9 700

Project
Review and Detailed Engineering Design of Comprehensive River Management of San Juan River
Name:
Designer: ASAN Checked by: EFV Date: 3/22/17 Rev. No.:
Design of Bored Pile ‐ SSP Combination 1
Station: 9+650 to 9+900 Side: Right
A. Input of Elevations
Land Side Elevations Land Side River Side
Proposed Bank Elevation 19.689 m 17.355 m
Ground Surface 17.355 m
River Side Elevations DFL 18.72 m
Design Flood Level (DFL) 18.72 m
Ordinary Water Level (OWL) 14.571 m
Dredge Line Elevation 14.571 m
OWL 14.571 m
B. Structure Input Data
1. Coping Beam Properties & Dimensions Fixed Head
Concrete Properties Dredge Line 14.571 m
Class B
Compressive strength, f'c 16.5 MPa
Coarse aggregate size 50 mm
Poisson's ratio 0.2 12.589 m Bottom of Sheet Pile
Dimensions 9.589 m Bottom of Bored Pile

a : 300 mm a
b : 700 mm
b
c : 800 mm
d : 700 mm
e : 400 mm c e
Coping Beam Detail
2. Bored Pile Properties & Dimensions
Concrete Unit Weight, ϒc 23.5 kN/m3
Concrete Compressive Strength, f' c 21 MPa Sheet
Pile
Pile Diameter, Dbp 1000 mm
Pile Length, Lbp 9m Bored
Pile
Pile Spacing, W 6m
Waling
3. Waling Beam Properties & Dimensions Beam
C ‐ Channel Type C12x30 Y
C1
Thickness of channel, twb 247.65 mm
Moment of Inertia, I wb 2.131E‐06 m⁴/m
Y
Section Modulus, Zwb 3.359E‐05 m³/m C2
Lbp
Distance from the bottom of the coping beam 0m
Y
Wailng Beam Spacing, y 0@ 750 mm C3
4. Sheet Pile Properties & Dimensions
Steel Properties
Grade ASTM A690
Yield strength 345 MPa
Tensile strength 485 MPa
Elongation 21 %
Elastic Modulus, Essp 200 GPa w
Steel Sheet Pile Dimensions Bored Pile ‐ Sheet Pile Scheme Drawing
SSP Type NS‐SP‐IV
Effective Width of Sheet Pile,wssp 400 mm
Effective Height of Sheet Pile, hssp 170 mm 400
Thickness of Pile, tssp 15.5 mm
Mass of Pile, Wssp 76.1 kg/m/pile 170 15.5
Cross Sectional Area of Pile, Asspperpile 96.99 cm2/pile

