having numerous other trigger levels Defining trigger values ect client or promoter of a project to
defining different actions. While fur- the construction contractor. The Amber
While the previous section provides a
ther trigger levels may have the benefit trigger may therefore represent a level
framework for defining trigger levels,
of allowing more detailed planning of that should not be exceeded provided
the following approach is commonly
escalating contingency responses, if a reasonable skill and care is adopted in
used for defining the value of the trig-
trigger doesnt result in a defined pro- carrying out the construction work.
ger levels based upon earlier design
cess, it is proposed that there should
analysis: Further considerations
be no need for the trigger.
Amber trigger is set close to the What movement is tolerable?
The following zones are commonly
calculated displacement from It was recommended above that Red
defined:
analysis; trigger levels should be based on a
Green = OK, proceed tolerable damage or deformation cri-
Red trigger is based on a tolerable
Amber = Monitor more fre- damage or deformation criteria. teria. When assessing some third party
quently, review calculations and assets, tolerable deformations are not
When setting Red trigger levels, an
start implementing contingency always easy to calculate. An example
alternative definition is, a conserva-
measures if trends indicate the Red of where this could be difficult is
tive estimate of when a serviceability
trigger may shortly be reached assessment of deformation of a tunnel
limit state is likely to be exceeded. In
Red = Implement measures to cease being used as part of an operational
this regard it is useful to consider the
movements and stop work. urban metro system. Tolerable defor-
Amber and Red trigger levels to be set
mations under this scenario can be
Alternative words are also commonly on two separate unrelated scales; one
related to several elements:
used to describe the Amber and Red related to calculated movements and
triggers. These include: one relating to tolerable movements. 1. Structural deformation;
Amber = Threshold, Alert, Review, An example of how trigger values can 2. Clearance of trains to tunnel lining;
Warning be set is provided in Figure 1. 3. Deformation of track within the tun-
Red = Limit, Maximum, Action, Consideration should be given to the nel; and
Response, Tolerable limit degree of conservatism adopted in the 4. Deformation of services and utili-
Prior to construction work starting calculation to define the Amber trigger ties within the tunnel.
a process and timeframe should be level. Assessing the amount of deforma-
defined that project participants adhere For assessing movements caused by tion that each of the above elements
to once a trigger has been reached. It tunnelling and with reference to the can tolerate have varying degrees of
is also recommended that consider- example provided in Figure 1, good difficulty. Specifying trigger levels
ation is given, prior to construction practice suggests carrying out service- on each of these factors is also chal-
work starting, of the actions or mitiga- ability limit state calculations using lenging as it may result in a complex
tions that can be readily deployed once a cautious estimate (or conserva- range of trigger values for the same
trigger values are reached. This may tive) volume loss rather than a best 3rd party structure. Where possible it
avoid scenarios where the program estimate. Therefore if setting the is advantageous to identify the critical
is impacted due to cessation of work Amber trigger at 80% of the calculated element(s) and base triggers on these.
once a Red trigger has been reached or movement, the actual movement can On what parameters should you set
exceeded. be expected to be of similar magnitude trigger values?
Consideration should then be given or less than the specified Amber trigger
Consideration must be given regard-
to the rate at which movements are level. Measured displacements greater
ing which measured parameters to
likely to occur. For instance, the rate at than the Amber trigger will therefore
set trigger values for. One particu-
which movements take place around a identify that the movements are in
lar challenge is that parameters (or
tunnel excavation formed using a tun- excess of calculated displacements
deformations) that cause damage such
nel boring machine is generally much using best estimate parameters and
as imposed curvature are not straight-
quicker than the rate of movement should therefore prompt a review.
forward to calculate from monitoring
around open or retained cut excava- It is also common to relate contractual results. Interpretation is often required
tions. This will influence project requirements to trigger values with to calculate an appropriate curvature.
participants views on what actions are respect to responsibility of causing The requirement for interpretation
appropriate and possible as and when impact and requirements for repair to may lead to disagreement between
trigger values are exceeded. third party structures. Commonly the project participants. Parameters that
Amber trigger is used to define where are easier to report from monitoring
responsibility transfers from the proj- data results such as settlement or tilt
John Dunnicliff
I was very impressed by the num- I considered including airborne laser Trevor Greening, March 2007.
