For Figure 1:
Figure 3: Input and Output voltage waveform of Figure 1, VIn p-p = 40mV & VOp-p = 380.33 mV
Figure 4: VSmax = 200mV
Figure 5: Input and output voltage waveforms for Figure 2, VIn p-p = 40mV & VOp-p = 3.7 V
Figure 6: Frequency response graph of amplifier in Figure 1
Analysis of the Frequency Response Graph of Figure 1 Amplifier
AVmax = 9.67 V
AVcut-off = 9.67 0.707
= 6.83
Lower cut-off frequency, fL = 71.26 Hz
Upper cut-off frequency, fH = 100 MHz
Bandwidth = fH - fL
= 100 MHz
Analysis of the Frequency Response Graph of Figure 1 Amplifier
AVmax = 93.31 V
AVcut-off = 93.31 0.707
= 65.97
Lower cut-off frequency, fL = 112.95 Hz
Upper cut-off frequency, fH = 6.69 MHz
Bandwidth = fH - fL
= 6.69 MHz
Task 2 (Practical)
Figure 6: Input and output waveform of the JFET amplifier (Figure 2) where VO(p-p) = 1.33 V
FREQUENCY RESPONSE TABLE FOR FIGURE 1 AMPLIFIER
10 87mV 2.17
30 148 mV 3.70
50 194 mV 4.85
1K 267 mV 6.67
3K 273 mV 6.82
5K 273 mV 6.82
1M 132 mV 3.30
2M 66.2 mV 1.66
10 172mV 4.30
30 516mV 12.90
50 610mV 15.30
1K 1.23V 30.75
3K 1.24V 31.00
5K 1.23V 30.75
1M 527mV 13.20
2M 229mV 5.70
Table 3: Results comparison (frequency response) between simulation and practical for Figure 2
amplifier
Analysis
In this assessment, there were two approaches carried out to obtain the results which are
simulation and experiment (practical). There were differences on the results obtained
from both simulation and practical. There are few reasons and factors which contributes
to the differences on the results obtained. Firstly, different JFET were used in simulation
and practical. For simulation 2N3823 JFET was used, while a 2N3819 JFET was used for
the practical. Each JFET has its own characteristics. There are differences between the
characteristics of both 2N3823 JFET and 2N3819 JFET. For instance, the maximum
ratings. The maximum ratings of 2N3823 JFET and 2N3819 JFET are (300mW, 30V) and
(200mW, 25V) respectively. Different characteristics of amplifier will affect the result
obtained. Secondly, the errors that might be occurred while the practical work were
carried out. For instance, instrumental errors. Examples of instrumental errors are
instrument drift. The readings obtained from oscilloscope and multimeter used in the
practical work might drift over time. Environmental errors such as vibrations and
electrical noise also might be the factors. Besides, the circuit construction also can cause
the differences between the results obtained from simulation and practical.
From simulation, the VSmax of the JFET amplifier is 200 mV while for practical,
VSmax = 480 mV. VSmax is the maximum input ac voltage for the amplifier before the output
voltage, VO distorts. If the input ac voltage is higher than the VSmax , the output voltage
waveform will distorts. There will be voltage cut-off at the negative parts of the output
voltage waveform. The output voltage of the amplifier will be DC voltage if higher input
ac voltage applied to the amplifier.
For single stage JFET amplifier (Figure 1), the input and output waveforms are in phase,
but inverted at 180. For cascaded amplifier (Figure 2 ), the input and output voltage are
in phase, not inverted.
Cascaded amplifier has higher cut-off frequency compared to the single stage amplifier.
Single stage amplifier has larger bandwidth compared to cascaded amplifier. By using
cascaded amplifier, Millers effect can be reduced.
Conclusion
In conclusion, there are some errors occurred while the practical work being carried out that
cause differences between the results obtained from simulation and from the practical work. The
errors are instrumental errors, environmental factors, circuit construction. The usage of different
code of JFET also affect the results obtained. For the common-source (CS) JFET amplifier, both
ac and dc parameters were determined. Besides, the effect of input signal on the output voltage
form also has been investigated.
UNIVERSITI KUALA LUMPUR BRITISH MALAYSIAN INSTITUTE
LAB PRACTICAL 2 :
DATE OF SUBMISSION:
LECTURERS NAME:
NORHAYATI YUSSOF
GROUP MEMBERS: