Student Name: John Park Date: 3/10/17 Instructor Name: Matt Class: Speaking & Listening Methods Assignment:

Methods Assignment: Observation Report 1

Item No relevant evidence Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
(0 59%)
(60% - 69 %) (70% - 79%) (80 89%) (90% - 100%)

Content & The assignment was not Ideas are not well developed or may Ideas are somewhat developed, and Ideas are developed, and demonstrate Ideas are fully developed, and
Ideas submitted, or the fail to demonstrate an understanding demonstrate some understanding of an accurate understanding of the task. demonstrate a significant and
submitted assignment of the task. Main ideas, or the task. Main point(s) and Main point(s) and supporting accurate understanding of the
59.5 / 70 was not relevant to the examples/details, may be obscure or examples/details may be included examples/details are clear and easily task. Main point(s) and
task at hand. missing. but not well integrated. identifiable. examples/ details are identifiable,
clear, and engaging for the
reader.

Evidence & The assignment was not When required, outside evidence When required, outside evidence When required, relevant outside When required, compelling
APA Format submitted, or the may be missing or may fail to may be minimal or may not fully evidence is included. It supports outside evidence is included; it is
submitted assignment support claims. Paper may not meet support claims. Paper may not claims. Paper follows APA format with seamlessly integrated into the
7.5 / 10 lacked evidence from basic requirements for APA format. follow APA format entirely or may few errors in citation/style. paper to support claims. Paper
outside sources and have errors in citation/style. follows APA format with no
APA formatting. errors in citation or style.

Organization The assignment was not The organization is not effective for The organization is somewhat The organization is effective for the The organization is highly
& Standards submitted, or the the task, or there is a lack of effective for the task, although it task. The organization is clear and effective for the task.
submitted assignment organization. Errors with transitions may be loose or unclear. There may logical. Transitions and connectors are Organization skillfully and
8.5 / 10 organized in an and connectors interfere with be some errors with transitions and used appropriately. Paper meets most logically builds support for the
appropriate or effective comprehensibility. Paper may not connectors. Paper may not meet all requirements for title, word count, thesis. Transitions and
way given the task at meet basic requirements for title, requirements for title, word count, spacing, etc. connectors are used appropriately
hand. word count, spacing, etc. spacing, etc. and seamlessly Paper meets
requirements for title, word
count, spacing, etc.
 Usage & The assignment was not Linguistic features of the writing
Mechanics submitted, or the (syntax, usage, word form,
submitted assignment tone/register, spelling, capitalization,
8.5 / 10 was not relevant to the punctuation, etc.) are not effective.
task at hand. Errors are very distracting and/or
interfere greatly with the
comprehensibility of the message.
The writing is not professional or
academic.
Linguistic features of the writing
(syntax, usage, word form,
tone/register, spelling,
capitalization, punctuation, etc.) are
somewhat effective. The errors
may be distracting and/or interfere
with the comprehensibility of the
message. The writing may not be
professional or academic.
Linguistic features of the writing
(syntax, usage, word form,
tone/register, spelling, capitalization,
punctuation, etc.) are effective. There
may be a few errors, but they do not
interfere with the comprehensibility of
the message. The writing is generally
professional/academic.
Linguistic features of the writing
(syntax, usage, word form,
tone/register, spelling,
capitalization, punctuation, etc.)
are highly effective. There are
no apparent errors. The writing
is very professional and
academic.

Score:84 / 100 Letter Grade: B

Comments:
Your objectives were good and met all criteria - specific, measurable, and student-centered. The observation notes lacked detail; you provided a sense of the main
stages of the lesson, but in many places, I wanted to see more details. As an example, the students were playing around with some activities was not explained or
exemplified. The discussion was clear, but lacked a reference to support your claims as per the instructions. The reference is intended to cite information about
pedagogy or theory that you include in the discussion, not just link to the video that you watched.
Student Name: John Park Date: 3/16/17 Instructor Name: Matt Class: Speaking & Listening Methods Assignment: Observation Report 2
Item No relevant Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
evidence (0 59%) (60% - 69 %) (70% - 79%) (80 89%) (90% - 100%)

Content & The assignment was Ideas are not well developed or may Ideas are somewhat developed, and Ideas are developed, and demonstrate an Ideas are fully developed, and
Ideas not submitted, or fail to demonstrate an understanding demonstrate some understanding of accurate understanding of the task. Main demonstrate a significant and
the submitted of the task. Main ideas, or the task. Main point(s) and point(s) and supporting examples/details accurate understanding of the
59.5 / 70 assignment was not examples/details, may be obscure or examples/details may be included but are clear and easily identifiable. task. Main point(s) and
relevant to the task missing. not well integrated. examples/ details are
at hand. identifiable, clear, and
engaging for the reader.

Evidence & The assignment was When required, outside evidence may When required, outside evidence may When required, relevant outside evidence When required, compelling
APA Format not submitted, or be missing or may fail to support be minimal or may not fully support is included. It supports claims. Paper outside evidence is included; it
the submitted claims. Paper may not meet basic claims. Paper may not follow APA follows APA format with few errors in is seamlessly integrated into
assignment lacked requirements for APA format. format entirely or may have errors in citation/style. the paper to support claims.
7.5 / 10 evidence from citation/style. Paper follows APA format with
outside sources and no errors in citation or style.
APA formatting.

Organization The assignment was The organization is not effective for The organization is somewhat The organization is effective for the task. The organization is highly
& Standards not submitted, or the task, or there is a lack of effective for the task, although it may The organization is clear and logical. effective for the task.
the submitted organization. Errors with transitions be loose or unclear. There may be Transitions and connectors are used Organization skillfully and
assignment and connectors interfere with some errors with transitions and appropriately. Paper meets most logically builds support for the
8.5 / 10 organized in an comprehensibility. Paper may not connectors. Paper may not meet all requirements for title, word count, thesis. Transitions and
appropriate or meet basic requirements for title, requirements for title, word count, spacing, etc. connectors are used
effective way given word count, spacing, etc. spacing, etc. appropriately and seamlessly
the task at hand. Paper meets requirements for
title, word count, spacing, etc.

Usage & The assignment was Linguistic features of the writing Linguistic features of the writing Linguistic features of the writing (syntax, Linguistic features of the
Mechanics not submitted, or (syntax, usage, word form, (syntax, usage, word form, usage, word form, tone/register, spelling, writing (syntax, usage, word
the submitted tone/register, spelling, capitalization, tone/register, spelling, capitalization, capitalization, punctuation, etc.) are form, tone/register, spelling,
assignment was not punctuation, etc.) are not effective. punctuation, etc.) are somewhat effective. There may be a few errors, but capitalization, punctuation,
8.5 / 10 relevant to the task Errors are very distracting and/or effective. The errors may be they do not interfere with the etc.) are highly effective.
at hand. interfere greatly with the distracting and/or interfere with the comprehensibility of the message. The There are no apparent errors.
comprehensibility of the message. comprehensibility of the message. writing is generally The writing is very
The writing is not professional or The writing may not be professional professional/academic. professional and academic.
academic. or academic.

Score:84 / 100 Letter Grade: B

Comments:
The observed class was not what we are looking for in this assignment, although I am sure from your comments that you gained valuable insight from the task. Its
much better to observe an actual ESL/EFL lesson than what is essentially a teaching demonstration by a teacher to student teachers. Your objective was quite good
and met all criteria. The observation notes lacked detail - I want to get a sense of how the teacher set up each activity, grouping, directions, etc. without having to
go watch the video myself. The discussion was good and clear, but lacked a reference to support your claims as per the instructions - reference does not mean
linking the video you watched.