Moment of Inertia per Pile, I sspperpile 4670 cm⁴/pile
Section Modulus per Pile, Sxsspperpile 362 cm³/pile U‐Type Steel Sheet Pile Dimensions
Mass of Pile per meter Wall, Wssppermtr 190 kg/m
Cross Sectional Area of Pile, Asspperpile 242.5 cm2/pile
Moment of Inertia per meter wall, I ssppermtr 38600 cm⁴/m
Section Modulus per meter wall, Sx ssppermtr 2270 cm³/m
Length of SSP, Lssp 6 m
Project
Review and Detailed Engineering Design of Comprehensive River Management of San Juan River
Name:
Designer: ASAN Checked by: EFV Date: 3/22/17 Rev. No.:
Design of Bored Pile ‐ SSP Combination 2
Station: 9+650 to 9+900 Side: Right
C. Design Parameters
1. Water Load
Unit weight of water, ϒw 9.81 kN/m³
Average velocity of water, Vw 0 m/s
2. Earth Pressure and Surcharge
Angle of Ground Surface, δ 0 deg.
Angle of Earth Friction on the Wall, β 0 deg.
Seismic Acceleration Coefficient, A 0.4
Horizontal Acceleration Coefficient, Kh 0.2
Vertical AccelerationCoefficient, Kv 0
3. Wind Load
Zone 2
Topographic Factor, KZT 1
Directionality Factor, KD Open signs and lattice frameworks
Velocity Pressure Exposure Coefficient, KZ 0.6
Importance Factor, IW Standard
Gust‐effect Factor, G 0.85
Net Force Coefficient, CF 1.35
D. Reinforcements
1. Coping Beam
Clear Concrete Cover, cc 100 mm
Side Longitudinal Reinforcement Diameter,ds 25 mm
Top and Bottom Longitudinal Reinforcement Diameter, dtb 25 mm
Transverse Reinforcement Diameter, DS 16 mm
Yield Strength of Main Reinforcement, FY 414 MPa
Yield Strength of Transverse Reinforcement, F yt 414 MPa
2.
Bored Pile
Clear Concrete Cover, c c 100 mm
Longitudinal Reinforcement Diameter, D ⅔ 32 mm
Longitudinal Reinforcement Diameter, D ⅓ 32 mm
Transverse Reinforcement Diameter, D S 16 mm
Yield strength of Reinforcement, F Y 414 MPa
Spiral Pitch, PS 100 mm
Steel Casing Thickness 10 mm
E. Design Codes
AASHTO LRFD 2012
AISC 13th Edition
Designed by: ASAN
PROJECT NAME: Review and Detailed Engineering Design of Comprehensive River Management of San Juan River Checked by: EFV
Date: 3/22/2017
Design of Bored Pile - SSP Combination 3
BHCSB-12 Table 1. Lateral Earth Pressure Computation

Water table = 16.86 m
Elevations Soil Properties
OWL = 14.57 m
DFL = 18.72 m 2 DL Depth Z Code N Type Description State ν γ ∅ C
1 0 17.36 0.00 GW 54 **Well graded gravel **Dense soil (Id > 0.67) Total 0.2 21.00 38.50 0
0 50
2 1 14.57 2.78 GW 54 **Well graded gravel **Dense soil (Id > 0.67) Effective 0.2 11.19 38.50 0
20.00 0 13.57 3.78 GW 54 **Well graded gravel **Dense soil (Id > 0.67) Effective 0.2 11.19 38.50 0
3
18.00 5 0 11.59 5.77 GW 54 **Well graded gravel **Dense soil (Id > 0.67) Effective 0.2 11.19 38.50 0
16.00 0 8.59 8.77 GW 54 **Well graded gravel **Dense soil (Id > 0.67) Effective 0.2 11.19 38.50 0
8
10 0 - - - -
14.00
11 0 - - - -
12 0 - - - -
12.00 13 0 - - - -
14 0 - - - -
Elevation
15 0 - - - -
10.00
16 0 - - - -
17 0 - - - -
8.00 18 0 - - - -
19 0 - - - -
20 0 - - - -
6.00
21 0 - - - -
22 0 - - - -
4.00 23 0 - - - -
24 0 - - - -
25 0 - - - -
2.00
26 0 - - - -
27 0 - - - -
0.00 28 0 - - - -
N‐Value
Figure 1. Borehole Data
Designed by: ASAN
Date: 3/22/2017
Table 1. Lateral Earth Pressure Computation (Continuation)

