MEDITATION
Swami Shantananda
www.classicalyoga.com.au
E: info@classicalyoga.com.au
Ph: +613 9833 4050
INTRODUCING MYSELF i
INTRODUCTION
TRADITIONAL MEDITATION 5
MEDICAL MODEL 11
MINDFULNESS 15
TWO PARADIGMS
SUMMING UP 27
APPENDIX
From there, I have never looked back. No more weird experiences, only peace and little
by little a profound shift in my outlook on life, culminating more recently in a decidedly
different experience of self. For the first year, I meditated for an hour twice a day, and
after that, an hour every day.
Prior to Meditation
I think our prior life has something to do with how we approach meditation. I was
reared Catholic, and I took my spiritual life very seriously, not so much in a dogmatic
way, but in a sense of feeling a presence. That was with me from my earliest memories. I
cant remember a time when I did not have a strong sense of inner life. My Catholic
schooling directed it towards a religious form, undoubtedly, but also reinforced
something beyond dogma - an experience of life within being, and that it is as important
as our ordinary tendency to externalise experience.
Eventually, the dogmatic aspects of the guidelines offered by the Church dominated my
experience. Disillusionment with the prescriptive role of religion is probably inevitable,
since a simplistic set of rules cannot address interior experience, particularly if the only
response of the teaching body condemns whatever it cannot control. For me, the title of
a feminist book in the seventies said it all: Ive Done So Well, Why Do I Feel So Bad?
And then came meditation mentored by a guru and supported by a tradition that has
been tempered over thousands of years. Aha, home! I felt reconnected with the inner- self
I had known from childhood.
i
ABOUT SWAMI SHANTANANDA
The guru who showed me what lay beyond the thinking mind
Yogis who dont meditate but live a deeply contemplative life
Yogis and non-yogis who mistake escapist visualisations for meditation
Leaders who guide visualisations to subtly manipulate the groups responses
New age spiritualists looking for extraordinary experiences
Zen Buddhists, whose meditation practice seems similar to mine
Mainstream and Tibetan Buddhists, who teach Mindfulness
Ian Gawler, and kept his company for a good while, taking his meditation teacher
training, and also becoming the founding Secretary of the Gawler Foundation.
From Ian I first came across the medical model of meditation and heard about
Herbert Benson
When I began teaching meditation, I went back to study. Initially, I took a degree-
equivalent Graduate Diploma in psychology from a rural campus that became Monash,
followed by a Postgraduate Diploma of Health Psychology from La Trobe. Amongst
ii
ABOUT SWAMI SHANTANANDA
other things there, I became re-acquainted with the work of Herbert Benson, and found
that the Medical Model is now an academic discipline in itself.
Now Id like to consider Meditation, from three perspectives: Traditional, Medical, and
Mindfulness.
iii
INTRODUCTION
WHAT IS MEDITATION
ORIGINS
PURPOSE
In fact, the word Zen is a corruption of the Chinese word, chan, meaning meditation
and chan itself is a corruption of the Sanskrit word, dhyna, meaning meditation!
Zen meditation really means meditation-meditation.
Christianity?
Some might ascribe the origins of meditation to Christianity, noting in particular the
Rhineland Mystics of the 14th Century, especially the great Meister Eckhart, though there
must also have been a flourishing practice in England, if the anonymous Cloud of
Unknowing is any indication. And surely the 40 days and 40 nights that Jesus spent in
the desert would have been an extended sojourn into meditation? Then, we would have
to consider a pre-existing meditation tradition from Judaism, and the Essenes have
certainly long been a contender. But what accounted for their practice?
Greece?
Perhaps Greece is a contender certainly Socrates seems to have had a meditative
understanding of living and being. Socrates was the teacher of Plato. Plato left us nothing
about Socrates except for reconstructed dialogues which showed his social and
philosophical insights. Those insights themselves were so out of kilter with the norms of
his community that he was condemned and executed for them. His unusual insight must
have arisen in a mind that was able to see beyond his social norms and, as we shall see
later in this notebook, the stillness of meditation is a potent tool in allowing one to move
beyond the constraints and conventions that shape the mind into accepting social norms
as though they are reality itself.