ber of papers about remote methods scanning(ALS or Aerial LIDAR), but Also by Allen Marr, September
for monitoring deformation at last have been advised that this is more 2008)
Septembers International Symposium applicable to topographical mapping Terrestrial interferometric synthetic
on Field Measurements in GeoMe- than for displacement monitoring due aperture radar (by Paolo Maz-
chanics (FMGM) in Berlin. Because I to the low accuracy. I also considered zanti, June 2011
knew almost nothing about several of including digital image correlation,
Reflectorless robotic total stations
these, with their multiple acronyms, I but have learned that this method is
(by Damien Tamagnan and Martin
decided to read the papers and learn. still in the R&D stage, and not yet
Beth, September 2011)
But then a colleague had a better idea ready for our use on our projects.
find knowledgeable people and ask but I decided to include them among
Weve had full-length articles in
each to write a brief article. So thats the current one-pagers for complete-
previous GINs about three of these
where were going. ness.
methods:
In this and the following GIN there So that wed have some uniformity,
Robotic total stations (by David
are/will be seven one-page articles Ive given the authors some guidelines
Cook, December 2006, with
about the monitoring methods in the about format and subheadings.
discussions by Martin Beth, Brian
table below. Dorwart, Richard Flanagan and This episode of GIN has articles about
the first four methods in the table (in
alphabetical order of first authors
Monitoring Method Acronym(s) Author(s) Authors name), and the remainder will be in
Company the June episode. To close out this
Terrestrial laser scan- TLS Matthew Lato Norwegian Geo- topic, in June there will also be a
ning (light detection and Terrestrial technical Institute concluding article by a colleague from
ranging) LiDAR Italy who has experience with most
Terrestrial interferomet- TInSAR Paolo NHAZCA (Natural of these methods. He will read all the
ric synthetic aperture GBInSAR Mazzanti HAZards Control one-pagers and write a comparative
radar and Assessment), analysis of the various methods for
Italy remote monitoring of deformation.
Robotic total stations RTS Rob Nyren, Geocomp, USA This is helping me to clarify my
(automatic total stations, ATS Ryan Drefus and muddled brainI hope yours too.
automated motorized AMTS Sean Johnson Two important action items for
total stations) you:
Reflectorless robotic RRTS Damien SolData, France, I recognize that, if youve had
total stations Tamagnan and USA and other experience with any of these
Martin Beth locations methods, you may not agree with
Satellite interferometric SInSAR, Francesca University of all that the authors say. If thats
synthetic aperture radar including Bozzano Rome, Italy the case, or if youd like to add
DInSAR and something that would be useful to
PSInSAR readers of GIN, please send me a
discussion.
Digital photogrammetry Raul Fuentes University College
Stuart Robson London Weve included the commercial
sources in North America that we
Differential global posi- D-GPS Rob Nyren Geocomp, USA
know about, but are likely to have
tioning system Jason Bond Gemini Navsoft
missed some. If you know of oth-
Technologies,
ers, please tell me, and Ill include
Canada
those in a future GIN.
Matthew J. Lato
Principle of operation error is the error in the positioning of processed in a manner that preserves
Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) is a the scanners mirrors. Systematic errors accuracy.
remote measurement technique that translates to an accuracy of +/- 5 mm Future challenges
employs Light Detection and Ranging at 25 m, to +/- 30 mm at 1000 m. There are three main challenges for
(LiDAR) technology. TLS calculates Random errors are in relation to the using TLS in geotechnical monitoring:
the distance between the scanner and incidence angle between the scanner data format, processing standards, and
the target by measuring the time delay and target, as well as the reflectivity timely collection of data. Data formats
between an emitted laser beam and the of the target. Random errors affect the are critical in an industry that employs
reflected signal (illustrated in Figure precision of the measurement, which various TLS technologies, each of
1). This is a similar technology to total is variable, generally 0 10 mm, which uses its own binary format to
stations; however, the laser is roboti- regardless of distance. reduce file size. A standard format will
cally rotated through the scanners field Pixel resolution of TLS equipment ensure that data collected today will
of view measuring up to one millions is based on the distance between the be processable on future computers.
points per second. The georeferencing target and the scanner, as well as the For example, airborne LiDAR (ALS)
of TLS data is done through placement type of scanner. This value can be as data is stored in the industry-approved
of targets in the scene, typically flat high as 5 mm at 25 m. However, due LAS format. No such format exists for
circles are used. The targets are also to beam divergence, the pixel spacing TLS data. The use of TLS for monitor-
used for measuring deformation at in the point cloud and the sampling ing is generally performed on an on
specific locations. resolution must be evaluated for every demand basis; there exist no general
Main fields of application project. guidelines for data manipulation,
Main advantages analysis, or presentation of results.