Surcharge Thousands
Soil Properties (cont…) E.P. Coefficients Lateral Earth Pressure
ko ## ka ## ‐1.00 ‐0.50 0.00 0.50
δ β θ ko ka kp Po Pa Pp Es Ls
20.00
22.00 0.00 90.00 0.38 0.21 11.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.55 2.67
22.00 0.00 90.00 0.38 0.21 11.90 11.76 6.61 0.00 2.55 1.42
18.00
22.00 0.00 90.00 0.38 0.21 11.90 15.98 8.98 133.21 2.55 1.42
22.00 0.00 90.00 0.38 0.21 11.90 20.13 11.32 264.02 2.55 1.42
22.00 0.00 90.00 0.38 0.21 11.90 24.36 13.69 397.23 2.55 1.42 16.00
22.00 0.00 90.00 0.38 0.21 11.90 28.58 16.06 530.43 2.55 1.42
22.00 0.00 90.00 0.38 0.21 11.90 32.80 18.44 663.64 2.55 1.42 14.00
22.00 0.00 90.00 0.38 0.21 11.90 37.03 20.81 796.85 2.55 1.42
22.00 0.00 90.00 0.38 0.21 11.90 41.25 23.19 930.06 2.55 1.42
12.00
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
10.00
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - 8.00
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - 6.00
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
4.00
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
2.00
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - 0.00
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
At‐rest Active Passive OWL DFL
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - Figure 2. Lateral Earth Pressure and Water Pressure Diagram
- - - - - - - - - - -
For sheet pile calculation:
▪ Point of contraflexure is calculated to be
2.83 meter(s) below the NGL.
Designed by: ASAN
Date: 3/22/2017
▪ Article 3.11.5, AASHTO LRFD 2012 ▪ Article 3.11.5.4, AASHTO LRFD 2012
Lateral Earth Pressure Passive Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficient
Lateral earth pressure shall be assumed to be linearly
p p  k p  s z  2c k p
proportional to tge depth of earth and taken as:
c : soil cohesion (kPa)
p  k s z
Coulomb Theory
p : lateral earth pressure (kPa)
cos 2 
γs : unit weight of soil (kN/m3) kp  2
 sin(  ) sin(   ) 
z : depth below the surface of the earth (m) cos  1 
k : coefficient of lateral earth pressure  cos  cos  
▪ Article 3.11.5.2, AASHTO LRFD 2012 ▪ Article 3.11.6.1, AASHTO LRFD 2012
At-Rest Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficient Uniform Surcharge Load
ko  1  sin  ' f  p  k s qs
ko : coefficient of at-rest lateral earth pressure ∆p : constant horizontal earth pressure due to
ϕ'f : effective friction angle of soil uniform surcharge (kPa)
ks : coefficient of earth pressure due to surcharge
▪ Article 3.11.5.3, AASHTO LRFD 2012 qs : uniform surcharge applied to the upper surface
Active Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficient of the active earth wedge (kPa)
sin 2    ' f 
set : 12
ka 

 sin 2  sin      ▪ Article 3.11.6.4, AASHTO LRFD 2012
in which: Live Load Surcharge
sin(  ' f  ) sin  ' f    

2 Figure 4. Forces Acting on Steel Sheet Pile
  p  k s heq
  1  
 sin     sin      ∆p : constant horizontal earth pressure due to Table 2. AASHTO 2012 TABLE 3.11.6.4-1
live load surcharge (kPa) heq (mm)
Retaining wall height
δ : friction angle between fill and wall taken from heq : equivalent height of soil for vehicular load (mm) 0.0mm 300mm +
AASHTO 2012 Table 3.11.5.3-1 set : 600 1500 1500 600
β : angle of fill to the horizontal 3000 1050 600
set : 0.00 ≥6000 600 600
θ : angle of back face of wall to the horizontal *Distance from wall backface to edge of traffic
set : 90.00 Figure 3. Active Earth Pressure
Designed by: ASAN
Date: 3/22/2017
Table 3. Subgrade Modulus and Spring Constant Computation

Elevations Soil Properties
Depth Z Code N Type Description State ν γ ∅ C Edef
1 17.36 0.00 GW 54 **Well graded gravel **Dense soil (Id > 0.67) Total 0.2 21.00 38.50 0 430.00
2 14.57 2.78 GW 54 **Well graded gravel **Dense soil (Id > 0.67) Effective 0.2 11.19 38.50 0 430.00
10 - - - - -
11 - - - - -
12 - - - - -
13 - - - - -
14 - - - - -
15 - - - - -
16 - - - - -
17 - - - - -
18 - - - - -
19 - - - - -
20 - - - - -
21 - - - - -
22 - - - - -
23 - - - - -
24 - - - - -
25 - - - - -
26 - - - - -
27 - - - - -
28 - - - - -
Figure 5. Sring Support
Reactions
Designed by: ASAN
Date: 3/22/2017
Table 3. Subgrade Modulus and Spring Constant Computation (continuation)

