fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TSG.2017.2710134, IEEE
Transactions on Smart Grid
1
1949-3053 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TSG.2017.2710134, IEEE
Transactions on Smart Grid
2
IV and Section V, respectively. in system state assessment. The details of the mining process
is explained in the next section. Thus, the next interesting
II. PROPOSED METHODOLOGY finding of this work is that the information from only
The system can be declared as stressed following any generator buses and boundary buses are sufficient to declare
event which may trigger relay mal-operation. The following the system state. In such situation, the number of PMUs
contingencies might make the system stress such as: (i) required will be very less. To summarize the state assessment
generator outage (ii) line outage (iii) line faults. Sometimes, process:
transmission lines remain out of service because of Power system is divided into different coherent
maintenance issues and this can be categorized as planned areas [14],[17],[20];
outage. The concept of relay margin (RM) is reported for the PMUs are assumed to be installed on generator
very first time in [15]. As shown in Fig.1, any contingency buses and boundary buses;
may reduce the RM of a distance relay. Decrease in RM Features which take part in state assessment are
increases the chance of relay mal-operation. Thus, during decided ( , , ) ;
stressed system condition, more bias should be given towards The features are used as input to a RF model (RF-
security aspect of the protection logic. As suggested in [12], 1);
situations in which the load flow converges can be classified Criteria for stressed and Normal system
as Normal. However, if the load flow does not converge, the condition are decided;
corresponding state is categorized as Stressed. In addition to
Development of learning sample;
this, large disturbances such as sudden generator outage, line
Training of RF-1 model followed by testing;
faults and line outage may also affect the RM of distance
relay. These situations may not create a non-convergence
case of load flow solution; however, such situations are also
kept in the stressed category, owing to their impact on RM
of a relay. In this study, following the contingency if RM of
any distance relay of the transmission system attains 1.3 times
reach setting of the zone-3 setting, then the corresponding
situation is declared as stressed condition. The threshold
1.3 is decided considering the trade-off between frequency
of shifting the bias towards security and the minimum time
required for coordinated PL-1 and PL-2 operation.
The next task is to decide the features which will take part in Fig. 1. Relay margin of a distance relay
predicting the system state. The investigation reveals that the
square of the positive sequence voltage magnitude of The next task is to develop algorithm for PL-2. Here, we
generator buses ( ), change in positive sequence voltage have used a recently introduced signal processing tool termed
phase angle of only generator buses
as VMD. The efficient mode decomposition feature of
and change in
VMD along with its robustness in noisy environment make it a
phase angle difference between any two boundary buses i
and j of any two areas ( ) can help in predicting the
suitable candidate for extraction of IMFs of the input signal
[22]. The objective of PL-2 is to correctly identify any power
system state reliably. This finding is also logically correct system event which behaves like a fault condition. Different
considering the fact that any disturbance pertaining to real
power flow will affect and ( ). Similarly, any
power system events such as generator outage, line outage,
line fault etc. often appear similar. This makes event
disturbance which involves change in reactive power flow, classification difficult if the raw PMU data is simply used.
will affect . The reason for considering square of the However, each event leaves its unique footprint on either the
positive sequence voltage is based on the fact that any voltage or frequency waveform of the system. The spectral
deviation from 1p.u. gets magnified and this helps the mining modes obtained through time-frequency resolution based
process. techniques can help in identifying different disturbances
Let us assume that the system under consideration is divided occurring in power system. Thus, the IMFs obtained through
into different coherent areas. The positive sequence voltage VMD help in deriving the features which are further utilized
phasors at the buses connected to the generators and at to distinguish no-fault situation from fault situation. Once the
boundary buses connecting two areas, are provided by the IMFs are obtained following the VMD based pre-processing,
PMUs. It is assumed that each area is coherent following a Hilbert Transform (HT) is applied to each IMF to extract the
contingency and the groups of coherent machines can be analytic signal. The features selected in the proposed study are
found out by applying the existing techniques [14], [17], [20]. the entropy (E) and standard deviation (S.D) of first three
Initially, authors used information from all buses of the IMFs of the input signal. It is to be noticed that the input
system. However, after the rigorous mining process, it was signal for the PL-2 is only the positive sequence voltage
found that very few PMU information are actually taking part magnitude of PMUs installed on the generator and boundary
1949-3053 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TSG.2017.2710134, IEEE
Transactions on Smart Grid
3
buses. Similar to the state assessment process, the buses to be Thus, the proposed scheme ensures systems reliability.
considered for the PL-2 development, was concluded only
after the mining process. Another RF model (RF-2) is used to
predict the fault occurrence, anywhere in the transmission
system.
