Design of Abutment
MJB 1 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
0.2
0.18 2.325
0.12
0.35
0.3
15.1
0.3
0.31
0.000
HFL= 95.5
1.300
GL= 90.004
1.400
8.500
MJB 2 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
CONTENTS
ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A SEISMIC DATA A-1
ANNEXURE B CALCULATION OF EARTH PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS B-1
ANNEXURE C CALCULATION OF EARTH PRESSURE C-1
ANNEXURE D CALCULATION OF BUOYANCY D-1
ANNEXURE E CALCULATION OF LONGITUDINAL FORCES AND E-1
TRANSVERSE MOMENT
MJB 3 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
CHAPTER - 1
Introduction
Consultancy Services for preperation of Feasibility cum Detailed Project Report for proposed
High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river with appraoch Road in Kapali to SuwarnRekha
river(on Kanderbera-Domuhani road) in state of Jharkhand (2nd bridge)
Code of reference
IRC: 5-1997
IRC: 6-2010
IRC: 21-2000
IRC: 78-2000
IS: 6403-1981
MJB 4 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
CHAPTER - 2
Design Data
MJB 5 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
2.5 Soil Data
Cohesion of Soil c.soil 0.000
Angle of internal friction .soil 36.000
Safe Bearing Capacity of soil in normal case sbc.n 1500.000
Safe Bearing Capacity of soil in seismic case sbc.s 1875.000
MJB 6 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
CHAPTER - 4
Calculation of Loads on Foundation
Normal Seismic
Against overturning fos.n.ot 2.00 fos.s.ot 1.50
Against sliding fos.n.sl 1.50 fos.s.sl 1.25
Against deep-seated failure fos.n.df 1.25 fos.s.df 1.15
MJB 7 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
4.2 Calculation of loads on foundation
4.2.1 Normal case
4.2.1.1 Calculation of forces at base of footing in normal case
2 Horizontal Load
2.1 LL surcharge 1120 7.550 8455
2.2a Braking max reaction case 257 12.700 3268
2.2b Braking max trans. moment case 257 12.700 3268
2.3a Earth Pressure LWL 6583 5.578 36719
2.3b Earth Pressure HFL 5353 5.487 29373
Note: All calculations has been done about centre line of abutment shaft.
4.2.1.2 Summary of forces & moments at base of footing for normal case
MJB 8 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
4.2.1.3 Check for stability
4.2.1.3.1 Check for overturning
4.2.1.3.1a LWL case
overturning resistning
S.No. Description moment moment FOS Check
about base about toe
1 LL max reaction case 48441 -161898 3.34 safe
2 LL max trans. moment case 48441 -161353 3.33 safe
3 Span dislodged 36719 -136428 3.72 safe
overturning resistning
S.No. Description moment moment FOS Check
about base about toe
1 LL max reaction case 41095 -148925 3.62 safe
2 LL max trans. moment case 41095 -148380 3.61 safe
3 Span dislodged 29373 -123455 4.20 safe
Horizontal
S.No. Description Vertical load FOS Check
load
1 LL max reaction case 33233 7960 2.92 safe
2 LL max trans. moment case 33091 7960 2.91 safe
3 Span dislodged 26617 6583 2.83 safe
Horizontal
S.No. Description Vertical load FOS Check
load
1 LL max reaction case 33205 6731 3.45 safe
2 LL max trans. moment case 33063 6731 3.44 safe
3 Span dislodged 26590 5353 3.48 safe
MJB 9 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
4.2.2 Seismic case
4.2.2.1 Calculation of forces at base of footing in seismic case
Seismic Seismic
S.No. Description Vertical load Lateral force
lever arm moment
1 Due to Vertical Load
1.1 DL+SDL reaction 5430 869 12.700 11034
1.2 Dirt wall 330 26 13.725 362
1.3 Abutment cap 613 49 11.867 582
1.4 Abutment shaft 4810 385 6.725 2588
1.5 Return wall 1360 109 8.900 968
1.6 Fly wing 0 0 15.100 0
1.7 Approach slab 420 34 14.950 502
1.8a LL max vertical load case 1186 95 12.700 1205
