DESIGN OF RC BEAM WITH AND WITHOUT CHICKEN MESH AS SHEAR

REINFORCEMENT

Abstract

Chicken mesh is widely used in the building construction because of its economy, easier and fast mode of construction and better
quality control. Chicken wire mesh can be a good substitute for the conventional reinforcement and yielded the excellent results in
both strength and ductility. The IS method was adopted for M30 grade of concrete. The preliminary tests were conducted for
various properties of materials such as cement, fine aggregate and coarse aggregate to check their suitability for concrete
making. The mesh are provided in beam that the span of L/3 and fully Chicken wire mesh as shear reinforcement. For concrete,
cubes (150x150x150mm), cylinders (300x150mm) and beams (1000x250x150mm) were cast for determination of compressive
strength, split tensile strength flexural strength. In fresh state workability test is conducted to determine the compacting factor and
slump value. To study the flexural behaviour of reinforced concrete beam the following parameter are obtained such as initial
crack load, the deflection at initial crack load, ultimate load carrying capacity of beam and ultimate deflection of the beam. To
compare the load carrying capacity of control beam by welded wire mesh as shear reinforcement.

Key Words: Chicken mesh, flexural test, deflection, crack load, ultimate load carrying capacity.
--------------------------------------------------------------------***----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. INTRODUCTION The main objectives of this paper were:
a) To find the deflection, location of crack and types of
Generally welded wired mesh consists of 1mm to 10mm
failure.
diameter and cross wire space altering from 20mm to 30mm
b) To compare the load carrying capacity of control
as per IS: 1566-1982. Welded mesh is widely used in the
beam by welded wire mesh as shear reinforcement.
building construction because its economy, easier and fast
mode of construction and better quality control. Weld mesh 3. EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
can be a good substitute for the conventional reinforcement All the materials tests were conducted in the laboratory as
and yielded the excellent results in both strength and per relevant Indian Standard codes. Basic tests were
ductility. In this project, preliminary tests were conducted conducted on fine aggregate, coarse aggregate, and cement
for various properties of materials such as cement, fine to check their suitability for concrete making. The
aggregate and coarse aggregate. The IS method was adopted proportions of ingredients of the control concrete of grade
for M30 grade of concrete for control mix ratio. Cubes, M30 had to be determined by mix design as per IS code.
cylinder and reinforced concrete beams were cast for Two types of reinforced concrete beam are cast with
determination of workability test, compressive strength, split Chicken wire mesh. Chicken wire mesh is used in this
tensile strength and flexural strength respectively. In fresh project. The mesh are provided in the span of L/3 and fully
state workability test also conducted. Chicken wire mesh as shear reinforcement. The beams are
1.2 ADVANTAGES OF THE WELDED WIRE MESH to be tested under two point loading to study the flexural
behaviour of concrete beams.
a) Higher Characteristic Design Strength
Table 3.1 Details of specimen are cast
b) Better Bonding Behaviour
S.no Specimen Size No of
c) Economic Crack Fighting with thinny Wires and
specimens
Nearer Spacing
d) Savings of Labour and Time S1 Control beam 1000x150x250mm 1
e) Flexibility of Handling and Placing
2. OBJECTIVES

1
S2 full wire mesh 1000x150x250mm 1 The diameter mesh is 1mm and used spacing of mesh is
25mm.
S3 L/3 wire mesh 1000x150x250mm 1
4 Materials properties
3.1 Material Properties
3.1.1General The preliminary tests were conducted for various properties
of materials such as cement, fine aggregate and coarse
This chapter briefly describes the various materials used in
aggregate to check their suitability for concrete making.
this project work are Cement, Fine aggregate, Coarse
Table 4.1 shows that Properties of cement. Table 4.2 shows
aggregate and Water.
that Properties of coarse aggregate. Table 4.3 shows that

3.1.2 Cement Properties of fine aggregate.

Cement is the well-known building material with adhesive Table 4.1 Properties of cement

and cohesive properties, which is capable of binding mineral

Fineness Modulus 2%
fragment into compact mass. The most popular Ordinary
Portland cement (OPC-53) is used in this study. Standard Consistency 31.5 %

