FRACTAL ANTENNA
function system for fractal curve generation. A critical comparison of modified Koch
curve fractal antenna with conventional Koch curve fractal antenna has also been
presented. The asymmetrical ground plane has been optimized by means of BFO and
PSO to make the proposed antenna miniaturized and feasible for wide band operation
that can be used for telemedicine applications. In order to assess the reliability of the
5.1 Introduction
New and Ultra-wide band (UWB) wireless schemes are needed with
increasing demand for improved performances, high bit rate transmission speeds and
the desire for synonymous operation with several different technologies [5], [30],
[83]. UWB has become efficient solution for indoor wireless radio, imaging and
radars. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has allocated the 3.1 to 10.6
GHz band for UWB modern communications [28], [62]. UWB generally refers to
system that either has a large absolute bandwidth or a large relative bandwidth [45],
operate beyond the 10.6 GHz upper frequency band limit, designated by the FCC.
77
Such applications can feature very high data rate, low power consumption and better
immunity to multipath effects [131], [148]. Most of the UWB monopole antennas
investigated till today are non-planar [52], [98] and due to their bulge structure, they
cannot be integrated with integrated circuits and they are comparably weaker in
physical strength. In [74], [80] CPW-fed circular disc monopole antenna for UWB
applications has been presented. Another study available in [41] has reported a
CrownSierpinski microstrip antenna to reduce the size of a crown square fractal. The
frequency notched ultra-wideband microstrip slot antenna with a fractal tuning stub is
antenna by adopting the fractal concept on the CPW-fed circular UWB antenna has
been proposed [42]. It has been found that by modification and perturbation in fractal
geometry, the multi band and miniaturization nature of these antennas can be
controlled. A method to overcome the problems with small antennas is to exploit the
ground plane of the device in to an active part of the system. Because of ground plane,
antennas use the ground plane through current induction to produce an asymmetric
image [79]. This concept can enhance the performance of compact microstrip
As per the idea of adding another degree of freedom, this work presents
applications. The design of the fractal geometry is carried out through a numerical
procedure and parameters of ground plane have been optimized using BFO and PSO
to obtain a multi and ultra-wide band behavior. The concept of BFO is based on the
fact that natural selection tends to eliminate animals with poor foraging strategies and
78
favor those having successful foraging strategies [40]. After various generations, poor
foraging strategies are either eliminated or restructured in to good ones [90]. The
basic concept of PSO lies in accelerating each particle toward its pbest and gbest
locations, with a randomly weighted acceleration at each time step. In order to assess
the effectiveness of the design procedure and the characteristics of the synthesized
antenna, the obtained numerical results are compared with the measurements from an
experimental prototype.
In this section, the design approach for the conventional Koch curve fractal
and modified Koch curve antenna has been discussed. The space filing property of
fractals that encloses a long infinite curve in a finite space has been used in Koch
fractals. This space filling property is being utilized to realize miniaturized and small
construction has been implemented to obtain the proposed geometry. This technique
lower scale to form the fractal geometries [158]. Figure 5.1 shows the geometrical
construction of the standard Koch curve antenna for zero iteration, K0, first iteration
K1 and second iteration K2. Figure 5.2 shows the geometrical construction of
modified Koch curve antenna for zero iteration, KM0, first iteration KM1 and second
iteration KM2. The dimensional parameters of the proposed modified Koch fractal
antenna are detailed in Table 5.1. The structural description of the modified Koch
fractal antenna for zero, first and second iteration is shown in Figure 5.3.
79
Table 5.1 Dimensional parameters of modified Koch fractal antenna
Parameters Values
Dielectric constant, r 4.4
Height of the substrate, h 1.6 mm
Width of curve strip 1.0 mm
Length of ground plane, X 50 mm
Width of ground plane, Y 50 mm
Height of modified Koch curve, L 35 mm
80
(a) (b)
(c)
Figure 5.3 Geometry of proposed modified Koch fractal antenna for (a) zero iteration
(b) first iteration (c) second iteration
modified Koch curve. A set of affine transformations forms the IFS for its generation.