And then there is Platos allegory of The Cave, which declares that, normally, we live in
illusion. It is possible to become free of it. Plato goes on - if you free yourself then go back
and try to tell your friends, you endanger yourself; they will be very angry with you
and, rather than be grateful, they will denigrate and harm you. It is curious how most
prefer their illusions. Perhaps that is because the pain of looking at the illusions we
hold dear is so great, that the challenge of sitting comfortably with reality is too hard to
bear. As TS Eliot said, Human kind cannot bear very much reality. (Four Quartets)
Page 1
MEDITATION ORIGIN TRADITIONS AND PURPOSE
There were many schools of philosophy in ancient Greece that had meditation as their
core practice. Some went across to Rome. The Contemplations of Marcus Aurelius,
emperor and general of Rome, are touching and profound insights into a man in a brutal
situation, teaching himself the art of compassion and dispassion. He was a Stoic, and the
word stoical has come down to us with the meaning of indifferent to hardship. A
meditator, however, easily recognises that one will practise dispassion in order to teach
the mind not to mistake its likes and dislikes for what truth is, and it is not and never
was about enduring hardship per se. Aurelius was surely a great meditator.
India
Many people have heard of the Rg Veda, even if they dont know quite what it is. And
most have heard of the Upaniads. Rarely, though, do Westerners know the word,
Aranyaka. For our purposes, lets just take it that Indian society of up to 6000 years ago
was hieratic, that is, that it conducted itself on religious principles administered by
priests. The Vedas, four texts on these principles and rules for living, were written down
from a prior oral tradition about 4000 years ago. The well-known Upaniads again were
oral at first but came into written form about 3000 years ago. The Upaniads were
profoundly contemplative rather than rule-bound. One example of their contemplations
is on how an apple once taken into the mouth soon becomes the body of the human eating
it. The point of the contemplation is to consider, can duality subside into oneness? The
apple is only a metaphor for deep existential enquiry.
The interesting middle step is the Aranyakas. The name literally means forest stories.
They are much older than the Upaniads, and almost inaccessible to Westerners, not
even translated. But they were the bridge between the formulaic notions of the Vedic
priests and the non-rule bound contemplations of the Upaniads.
It may be simplistic and speculative, but it seems that some individuals of the Vedic
period began to suspect that the restrictions, prescriptions and proscriptions of the
priesthood somehow prevented the individual from discovering Brahman, the ineffable
Being that even in the most ancient times was considered the ground of all consciousness.
And so they wandered off into the forest, to meditate and contemplate without the
constraints of religious imposition. They began to discover something in their own
experience and in their own consciousness that removed those constraints altogether.
And as that began to filter back to mainstream Vedic society, people began to seek out
these forest dwellers and listen to what they had discovered and learn from them. The
root meaning of the word upaniad is to sit and listen. One might see the prototype of
people seeking out a meditation teacher to this day.
Page 2
MEDITATION ORIGIN TRADITIONS AND PURPOSE
What has Indian meditation history got to do with Traditional Still-mind, Medical and
MIndfulness approaches to meditation? Everything.
But heres a thing: if thinking stops altogether, or if self and other" is recognised as
fundamentally a thought-construct, perhaps there is no self/other duality, only a oneness
of being, experienced in billions of ways.
Mindfulness
The origin of the practice of mindfulness is usually attributed to Buddhism. But surprise,
surprise the Buddha, when he first left home on his quest for enlightenment, studied
with Yogis. He would have been thought of initially as a yogi, and his first students would
have been yogis. He attained his great state by extended still-mind meditation, an
essential of traditional Yoga. And although the Buddha developed a body of teaching
outside the literature that evolved from the Vedic/ Upaniadic line, many of the terms in
Buddhism are Pali corruptions of Sanskrit words pre-existing in Yogic teachings. For
instance, metta, compassion in Buddhism, is a corruption of the Sanskrit maitri
compassion, and dhamma, a corruption of the Sanskrit dharma, natural law, proper
conduct, both long pre-existing the Buddha.
Page 3
MEDITATION ORIGIN TRADITIONS AND PURPOSE
Whatever the origin of Mindfulness, its purpose is to develop full conscious awareness
of everyday activity. The further point of this is to relinquish patterns of thinking and
reacting that keep us in dysfunction and unhappiness. This is achieved by focusing fully
on what is in front of us, instead of on the melodramas and injustices of our lives.
Now lets look at these three approaches, considering their methods, purpose, their
benefits or outcomes, and any problematic issues with them.
While all three are similar at the beginning, it is in the long term aims that they might
diverge considerably.
