2
MODULE 4 Matching Objectives to Instruction: A Models Approach
1. Define and use Direct Instruction (DI) as an effective tool and device in
teaching and learning;
2. Comprehend and appreciate DI as the most basic of all teaching models
which are
3. Applicable in all forms of educative processes and fora; and,
4. Discuss the six (6) steps or processes in the DI model.
3
3. Enhance skills in social and cognitive competencies, group dynamics, and
problem
solving
1. Explain the cause and effect model and its importance as a pedagogic
strategy
2. Imbibe the guidelines in recognizing cause and effect relationships
3. Use the different steps of the Cause and Effect Model in classroom situations
1. Become familiar with methods and tools as well as delivery modes used in
providing technology-based learning programs;
4
2. Compare TBL methods and delivery modes with traditional approaches;
3. Develop attitudes and strategies for remaining current on developments in
educational technology; integrate technology in the teaching-learning
process; and
4. Discuss the integrated blended learning model in education
V. COURSE REQUIREMENTS
Arrive to class on time ready to collaborate. You are encouraged to share your reflections on
previous practice as an educator and learner, along with your readings and observation to
make every offline session the best learning experience possible.
There will be assigned topics to work on every online session (in between offline sessions).
Instructions on the assignments or exercises could be given during the offline sessions or
through the OUS Learning Management System and FB group. Submissions could be offline or
online.
Work in teams, develop a paradigm (framework) of the learning model that will be assigned to
the group for class presentation during the last offline session. Application of said model should
be through a video presentation (microteaching).
Quizzes could be given online or offline sessions (objectives or essay). No special examination
will be given to those who are late or absent when the examination is given.
5
Adams, G. L. and Engelmann, S. Research on Direct Instruction: 25 years beyond
DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems. 1996.
Bernstein, Douglas A., et. Al., Psychology, Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston Dallas Geneva,
Illinois, Palo Alto Princeton, 1988
Briggs, Ann R.J. Monitoring and Evaluating Learning, in the Principles and Practice of
Educational Management, London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 2005.
Burden, Paul & Byrd David. Methods of Effective Teaching. 3rd Edition, Pearson
Education, Inc., Boston, 2003.
Bush, T. Bell. The Principles and Practice of Educational Management. Paul Chapman
Publishing, Inc., California. 2005
Caldwell, J. Huitt, W. Huitt & French. V. Research Based Classroom Modifications for
Improving Student Engaged Time. 1981.
Conley, David T. Some Emerging Trends in School Restructuring. ERIC Digest, 1992
Costa, Arthur L. and Lovell, Richard A. The Legacy of Hilda Taba. Journal of Curriculum
and Supervision, Vol. 18, No. 1, Fall 2002.
Davies, Ivor. Objectives in Curriculum Design. England: McGraw Hill, UK, 1986.
Dimmock, C. and Walker A. Globalization and Societal Culture. London: Falmer Press.
2000.
Driscoll, P. Marcy, Psychology of Learning for Instruction, 2nd Ed., Ally and Bacon, 2000.
Dunn, R., and K. Dunn. Teaching Secondary School Through Their Individual Learning
Styles. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. 1993
Dunn R. and K. Dunn. Teaching Elementary Schools Through Their Individual Learning
Styles. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. 1992
Dunn, R. and K. Dunn. The Complete Guide to Learning to Learning the Styles
Inservice System. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. 1999.
Gunter, Mary Alices, et al., Instruction: A Model Approach. Third Edition. Allyn and
Bacon, Boston. 1999.
Hoy, W. and Miskel, C. Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8th
Edition, 2008.
Joyce, Bruce R. et. Al., Models of Teaching. A Simon and Schuster Company,
Needleham Heights, Mass. 02194, 1996.
Kulik, C.C., Kulik, J.A., and Bangert-Drowns, R.L. Effectiveness of Mastery Learning
Programs: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 1990.
Lardizabal, Amparo S., Bustos, Alicia; Bucu, Luz, tangco, Maura G. Principles and
Methods of Teaching. Phoenix Publishing House, Inc. 1985.
Lumby, J. Framing Teaching and Learning in the Twenty-First Century. London, Paul
Chapman Publishing, 2001.
Orlich, Donald C., et. Al. Teaching Strategies: A Guide to Better Instruction. Houghton
Mifflin Company, 1998.
Ponder, D. Restructuring Schools for Collaboration. Albany, NY: University of New York
Press, 1998.
7
Radencich, M. and L. McKay (eds). Flexible Grouping for Literacy in the Elementary
Grades, Boston, Mass.: Allyn and Bacon, 1995.
Rubin, Aick and McNeil, Elton B. The Psychology of Being Human, 3rd Edition, Harper
and Row, Publishers, New York, 1981.
Slavin, R. E., and Karweit, N.L. Mastery Learning and Student Teams: A Factorial
Experiment in Urban General Mathematics Classes. American Educational
Research Journal, 1984.
Sternberg, Robert. Teaching Critical Thinking, Part I and II, Russel Sage Publications,
1985.
Tenedero, Henry S. Breaking the IQ Myth: Learning Styles, Multiple Intelligences and
Emotional Learning in the Classroom Envrionment, 1998.
Verduin, J R., Jr. Helping Students Develop Problem Solving and Investigative Skills in
Cooperative Settings. Springfiled, Ill: Charles C. Thomas, 1996.
Weber, E. Student Assessment that Works: A Practical Approach. Boston, Mass.: Allyn
and Bacon, 1999.
Woolfolk, A. Educational Psychology. 10th Edition., Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2005.