Figure 2 shows the flow chart of the proposed scheme. It is
inferred from the figure that there are two protection logics
which drives the back-up protection operation of a
transmission line (PL-1 & PL-2). PL-1 is the traditional zone-
3 distance relay and PL-2 is based on wide area information.
The positive sequence voltage magnitudes of the generator
and boundary buses are passed through VMD based pre-
processing tool. The first three IMFs extracted through VMD
are passed through a RF model, which helps in differentiating
fault condition from other power system disturbances.
However, if the system is in normal condition, the bias should
be more towards dependability. Thus, the state assessment
(SA) algorithm can assist in deciding whether the bias should
be more towards dependability or towards security. If the
SA logic detects that the system is in stressed condition,
then both PL-1 and PL-2 must be connected in such a way that
the overall bias of the protection scheme should be towards
security. In order to achieve this objective, the truth table is
drawn as shown in Table I. The following rules are followed
to build the truth table.
If output of SA is 0, it indicates normal operating
condition. Here, the overall bias of the back-up
protection scheme should be towards dependability.
Thus, the output function (F) should follow operation of
PL-1.
If output of SA is 1, it indicates stressed operating
condition. Here, the overall bias of the back-up
protection scheme should be towards security. In this Fig. 2. Conceptual block diagram of the proposed scheme
situation, in order to get a final trip signal, both the
protection logics PL-1 and PL-2 must provide their
output as 1.
Applying the concept of minterm to Table I, the
expression for the final output signal (F) can be
expressed as (1).
= + + (1)
Fig. 3 shows the k-map for the truth table. The final
expression for the output function is shown in (2).
= + (2)
where A, B and C indicate logical output signals from SA,
Fig. 3. K-map for the truth table
PL-1 and PL-2, respectively.
1949-3053 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TSG.2017.2710134, IEEE
Transactions on Smart Grid
4
TABLE I
TRUTH TABLE
SA PL-1 PL-2 Output
(A) (B) (C) Function
(minterms, F)
N 0 0 0 0(m0)
O
R 0 0 1 0(m1)
M 0 1 0 1(m2)
A
0 1 1 1(m3)
L
S 1 0 0 0(m4)
T
R 1 0 1 0(m5)
E
S 1 1 0 0(m6)
S
E 1 1 1 1(m7)
D
1949-3053 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TSG.2017.2710134, IEEE
Transactions on Smart Grid
5
the classification process. Fig. 7 shows the top down introduction of VMD based mode extraction which assist in
importance of variables according to the accuracy loss when identifying a fault situation from other stressed conditions.
0.04
they are respectively removed from or included in the feature
OOB
set. It is observed from the figure that positive sequence 0
voltage angle difference between boundary buses (x61, x58, x39) 1
0.03
classification process. This is the basis on which the optimal
number of features (information from generator bus and
boundary bus) are selected which take part in the SA process.
0.02
Error
As pointed out earlier, 30% of total data set are kept for
testing purpose. These data set are termed as out of bag
(OOB) data set. Fig.8 shows the error characteristics of the
0.01
RF-1 model. In the figure, x-axis represents the number of
trees and y-axis represents the error rate. It is concluded that
the OOB error stabilizes after around 15 trees.
0.00
x61 0 10 20 30 40 50
x55
x35 trees
x58
x48
Fig. 8. Convergence characteristics of OOB test cases
x39
x68
x66
x79
The three primary steps involved in VMD based pre-
x78
x75
processing are as follows: [22]
x80
x70
x81 (i) modes update
x72
x71 (ii) center frequency update
x2
x1 (iii) dual ascent update
x73
x7
x74
x6
(i) Modes update: In VMD, the Wiener Filtering is embedded
x10
x3
in order to update the mode. The process of updating the
x9
modes is accomplished in Fourier domain by tuning a filter to
the center frequency )*
"
.
x4
x8
x5
"- ())
+,*
$ " ())/2)
./()) 2* +, "- ()) 3* +, " ()) + (4
2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0
= ")
(4)
Fig. 6. Degree of correlation between the input features
1 + 28() )*
x61 x58 (ii) Center frequency update: The following equation is used
x39 x61
to update the center frequency.