Page 4
THE METHODS
TRADITIONAL
MEDITATION METHODS AND PURPOSE - - TRADITIONAL
There are two ways that still-mind meditation can be approached. One entails
concentration on an object, and the techniques for it are numberless. The other is to go
directly for no-thought for the courageous or the advanced meditator.
Concentration Methods
Lets talk about only three concentration methods: 1. Breath Focus, 2. Mantra, 3.
Noticing Sensations, and then well briefly consider no-thought methods.
1. BREATH FOCUS
The breath is your oldest companion! Your first action was to breathe in, and your last
will be to breathe out to expire! And the breath has a constant rhythm. Focusing your
attention on the breath and its rhythm can be very soothing and help you settle into
deep peace.
PRACTICE:
Notice your breath as you breathe in. The diaphragm lowers to allow for the expansion of the lungs
as they fill. You will probably notice that there is also a feeling of lightness or emotional lift with
the in-breath.
There is a pause in the cycle at the in the cycle on completing the in-breath. For a few moments a
chemical exchange happens as oxygen is extracted from the air, and carbon monoxide is about to
be exhaled. Allow yourself to notice that pause, perhaps as though there is a moment of stillness at
the bridge of the nose.
Then notice your breath as you breathe out. The diaphragm resumes its normal dome shape,
pushing against the lungs and thus assisting the exhale. You may feel an emotional settling with
this, the sigh of the outbreath.
Notice that on the inbreath, you will detect whatever odour is in the air the scent of flowers, or
incense, or any other ambient aroma. And the in-breath will be the same temperature as the air
around you, so it may feel a little chilly, or moist and humid, or warm. The exit breath will be the
same temperature as the body and have no odour (unless you have a nasal infection,)
No need to change the rate of your breathing, for a beginners practice. Just notice the breath, in,
pause, out, in, pause, out Perhaps at some time you feel that a deep stillness is inviting you into
it just let go, let stillness happen if thoughts start up again, resume noticing the breath, in,
pause, out, in, pause, out..
2. MANTRA
Mantra is a Sanskrit word literally meaning, sacred speech. For meditation, it is a short
phrase uttered over and over, with the purpose of replacing all other thoughts. This can
bring on a thought-free state, or it can become the default thought so that the mind is
SWAMI SHANTANANDA 2015 Page 5
MEDITATION METHODS AND PURPOSE - - TRADITIONAL
not wandering all over the place, and it is restrained from replaying its old patterns of
reaction. An example is Hamsa, a mantra of which imitates the sound of the breath,
occupying the whole breath, one syllable on the in-breath and the other on the out-
breath. It means I am.
Mantra takes you to the still state, where there is no engagement with the minds idea of
itself. It refuses the invitation of the mind to take its artificial world view seriously. The
repetition of mantra is to encourage the mind to let go of all other thoughts but then to
let go of the mantra, too, as it is also a thought-construct.
PRACTICE
Think of a word or short phrase that you would like to try as a mantra. There are some famous
Sanskrit mantras, but I do not offer them unless a person is interested in Yogic spirituality. Anything
that takes you to non-engagement with thoughts will do. And let it be something that flows easily
with the rhythm of the breath. For instance, Calm would be a reasonable mantra, but it doesnt
flow very well. Serenity might fit more naturally with the cycle of breathing.
searched for or invented. And the body itself supplies a structured plan - your own
skeletal structure with its layer of soft tissues.
Here is a strange phenomenon, though. Most of the time we do not really experience
our sensations! Rather, we comment on them and then react to the comment. We assume
that the sensation fits the comment and the reaction.
Imagine yourself sitting in an uncomfortable chair. Your mind says, Thats my bottom,
thats the chair, this is uncomfortable, I want a cushion, my back hurts. And yet, if you
simply do not allow the mind to do its commentary, you dont feel any of that. Deep focus
on sensation is different from thinking about sensation. In the deep focus, you may be
surprised to find that the edge between your bottom and the bottom of the chair
cannot be detected. You cannot detect where the skin of your face ends and the air
molecules touching it start. You may not be aware of which part of your back a sensation
is coming from. Your hands may feel dissolved and fuzzy. Perhaps the entire body feels
just like one big amorphous sensory mass.
Sensory focus is quite mindful, in fact just feel the body and nothing else. Just feel the
sensations instead of conceptualising them into a commentary on my body.
There are two no-thought techniques that have been around for centuries, if not
millennia:
1. Finding the space between two thoughts; 2. Refusing thought.
A third, not really a method, is simply to sit, allowing thought but not engaging with the
thoughts that roll by.