Bearing Capacity Factors Subgrade Modulus ▪ Article 13-3.3, Foundation Design & Analysis ▪ Table 4-2, Foundation Design & Analysis
Nc Nq Nγ As Bs As + Bs tan-1(Z/D) Modulus of subgrade reaction Bearing-capacity factors
1 84.33 69.33 83.00 - - - The finite element method uses ks in the passive ∅ Nc Nq Nγ
2 84.33 69.33 83.00 18575 31032 18575.40 pressure region below the dredge line in front of 0 5.7 1 0
3 84.33 69.33 83.00 18575 31032 22989.96 the wall. 5 7.3 1.6 0.5
84.33 69.33 83.00 18575 31032 27158.77 10 9.6 2.7 1.2

k s  As  Bs tan 1 ( Z / D )
4
5 84.33 69.33 83.00 18575 31032 31101.40 15 12.9 4.4 2.5
6 84.33 69.33 83.00 18575 31032 34659.74 As  C (cN c  0.5 (1) N  ) 20 17.7 7.4 5
7 84.33 69.33 83.00 18575 31032 37807.91 25 25.1 12.7 9.7
84.33 69.33 83.00 18575 31032 40558.98

Bs  C (N q ) Z n 30 37.2 22.5 19.7
8
9 84.33 69.33 83.00 18575 31032 42947.96 Note: 34 52.6 36.5 36
10 - - - - - - 1. The use of 1 in the equation for As is for B = unit width of wall 35 57.8 41.4 42.4
11 - - - - - - 2. Assuming ∆H (displacement) when the ultimate 40 95.7 81.3 100.4
12 - - - - - - bearing pressure is developed, C becomes; 45 172.3 173.3 297.5
13 - - - - - - ∆H : 25 mm 48 258.3 287.9 780.1
14 - - - - - - C : 40 50 347.5 415.1 1153.2
15 - - - - - - 3. D = embedment depth on any cycle
16 - - - - - - 4. Z = depth from dredgeline to the current node
17 - - - - - -
18 - - - - - -
19 - - - - - -
20 - - - - - -
21 - - - - - -
22 - - - - - -
23 - - - - - -
24 - - - - - -
25 - - - - - -
26 - - - - - -
27 - - - - - -
28 - - - - - -
Project Review and Detailed Engineering Design of Comprehensive River
Name: Management of San Juan River
Designer: ASAN Checked by: EFV Date: 3/22/17
8
Design of Bored Pile ‐ SSP Combination
Geometric Model
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction
The most general form for either a horizontal or lateral modulus of subgrade reaction is:
(9-10, Bowles, Foundation Analysis and Design)
k s  As  Bs Z n
where:
As  Fw1CCm cN c  0.5DN  (16-26a, Bowles, Foundation Analysis and Design)
B s  F w 2 CC m  N q Z N
 (16-26a, Bowles, Foundation Analysis and Design)
As = Constant for either horizontal or vertical members
Bs = Coefficient for depth variation
Fw1 = Shape factor
Fw2 = Shape factor
C = Reduction factor
Cm = Size factor multiplier
n = Exponent to give ks the best fit (0.4 to 0.6)
9
Node ΔL Z ∅ C ϒ Nc Nq Nϒ As Bs
1 0.00 0.00 39 0 21.00 65 53 62 103000 440000
2 2.78 2.78 39 0 11.19 65 53 62 55000 235000
3 1.00 3.78 39 0 11.19 65 53 62 55000 235000
4 0.98 4.77 39 0 11.19 65 53 62 55000 235000
5 1.00 5.77 39 0 11.19 65 53 62 55000 235000
6 1.00 6.77 39 0 11.19 65 53 62 55000 235000