3.1.3 Fine Aggregate Initial Setting Time 36 minutes

Aggregate which is passed through 4.75 mm IS sieve and Final Setting Time 360 minutes
retained on 75 micron IS sieve is termed as fine aggregate. It
Table 4.2 Properties of coarse aggregate
fills the voids in coarse aggregate. The sand conforming IS
383-1970 is used in this project. Specific Gravity 2.78

3.1.4 Coarse Aggregate

Fineness Modulus 3.98

Aggregate which passes through 75 mm IS sieve and

Bulk density in Loose State 1507.01 Kg/m3
retained on 4.75 mm IS sieve are known as coarse
aggregate. Aggregates should be properly screened and if
Bulk density in Compacted 1642.5 Kg/m3
necessary washed before use. Coarse aggregates containing
state
flat, elongated or flaky pieces should be rejected. The
grading of coarse aggregates should be as per specifications
Water absorption 0.5%
of IS 383-1970. In this project, 20 mm size of coarse
aggregate is used.
Moisture content 0.32 %

Table 4.3 Properties of fine aggregate

3.1.5 Water
Specific Gravity 2.68
Water used for mixing and curing shall be clean and free
from oils, acids, alkalis, salts etc. Fineness Modulus 2.82

3.1.6 Reinforcement Bulk density in Loose State 1608Kg/m3

HYSD bars of 8 mm and 6 mm were used as longitudinal
reinforcement and stirrups respectively. Bulk density in Compacted 1643 Kg/m3

3.1.7 Chicken wire mesh

2
state

Water absorption 0.8%

Moisture content 2.64 %

Figure 6.2 Reinforcement details of beam specimens S3
7 Experimental setup
The flexural tests were carried out on beam of size 1000mm
5 Mix Design x 250mm x 150mm which reinforced with 4 Nos of 8mm
diameter HYSD bars and 6mm diameter mild steel bar two
Cement Fine Coarse Water
legged stirrups at 150mm center to center shear
aggregate aggregate
reinforcements were provided under standard two point
1 1.69 2.723 0.45 loading. Dial gauge was fixed at one third of the span for
finding the deflection of the reinforced beam. Figure7.1
shows that Experimental setup for flexural strength of beam.

6 Preparation of the specimens

The beam specimens are prepared according to the

following procedure

6.1 Reinforcement

Four bars of 8 mm diameter were as the longitudinal
reinforcement. The welded wire mesh was connected to the
beam specimen by using steel winding wires. The cover of
the specimen was maintained at 25 mm.
6.2 Mixing and casting of the beam specimen
The mix design for concrete was 1: 1.69: 2.723: 0.40. All
this values are within permissible limits. The mixing of the
concrete was done in an electronic drum mixture machine.
The specimens were unmolded after 24 hours and cured in a
water tank for 28 days. After curing they were kept for
drying and coated with lime for visibility of cracks during
testing. Figure 6.1 shows that Reinforcement detail of beam
specimens S2. Figure 6.2 shows that Reinforcement detail of
beam specimens S3.
Figure 7.1 Experimental setup for flexural strength of beam
8 Experimental Results and Discussion
The ultimate load carrying capacity of specimen S1, S2, S3
was 100kN, 160KN, 150kN. The experimental results
suggest that the ultimate load capacity of the beam
specimens is increased for the S2 and S3 specimen with the
full layer and L/3 of welded wire mesh. The specimen S2,
S3 has increased with 23% & 20% ultimate load carrying
capacity of control beam. This indicates that the mesh has
provided at L/3 and fully mesh wire ratio will increase the
strength of the beam specimen. Therefore, the beam with
full layer of mesh was used in this study can be used as an
alternative to control specimen. Figure 8.1 Load deflection
curve of S1. Figure 8.2 Load deflection curve of S2.
Figure 8.3 Load deflection curve of S3

Figure 6.1 Reinforcement details of beam specimens S2

3
 decreases for the S3 specimen with addition of L/3 wire
mesh compare to S2. This indicates that the mesh has
provided at fully mesh wire has increase the deflection of
the beam specimen
8.3 Ductility
The ductility of the specimens increases for the specimen S2
considerably compared to the control specimen S1 and
comparable with all other specimens.
8.4 Cracks
The crack pattern is flexural for the specimen S2. It is a
combination of flexural and shear for S1, S3. Figure 8.1
Figure 8.1 Load deflection curve of S1
shows Crack pattern of S1 specimen. Figure 8.2 shows
Crack pattern of S2 specimen. Figure 8.3 shows Crack
pattern of S3 specimen.