All of them require an absolute commitment which is that, at least for the time you are
meditating, no thought whatsoever has any value. In the thought-replacement techniques,
a thought is held for a while but even then, the understanding is that the destination is
thought-free.
At the College, we also have Mindful Living groups, which help us explore our reactionary
patterns and become able then simply to sit with reality. It is part and parcel of the
contemplation which, with meditation, allows the penny to drop. I love hearing that clink!
In this wonderful illustration by Mudit Smyth, how clearly she shows that even a garden
of lovely thoughts is not meditation; and mantra or any attempt to replace thoughts
with another more favoured thought - only approaches meditation.
Concentration trains the mind to hold a focus on one thing. At the beginning level, it
may be breath focus, mantra, meditation on simple daily activities. This is useful training
for a scattered mind in itself.
The more important outcome, though, is that eventually we realise that our egocentric
outlook is entirely supported and created by a bundle of thoughts and reactions. Without
them, there is just being. We begin to recognise that the world is not tailored to our
egocentric idea of it, and reality has no obligation to conform to our preferences. We get
better at being ok with people and things, more open to differences, happier in
ourselves, not holding on to resentments or self-sabotage. The decisions or choices we
make are purposeful, not driven by reaction.
In letting go of the illusory, we find that reality is just what it is. Traditional still-mind
meditation has no truck with illusion.
Recognising that we are not at the centre of anything, and that our mind creates illusions
so that we can feel comfortable, is stunning. Zen might call the experience of it The Void,
and the ego self and its projections are replaced by an experience of the suchness
or is-ness of what there is, including oneself.
Shiva or Supreme Consciousness might be what Yoga the stream I am from anyway
would call the state of getting free of the minds projections. Other streams might call it
Brahman.
Buddhism might call it Ordinary Mind but the Buddhist ordinary mind has undergone
much training in awareness. Did you know that the word Buddha does not mean The
Enlightened One? No, the Buddha was the one with the fully awakened intellect. The
buddhi, from which the word Buddha is derived, refers to intellectual faculties.
SWAMI SHANTANANDA 2015 Page 9
MEDITATION METHODS AND PURPOSE - - TRADITIONAL
In fully awakened awareness, one does lives a very ordinary life, but it is one that is
hugely different in self-recognition.
The purpose and ultimate outcome of traditional still mind meditation is intrinsically
different from all other approaches to meditation.
Herbert Benson
The medical or therapeutic model of meditation came into being entirely through the work
of Herbert Benson. He is the Mind/Body Medical Institute Associate Professor
of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and director emeritus of the Benson-
Henry Institute (BHI). He is the author or co-author of more than 175
scientific publications and 11 books
Benson and TM
In the early 1970s he was invited by the TM (Transcendental Meditation) group to do
research into their meditation practices, based principally on mantra.
TM may have found they made a pact that they werent particularly happy with. They rather
expected that Benson would prove that their particular form of meditation is special, and
especially therapeutic. Benson is a medical doctor and scientist. He had no first-hand
experience of meditation. When he began his research, not surprisingly he started with
biometric measures, that is, heart rate, respiration, and epidermal electrical conductivity and
neural activity, because they are accessible and indeed measurable. And so, the result was
that TM and all meditation now tended to be defined by biometrical changes in the
participants.
Herbert Benson, however, was on a roll. Being the first to research meditation undoubtedly
gave him an edge with publishers, both scientific and popular. And his eminence as a doctor
and scientist lent credibility to his research. Can you imagine the look on the faces of his TM
clients when he published data that showed that saying coca cola would have the same
effect as an ancient Sanskrit mantra? It must have been comical. And how discombobulated
they must have been when their employee went on to publish his own method from what he
had learnt at TM, and fathered an entire profession of therapeutic meditation, in which TM
played no part at all.
It may be possible that, had TM asked a practising meditator who was also a scientist to
attempt research, a qualitative approach on the inner experience of meditators may have
been the order of the day, supported by biometric data. The equation could have had two
sides. But, as Benson had never experienced the inner state of meditation, the biological
came first, and the conversation about meditation became very one-sided.
Response. The title also gives an indication as to how meditation began to be seen as a medical
adjunct it is the obverse of the stress response.
