Anda di halaman 1dari 4

There was no Aryan invasion- the Rigvedic people were already established in India no later

than 4000 BCE. This means as correctly pointed out by Suzanne Marie Sullivan Aryans
invading Indus valley was a hoax .

During the 19 the century (early 1800s) when British started showing Interest towards
India's wealth and of course they had a plan to plunder it all .

The Aryan invasion theory's birthday seems to be April 10th, 1866, at a secret meeting held
in England by Royal Asiatic Society. This was "to induct the theory of the Aryan invasion of
India, so that no Indian may say that English are foreigners. India was ruled all along by
outsiders and so the country must remain a slave under the benign Christian rule
"Divide India to rule India". ( sources - Proof of Vedic Culture's Global Existence - By
Stephen Knapp p)

Racially, the Aryans had been projected as the white coloured race, migrated from middle
Asia, or from Black Sea into India on horsebacks and had driven out the local Dravidians
into South India and established superior culture and civilization in Northern part of India.

This thoery created havoc among the Northern (termed as Aryans) and Southern
(Dravidians) Indians . later on only the fair skinned people were termed as brahmin,
kshatriya and dark were shudras. Not to forget this was a very vulnerable period when there
were invasions from Mughals from 1700 s who were also attacking on hindu beliefs and
culture.

This theory had not only torched the Indian


minds, but also influenced the German dictator
Adolf Hitler with Aryan superiority complex, that
had resulted in Second World War. Hitler was
inspired by the German archaeologist Gustaf
Kossinna , thanks to Max Muller Also ( I guess ).
The caste system was also by product of this Theory according to me . The vedas never
divided the society in to castes . According to the vedas there were 4 varnas(ranks)

1.Brahmin - One who is wise and leads us to the brahman (the divine Infinite) by being able
to master the principles in vedas and teach fellows .

2.kshatriya - constituted the ruling and military elite. Their role was to protect society by
fighting in wartime and governing in peacetime.

3.Vyshya - the vyshyas were the economic sector (agriculture,blacksmith,traders &


commerce , cattle rearing ,etc)

4.Shudra - Now this term has been wrongly interpreted by almost everyone .
According to the vedas a shudra is an imbecile . He is not allowed to read the vedas because
of his immaturity and lack of understanding .

Janman jyate dra saskrad bhaved dvija - everyone is born shudra . but if he
accepts samskaras ( culture,education, reach a higher consciousness) either
seeking through his senses or from a guru then their life is reformed and they become a
dvija ( 2nd birth - born as higher rank something like a graduation course ). And now they
are allowed to read the texts and also chose any of the above ranks mentioned . Until then
they are SHUDRAS.

Another misunderstanding about brahmins being the top of those ranks .


Any body can become a brahman but brahmins make it easier just like some crash course
to enlightenment . That is why they are considered holy .
Now dividing everyone in to these ranks was quintessential for any kingdom to survive .
Though culture and languages differed in the Indian subcontinent the principles were
always travelling in the form of stories and epics . Dharma was followed by everyone in their
ranks .

Thus the british divided and conquered India. Caste system Broke India not only from the
Outside but also from the very Inside which still prevails like a parasite hanging on to these
so called shudras .

And the great epic Ramayana has a singularly eloquent expression describing Rama as:

arya sarva samascaiva sadaiva priyadarsanah


Arya, who worked for the equality of all and was dear to everyone.

The Rigveda also uses the word Arya something like thirty six times, but never to mean a
race. The nearest to a definition that one can find in the Rigveda is probably:

praja arya jyotiragrah ... (Children of Arya are led by light)


RV, VII. 33.17
.
Light here refers to Enlightenment . The
word Arya, according to those who(ancient
Indians /Bharata - one who is engaged in search
for knowledge) originated the term, is to be used
to describe those people who observed a code of
conduct; people were Aryans or non-Aryans
depending on whether or not they followed this
code. So it is not compulsory that the person is a
hindu Indian , etc !!!
No wonder the ancient Indians were right about
only the wise should read these texts . It has been
completley misinterpreted by the most of the
European scholars .
Sanatana Dharma (eternal order) is a set of Principles which if a person follows can reach
the infinite .

People say Hinduism is the oldest religion ( philosophy) in the world but I completely
disagree we are not following the ancient philosphy it has been totally polluted .Over the last
1000 years it has been completely modified to peoples own interests and egos because of the
amount of freedom this philosophy gives . Only few ancient traditions have been carried
forward which makes some sense . Rest all are the works of imbeciles.

Our texts never mentioned any race or castes . Again the word Arya expressed a particular
ethical and social ideal, an ideal of well-governed life, candour, courtesy, nobility, straight
dealing, courage, gentleness, purity, humanity, compassion, protection of the weak,
liberality, observance of social duty, eagerness of knowledge, respect for the wise and
learned, the social accomplishments.

nothing more If you have read the texts you would have not raised this question ( i am not
being rude again)

this occurence of the word arya in vedas and our epics has been misinterpreted european
scholars as a different race .

Ancient Indian records have absolutely no mention of such a theory Strange as it may
sound, none of the epics, puranas or scriptures mentions anything even remotely close to
Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT). This theory, however, had stated that the Vedic literature goes
back to the 2nd millennium BC.

If Aryans did Invade India then obviously they should have mentioned about it in atleast
one of the above scripts

Please look in to this with an open mind .

Significantly, Vedas are identified as sanatan,


timeless and universal. Which means they cannot
be anchored to any period or place, or even to a
people. So the very discussion of its historical and
geographical origins seems like a pastime of
academicians and politicians, who value every
thing about the Vedas except the wisdom of its
content.
99 % people did not read the sacred texts .. some part of the texts mahabharta and
ramayana is although widespread . I am sure that the meessage was never sent across...
ofcourse you need to finish the high school ( vedas and upanishads / sruti )before the
Graduation ( ramayana and bhagavad gita /smriti ) .
cheers

If you want to know more about the truth behind this Ridiculous theory (Aryan Invasion
History or Politics?
By Dr. N.S. Rajaram )

Anda mungkin juga menyukai