7 1.00 7.77 39 0 11.19 65 53 62 55000 235000
8 1.00 8.77 39 0 11.19 65 53 62 55000 235000
9 1.00 9.77 39 0 11.19 65 53 62 55000 235000
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10
n Ks k1 k2 K
Node As + Bs Z
1 103000 + 440000 Zⁿ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
2 55000 + 235000 Zⁿ 55,000.00 0.00 53333.33 53,334.00
3 55000 + 235000 Zⁿ 290,000.00 84666.67 126460.82 211,128.00
4 55000 + 235000 Zⁿ 385,841.28 139009.64 164332.21 303,342.00
5 55000 + 235000 Zⁿ 460,809.01 174327.91 192741.24 367,070.00
6 55000 + 235000 Zⁿ 523,941.31 201158.88 216988.25 418,148.00
7 55000 + 235000 Zⁿ 579,529.27 224399.98 238509.94 462,910.00
8 55000 + 235000 Zⁿ 629,766.00 245208.17 258064.49 503,273.00
9 55000 + 235000 Zⁿ 675,951.65 264222.57 0.00 264,223.00
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Review and Detailed Engineering Design of Comprehensive River
Project Name:
Management of San Juan River
11
Design Loads
A. Hydrostatic Pressure
p HS   W h
where:
PHS = ‐ Water Pressure, kN/m²
ϒw = 9.81 Unit weight of water, kN/m³
h = ‐ Height of water being considered from pile tip, m
River Side ‐ Bored Pile
h PHS Land side River side
Pile Head 9.00 88.29

Design Flood Level 9.13 89.58
Non‐flood Level 4.98 48.87
River Side ‐ Sheet Pile
h PHS
Pile Head 6.00 58.86
Design Flood Level 6.13 60.15
Non‐flood Level 1.98 19.44
Land Side ‐ Bored Pile
h PHS
Ground Surface 7.27 71.33
Land Side ‐ Sheet Pile
h PHS
Ground Surface 4.27 41.90
B. Earth Forces and Surcharge
For other lateral forces, see Lateral Earth Pressure Computation
Load Combination
STR I 1.25DC + 1.00WA + 1.5ES + 1.75LS + 1.5EH
SER I 1.00DC + 1.00WA + 1.00ES + 1.00LS + 1.00EH
Project Name: 12
Computer Output
A. Geometry
COPING BEAM
BORED PILE
L=11 m
D= 1 m
STEEL SHEET PILE
L= 6 m
B. LOAD DIAGRAMS
I. DEAD LOAD OF COMPONENTS
II. HYDROSTATIC
STEEL SHEET PILE BORED PILE
Project Name: 13
III. EARTH SURCHARGE
IV. LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE
Project Name: 14
V. ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE
C. FORCE DIAGRAMS
C FORCE DIAGRAMS
I. STEEL SHEET PILE
MOMENT DIAGRAM
Mmax = 34.018 kN‐m
LOAD COMBINATION: 1.25DC + 1.00WA + 1.5ES + 1.75LS + 1.5EH
Project Name: 15
SHEAR DIAGRAM
Vmax = 62.901 kN
II. BORED PILE
MOMENT DIAGRAM
Mmax = 1531.637 kN‐m
Project Name: 16
SHEAR DIAGRAM
Vmax = 558.783 kN
AXIAL DIAGRAM
Nmax = 155.893 kN
Project Name: 17
D. DEFLECTION
δmax = 23.332 mm
E. DESIGN
E DESIGN
I. DESIGN OF STEEL SHEET PILE
DESIGN FOR FLEXURE
ARTICLE 16‐F1; AISC 13TH EDITION
φb = 0.9 (LRFD)
Mmax = 34.08 kN‐m
Sprov = 362 m^3
Fy = 345 MPa
M max
S 
 Fy
x
Provided Required Remark

362 > 109.76 OK!
DESIGN FOR SHEAR
ARTICLE 16‐F1; AISC 13TH EDITION
φV = 0.9 (LRFD)
Vmax = 62.901 kN
Assp = 96.99 cm^2
Provided Required Remark

310.5 > 6.49 OK!
Project Name: 18
II. DESIGN OF BORED PILE
Software used: STAAD Pro
Pu(kN) My (kNm) Mz (kNm)