= "- ())|
: )|+,* <)
x58 x66
x78 x78
)*
"-
= >= (5)
x68 x39
x48 x48
:> |+,*
"- ())| <)
x81 x68
x79 x79
x35 x35
x66 x55
x55 x71
x71 x70
x10 x81
x9 x72 (iii)Dual ascent update: The Lagrangian multiplier is updated
x80 x80
x72
x75
x75
x2
using the following equation.
" "
B+,* +* /+,* < G (7)
-1 0 1 2 3 4 0 5 10 15 20 25
MeanDecreaseAccuracy MeanDecreaseGini "-
Rattle 2017-Jan-18 19:04:10 Manas
1949-3053 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TSG.2017.2710134, IEEE
Transactions on Smart Grid
6
S WV
Actual Predicted Actual Predicted Actual Predicted
IEEE- 1229 1218 6 6 26 26
39 bus
The instantaneous frequency is computed using the following Actual 1 1 1 1 - -
PMU
equation.
YU( )
data
YZ( )
1 +(J) Y +(J) Y I(J)
)(J) = (9)
2X + (J) + I (J)
IV. RESULT ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
Instantaneous amplitude is computed using the following The efficacy of the proposed scheme is further tested for
equation. various operating conditions which led to mal-operations of
(J) = \+ (J) + I (J) (10)
the conventional zone-3 based back-up protection logic. The
results are discussed below.
1) Performance during stressed conditions:
In [22], superiority of VMD over some of the recent signal The effectiveness of the proposed scheme is verified by
processing tools such as wavelet transform (WT), S-transform comparing it to the conventional blinder based schemes. Two
(ST) and empirical mode decomposition (EMD) in terms of concentric polygons blinders are used for power swing
decomposition quality, noise robustness, insensitivity to detection [26], [27] and load blinder [28] is used to block
sampling frequency is explored. This very property of zone-3 operation during load encroachment. The blinder
efficient mode extraction is used in this paper to assist settings detailed in [26], [27] and [28] are used for the test
distance relay in making a secure relaying decision during system. In case of concentric polygons blinders, the inner
stressed condition. Various events such as generator outage, blinder is placed outside the protection zone-3 characteristics.
line outage, line faults give rise to various spectral modes. As suggested in [26], the outer blinder settings are considered
These modes help in classifying different events occurring in to keep 5% security margin resistively away from the possible
the power system. The different modes corresponding to maximum load, and 20% margin reactively away from the
different disturbances can be quantified in terms of statistic- maximum mho relay reach. Settings of the load blinder are
based metrics. In order to achieve the same, the first three referred from [28]. The maximum slip frequency is considered
IMFs of positive sequence voltage signal are used. Further, to be 2 Hz and the minimum block duration is set to be 11ms
entropy (E) and standard deviation corresponding to each IMF [26].
are used as input to RF-2. The RF model is built using the Load encroachment is one of the possible causes behind
rattle software package [23]. The data collection and training relay mal-operations. In order to observe the performance of
process remains same as RF-1. Further, 1229 fault cases, 6 the proposed scheme during load encroachment, the following
generator outage cases and 26 line outage cases are used as steps are followed. Line 26-27 of IEEE-39 bus system is kept
unseen test file to the trained RF-2 model (IEEE-39 bus out of service. This is predicted as stressed condition by RF-
system). It was observed that RF-2 provides a high detection 1. Thus, the distance relays operating in the system are more
accuracy. (Table II). biased towards security. Now, the active and reactive powers
The efficacy of RF-2 is also tested for field data available of load at bus 26 are doubled. This caused dip in voltage and
from the PMUs installed at some strategic locations of the apparent impedance seen by the relay at bus-29 is shown
Northern Indian Grid. Training data is generated by modeling in Fig. 9. It is observed from the figure that the conventional
the Northern Regional Power Grid (NRPG) of Indian Power load blinder is unable to block the zone-3 operation.