TLS is used for geotechnical monitor-
For TLS technologies to be adopted,
ing of tunnels (during construction Using TLS for deformation monitor-
this must be addressed. Finally, TLS is
and post construction degradation); ing is advantageous for many reasons
viewed as a costly tool and therefore
rockcuts along transportation cor- relating to data collection, process-
is generally used once site conditions
ridors; construction (piles, shoring, ing flexibility, and presentation of
have deteriorated. This is a challenge
etc.); landslides; dams; and building results. TLS is an extremely fast,
for achieving the optimal monitoring
deformation. Non-geotechnical appli- accurate, non-destructive technology.
results because a baseline cannot be
cations include forensics; archeology; Data collection can be integrated with
established. To achieve the best results
and architecture. construction projects or implemented
from TLS, data must be collected
Accuracy and pixel in remote regions. Processing options
before problems arise.
resolution are diverse, including investigating
individual TLS models for geometry, Some commercial sources
TLS accuracy is determined by sys- comparison to CAD, and temporal Applied Precision: Mississauga,
tematic and random error. Systematic modeling over time. As well, the high Canada, www.applied3Dprecision.
error is governed by range error and resolution nature of the data enables com, +1 905-501-9988
angular error. Range error is error in realistic images and models for report- Norwegian Geotechnical Institute,
the measurement of distance between ing of results. Norway, www.ngi.no, +47414 93
the scanner and the target. Angular
Main limitations 753
TLS is an emerging technology with Precitech AB, Sweden, www.preci-
variable equipment and processing tech.se, +46 31762 54 00
options. Users must be aware of their Matthew J. Lato
options and the limitations of each Engineer, Norwegian Geotechnical
system. As well, it is essential that Institute, Oslo, Norway,
Figure 1. Operating schematic of a data be collected properly, without T: +47-465-42-970,
TLS scanner. occlusion (shadowed regions) and E: mjl@ngi.no
Paolo Mazzanti
[Please refer to Mazzanti, GIN June Main fields of application Main limitations
2011, pp 25-28 for more details. The best application of TInSAR is the The main limitation is the complex
Ed.]
continuous monitoring of unstable management, processing and inter-
Principal of operation slopes and dams. Other applications pretation of TInSAR data. Other
Terrestrial Synthetic Aperture Radar include linear infrastructures such limitations include: i) the size of
Interferometry (TInSAR, also referred as bridges, localized subsidence and commercial equipment (up to 3 metres
to as ground based SAR interferome- buildings. TInSAR monitoring of long); ii) limited cone of view (some
try, GBInSAR) is a RADAR technique buildings is quite challenging because tenths of degrees in both the H and V
for the remote monitoring of displace- although it is possible to collect planes); iii) unidirectional measure of
ments. By the movement of a RADAR highly accurate displacement data by displacement (along the instrument
sensor along a linear scanner (i.e. a a non-contacting technique, it is quite LOS) and iv) signal phase ambiguity
rail that allows precise micrometric complex to detect vertical movements. (i.e displacement higher than 4.5 mm
movements of the sensor), 2D SAR Accuracy and pixel between two consequent images are
images are derived. By comparing the resolution not easily detectable).
phase difference, i.e. interferometric Future challenges
The theoretical accuracy of TInSAR
technique, of each pixel between two
equipments is on the order of +/- 0.1 The increasing number of applica-
or more SAR images acquired at dif-
mm. However, both the precision and tions will contribute to improve
ferent times, the displacements along
the accuracy are strongly reduced by both the technique and monitoring
the instrument line of sight (LOS) are
the atmospheric noise. The precision good practice.
derived. Thus, 2D color images of
ranges from few tenths of mm to a few Cheaper and smaller hardware
LOS displacement can be achieved as
mm, depending on the monitoring dis- may improve the use of TInSAR,
well as the displacement time series of
tance and the atmospheric conditions. especially in urban areas.