In proposed modified Koch curve fractal antenna, indentation angle has been
height, L constant for all iterations as shown in Figure 5.2. The transformations to
1
x' 0 x
w1 3.414 (5.1)
y' 1 y
0
3.414
81
1
x' 0 x 10 (5.2)
w2 3.414
y' 1 y 0
0
3.414
1 1
x' cos 45 sin 45 x 10 (5.3)
w3 3.414 3.414
y' 1 1 y 10
sin 45 cos 45
3.414 3.414
1 1
x' cos 45 sin 45 x 17.07 (5.4)
w4 3.414 3.414
y' 1 1 y 17.07
sin 45 cos 45
3.414 3.414
1
x' 0 x 24.14 (5.5)
w5 3.414
y' 1 y 10
0
3.414
1
x' 0 x 24.14
w6 3.414 (5.6)
y' 1 y 0
0
3.414
= = (5.7)
This ensures the distance between the start and end points for all iterations is the
same. It may be easily verified that this formulation degenerates to the standard Koch
These affine transformations in the generalized case also lead to self-similar fractal
D= = = 1.45 (5.9)
unique description for the geometry; instead it describes a group of geometries with
82
similar nature. So a first step in the utilization of fractal properties in antenna design
The MATLAB software has been used for curve fitting method to form a
relationship between the design parameters (x) and the corresponding bandwidth
(BW) of the proposed modified Koch curve fractal geometry. In case of fractal
simulator has been used to generate data sets by varying ground plane dimension of
the antenna and after applying these values, following equation was obtained that
The role of the BFO in this case is to find the optimized values of the ground
plane dimension (width, x) that defines the best modified Koch to resonate with
required frequency bandwidth (8-12 GHz) of X-band region. In order to start the BFO
process this parameter was initialized with suitable lower and upper bound that
defines a solution space in which the BFO searches for the optimal design parameter
of the geometry. The input variables of BFO for the proposed antenna are detailed in
Table 5.2. The fitness function, given by Equation 5.11, was developed to find the
Where BW is the processed output from cost function, corresponding to the required
83
Table 5.2 Input parameters of BFO
Parameters Details of Parameters Values of
Parameters
S Total number of bacteria in the population 16
Nc Number of chemotactic step 25
Ns Swimming length 4
Nre Number of reproduction steps 4
Ned Number of elimination-dispersal events 2
Ped Elimination-dispersal probability 0.125
The dimensions of ground plane (width, x) have been optimized using PSO
also, that defines the best modified Koch to resonate with required frequency
positions and velocities of antenna parameters (width of ground plane, x) with their
lower and upper bounds in solution space. The Equation 5.11 is taken as a fitness
function for PSO to find the designed parameter of the proposed structure. After
getting the swarm initialization and a fitness function, the task is to set the value of
the optimization parameters and run the PSO program. The particle position (SN) and
velocity (VN) was changed according to the Equations 5.12 and 5.13. In the present
work c1 and c2 are set to 2.0 and the inertial weights are varied linearly from 0.9 to 0.4
over iteration, finally w is set at 0.7. The instantaneous frequencies were developed
using curve fitting method. The particles position can be modified according to the
84
5.2.5 Design Steps of Proposed Antenna
Step2. Optimization loop, with the use of curve fitting relation, determines the
Step3. If the antenna produces the desired bandwidth, the design process is terminated
Step4. Use the optimized dimensions to fabricate the antenna for experimental
validation.
Figure 5.4 shows the flow graph of the design process of proposed fractal antenna.