If the stress is very long term, it is costly to the body. The stress response is the bodys
emergency service. The archetypal metaphor is the cave man hearing the roar of a sabre
tooth tiger fight it? Run away? Save baby? But when the danger is past, the body returns to
more restful, more normal functioning. The two states are also called the functioning of the
sympathetic nervous system and the other, that of the parasympathetic nervous system.
However, in modern society we often have long term stress, eg traffic sounds outside your
bedroom window, a demanding boss in a job you are afraid to relinquish, a dysfunctional
relationship, or even the constant marketing from the media making you feel inadequate
because you havent got enough products. We function in the sympathetic and often dont
even truly rest (parasympathetic) at night, experiencing restless interrupted sleep and
waking up still tired.
It may be that the biological load of long term stress is a contributor to many everyday
illness, as well as to anxiety, depression and other mental unease.
The term fight or flight was coined by Walter Cannon in 1932, working in physiological
science at Harvard. And now here was Dr Benson, also from Harvard, having discovered a
method that could turn off the stress response and elicit the relaxation response. And if
stress contributes to ill health, perhaps the relaxation response could be an antidote and
contribute either to cure or prevention.
Now if someone said, Well isnt that a great thing?, wouldnt you reply, Yes, indeed!. And
yet, all may not be what it seems.
to those who derided it as Eastern mumbo jumbo, and that the scientific world took notice
that meditators might have been onto something seriously good. From there, an interest in
the mind/body connection gave rise to vast numbers of research projects, and the Western
world now has some sense that we can intervene in our own processes for better functioning
of both mind and body.
At the same time, I feel a bit peeved perhaps like an Aboriginal Australian might have felt
when a certain Mr Ayers had a rock named after him when it was discovered by one
William Gosse in 1873. There is a whole lot more to Uluru than Ayers ever considered in his
rock, and it was by no means discovered in 1873, but rather thousands of years before by
other humans from a different culture.
Bensons Method
The method Benson advised is basically a quite simple one of breathing with an added focus
count one on the in-breath and one on the out-breath. He suggests starting with a
progressive muscle relaxation as you first sit to your practice.
Beyond that, he simply encourages the person not to worry about their progress and to
maintain their practice for 10 to 20 minutes once or twice a day.
Here it is in a version modified by the Australian College of Classical Yoga, but note, we call
it Relaxation. It keeps your mind occupied on all levels so that you cant put your mind to
worrying thoughts.
1. TACTILE
Feel the contact that your body makes with any surface
Feel what your body is experiencing - not think about, but feel
2. KINAESTHETIC
3. AURAL
4. VISUAL
See an image -
Find an image that keeps company with the rhythm of the breath
eg the tide coming in and out or a balloon that fills and empties as you breathe
Do this for 10 minutes, every day or when you begin to feel stressed.
It is thought that regular periods consciously eliciting the relaxation response will reduce
anxiety and contribute to well-being on many levels, alleviating the potential damage of
unremitting stress and its biological concomitants.
A vast body of research bears this out. A Google search into Herbert Benson will give you
listings of his research likewise for Jon Kabat Zinn, regarding Mindfulness
METHODS: MINDFULNESS
Conscious awareness moment by moment keeps us focused on the real.
Mindfulness has been a part of Buddhist practice since the time of the Buddha. It also
may have had common or prior existence in Yogic traditions. The Buddhist teaching
soon diverged in its focus, to develop a conscious awareness at every moment. The Pali
word for mindfulness sati - is a corruption of the Sanskrit word " smti, memory or
remembering. Thus mindfulness was to hold in mind. The Yogic notion of smti has
more to do with remembering the teachings, as opposed to ruti or revealed texts.
Traditional Methods
There are four parts to mindfulness in Buddhism:
Purpose
The purpose of Mindfulness in Buddhism was to have the practitioner constantly aware
of the impermanence of his or her life and of all things. This was presumably an aspect
of letting go of the egocentrism of the mind and personal sense of self, and the realisation
of the oneness of self with all else.
However, the perceived purpose seems to have altered as Mindfulness came to the West.
Its purpose now seems to be more associated with stress reduction and lowering of
anxiety.
While all traditional meditation is effective in improving these aspects of living, such
improvement is regarded as a first step. Making it the full focus is problematic, because it
does not allow for progression into recognising the ego-centre itself.
Because the issue of what self is is never addressed, if mindfulness techniques are
regarded or taught as merely methods to reduce stress, they end up paradoxically
maintaining the grip of egocentrism.
