female anatomy. Many women never hear the word clitoris used in their
homes, among their friends, or on television.

One of the problems with calling the female genitalia "vagina" is that it makes it harder to define
sex on your own terms because "your terms" are so inconsequential that they are never included
in the vocabulary. From the standpoint of popular culture, your clit doesn't exist and therefore
needs no attention.

And it is also true that the way women are socialized to view sex puts us at a distinct
disadvantage in the heterosexual bedroom. Jane mentions that one of the problems she had was
that she fantasized while she masturbated and that she couldn’t easily do this with a partner
present. I can relate to that one too.

The clit doesn’t usually stand at attention because of a partner’s nudity or from the mere sight of
something sexual the way the dick does. Many women are more aroused by their own randy
thoughts and by the emotional elements of a sexual encounter than they are by looking at a
lover’s six pack.

Men are more into visual stimulation than woman, and this a taken-for-granted gender
difference.  However, what are the ramifications of this difference? Personally, I believe that this
has a profound effect on male and female arousal. Male arousal is grounded in the body -
something concrete, static, and not subject to change at a moment's notice. It is also something
subject to classical conditioning - the old Pavlov and the dog thing here. [Explanation: Pavlov
conditioned a dog to drool to the sound of a bell by repeatedly ringing a bell and presenting
meat. Eventually, just the bell alone caused the reaction].

Men form very tight associations between their own arousal and the physical (or visual) aspects
of sex, and they reinforce these connections over and over again by looking at porn, fantasizing,
and masturbating. Plus, heterosexual sex is set up to provide them with an ever-present orgasmic
payoff. Men appear highly sexual because their responses are so conditioned that they are
automatically triggered by sexual stimuli. And our priaptic media plays on this male
vulnerability to sell everything from cars to toothpaste.

So, is male randiness really about testosterone- or is it about hardwired associations?

Women, on the other hand, don't make these connections as well. We are discouraged from
masturbating (hard to do when you don't know you have a clitoris because it's called a vagina),
we are not socialized to find our partner's body all that exciting, and heterosexual sex often
doesn't provide much of a payback.

The end result for women is that there is often a disconnect between sexual activity and their
own gratification. In other words, we don't sexualize sex. We romanticize it as a way to fill in the
orgasm gap between men and women. And unfortunately, this makes actual physical arousal
harder to come by because you can't condition a physiological response (like arousal) by using
an emotion as a stimulus. An emotion is, by its nature, fragile and easily changed. This is one of
the reasons why women have more problems getting and staying turned on than men. Our
arousal is simply not anchored in anything stable.

Sometimes, fantasy can help fill the gap, but as Jane points out, this can be tough to do with a
partner present. Fantasizing during sex means you are less likely to attend to your partner's needs
- a no-no for women. I would argue that there is no reason you can’t lose yourself in a fantasy
with a partner. It simply involves giving yourself permission to focus on your own feelings and
stop thinking so much about what he wants.

That, of course, is the hard part making your own sexual satisfaction as important as your
partner's, defining it for yourself, and being able to reveal it to a lover. Not easy in a culture in
which a woman still makes 79 cents for every dollar a man makes. And not an easy task when
genuine female sexuality is culturally invisible and what is visible is a pornified facsimile of
female desire.

Another part of clitaphobia is the restriction of sex to a small number of sexual acts, which is so
different from female masturbation. And it is one major reason why many women fail to transfer
their orgasmic abilities to a partner’s bed. Women are far more creative in how they masturbate
than men. And as Margaret Mead pointed out, a broad sexual menu is key for most women's
orgasmic satisfaction. Hite found that women humped teddy bears, used shower massagers, and
squeezed their thighs together all in the name of a good come.

Once again, I argue that even the wackiest masturbation technique can and should be used with a
partner, if you think outside of the aforementioned box. So what if the only way you are able to
orgasm is with a teddy bear.  Maybe you could do some age play, or he could stroke you, while
you hump teddy for all its worth. This doesn’t mean you can’t expand your repertoire beyond
teddy – just that it’s okay to use what works for you.

It's time we stopped pretending that women don't need sex or orgasms - that we’re okay with
scraps rather than a four-course meal, and the only thing we are looking for out of sex is
intimacy. Natalie Angier once said that the idea that we women don't mind if we come or not
makes as much sense as saying  homeless people are okay with being homeless because they “
like living outdoors”.

 I have only one response to that kind of bullshit “remember Lorena”. You know, the petite
South American with the apt last name of Bobbitt. When asked why she attempted to neuter her
husband, she replied:

“He always have [sic] [an] orgasm and he doesn't wait for me to have [an] orgasm. He's selfish.”

Orgasm is not the be-all and end-all of sex for either men or women. Sometimes, the journey is
more important than the destination. But sometimes, the journey is a long boring trip in a hot car
going nowhere. And most women don't have a choice whether to pursue the destination or the
journey. Many of us are stuck with the journey because of social norms - not out of personal
choice. Hite has argued that what we really need is a new definition of sex based on individual
pleasure.  And as she very succinctly put it:
 …sex can evolve beyond orgasms. Sex can be transformed to become an individual
vocabulary of erotic gestures, combining bodies to reach high states of arousal and
desire, beyond a quest for orgasms by either woman or man. Sex can become something
new, something we have not yet seen, something that we all now create by taking private,
very courageous, steps.

Now, that would be a real sexual revolution...