Anda di halaman 1dari 7

LEMBAR LATIHAN SCIENTIFIC PAPER APPRAISAL

(TELAAH KRITIS TULISAN ILMIAH)

Nama / kelompok : KELOMPOK E
NIM :-
Judul paper : Elevated Risk for HIV Infection among Men Who Have Sex with
Men in Low- and Middle-Income Countries 2000–2006:
A Systematic Review

Instruksi :
1. isilah kolom-kolom di bawah ini
2. beri garis bawah dengan tinta merah atau stabilo pada bagian paper yang telah anda
telaah

1. TELAAH KELENGKAPAN FORMAT PAPER :

Item telaah Ada / tidak (sebutkan

halamannya)
 Judul (Title) Ada, halaman 1901
 Abstrak dan/atau Ringkasan (Abstract and or Ada, halaman 1901

Summary)
 Pendahuluan (Introduction, background) Ada, halaman 1902
 Bahan dan Cara (Method) Ada, halaman 1902 – 1905
 Hasil (Result) Ada, halaman 1905
 Diskusi (Discussion) Ada, halaman 1905
 Ucapan terima kasih/ penghargaan Ada, halaman 1908

(acknowledgement)
 Daftar Pustaka (Reference) Ada, halaman 1908 – 1911

Kesimpulan : format lengkap/tidak lengkap

2. TELAAH VALIDITAS PENELITIAN

Tujuan penelitian : To investigate the global epidemic of HIV among MSM and the

relationship of MSM outbreaks to general populations (page 1901)

Metode penelitian
Item telaah Temuan (sebutkan berikut

halamannya)
Disain/rancangan (design) Systematic Review

1

an abstract at a conference with peer-reviewed blinded abstract selection process.395 articles. Men’’ OR ‘‘Homosexual’’ which were cross-referenced with the key word (AND) ‘‘HIV’’ (1. Sesungguhnya disain penelitian dalam artikel ini adalah meta- analysis. male sex workers. listed details regarding data sampling techniques. studies in lowand middle-income countries. data collection started since January 1. The following medical subject heading (MESH) terms were used for PubMed. and studies taking place in countries where UNAIDS has calculated a general population prevalence for 2006. publication in a peer-reviewed journal. bisexual. while the same terms were used as keywords in the other databases: ‘‘Homosexual. Selain itu. and other country-specific population of MSM). Catatan: meta-analysis adalah systematic review + analisis statistik * Tingkatan dalam hierarchy of evidence Peringkat 1 Sampel (sample) studies including HIV prevalence data among MSM populations (including homosexual. If the studies were not published in a peer-reviewed journal. Coba lihat pooled OR yang ada di narasi maupun gambar. 2000. 96 reviews) OR the MESH 2 . transgender. though commissioned by governmentmanaged epidemiologic monitoring agencies such as European Centre for the Epidemiological Monitoring of AIDS (EuroHIV) or the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). the studies were also included. meskipun judulnya adalah systematic review. dalam narasi juga disebutkan meta-analysis.

the studies were also included. published between October 3. The following medical subject heading (MESH) terms were used for PubMed. an abstract at a conference with peer-reviewed blinded abstract selection process. four reviews) and limited to reports in the English language. 2000. though commissioned by governmentmanaged epidemiologic monitoring agencies such as European Centre for the Epidemiological Monitoring of AIDS (EuroHIV) or the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). and the present date. transgender. and other country-specific population of MSM). 2000. and the present date. and pertaining to individuals 15 y of age and older (pp 1902-1903) Artikel Ilmiah ( Published studies) (Page 1911) Ukuran sampel (sample size) 83 (Page 1911)(p.395 articles. published between October 3. bisexual. Men’’ OR ‘‘Homosexual’’ which were cross-referenced with the key word (AND) ‘‘HIV’’ (1. 1903) Kriteria inklusi (eligibility criteria) studies including HIV prevalence data among MSM populations (including homosexual. 2000. four reviews) and limited to reports in the English language. and studies taking place in countries where UNAIDS has calculated a general population prevalence for 2006. data collection started since January 1. term ‘‘Human Immunodeficiency Virus’’ (107 articles. studies in lowand middle-income countries. male sex workers. publication in a peer-reviewed journal. If the studies were not published in a peer-reviewed journal. and pertaining to individuals 15 y of age and older (pp 1902-1903)Studies including HIV prevalence data among MSM populations 3 . listed details regarding data sampling techniques. 96 reviews) OR the MESH term ‘‘Human Immunodeficiency Virus’’ (107 articles. while the same terms were used as keywords in the other databases: ‘‘Homosexual.