You can see the effect in this snip from a web search, illustrated below. It is clear that for
some, Mindfulness is now about achieving ego aims by goal setting and motivation. It is
fine to set goals and lift motivation but the meditative purpose of Mindfulness has
been lost in translation.
The book was marketed as a guide to meditation, but the practices Thich Nhat Hanh
recommended are more easily recognised as mindfulness practices. This is interesting,
because it is obvious that originally, he was trying to introduce people to the benefits of
meditation yet his teachings melded into mindfulness practices.
As a Zen Buddhist, his own meditative life would have been focused on becoming free of
mental conditioning, and to experience oneness of self without the intrusion of the
separatist tendencies of the mind. In his practice for others, he seems just delightful.
He has an enormous output of suggestions for practising Mindfulness those listed below
are only a few.
The Hugging Meditation sounds very appealing!! (first bow to your huggee, and bow
after hugging, too) What about lazy day meditation? Where you really, really do nothing.
Traditional or Modern/medical?
Thich Nhat Hanh is very prolific. You can acquire his many books easily, and The Miracle
of Mindfulness is available as an e-book. The Plum Village website offers many, many
videos and talks. He is a phenomenon, and a lovely influence for peace and love in the
world.
The problem is that often people misattribute peace and love to the ego-self - qualities
that is just hasnt got. An ego is not altruistic. The very word altruistic implies other
than me, and in so-doing, paradoxically reinforces the me.
The most reliable shift to kindness and compassion comes from dissolution of the
illusion of self-importance. Attempting instead constantly to modify its self-centredness
is like pushing water (or something of a darker colour) uphill.
Now, do you suppose the aim and outcome of Thich Nhat Hanhs mindfulness training
is paradoxically to maintain egocentrism, though now conditioned to be less selfish,
more compassionate and more forgiving? Or is it a direct experience of reality without
the conditioning of the mind? The former is more religious in tone (strive to be a
better person). The latter is a penetration of the minds veils.
You might find it interesting to browse into Suzukis Zen Mind Beginners Mind. Suzuki
brought Zen to the West, in the 50s, before the emergence of the notion that meditation
and mindfulness can be extracted from their context to become primarily tools to
relieve stress and have a better functioning ego. You might find echoes somewhere of
Thich Nhat Hanh in Suzuki, as they are both Zen Buddhist teachers but see if you can
tell what differences there might be between them.
Jon Kabat-Zinn
Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction
Jon Kabat-Zinn is an academic microbiologist who was a practising student of Zen and Yoga,
who attended one of Thich Nhat Hanhs American retreats on mindfulness, and realized that
the practices could be adapted to a medical purpose. He developed them into an eight- week
course that he called Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction. He is known in the Yoga world, too,
and his course combines hatha yoga practice and moment to moment mindfulness. Kabat-Zinn
SWAMI SHANTANANDA 2015 Page 17
MEDITATION METHODS AND PURPOSE - - MINDFULNESS
is prolific, too, with at least 10 book titles with wonderful names like Full Catastrophe Living,
and some of his talks are accessible through online videos.
Both Thich Nhat Hanh and Jon Kabat-Zinn appear themselves to have a profound personal
practice based on traditional principles.
One could scarcely begrudge the great help they give to those who are stressed or sick in body
or mind and come seeking a specific cure. Yet if that has evolved accidentally into the focus of
their teaching, perhaps they preclude the possibility of a profound practice for anyone else.
Those who, having some experience of mindfulness, go out and teach others in a shallow way,
dilute the original methods and purpose more and more, till the bizarre notions displayed in
the snip above become the general notion of what mindfulness meditation is.
It seems to me that helping people to ease their ego pain could be less than best practice unless
there is a willingness to discover its source And the source goes much deeper than such things
as childhood traumas, or things that happen to an ego; the source is the misunderstanding of the
me-myself, that is, the actual ego and its etiology.
In trying to ease ego pain but not addressing the source of it, perhaps these two great teachers,
so instrumental in making mindfulness a world-wide phenomenon, have ended up fathering an
industry that reinforces rather than remedies what they sought to address
PROBLEMATIC ISSUES IN
MEDITATION
MEDITATION METHODS AND PURPOSE - - BENEFITS AND PROBLEMS
]\
BENEFITS OF MEDITATION
All meditation is beneficial
This article is reprinted here, and for this particular use, with the kind permission of the
Editor of the International Journal of Psychotherapy.