1.8b LL max trans. moment case 1044 84 12.700 1061
4.2.2.2 Summary of forces at base of footing in seismic longitudinal and transverse case
Longitudinal Transverse
S.No. Description
HL ML HT MT
1 Due to Vertical Load
1.1 Superstructure DL+SDL 869 11034 434 5517
1.2 Substructure DL 603 5003 603 5003
1.3a LL max vertical load case 0 0 95 1205
1.3b LL max trans. moment case 0 0 84 1061
4.2.2.3 Summary of seismic design forces at base of footing as per IRC:6-2010, Cl. 219.4
Longitudinal Transverse
S.No. Description
HL ML HT MT
1 Due to Vertical Load
1.1 Superstructure DL+SDL 999 12689 695 8827
1.2 Substructure DL 783 6504 783 6504
1.3a LL max vertical load case 28 361 95 1205
1.3b LL max trans. moment case 25 318 84 1061
MJB 10 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
4.2.2.4 Calculation of Forces at base of footing in seismic case
MJB 11 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
4.2.2.5 Summary of forces & moments at base of footing for seismic case
4.2.2.5.1a Longitudinal case (in the direction of earth pressure)
2 HFL Case
2.1 LL max reaction case 32257 8913 41369 626
2.2 LL max trans. moment case 32228 8909 41326 626
2.3 Span dislodged 26590 7494 24504
2 HFL Case
2.1 LL max reaction case 32257 -1978 0 626
2.2 LL max trans. moment case 32228 -1975 0 626
2.3 Span dislodged 26590 -783 0
4.2.2.5.2a Transverse case (additive with longitudinal effect in the direction of earth pressure)
2 HFL Case
2.1 LL max reaction case 32257 1573 22177 17161
2.2 LL max trans. moment case 32228 1562 22134 17017
2.3 Span dislodged 26590 783 18000
4.2.2.5.2b Transverse case (additive with longitudinal effect in the opposite direction of earth pressure)
2 HFL Case
2.1 LL max reaction case 32257 1573 0 17161
2.2 LL max trans. moment case 32228 1562 0 17017
2.3 Span dislodged 26590 783 0
MJB 12 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
4.2.2.6 Check for stability
4.2.2.6.1 Check for overturning
4.2.2.6.1a Longitudinal case (in the direction of earth pressure)
overturning resistning
S.No. Description moment moment FOS Check
about base about toe
1 LWL Case
1.1 LL max reaction case 70825 -158246 2.23 safe
1.2 LL max trans. moment case 70782 -158137 2.23 safe
1.3 Span dislodged 47456 -129925 2.74 safe
2 HFL Case
2.1 LL max reaction case 62455 -145273 2.33 safe
2.2 LL max trans. moment case 62412 -145164 2.33 safe
2.3 Span dislodged 39086 -116952 2.99 safe
Horizontal
S.No. Description Vertical load FOS Check
load
1 LWL Case
1.1 LL max reaction case 32284 10454 2.16 safe
1.2 LL max trans. moment case 32256 10450 2.16 safe
1.3 Span dislodged 26617 9035 2.06 safe
2 HFL Case
2.1 LL max reaction case 32257 8913 2.53 safe
2.2 LL max trans. moment case 32228 8909 2.53 safe
2.3 Span dislodged 26590 7494 2.48 safe
2 HFL Case
2.1 LL max reaction case 32257 1.62 90.12 384.24
2.2 LL max trans. moment case 32228 1.62 90.06 383.89
2.3 Span dislodged 26590 1.26 103.43 287.59
MJB 13 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
4.2.2.7.1b Longitudinal case (in the opposite direction of earth pressure)
2 HFL Case
2.1 LL max reaction case 32257 0.33 204.19 270.17
2.2 LL max trans. moment case 32228 0.33 204.01 269.94
2.3 Span dislodged 26590 0.33 171.00 220.03
4.2.2.7.2a Transverse case (additive with longitudinal effect in the direction of earth pressure)
2 HFL Case
2.1 LL max reaction case 32257 1.02 57.22 417.14
2.2 LL max trans. moment case 32228 1.02 57.90 416.04
2.3 Span dislodged 26590 1.01 121.36 269.66
4.2.2.7.2b Transverse case (additive with longitudinal effect in the opposite direction of earth pressure)
2 HFL Case
2.1 LL max reaction case 32257 0.33 118.37 355.99
2.2 LL max trans. moment case 32228 0.33 118.94 355.01