each pixel (Figure 1). TInSAR moni-
The pixel resolution of a terrestrial
toring can be performed by installing Advanced algorithms and software
SAR image ranges from few decime-
the equipment at a stable location for the processing of data may
tres to several meters (depending on
in a panoramic position, and it does improve the usability and effec-
the equipment and on the monitoring
not require the installation of contact tiveness of TInSAR.
distance). At a distance of 1 km, the
sensors or reflectors in the monitored
most common commercial equipment Commercial sources inNorth
area.
has a resolution of about 0.5 x 4 m. America
Main advantages In the authors knowledge the fol-
lowing two companies are providing
The main advantage of TInSAR
services with TInSAR: Olson Engi-
is probably the ability to monitor
neering Inc., Colorado (USA), http://
displacements from a remote position
olsonengineering.com.and C-Core,
without the installation of targets or
Kanata, Ontario (Canada), www.c-
sensors on the monitored ground or
core.ca. European companies with
structure. Other advantages include
longer expertise are listed in the article
applicability under any lighting and
referred to above.
weather conditions, including rain-
falls, clouds and fog; high data sam- Paolo Mazzanti
pling rate (few minutes); long range NHAZCA S.r.l. - spin-off Sapienza
efficacy (some km); high accuracy and Universit di Roma,
spatial control. Via Cori snc, 00177, Rome, Italy,
Figure 1. TInSAR displacement map T: +39-3469776508,
overlaid on the slope picture and E: paolo.mazzanti@nhazca.com
time series of displacement.
[Please refer to Tamagnan and Beth, Main fields of application Case histories
GIN Sept 2011, pp 21-24 for more Monitoring of road surfaces during The RRTS method has been well
details. Ed.] underground work. proven in practice in many work sites
Principle of operation since 2005.
Accuracy
A remote monitoring system able to In Amsterdam (Netherlands) over
The accuracy of the RRTS method has
measure surface deformation 24 hours 82 RTS are used to measure more
been confirmed by comparing precise
a day is made up of: than 5000 RSPs above the tunnel
levelling with RSP movements. Exter-
A robotic total station (RTS) boring machine during the con-
nal controls confirmed a consistency
equipped with a reflectorless dis- struction of the metro line.
better than 1 mm.
tance meter. In Toulon (France) a network of
Main advantages
A support platform, electronics 1830 RSPs has been measured
High frequency of readings pos- over roads and pavements from 36
box, and 3G or Wi-Fi system.
sible (down to one reading per RTSs during four years.
A data logger which can be oper- hour for example)
ated remotely with specific soft- In Barcelona (Spain) long-term
Uninterrupted traffic, neither for monitoring of the high speed
ware able to drive the total station
installation nor for taking readings railways tunnel and of Metro Line
to the predetermined locations of
the monitored points. Very safe, no surveyors on the road 9 has been set up to monitor settle-
Computation software, which can Very cost effective for high fre- ment on roads, sometimes with
be more or less advanced, for quency of readings heavy traffic.
calculating the movements of the Main limitations Damien Tamagnan
points of interest. The range of the distance meter SolData Group, Head of survey
During each monitoring cycle the is limited, and so is the angle of department, Travesia Industrial,
instrument sights at (see Figure 1): incidence of the laser beam on the 149 -3 C 08907 Hospitalet de
Llobregat Barcelona (Spain).
The reflectorless surface points measured surface. Weather conditions T: +(34) 93263 29 69.
(RSPs) on a flat, homogeneous and also downgrade the emitted distance E: Damien.Tamagnan@soldata.fr
planar surface for which vertical meter signal.
deformation is to be monitored.
RSPs are not physically marked
and are not physical objects; they
are just a location on the ground at
which the RTS is sighting.
The stable reference prisms, which
permit computation of the correct
position and orientation of the
RTS.
If necessary, the same total station
and software can sight monitoring
prisms installed on structures to be
monitored in 3D, as for a standard
RTS.
On completion of the cycle, the raw
and/or calculated data are sent to the
database via Wi-Fi or 3G. The system
can also trigger alarms sent by SMS or
e-mail if predetermined thresholds are Figure 1. A Reflectorless Robotic Total Station (RRTS) measuring RSPs and
exceeded. prisms.