Anda di halaman 1dari 11

Holistic social intervention The crying need for

waste management


In an environment where affluent families are dominant, garbage becomes waste

though it may then become an important source of income for some of the poor
people living in urban areas. It is said that in countries such as Sri Lanka, one per
cent of the urban population (that is at least nearly 150,000 people) survive by
separating what can be reused from the waste that others dispose of.
In areas like Bloemendhal and Meethotamulla where garbage has been piled up
into mountainous heaps, and in areas proposed such as Ekala where garbage is to
be re-stacked, some people survive by finding something beneath these
mountains of garbage to sell or eat. The people, who go through these garbage
mountains are subject to poisoning and toxic smoke and face various kinds of
diseases. When considering waste management in any country, the betterment of
the lives of such people needs to become part of that management process.

In the subject curriculum of environment used in many schools, waste

management can also be included. Creating awareness of students from
kindergarten upwards and their parents and neighbours through educational
activities conducted at their homes and providing them with the necessary
facilities is an important part of a waste management programme. A national
programme of waste management can be launched using such school-based
activities on waste management as well as the activities that can be practised in
day to day life as a model.

Contribution to the tragedy

Meethotamulla is not the first garbage mountain that has collapsed. Unless
conscientious measures are adopted to prevent such situations from occurring in
the future, it will not be the last. One cannot talk about this garbage mountain
without mentioning the fact like everywhere else in the world, Lankans also live in
a consumer society, in which investors act to maximise their profits at the cost of
human life, regardless of the moral or legal consequences. Bribery, corruption,
bloodshed and murder are recurring motifs of such an inequitable society, as
evidenced by the repressive measures the Lankan State used against protest
campaigns by the communities living near this garbage mountain carried out for
the last several years.

All successive governments, politicians and the bureaucracy who have not
considered or disregarded these issues and all those people who have not paid
attention about this issue have directly or indirectly contributed to this tragedy.
Until the end of the nineties, many in Lanka used ceramic ware, banana or lotus
leaves to consume food and drinks. Local authorities at the time arranged waste
collection and disposal operations successfully, though such operations became
defunct at a later stage.

The situation changed in this century with plastic being used in day to day life as a
very common and inexpensive raw material.
Due to the short life span of plastic products, an enormous amount of garbage
started piling up in our environment. Lankans began using disposable plastic ware
and bags, as well as polythene wraps to pack and consume their food and drinks
and then dumping that plastic rubbish everywhere. This waste started being piled
up plenteously, not only in the surrounds of Colombo, but also in faraway villages.

Global waste generation

This garbage crisis is not a problem confined only to Sri Lanka. Many countries
that celebrated the World Earth Day on 22nd April last, find waste management
escalating into a dangerous issue. When the amount of garbage thrown out
around the world is taken into consideration, only less than half of the world's
population enjoy the privilege of systematic and regular waste collection.

According to the estimates the World Bank had made in 2011, cities around the
world generate about 1.3 billion tons of waste every year [1]. The amount of
waste is expected to increase to 2.2 billion tons in the year 2025 and to 4 billion
tons in 2100.

The highest waste generating countries of the world are the United States of
America, China, Brazil, Japan and Germany. During the past decade, Australia's
waste generation has increased by 170 per cent [2].

Mega cities in Asia are facing a serious challenge of disposing waste. Smokey
Mountain with a population of about 13 million in the city of Manila in the
Philippines is one of the largest lands refilled with waste. Thousands of people
who live here and use the waste become victims of toxic smoke every day.
Mumbai in India with a population of about 12 million find it difficult to locate
land to refill with waste. The city of Jakarta in Indonesia with a population of
around 11 million is overflowing with waste. The city of Bangkok in Thailand with
a population of around 10 million was covered with smoke for weeks due to
waste mountains catching fire recently. These situations leading to environmental
pollution are not only harmful to the health of the general public, but may also
lead some developing countries to a state of desolation covered almost entirely
with toxic poisonous gases.