2.3 Span dislodged 26590 0.33 171.00 220.03
MJB 14 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
4.2.2.7 Summary of Base Pressure
S.No. Description Min. Base pr. at heel Max. Base pr. at toe
LWL HFL LWL HFL
1 Normal case
1.1 Service condition 156.61 141.21 331.19 346.19
1.2 Span dislodged 163.55 148.14 227.88 242.88
2 Seismic case
2.1 Longitudinal case a
2.1.1 Service condition 102.64 90.06 372.07 384.24
2.1.2 Span dislodged 116.01 103.43 275.42 287.59
MJB 15 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
CHAPTER - 5
Design of Foundation
Material Property
Grade of concrete f.f ck 35
Permissible bending strength of concrete f. cbc 11.67
Grade of flexure reinforcement f.f y .fl 500
Grade of shear reinforcement f.f y .sh 415
Permissible tensile strength of flexure reinforcement f. st .fl 240
Permissible tensile strength of shear reinforcement f. st .sh 200
Modulus of elsticity of concrete f.E c 3.15E+04
Modulus of elsticity of reinforcement f.E s 2.00E+05
Modular ratio f.m 10.000
clear cover f.ccov 0.075
Design constants:
neutral axis depth factor k =1 / (1 + st / m cbc ) f.k 0.33
lever arm facror j = 1 - k/3 f.j 0.89
moment of resistance factor Q = 0.5 cbc . jk f.Q 1.70
Normal case
LWL Case 156.6 238.8 265.5 306.8 331.2
HFL Case 141.2 237.7 269.0 317.6 346.2
Seismic case
LWL Case 69.8 227.5 278.8 358.1 405.0
HFL Case 57.2 226.6 281.6 366.9 417.1
MJB 16 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
5.3 Design of Foundation (per unit width)
5.3.1 Toe Slab
5.3.1.1 Design for Flexure
Normal Seismic
Component unit
LWL HFL LWL HFL
Tension reinforcement
Bending moment
due to base pressure kN-m -1584 -1641 -1858 -1905
due to self weight kN-m 166 141 166 141
due to water over toe kN-m 190 461 190 461
Distribution reinforcement
design bending moment kN-m -307 -260 -376 -326
dia of bar mm 16 16 16 16
effective depth available mm 1992 1992 1992 1992
required area of reinforcement mm2 720 610 588 510
minimum area of reinforcement mm2 1195 1195 1195 1195
required spacing of reinforcement mm 168 168 168 168
provided spacing of reinforcement mm 150 150 150 150
5.3.1.2 Check for Shear (at critical section, at a distance of effective depth)
Normal Seismic
Component unit
LWL HFL LWL HFL
shear force due to base pressure kN 379 394 406 415
shear force due to self weight kN -45 -38 -45 -38
shear force due to water over toe kN -44 -107 -44 -107
MJB 17 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
5.3.2 Heel Slab
5.3.2.1 Design for Flexure
Normal Seismic
Component unit
LWL HFL LWL HFL
Tension reinforcement
Bending moment
due to backfill/ return wall kN-m -2142 -1573 -2142 -1573
due to self weight kN-m -260 -221 -260 -221
due to base pressure kN-m 1472 1387 979 909
Distribution reinforcement
design bending moment kN-m -232 -102 -356 -221
dia of bar mm 16 16 16 16
effective depth available mm 1997 1997 1997 1997
required area of reinforcement mm2 544 238 555 345
minimum area of reinforcement mm2 1198 1198 1198 1198
required spacing of reinforcement mm 168 168 168 168
provided spacing of reinforcement mm 150 150 150 150
Normal Seismic
Component unit
LWL HFL LWL HFL
Shear force
due to backfill/ return wall kN -1106 -891 -1106 -891
due to self weight kN -150 -128 -150 -128
due to base pressure kN 791 758 595 568
MJB 18 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
CHAPTER - 3
Calculation of Loads on Abutment
2 Horizontal Load
2.1 LL surcharge 964 6.500 6267
2.2a Braking max rea./ ver. load case 257 10.600 2727
2.2b Braking max trans. moment case 257 10.600 2727
2.3a Earth Pressure LWL 5034 4.877 24548
2.3b Earth Pressure HFL 4110 4.736 19463
Note: All calculations has been done about centre line of abutment shaft.