system using Siemens commercial simulation software Similarly, power swing is simulated in the IEEE-39 bus
package named Power System Simulation for Engineering system by incepting a 3-phase fault on line 26-28 at 10.8 s
(PSS/E). The reduced NRPG system (220 kV and 400 kV followed by opening of the breaker at 10.88s. The
only) network consists of 246 buses, 376 branches corresponding R-X trajectory for the relay at bus-29 is shown
(lines/transformers) and 40 shunt reactors. The detailed line in Fig. 10. It is inferred from the figure that following the fault
data, bus data and the dynamic data required for the dynamic inception, the impedance locus enters the outer blinder.
modeling of the NRPG system are referred from [24]. However, because of instantaneous rate of change of
However, the testing is carried out on a completely new field impedance during fault situation, the blinder setting does not
data set. An instance of loss of generation is the loss of 2000 classify it as swing. Following removal of fault, the apparent
MW generator occurred at the Rihand Super Thermal Power impedance locus reenters the outer blinder at 11.4s followed
Station (STPS) complex on 1st June 2010 at 23:49 hrs. It was by inner blinder at 11.48s. Thus, this condition is incorrectly
a case of line to ground fault followed by generator outage. identified as an out-of-step phenomena. In both the cases,
Details of the above mentioned incident is reported in [25]. zone-3 at bus-29 mal-operates. The performance of the
Both the incidents are correctly predicted by RF-2. Table II proposed scheme is depicted in Table III. It is observed that
details the performance of RF-2 with respect to event RF-1 predicted the system as stressed condition. Thus, the
detection. back-up protection operation follows the logic presented in
Fig. 3. As RF-2 does not give any trip signal in both the
1949-3053 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TSG.2017.2710134, IEEE
Transactions on Smart Grid
7
Reactance X (p.u.)
The test cases are simulated by initiating different (N-1)
contingencies (sudden loss of generation or transmission line)
and fault situations at various operating points. The loads are
varied from 90% to 200%. The objective is to induce zone-3
mal-operations due to load encroachment and stable swing
condition. Out of 2112 mal-operations, 1194 cases are due to
stable swing condition and the rest 918 cases are due to load
encroachment. It is observed that the proposed scheme could
able to avert 2092 cases of mal-operations. A new index
termed as Blocking efficiency (BE) is introduced in this
paper. BE is defined as follows.
`abcd efghijk al jidcm gcdanijcboaek cpijbiq
BE =
`abcd efghijk al jidcm gcdanijcboaek
(11) Fig. 10. Impact of power swing on relay at bus-29
TABLE III
PERFORMANCE OF PROPOSED SCHEME TO BLOCK RELAY AT BUS-29
Cases SA output Zone-3 at RF-2 output Final output
bus-29
Load 1 1 0 0
encroachment
Power swing 1 1 0 0
Generator 1 0 0 0
outage at bus-
38
Line outage 1 0 0 0
at 26-27
TABLE IV
OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF PROPOSED SCHEME
Stressed PL-1 PL-1 Mal-op. BE of the BE of
scenarios Mal-op. Mal-op. averted Blinder the
(2112) (without averted by PL-2 based proposed
blinders) with scheme scheme
blinders) (%) (%)
Stable swing 1194 606 1190 50.75 99.66
(1194)
Fig. 9. Impact of load encroachment on relay at bus-29 Load 918 513 902 55.88 98.257
Encroachment
We observed that PL-1 declares all 1194 stable swing (918)
scenarios as fault situations (without blinder operation)
whereas PL-2 declares 1190 cases as no-fault scenarios (4 2) Performance comparison between Data-mining techniques:
numbers of mal-operation). When concentric polygon blinders The performance assessment of the PL-2 developed using
are included in the distance relay modeling, only 606 cases of different data-mining tools such as neural network (NN),
zone-3 mal-operations are prevented. Similarly, out of 918 support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT) and
load encroachment cases, 902 cases are declared as no-fault random forest (RF) is depicted in Table V (NRPG-246 bus
conditions by PL-2 and only 513 cases of zone-3 mal- system). It is observed that the black box models such as NN
operations are avoided by load blinders. The main drawback and SVM show poor classification accuracy. In particular,
of blinder based scheme is to find the settings for blocking fault cases are mostly misclassified. Even though DT shows
during stable power swing and tripping during unstable power improved classification accuracy, however, it is very difficult
swings. It requires detailed stability studies of the system for for a single decision tree to capture the signature of each and
various contingency conditions [26]-[28]. The proposed every event accurately, particularly when lesser PMU
scheme provides much improved BE compared to the measurements are available. Even though DTs are more
conventional blinder based scheme. Table IV depicts the transparent, authors have opted for RF giving more priority to
detailed results. accuracy.
