From coast to coast, zombies have taken to the streets! In Portland, Maine,
the stumbling undead suddenly appear amidst a crowd. In a flash, the
music of Michael Jacksons Thriller begins, and the undead, made up of
both amateur and professional dancers, recreate the iconic music video
(WMTW, 2013). Across the country in Portland, Oregon, a food bank is the
recipient of a fundraising Zombie Walk with the tagline: We may eat brains,
but we do have hearts! (Oregon Food Bank, Inc., 2009). And its not just
zombies. Every October, more than 2,500 interactive haunted houses
spring up around the world, where local residents dress up to gleefully
terrify visitors on country hayrides, in backyard mazes, on movie studio
backlots, and in abandoned prisons (Olmstead, 2013).
Zombies, vampires, aliens, and other monsters are prevalent on todays
movie screens, televisions, and book shelves. This may hint at current
cultural anxieties, but there is a long history of fascination with these
mysterious forms across cultures. Monsters run rampant through folklore,
religion, fairy tales, and mythology, and clinical practitioners have drawn
inspiration from them since the onset of psychotherapy.
Many dont understand the allure of monster movies, particularly those
pictures designed to horrify and instill dread. Even more bewildering is this
impulse to spend days every autumn putting on makeup and terrifying
people, even when those people are paying for the privilege to be scared.
In an attempt to understand the appeal of horror, film critics, cultural
analysts, psychologists, and psychotherapists have examined the genre
using various psychological orientations, including psychoanalytic,
existential, and postmodern views. For more information, see Horror Film
and Psychoanalysis: Freuds Worst Nightmare, a collection of essays
edited by Steven Jay Schneider (2004) and Horror and the Holy: Wisdom-
Teachings of the Monster Tale by Kirk J. Schneider (1993).
The first half of this piece will explore a variety of these views. The latter
half will explore monster archetypes through more embodied drama
therapy approaches.
Page 2 of 7
Beginning in the 1970s, the popular essays of film critic Robin Wood
explored classic psychoanalytic interpretations of monster movies, based in
Freuds linked conceptions of repression and the uncanny (Wood, 1986).
Wood states One might say that the true subject of the horror genre is all
that our civilization oppresses and represses (1986, p. 68). Stanley
Kubrick, while discussing his film The Shining with film critic Michel Ciment
(1980), offered, In his essay on the uncanny, Das Unheimliche, Freud
said that the uncanny is the only feeling which is more powerfully
experienced in art than in life. If the horror genre required any justification, I
should think this alone would serve as its credentials (para. 66).
Many monster stories speak to questions of existential psychology:
survival, fear of death, life purpose, somatization, and generativity. In Holy
and the Horror: Wisdom-Teachings of the Monster Tale, existential
psychotherapist Kirk Schneider (1993), states that any common physical
sensation or human emotion can become monstrous in the extreme:
unceasing hunger, boundless adoration, and uncontrollable sight all have
given birth to monster characters. These basic fears can be as horrific as
the fear of debilitating illness and painful lingering death; all represent an
imprisonment within the body. Even good health can be excruciating; for
being healthy carries responsibility and freedom, which can even more
painfully remind us of the boundaries of our abilities (Ziegler, 1991) which in
turn invites the fantasy of extreme deviation.
As in narrative therapy, postmodern interpretations of monster stories cast
the monster as the problem; the monster is either a catalyst for change, or
a staunch defender of the status quo that needs to be vanquished. In the
introduction to Monsters in the Closet: Homosexuality and the Horror Film,
homosexuality is compared to the Wolfman, Frankensteins monster, mad
scientists, and vampires all of whom challenge the very foundations of
society (Benshoff, 1997, p. 1). Film critic and sociologist Andrew Tudor
(1989), identifies the emergence of paranoid horror (widespread confusion
as in Night of the Living Dead or Texas Chainsaw Massacre) in the 1960s
as the erosion of the foundations of social legitimacy in many western
societies, going on to call it the age of delegitimization (p. 222).
As rich as the view of monster movies is from the (psychoanalysts) couch,
there is one key element that none account for why people so often love
and empathize with the monster. In Killing Monsters: Why Children Need
Page 3 of 7
https://thedramascope.wordpress.com/2015/06/08/casting-shadows-
playing-in-the-realm-of-monsters/