You might like to read it, because it does give details of research showing the real
psychological and physiological outcomes of applying meditation or mindfulness
techniques in a therapeutic setting.
Also, the set of references included with any research report a goldmine of other
treasures and worth browsing through.
No surprises here. Anyone who has meditated persistently for a few years knows them.
But it is nice to find it in the scientific literature that such outcomes as recognise inner
nature and responsibility and allows its practitioner to step out of conceptual limitations, a
process which is considered to be the hallmark of insight and creativity, and the converse of
neuroticism are accepted benefits. These are unlikely to come of listening to a guided
relaxation, though. And the allowance that On the other hand, in order to reach this deeper
stability, one has to become fundamentally destabilised would never be tolerated at level
where the meditator is only seeking stress relief, or who wants ego validation and
affirmation from those they seek as teachers.
Medical Benefits
Medical benefits are much harder to ascertain. While there is much literature, the
consensus seems to be that it is still to be proven. Some instances where benefit is seen
are
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
High Blood Pressure
It may be that the more easily measured biometric changes and the
psychological/emotional changes in meditation are the contributing factor wherever
there does seem to medical improvement. For example, it would be hard to discount the
therapeutic effect, in such syndromes, of lowering ones own biological level of stress
- and that would flow on to how one handled relationships and challenging situations.
It would be useful to have a screening process in place and a referral system at hand.
Methodological Questions
A problem with research is that often the researchers are not also meditators just as Benson
was not. This can subtly bias a study. Here are some of the possibilities for bias
Two paradigms
These vexed issues of benefits and problems bring us to a central issue, one that is
rarely talked about, and that is that meditation has two paradigms (basic
principles or understanding). Lets think about them, next
TWO PARADIGMS
The differences between the two paradigms of meditation and mindfulness one traditional,
the other goal oriented or focused on remediation have implications for a perspective on
what healthy might mean, and what is acceptable in personal experience.
Traditional Model
The Traditional approach has a totally different paradigm. It is absolutely reality-centred, not
social norm-centred.
It takes it that the consensus reality isnt very consensual after all, (ask people how they see a
political figure, or whether immigrants take jobs or make jobs). It suggests even that the
concrete reality of the world around us is not as solid or as real as you take it to be (ask any
physicist), and that your sense of order in the world is just a projection; and even the objects
you take for real a flower, a pen only have as much object reality as you assign to them. In
themselves, they are not the product of your thinking or naming. And as with a flower or a pen,
so also with your ego self. It has as much object reality as you assign to it, but in itself, it is
only a function of neural activity, not what you prefer to think it is (ask any neurophysicist).
Your personhood is a mental construct, not an independent entity (ask any neuropsychologist,
or perhaps any deep-thinking cognitive psychologist).
Undoubtedly, a meditation practice that is fiercely realistic will eventually see the individual
lose interest in many of the conventional norms and their notions of psychological health.
Living in a cave or living a life of full engagement will be seen to be a choice of practice, not one
of health. Feeling guilt as a transition -- from unawareness of the effects of our behaviour on
others, till eventually a fully aware compassion arises - might be seen as perfectly
understandable. Feeling defenceless, if supported by a loving meditation community, could be
found to be a courageous move toward a resilience that comes from being open to life
rather than having to put up barriers around our hearts and minds.
From the other perspective, the willingness of the traditional approach to allow and
support considerable levels of ego discomfort could play havoc in the client-provider
relationship of the medical model.
It is just that the traditional model doesnt stay at that stage the traditional meditator
is intrigued by something both more mysterious and ultimately more real.
SUMMING UP
Putting some perspective into it, you might like to consider this quote from the National
Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, a body that is governed by the U.S.
Department of Health & Human Services:
Well put!
The medical or therapeutic approach is to help people with a specific health issue and is
situational and short term.
Secondly, people will make allowance for you if they know. So, for instance on a weekend, if
you have visitors, you can easily say, time for my meditation now, Ill see you in an hour (half
an hour, 20 mins depending on your practice). However, if you just spring it on them, you and
they will feel uncomfortable, as though you have just been unfriendly. They wouldnt want to
stop you from having your lunch, or going to the dentist. You have to put your meditation in
the same priority. No one else will accord it that priority unless you do.
Sitting for the exact planned time stops your mind taking over your meditation. It is not an
indulgence for the mind.
www.classicalyoga.com.au
E: info@classicalyoga.com.au
Ph: +613 9833 4050