Experimental verification
85
5.3 Results and Discussion
The simulation tool adopted for evaluating the performance of the Koch curve
antennas is IE3D software, which exploits the method of moments to solve the
electric field integral equation. Figure 5.5 shows the s-parameters for all the three
iterations of modified Koch curve that is KM0, KM1 and KM2. As expected, it was
demonstrated that increasing the total strip length in a Koch curve antenna of fixed
height, lowers its resonant frequency independent of antenna geometry. The proposed
antenna geometry fulfills the self-similarity property of fractal structures and exhibits
multiband characteristics. From the Figure 5.5 it is clear that the antenna is driven in
resonance at the frequency bands 2.12-2.40 GHz, 4.70-4.83 GHz, 7.40-7.60 GHz and
8.82-10 GHz for second iteration. The bandwidth at each frequency band is 12.41%,
the antenna at its terminals. The impedance of an antenna can be written as:
Zin = R + jX (5.14)
where Zin is the antenna impedance, R is the antenna resistance and X is the antenna
reactance of the terminals. The antenna resistance may be defined as the sum of two
resistances that is radiation resistance and ohmic losses. Typical input characteristics
of the first three iterations for the modified Koch curve antenna are shown in Figure
5.6 and Figure 5.7. And it is illustrated that with increase in iterations, the input
86
Figure 5.5 S-parameters of modified Koch fractal for KM0, KM1 and KM2
Figure 5.6 Real part of input impedance for KM0, KM1 and KM2
87
Figure 5.7 Imaginary part of input impedance for KM0, KM1 and KM2
Figure 5.8 VSWR of modified Koch fractal for KM0, KM1 and KM2
5.3.1.2 VSWR
VSWR is the ratio of the peak amplitude of a standing wave to the minimum
amplitude of a standing wave. The VSWR values of the proposed antenna for all the
three iterations are shown in Figure 5.8. The presented results reveal that for all the
88
iterations, VSWR is less than 2 at respective resonating frequencies, as per antenna
transmission line and the antenna system as a function of frequency. The smith chart
of all the three iterations such as KM0, KM1 and KM2 are shown in Figure 5.9. It
may be observed that input impedance of the proposed antenna is increasing with
iterations are shown in Figure 5.10. The results obtained confirms that antenna and
radiation efficiency for all three iterations are equally better and the maximum
89
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 5.9 Smith chart for modified Koch fractal (a) KM0, (b) KM1 and (c) KM2
90
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 5.10 Antenna and radiation efficiency for modified Koch fractal (a) KM0, (b)
KM1 and (c) KM2
91
5.3.1.5 Gain
The gain of an antenna is the ratio of the maximum radiation intensity in given
the same direction with same power input [16]. It is a basic property of an antenna.
The graph between maximum gain and frequency of the proposed antenna for zero,
first and second iteration of proposed modified Koch curve fractal antenna are shown
in Figure 5.11. The presented results reveal that there is considerable increment in the
values of gain with increase in the number of iterations, for the corresponding
resonating frequencies.
(a) (b)
(c)
Figure 5.11 Gain of modified Koch fractal for all the three iterations (a) KM0 (b)
KM1 and (c) KM2
92
5.3.2 Analysis of Conventional and Modified Koch Curve Antenna
all these antennas from end to end has been kept constant. From the resonant
performance data presented in Table 5.4 and Table 5.5, it is evident that modified
standard Koch curve antenna. The presented results also describe that both the
antenna geometries exhibit similar behavior for resonant frequency, with increasing
total strip length, the antennas resonant frequency decreases. This is because of
93
5.3.3 Optimization of Asymmetrical Ground Plane using BFO and
PSO
the overall radiator. Figure 5.12 shows the proposed geometry with symmetrical
ground plane. The dimensions of the ground plane of proposed antenna has been
analyzed by varying its length (Y) and width (X) with step size of y and x including
the corresponding substrate layer, which makes the reference ground plane
94
The design of the ground plane has been formulated in terms of an
obtain a database from simulator for generating fitness function, the dimensions of the
left half of the proposed antenna has been varied from 0 mm to 20 mm. The below
m
X = x+ t. x (5.15)
t 1
Y = y-y (5.16)
where m is the number of steps. Using the data; the equations representing the relation
MATLAB software. This relation has been used to obtain the fitness function for BFO
and PSO to optimize the ground plane structure in order to obtain ultra-wide band
operation. The purpose of using these optimization techniques are their simplicity and
the graphical comparison of s-parameters between BFO and PSO. The various
antenna parameters and their simulated results using both the optimization techniques
have been detailed in Table 5.6. For making the comparative results in tabular form,
only the resonating frequencies of the X-band region have been considered here. A
from Table 5.6, that BFO provided far better results compare to PSO with respect to
95
obtaining bandwidth and reflection coefficient for the problem in hand. From the
presented results it is clear that the proposed antenna with asymmetrical ground plane
size and bandwidth. The choice of a narrower PCB enables the designer to achieve
acceptable levels of performance with lower ground values. It indicates that the
Though it looks as, aiming for larger bandwidth might offer the possibility of smaller
sizes at the same time. It is important to note that the printed elements coupled to the
ground in a unique way. The difference in overall performance between the elements
under study is directly a function of this coupling, which establishes the current
distribution on both the antenna and ground surface. This strengthens the fact that it is
bad practice to view the antenna as a separate component that would be selected at a
later design stage; it is an integrated part that must be designed along with the entire
96
Table 5.6 Comparison of PSO and BFO results for proposed antenna.