'Waste Zero'

The chairperson of the 'Waste Zero' initiative in the USA states that we do not
consider waste management as an issue so long as we cannot see that waste. It
cannot be so in Sri Lanka as waste has been piled up everywhere for everyone to
see. Compared to electricity, water and gas, there is no price to be paid for waste
disposed of, and this is said to be one of the factors influencing less emphasis on
waste. It is also said that when arrangements are made to efficiently dispose of
waste, we are influenced to put away garbage even more.

As such some experts say that measures are to be taken for each household to
pay a fee according to the weight or the size of waste that household puts away
[3]. It is said that due to the 'WasteZero's' support for charging a fee for every bag
of waste disposed at a waste collection centre, waste recycling has increased two-
fold and waste disposal has reduced by 44 per cent. However, for many Lankans,
who are already paying a heavy tax out of their small income, this will become
another burden on them. Obviously, it can become a burden that they could not

Waste generation and management in Sri Lanka

Lanka generates less than 15 million tons of waste annually. Nevertheless, many
local authorities find managing even this amount of waste a huge burden. A
substantial part of revenue of these authorities is spent on disposing rubbish. Due
to increasing urbanization, industrialization and consumerism with population
growth, not only the amount of waste generated is rising, but also the
constitution of waste (for example, electronic waste: e-waste) is also changing.
When compared with the land size and the population density of the country, this
is a worrying development. For managing the existing and the future exponential
increase in waste, there are no signs of a timely policy platform or a clear
programme, except for the great vocabulary of politicians.

For such a plan, some key elements for consideration would be the facts that the
composition of waste is changing; the amount of waste is accelerating, the
collection of waste is more expensive than waste disposal, and in particular, the
collection of waste remains mostly inefficient. Despite many people thinking that
this issue could be avoided by taking the waste mountains in their surrounds
elsewhere, the outcome of such a step would be to impose this issue on people
living in another area. Some others think that by burning garbage in the open or
using incinerators, this issue could be solved. Even though such measures can be
used as part of the solution, one step for a real solution to the problem is to make
arrangements to collect waste efficiently.

However, a holistic solution for waste management cannot be achieved without

social participation, working to change the cultural attitudes and behavioural
patterns of people.

Around the year 1970, I remember seeing some households in Nuwara Eliya using
human excreta during their agricultural work.

Being harmful to public health and putrid gases released, this process would have
come to a standstill. In the villages and surrounds of the cities, some of those
engaged in agricultural work make mixed fertilizer from waste, and even using

Rural people in India and Nepal very cleverly engage in this type of activities.
Without dumping decaying garbage on street corners, they use barns, boxes and
concrete pits for this purpose. They sell mixed fertilizer to nurseries and farmers.
They separate plastic parts from garbage and sell them. Remaining garbage is
buried, or burned.

Yet, in locations where population density is high, it is difficult to carry out such
activities. Government intervention is necessary to develop technological facilities
needed for the management of waste being collected in cities. If this cannot be
done, then such waste needs to be moved to appropriate, less populated areas.
For this, after negotiating with local authorities, arrangements could be made to
launch on a national scale a programme that is based on a scientific analysis.
Importance of Genuine Good Governance

When a country lacks genuine good governance; government administration

becomes weak. Politicians become misled as they do not receive from a passive,
poorly disciplined and unprincipled bureaucracy appropriate advice for social
development. Political commitment to implement the pledges they made to the
people when they came to power, has vanished. Policy platforms, mechanisms
and programmes needed for good governance are nowhere to be seen. When
such a situation prevails, it is not surprising that the outcome is that the public
service becomes inefficient and local authorities are unable to maintain essential

In such circumstances, those who wield power and those who are close to them
come forward, as they choose, to achieve their personal objectives. The result of
this inefficiency will be soaring 'peoples' protests. Through such protests people
themselves come forward to take initiatives to address such social issues. Making
communities aware of and training them in waste management cannot be an
arduous task. What is needed is to make a positive change in people's attitudes
relating to putting away waste and generate the attitude among them that waste
is something that can be used as a resource.

