[Working Group Members] - Prafulla Pillai (Chair), Alan Pierce, Bruce Bailey, Bruce Douglas,
Charles Mozina, Clifford Normand, Daniel Love, David Shipp, Gerald Dalke, James R. Jones, Jay
Fischer, Jim Bowen, Lorraine Padden, Louie Powell, Neil Nichols, Ralph Young, Norman T.
Stringer
Working Group Chair:
Prafulla Pillai
Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.
Houston, Texas 77002
Abstract - The paper discusses typical grounding damage from prolonged fault current flow. IEEE Guide
practices and ground fault protection methods for C37.101 [1] for Generator Ground Protection provides a wide
medium voltage generator stators, highlighting their range of generator ground protection schemes for different
merits and drawbacks. Particular attention is given to generator grounding and system grounding configurations. A
applications of multiple generators connected to a single summary of the recommended protective schemes and
bus. The paper also provides an overview of the grounding arrangements to which they may be applied is
generator damage mechanism during stator ground given in Table 1 of this IEEE guide. Typical generator ground
faults. Problem areas associated with each type of fault protection methods include:
grounding are identified and solutions are discussed. The
Percentage phase differential protection (device 87)
paper also provides a list of references on the topic. The
paper is intended as a guide to aid engineers in selecting Ground differential protection (device 87GN)
adequate grounding and ground fault protection schemes Ground time-overcurrent protection (device 51G)
for medium voltage industrial and commercial Instantaneous ground overcurrent protection
generators for new installations, for evaluating existing (device 50G)
systems, and for future expansion of facilities, to Wye-broken-delta vt ground overvoltage protection
minimize generator damage from stator ground faults. (device 59G)
These topics are presented in four separate parts, Part 1 Stator winding zero-sequence neutral overvoltage
through Part 4. Part 1 covers scope, introduction, user protection (device 59GN)
examples of stator ground failure, and theoretical basis Application of these protective functions requires
for the problem. Part 2 discusses various grounding subjective judgment. Larger generators will commonly be
methods used in industrial applications. Part 3 describes equipped with all of these functions, while some functions
protection methods for the various types of grounding might be omitted from smaller generators on the basis that
and Part 4 provides a conclusion and bibliography of the incremental value in limiting damage does not justify the
additional resource material. increase in cost. Refer to IEEE guide C37.101 [1] for a
detailed discussion regarding settings, sensitivities,
I. GENERAL advantages and disadvantages of these protection schemes
For internal generator ground faults, the generator should and available variations.
be shut down as quickly as possible. However, for an external All of the above protective functions should initiate a
ground fault such as a feeder fault, a time-delayed shut down complete shut down of the generator, including tripping of
is usually employed to permit selective isolation of the faulty the generator main and field circuit breakers and closing of
circuit. Along with the time-delayed tripping, an the prime mover throttle valve.
instantaneous alarm will provide early warning for the
operator to take necessary action to minimize generator
Presented at the 2003 IEEE IAS Pulp and Paper Industry Conference in Charleston, SC: IEEE 2003 - Personal use of this material is permitted.
II. PERCENTAGE PHASE DIFFERENTIAL IV. GROUND TIME-OVERCURRENT
PROTECTION (DEVICE 87) PROTECTION (DEVICE 51G)
Conventional percentage differential protection for phase- As previously mentioned, one of the most important
to-phase winding faults (Fig. 19) will provide the ability to advantages of low-resistance grounding is the ability to
detect most internal ground faults, depending on the selectively coordinate ground overcurrent protection for
available ground fault current. If the maximum ground fault downstream faults; thereby tripping only the faulted part of
current is below the phase percentage differential pick-up, the system. For example, consider a ground fault occurring
the phase differential relays will not provide any ground fault on a load feeder supplied from a generator bus, as shown in
protection. In such cases a ground differential scheme as Fig. 21. The load feeders will be protected using sensitive
discussed below may be needed to provide adequate instantaneous ground overcurrent relays (device 50G) on
protection of the generator. each feeder , permitting high speed clearing of the fault. In
the event of an uncleared feeder fault, an inverse time-
overcurrent relay (device 51G) on the bus tie breaker will
provide back-up protection, isolating the faulted bus section.
Further back-up protection will be provided by the inverse
time-overcurrent relays (device 51G) on the grounded
neutrals of the sources. Although, time-overcurrent ground
relays provide sensitive, high-speed protection for ground
faults, coordination can be difficult with multiple sources
Fig. 19. Generator Percentage Phase Differential Protection since the ground current magnitude will vary with addition or
removal of sources.
Fig. 26. High-Resistance Grounded Generator, Third-Harmonic Residual Terminal Voltage Based
Ground Fault Protection Scheme
59GN Overvoltage Relay Tuned to the Fundamental (60 Hz) Frequency
59D Overvoltage Differential Relay Tuned to the Third Harmonic (180 Hz) Frequency
Fig. 27. High-Resistance Grounded Generator, Third-Harmonic Comparator Based Ground Fault Protection Scheme