Parameters Width of Resonant Reflection Bandwidth Computational
ground Frequency Coefficient (%) Time (sec.)
plane, x (GHz) (dB)
(mm)
PSO 31.8 9.02 -24.35 36.31 1.08
10.83 -26.99
BFO 30.6 9.38 -35.35 45.79 9.02
11.27 -27.35
tests have been carried out, and the results are briefly summarized in this section. The
parameters found using developed methodology were used to draw the structure of the
antenna; the structure were then simulated and fabricated for measurement. The
prototype is fabricated using standard printed circuit methods and the photograph of
the fabricated antenna is shown in Figure 5.15. The experimental S11 plot obtained
using Vector Network Analyzer is overlapped with the simulated plot for comparison
purpose as shown in Figure 5.16. The experimental data are in good agreement with
the simulated results besides some differences due to fabrication imperfection in the
realization of the prototype. It is clear from the obtained results that the proposed
structure resonates at 2.72 GHz (2.4 2.86 GHz), 5.17 GHz (4.65 5.33 GHz), 5.89
GHz (5.77 6.21 GHz) and 9.38 GHz, 11.27 GHz (8.42 13 GHz) covering WLAN,
shown in Figure 5.16, a wide bandwidth has been obtained by using asymmetrical
ground plane along with the size reduction of about 40% in terms of the reduction in
97
Figure 5.15 Photograph of fabricated antenna
coordinates are expressed in terms of the elevated plane and the azimuthal plane [16].
Generally, it is a graphical representation of the radiated power from the antenna per
98
Figure 5.17 Testing setup for measuring radiation patterns
(a) (b)
Figure 5.18 Simulated radiation patterns of modified Koch fractal antenna for zero
iteration (a) E-plane (b) H-plane
5.17. The simulated radiation patterns of the proposed modified Koch fractal antenna
for zero, first and second iterations are shown from Figure 5.18 to Figure 5.20. The
simulated and measured radiation characteristics of the optimized antenna are plotted
99
(a)
(b)
Figure 5.19 Simulated radiation patterns of modified Koch fractal antenna for first
iteration (a) E-plane (b) H-plane
100
(a)
(b)
Figure 5.20 Simulated radiation patterns of modified Koch fractal antenna for second
iteration (a) E-plane (b) H-plane
101
(a)
(b)
Figure 5.21 Simulated radiation patterns of optimized antenna (a) E-plane (b) H-plane
patterns at the y-z plane and 8-shape radiation patterns at the x-z plane. It may be
notice that simulated and measured radiation characteristics are in good agreement
102
except few oscillations in the measured patterns and these are because of spurious
radiations created at the feeding end and the improper coupling of the element.
(a)
(b)
Figure 5.22 Measured radiation patterns of optimized antenna (a) E-plane (b) H-plane
103
5.4 Conclusion
plane is presented. The proposed geometry exhibits miniaturization along with more
number of frequency bands when compared with conventional Koch curve fractal
antenna. A method of varying the ground plane, without increasing the overall
antenna size, is shown to improve the bandwidth and to enable the use of significantly
smaller ground planes. The asymmetrical ground plane has been optimized by means
of BFO and PSO in conjunction with curve fitting technique to make the proposed
antenna feasible for wide band operation. The overall simulation results from the
presented optimization techniques indicate that BFO is a viable and more accurate as
compared to PSO. The results of the comparative study indicate that BFO provide
converges faster for the presented problem. A prototype of the antenna has been built
and some comparisons between measured and simulated return loss values have been
carried out to demonstrate the effectiveness and reliability of the synthesis process.
The presented results revealed that the asymmetrical ground plane provide wider
original antenna structure. The outcome of these techniques on radiation pattern are
WLAN, WiMAX and X-band regions which can be used for Telemedicine and other
wireless applications.
104