1949-3053 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TSG.2017.2710134, IEEE
Transactions on Smart Grid
8
1949-3053 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TSG.2017.2710134, IEEE
Transactions on Smart Grid
9
Northern Regional Load Dispatch Centre (NRLDC) of IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 144-158, Sept.
2010.
Power Grid Corporation of India, for sharing the PMU [20] S. Yusof, G. Rogers, and R. Alden, "Slow coherency based network
information recorded in their system. Author M. K. Jena partitioning including load buses," IEEE Transactions on Power
gratefully acknowledges the financial and technical support Systems, vol. 8, pp. 1375-1382, 1993.
[21] IEEE. (2 april 2014). New England 10 Generators 39 Busses Test
received from Dr. Nilanjan Senroy of Indian Institute of
System. Available: http://sys.elec.kitami-it.ac.jp/ueda/demo/WebPF/39-
Technology Delhi, India. New-England.pdf
[22] K. Dragomiretskiy and D. Zosso, "Variational Mode Decomposition,"
VII. REFERENCES IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 531-544,
Feb.1, 2014.
[1] G. Andersson et al., "Causes of the 2003 major grid blackouts in North [23] Rattle (the R Analytical Tool to Learn Easily), by D.Williams, ver. May
America and Europe, and recommended means to improve system 2008. [Online]. Available: http://rattle.togaware.com/
dynamic performance," in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. [24] [online],NRPG data, http:// www.iitk.ac.in/ eeold/facilities/ Research_
20, no. 4, pp. 1922-1928, Nov. 2005. labs/ Power_System/ NRPG-DATA.pdf, accessed 16 Oct 2015.
[2] S. H. Horowitz and A. G. Phadke, "Blackouts and relaying [25] A. Prince, N. Senroy and R. Balasubramanian, "Targeted approach to
considerations - Relaying philosophies and the future of relay systems," apply masking signal-based empirical mode decomposition for mode
IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 60-67, Sept.-Oct. identification from dynamic power system wide area measurement
2006. signal data," IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 5, no.
[3] (2012). Report of the Enquiry Committee on Grid Disturbance in 10, pp. 1025-1032, October 2011.
Northern Region on 30 July 2012 and in Northern, Eastern and North [26] M. McDonald et al., IEEE PSRC Working Group D6, Power swing and
Eastern Region on 31 July 2012 New Delhi, India. [Online]. Available: out-of-step considerations on transmission lines, Jun. 2005.
http://powermin.nic.in/upload/pdf/GRID ENQ REP 16 8 12.pdf, [27] D. Kang and R. Gokaraju, "A New Method for Blocking Third-Zone
accessed Aug. 20, 2012 Distance Relays During Stable Power Swings," IEEE Transactions on
[4] V. Rampurkar, P. Pentayya, H. A. Mangalvedekar and F. Kazi, Power Delivery, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1836-1843, Aug. 2016.
"Cascading Failure Analysis for Indian Power Grid," in IEEE [28] [online],http://www.erlphase.com/downloads/application_notes/Perform
Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1951-1960, July 2016. ing_Load_Encroachment_with_an_LPRO.pdf
[5] S. H. Horowitz and A. G. Phadke, "Third zone revisited," IEEE [29] IEEE PSRC Working Group D4, Application of overreaching distance
Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 23-29, Jan. 2006. relays, 2009.
[6] K. Seethalekshmi, S. N. Singh and S. C. Srivastava, "Synchrophasor [30] A. G. Phadke and J. S. Thorp, Communication needs for wide area
Assisted Adaptive Reach Setting of Distance Relays in Presence of measurement applications, presented at the 5th Critical Infrastruct. Int.
UPFC," IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 396-405, Sept. 2011. Conf., Beijing, China, Sep. 2010.