3.624 16.617 0
3.624 2.854 147.281
3.624 16.617 0
3.633 28.911 30.867
3.633 28.911 30.867
3.633 28.911 30.867
3.633 12.994 170.463
3.633 28.911 30.867
3.656 15.239 413.539
3.658 14.955 422.529
3.624 16.617 0
20 ‐ 36mmΦ bars
Material Properties:
====================
f'c = 21 MPa fy = 414 MPa
Ec = 21538.1 MPa Es = 200000 MPa
Ultimate strain = 0.003 mm/mm
Beta1 = 0.846954
Section:
Section:
========
Circular: Diameter = 1000 mm
Gross section area, Ag = 785398 mm^2
Ix = 4.90874e+010 mm^4 Iy = 4.90874e+010 mm^4
rx = 250 mm ry = 250 mm
Xo = 0 mm Yo = 0 mm
Confinement: Spiral; #16 ties with #25 bars, #16 with larger bars.
phi(a) = 0.85, phi(b) = 0.9, phi(c) = 0.75
Total steel area: As = 20120 mm^2 at rho = 2.562%
Minimum clear spacing = 78.77 mm
20 #36 Cover = 100 mm
II. DESIGN OF COPING BEAM
Software used: STAAD Pro
2 - 20mm DIA. 7 - 20mm DIA.
Design Code: ACI‐08
Design Load Design Parameters
+M = 422.529 kN‐m +As req'd = 2072 mm^2 ρact=0.0045
‐M = 0 kN‐m Bar Size = 20 mm ρmax=0.0163
ρmin=0.0033

9 700

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

9 700

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Project

Dimensions 9.589 m Bottom of Bored Pile

Cross Sectional Area of Pile, Asspperpile 96.99 cm2/pile

Design of Bored Pile - SSP Combination 3

BHCSB-12 Table 1. Lateral Earth Pressure Computation

Design of Bored Pile - SSP Combination 4

Table 1. Lateral Earth Pressure Computation (Continuation)

Design of Bored Pile - SSP Combination 5

sin(  ' f  ) sin  ' f    

AASHTO 2012 Table 3.11.5.3-1 set : 600 1500 1500 600

β : angle of fill to the horizontal 3000 1050 600

set : 0.00 ≥6000 600 600

Design of Bored Pile - SSP Combination 6

Table 3. Subgrade Modulus and Spring Constant Computation

Design of Bored Pile - SSP Combination 7

Table 3. Subgrade Modulus and Spring Constant Computation (continuation)

Nc Nq Nγ As Bs As + Bs tan-1(Z/D) Modulus of subgrade reaction Bearing-capacity factors

84.33 69.33 83.00 18575 31032 27158.77 10 9.6 2.7 1.2

5 84.33 69.33 83.00 18575 31032 31101.40 15 12.9 4.4 2.5

7 84.33 69.33 83.00 18575 31032 37807.91 25 25.1 12.7 9.7

84.33 69.33 83.00 18575 31032 40558.98

9 84.33 69.33 83.00 18575 31032 42947.96 Note: 34 52.6 36.5 36

11 - - - - - - 2. Assuming ∆H (displacement) when the ultimate 40 95.7 81.3 100.4

12 - - - - - - bearing pressure is developed, C becomes; 45 172.3 173.3 297.5

13 - - - - - - ∆H : 25 mm 48 258.3 287.9 780.1

14 - - - - - - C : 40 50 347.5 415.1 1153.2

15 - - - - - - 3. D = embedment depth on any cycle

16 - - - - - - 4. Z = depth from dredgeline to the current node

4 0.98 4.77 39 0 11.19 65 53 62 55000 235000

5 1.00 5.77 39 0 11.19 65 53 62 55000 235000

6 1.00 6.77 39 0 11.19 65 53 62 55000 235000

Pile Head 9.00 88.29

Mmax = 34.018 kN‐m

Mmax = 1531.637 kN‐m

Provided Required Remark

Provided Required Remark

Pu(kN) My (kNm) Mz (kNm)

2 - 20mm DIA. 7 - 20mm DIA.

Anda mungkin juga menyukai