Society towards waste management

The recycling behavioural patterns that can be employed at households can be

positively influenced by means of a school based practical waste management
education model utilising the experiences and inspirations found among the
generations. By this, knowledge and understanding of primary school students
can be developed significantly; thus, the message of "reducing, re-using and
recycling" of waste can also be carried over to their families and friends. When
good actions are observed, they can be motivated to use such actions again and
again. By doing so, it will be possible to link them to a sustainable waste
management process.

Urban waste management is a crucial factor in maintaining our ongoing

relationship with the environment around cities. Efficient and sustainable waste
management depend on several factors, including the existing development
trends, the socio-economic composition and the commitment of the government
and society. Therefore, it is a unique challenge that we are faced with in this
It was reported recently that because waste found in Sri Lanka is highly moist,
such waste cannot be used for recycling and power generation, sanitary land
filling methods should be used for wet waste management, an area in the
Puttalam district had been selected for this purpose, and China was willing to
assist with this project. In some countries of the world, for example, in China and
Singapore, management of such wet waste is carried out.

Experience of China

In the past few decades, Chinese people have moved in vast numbers from rural
areas to urban areas. Because of this, there had been a rapid increase of
population in the cities and a huge change in lifestyles. Enormous changes in the
consumerist lifestyle of nearly 1.4 billion people generated a massive flood of
waste. As such, the not so developed general waste management services have
been severely affected. In urban waste management, China appears to be relying
on a formal government administered system and an informal system that is not
under the control of the government.

About 300 million tons of garbage generated annually; a huge amount of this
waste is generated in the cities. The common waste management service that
exists is to collect unsorted urban solid waste for land filling in suburban areas or
their surrounds, or as close as possible to the countryside, or for burning using
incinerators. Despite the allocation of containers for separating recyclable waste,
the government's waste management service does not have the capacity to
implement such a recycling methodology. It is also said that a large amount of
electronic waste passes through a shadow market.
We know that the waste management in the cities of China has adversely affected
the lives of people living there. It is said that the weak infrastructure used in the
collection of garbage and the lack of investment and enforcement in waste
management are consolidating the social inequalities of the people from lower
socio-economic backgrounds, who migrate to the city from the village.
Reclamation of land for refilling with waste and installation of incinerators for
burning waste close to the suburbs where poor immigrants are inhabiting not
only bring in toxic gases, but among some of the disturbances include pollution of
sound, soil, water and air caused by trucks transporting that waste. Thus, the
interior of prosperous cities remains relatively clean, while the environmental
pollution the garbage of the residents in those cities is exported to small towns
and poor communities, who have been politically and economically marginalized
from the city. [5]

China has tried various methodologies to overcome the challenges urban waste
has caused. A few years ago, China tested certain advanced theoretical
technologies capable of mechanically separating urban waste material, and
convert bio-degradable components into compost material, for making mixed
fertiliser. However, the toxic sediments produced were not only unusable; those
sediments also became a health hazard. The unsorted waste containing organic
matter is not an efficient burning fuel. Due to the large amounts of additional fuel
that were needed, it became a loss-making exercise.

Regulation of waste incineration in China is also unsatisfactory. The

environmental pollution the toxic gases emitted from burning waste has become
one of the most pressing environmental and health issue for the needy
communities living around the edges of cities. The interest the Chinese central
government has shown in recent years about the use of anaerobic digesters to
decompose organic waste can be viewed as a positive step. It is reported that
now China has launched several large scale pilot projects that use anaerobic
digestive agents.

Experience of Singapore

In the year 2000, Singapore generated around 7,600 tons of waste per day. There
was no further land available in the mainland to dispose of waste by landfill.
Singapore could take rapid effective measures to overcome the growing waste
management crisis because of the political commitment of its government and
leaders, it being a small country, and its economy being a strong one. In 2001,
Singapore launched a programme to raise the waste recycling ratio. A landfill was
built on the island of Semakau on land reclaimed from the sea.