listed details regarding data sampling techniques. data collection started since January 1. self reported HIV status rather than serologic testing. publication in a peer-reviewed journal. (Page 1902) Kriteria Eksklusi The exclusion criteria were studies with a sample size of less than 50. transgender. and other country-specific population of MSM). studies in low and middle-income countries. an abstract at a conference with peer-reviewed blinded abstract selection process. 2000. (including homosexual. and studies taking place in countries where UNAIDS has calculated a general population prevalence for 2006. male sex workers. and if the sample was a subset of another population used in another study (Page 1903) Metode penentuan sampel (sampling frame) Total sampling Metode pengumpulan data Ekstraksi / Penelusuran artikel 4 . bisexual.

Jikalau sudah diekstraksi lalu dicari kesimpulannya. kemudian diseleksi kualitas dan eligibilitasnya. MSM in low and middle.8 – 19.3 kali lebih besar untuk terjangkit HIV dibandingkan yang bukan MSM.income countries Mempunyai resiko 19. MSM ( Men who have Sex with Men) in low and middle.8 Artinya : pada populasi. TELAAH IMPORTANCE PENELITIAN Komentar mengenai kesesuaian nilai RR/OR/PR dengan disain yang dipergunakan.3 Artinya : pada sample. Confidence interval : 18.income countries mempunyai risiko 18.8 kali lebih 5 .Dilakukan analisis statistik untuk mendapatkan pooled OR Kesesuaian antara disain dan tujuan penelitian : sesuai / tidak sesuai Kesesuaian cara pengukuran dan instrument yang dipergunakan : sesuai/tidak sesuai Kesimpulan : valid / tidak valid (HANYA BERDASARKAN KEDUA KRITERIA DI ATAS) 3. Cara pengukuran (measurement and or melalui search engine assessment) Instrumen yang dipergunakan (instrument) Search engine Metode randomisasi (randomization) Tidak ada Intervensi (intervention) Tidak ada Metode analisis / pengolahan data (analysis Mengumpulkan jurnal yang method) berdesain sama. Sesuaikah pooled OR yang ditemukan dalam pebelitian ini dan disain penelitiannya? OR gabungan = 19.8 – 19.

besar terjangkiti HIV daripada yang bukan MSM. P = 0. Good! Jika anda mempunyai pasien dengan kasus yang sama.05 Artinya = Bila penelitian diulang 100 kali maka yang 95 kali persis hasilnya (dengan yang tadi). Oleh karena itu mereka dapat lebih berhati-hati dalam menjaga dirinya untuk terhindar dari inveksi HIV. * 4. APPLICABILITY (KEMAMPUTERAPAN) Pergunakan item pertimbangan di bawah ini untuk menilai kemamputerapan paper dalam kasus anda Pertimbangan applicability : 4 B Item pertimbangan Keputusan burden of illness (pasien. Yang 5 kebetulan saja sama (by chance). kota) sama/ tidak sama barriers to treatment (ekonomi. MSM dapat menyadari probabilitasnya untuk terjangkit HIV lebih besar daripada mereka yang bukan MSM. geografi) sama/ tidak sama 6 . Karena dengan adanya penelitian ini. bagaimana importance penelitian ini untuk kasus anda ? Penting / tidak penting Alasan : Karena dalam interval CI penelitian ini tidak terdapat angka 1 sehingga penelitian ini penting.

behaviours needed (perilaku kita dan pasien kita) untuk Perlu banyak perubahan mengadopsi Dx. Tx perilaku/ tidak perlu banyak perubahan perilaku balance (pertimbangan untung rugi antara Untung / rugi mengaplikasikan dengan cara yang ada di paper dan cara yang ada dalam kasus) Bagaimana applicability penelitian ini terhadap kasus anda ? Applicable/tidak applicable * = tidak perlu dikerjakan 7 .