Figure 8.1 Crack pattern of S1 specimen

Figure 8.2 Load deflection curve of S3

Figure 8.2 Crack pattern of S2 specimen

Figure 8.3 Crack pattern of S3 specimen

9. Conclusions
The conclusions of this paper are presented by the mesh are
provided in beam that the span of L/3, fully Chicken wire
Figure 8.3 Load deflection curve of S3
mesh as shear reinforcement and control concrete.
1) The specimen S2, S3 has increased with 23% & 20%
8.2 Maximum Deflection
ultimate load carrying capacity of control beam. This
The ultimate deflection value of S1, S2, and S3 is 14.85mm,
indicates that the mesh has provided at L/3 and fully mesh
16.86mm and 14.98mm. The maximum deflection values of
wire ratio will increase the strength of the beam specimen.
the specimen are increased in specimen S2, S3 with addition
of wire mesh compare to control beam. The deflection value

4
2) By varying ratio of mesh has obtained 160 and 150 of the
ultimate load for specimens S2 and S3.
3) The deflection value decreases for the S3 specimen with
addition of L/3 wire mesh compare to S2. This indicates that
the mesh has provided at fully mesh wire has increase the
deflection of the beam specimen
4) The ductility of the specimens increases for the specimen
S2 considerably compared to the control specimen S1 and
comparable with all other specimens.
5) The crack pattern is flexural for the specimen S2. It is a
combination of flexural and shear for S1, S3.
The conclusion of this project shows the specimen S2 has
performed better than the control beam. Chicken wire mesh
can be a good substitute for the conventional reinforcement.
References
1. Amala M, (2016) Experimental study of flexure
and impact on ferrocement slabs, IOSR Journal of
Mechanical and Civil Engineering, volume 1, Issue
2, pp 62-66.
2. Gokulram H (2015) Flexural Behaviour of RC
Beam with Welded Mesh as Shear Reinforcement,
International journal of engineering sciences &
research and technology, Vol.56, Issue 3, pp 77-81.
3. Gurbir Singh Benipa (2015) Reinforced concrete
beams retrofitted using ferrocement, IJEDR,
Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 420-436.
4. IS 10262:2009 Indian Standard code
Recommended Guidelines for Concrete
Design, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
5. IS 2386:1963 Indian Standard methods of test for
aggregates for concrete, Bureau of
Standards, New Delhi.
6. IS 383:1970 Indian Standard Code of Coarse and
Fine Aggregates from Natural Sources
Concrete, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
7. IS 456:2000 Indian Standard Code of Plain and
Reinforced Concrete Code of Practice, Bureau of
Indian standards, New Delhi.
8. IS 1199-1959 Methods of Assembling and
Analysis of Concrete, Bureau of Indian standards,
New Delhi.
9. IS 516-1964 Method of Test for Strength of
Concrete , Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi.
10. Noor Ahmed Memon (2006) Strength and
behaviour of light weight ferrocement aerated
concrete sandwich blocks, Malaysian Journal of
Civil Engineering, Volume.3, Issue 4, No. 3, pp
564-578.
11. Nandhinisree M (2014) Structural behaviour of
self compacting concrete column with
ferrocement, SSRG International Journal of Civil
Engineering (SSRG-IJCE) volume 1, Issue 1, pp
340-351.
12. Pallavi sameer parande (2014) Behaviour of
ferrocement composite in direct tension by using
welded square mesh, International Journal of
Research in Advent Technology, Vol.2, Issue 2 , pp
55-67.
13. Prathima S (2015) Experimental investigation of
wired mesh with RC beams, International Journal
of Chem Tech Research, Vol.8, Issue.2, pp 815-
821.
14. Shang S.P (2003) Flexural strengthening of
reinforced concrete beam with ferrocement, 28th
Conference on our world in concrete & structures,
of
Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 62-63.
Mix
15. Song G (2008) Experimental study on flexural
behavior of RC beams strengthened with smpm,
Beijing, China, Vol. 03, Issue 4, pp 316 321.
Indian 16. Saravana Kumar N (2015) Flexural Behaviour of
Self Compacting Concrete Beam using Welded
Wire Mesh as Shear Reinforcement, International
Journal of Science and Research, Vol.7, Issue 1, pp
for 1-7.