Singapore introduced waste sorting and recycling process for its residents and a
system of waste collection. Schools, offices, shopping malls and factories were
brought under the recycling programme. By the end of 2005, 56 percent of the
Singaporean households had been contributing to the recycling process. Thus,
Singapore could reduce the volume of waste going into landfills and produce
power. By employing modern innovative waste disposal methodologies, about 38
percent of Singapore's solid waste materials is used for power generation, about
60 percent is recycled and about 2 percent is used for land filling. Its four plants
generating electricity from waste, which is tantamount to about three percent of
the country's electricity needs.

According to the Executive Director Eugene Tay of Singapore's WasteZero-SG

agency, megacities of Asia can learn many lessons from Singapore. He thinks that
these cities need to take a step backward, and after emphasising on the aspects
of "reducing" and "reusing" of the waste management cycle, need to look at
waste disposal as the last resort. [6]

Initial steps of waste management

The initial step of a programme of waste management in Sri Lanka needs to make
arrangements to change the habits and behaviour of people towards waste. Key
aspects that need to be in such a plan include minimising the use of material that
leads to the generation of waste, motivating them to separate waste and reuse
whatever items that can be reused, recycling and encouraging them to regularly
dispose of waste.

Funds or loans received from the government or international bodies can be used
for implementing a waste management process.

Nevertheless, if a local body cannot cover the costs needed for the daily activities
required for this, it will not be able to maintain waste management on a regular
basis. It is possible to reduce the per capita ecological footprint in Colombo and
other cities by introducing a socially more reasonable approach in the use of
resources towards urban waste management. This is crucial in reducing the
ecological impact due to urbanisation. Using the resources in a fairer manner, our
cities can be maintained in a more sustainable manner. Addressing the ecological
injustices of the currently existing waste management system will also be a step
towards alleviating the social inequalities that exist among all those who live in
and use our cities.

For effective implementation of the methodology that will be used for waste
management as designed, the following need to be satisfied: Local authorities
need to have the knowledge and ability required to monitor and assess the work
that is expected from a private service provider engaged in waste management;
The methodology used to collect waste needs to match with the needs and
intentions of the residents in the local authority; Taking steps necessary for waste
management only after consultations with those who manage and handle waste;
and not to impose those measures on them.

Otherwise, the waste management system will neither be embedded in society

nor be regularly maintained.

Experiences of other countries have shown that the use of some very
sophisticated technologies for power generation from waste does not go together
with certain facts. Therefore, in determining an appropriate technology for waste
management in Sri Lanka, it will be important to consider the following:

*Is the proposed technology compatible with the composition of the waste
generated in the country?
*Is that technology compatible with the existing or futuristic recycling needs?

*Is it possible for the people resident in the local authority to sustainably
maintain that technology?
*Is the methodology the local authority use advanced enough to properly utilise
that technology?
For every unit of waste reduced, reused, or recycled, it is not necessary to spend
on collecting or safely disposing that unit of waste. What is important for cities
that do not currently engage in waste management would be to identify simple,
appropriate and affordable solutions that can be gradually implemented.

Doing so can provide the best affordable solution to the people. As the first step,
collection of waste can be expanded to include the whole city; and locations
where garbage is openly piled can be taken under the control of the local
authority and make those locations into waste disposal centres. Creating an
environment for the public sector including local authorities, citizens, private
sector including businesses to work together, the cycle of reducing, reusing and
recycling waste can be taken forward while safeguarding public health, and the

1. Ede Ijjasz-Vasquez, Senior Director, Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global
Practice, World Bank.
2. MRA Consulting 2016, State of Waste 2016 current and future Australian
trends, at
3. For example, see Waste & Recycling at the town of Turtleford, UK, at
4. Bald, C.P., Wang, F., Kuehr, R., Huisman, J. (2015), The global e-waste monitor
2014, United Nations University, IAS SCYCLE, Bonn, Germany.
5. See Beijing Besieged by Waste, a documentary directed by Wang Jiuliang
6. Yep, E. 13 September 2015, Singapore's Innovative Waste-Disposal System,
Wall Street Journal, at
Posted by Thavam