[7] K. Seethalekshmi, S. N. Singh and S. C. Srivastava, "A Classification [31] I. Kamwa, L. Geoffroy, S. R. Samantaray and A. Jain," Synchrophasors
Approach Using Support Vector Machines to Prevent Distance Relay data analytics framework for power grid control and dynamic stability
Maloperation Under Power Swing and Voltage Instability," IEEE monitoring," IET Engg. And Technol. Reference, (early access).
Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1124-1133, July [32] S. A. Lavand and S. A. Soman, "Predictive Analytic to Supervise Zone 1
2012. of Distance Relay Using Synchrophasors," IEEE Transactions on Power
[8] M. M. Eissa, M. E. Masoud and M. M. M. Elanwar, "A Novel Back Up Delivery, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1844-1854, Aug. 2016.
Wide Area Protection Technique for Power Transmission Grids Using
Phasor Measurement Unit," IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol.
25, no. 1, pp. 270-278, Jan. 2010.
[9] Paresh Kumar Nayak, Ashok Kumar Pradhan and P. Bajpai, Wide- BIOGRAPHIES
area measurement-based back-up protection for power network with Manas Kumar Jena received the B.Tech. degree in
series compensation, IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol.29, no. 4, pp. 1970 electrical and electronics engineering from the Silicon
1977, Aug. 2014. Institute of Technology, Bhubaneswar, India, in 2011. He
[10] M. K. Jena, S. R. Samantaray, B. K. Panigrahi, "A New Wide-Area is currently working towards PhD degree in the
Backup Protection Scheme for Series-Compensated Transmission Department of Electrical Engineering at the Indian
System," IEEE Systems Journal , vol. PP, no.99, pp.1-11. Institute of Technology, Delhi, India.
[11] S. H. Horowitz, A. G. Phadke and J. S. Thorpe, "Adaptive transmission
system relaying," IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 3, no. 4, S. R. Samantaray(M08SM10) received the B.Tech. in
pp. 1436-1445, Oct 1988. electrical engineering from UCE Burla, India, in 1999 and
[12] E. E. Bernabeu, J. S. Thorp and V. Centeno, "Methodology for a thePh.D. in power system engineering from the Department
Security/Dependability Adaptive Protection Scheme Based on Data of Electronics and Communication Engineering, National
Mining," IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 104- Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India, in 2007. Dr.
111, Jan. 2012. Samantaray holds the position of Associate Professor in the
[13] R. D. Quint and M. K. Thomas, "Implementation of an Adaptive Voting School of Electrical Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar,
Scheme using synchronized phasor measurements," Southeastcon, 2012 India.
Proceedings of IEEE, Orlando, FL, 2012, pp. 1-6. He serves as Editor of IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, Associate Editor
[14] J. H. Chow, Power system coherency and model reduction: Springer, of IET, Generation, Transmission & Distribution.
2013.
[15] F. Dobraca, M.A. Pai, P.W. Sauer, Relay margin as a tool for dynamic Bijaya Ketan Panigrahi (SM06) received the Ph.D.
security analysis, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 12, no.4, pp. degree from Sambalpur University, Sambalpur, India, in
226-234, Oct. 1990. 2004. He is a Professor with the Department of Electrical
[16] L. Breiman and A. Cutler, "Random forests," Machine learning, vol. 45, Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), New
pp. 5-32, 2001. Delhi, India. His research interests include digital signal
[17] H. Supreme, A. Dessaint, I. Kamwa A. Heniche-Oussedik, processing, power quality assessment, and application of
"Development of New Predictors Based on the Concept of Center of soft computing techniques to power system.
Power for Transient and Dynamic Instability Detection," IEEE He serves as Associate Editor of IEEE Systems Journal.
Transactions on Smart Grid , vol.PP, no.99, pp.1-1.
[18] I. Kamwa, S. R. Samantaray and G. Joos, "On the Accuracy Versus
Transparency Trade-Off of Data-Mining Models for Fast-Response
PMU-Based Catastrophe Predictors," IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid,
vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 152-161, March 2012.
[19] I. Kamwa, S. R. Samantaray and G. Joos, "Catastrophe Predictors From
Ensemble Decision-Tree Learning of Wide-Area Severity Indices,"
1949-3053 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.