3.1.2 Summary of forces & moments at base of abutment shaft for normal case
MJB 19 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
3.2 Seismic case
3.2.1 Calculation of forces at base of abutment shaft in seismic case
Seismic Seismic
S.No. Description Vertical load Lateral force
lever arm moment
1 Due to Vertical Load
1.1 DL+SDL reaction 5430 869 10.600 9209
1.2 Dirt wall 330 26 11.625 307
1.3 Abutment cap 613 49 9.767 479
1.4 Abutment shaft 4810 385 4.625 1780
1.5 Return wall 1360 109 6.800 740
1.6 Fly wing 0 0 13.000 0
1.7a LL max vertical load case 750 60 10.600 636
1.7b LL max trans. moment case 750 60 10.600 636
3.2.2 Summary of forces at base of abutment shaft in seismic longitudinal and transverse case
Longitudinal Transverse
S.No. Description
HL ML HT MT
1 Due to Vertical Load
1.1 Superstructure DL+SDL 869 9209 434 4605
1.2 Substructure DL 569 3305 569 3305
1.3a LL max vertical load case 0 0 60 636
1.3b LL max trans. moment case 0 0 60 636
3.2.3 Summary of seismic design forces at base of abutment shaft as per IRC:6-2010, Cl. 219.4
Longitudinal Transverse
S.No. Description
HL ML HT MT
1 Due to Vertical Load
1.1 Superstructure DL+SDL 999 10590 695 7367
1.2 Substructure DL 740 4297 740 4297
1.3a LL max vertical load case 18 191 60 636
1.3b LL max trans. moment case 18 191 60 636
MJB 20 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
3.2.4 Calculation of Forces at base of abutment shaft in seismic case
3.2.4.1a Longitudinal case (in the direction of earth pressure)
MJB 21 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
3.2.5 Summary of forces & moments at base of abutment shaft for seismic case
3.2.5.1a Longitudinal case (in the direction of earth pressure)
2 HFL Case
2.1 LL max reaction case 11082 7268 39938 626
2.2 LL max trans. moment case 11053 7268 39938 626
2.3 Span dislodged 5415 5891 26130
2 HFL Case
2.1 LL max reaction case 11082 0 0 626
2.2 LL max trans. moment case 11053 0 0 626
2.3 Span dislodged 5415 0 0
3.2.5.2a Transverse case (additive with longitudinal effect in the direction of earth pressure)
2 HFL Case
2.1 LL max reaction case 11082 1495 25051 12926
2.2 LL max trans. moment case 11053 1495 25051 12926
2.3 Span dislodged 5415 740 21833
3.2.5.2b Transverse case (additive with longitudinal effect in the opposite direction of earth pressure)
2 HFL Case
2.1 LL max reaction case 11082 1495 0 12926
2.2 LL max trans. moment case 11053 1495 0 12926
2.3 Span dislodged 5415 740 0
MJB 22 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
CHAPTER - 6
Design of Abutment
Dimensional Data
Abutment width a.wid 16.000
Abutment shaft thickness a.thk 1.300
Abutment shaft height a.ht 9.250
Material Property
Grade of concrete a.f ck 35
Permissible bending strength of concrete a. cbc 11.67
Grade of flexure reinforcement a.f y .fl 500
Grade of shear reinforcement a.f y .sh 415
Permissible tensile strength of flexure reinforcement a. st .fl 240
Permissible tensile strength of shear reinforcement a. st .sh 200
Modulus of elsticity of concrete a.E c 3.15E+04
Modulus of elsticity of reinforcement a.E s 2.00E+05
Modular ratio a.m 10.000
clear cover a.ccov 0.050
Reinforcement Details:
MJB 23 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
6.2 Design of Abutment Shaft
6.2.1 Design for Flexure
6.2.1.1 BIAX Input
* Suwarnrekha river
9 10.00 10.00
*
A-Fix: Normal 01 - max reaction case (case 01)
1.3 16 0 0 1223 2967 313 116.7 2400.0 0
A-Fix: Normal 02 - max transverse moment case (case 02)
1.3 16 0 0 1209 2967 313 116.7 2400.0 0
A-Fix: Normal 03 - span dislodge case (case 03)
1.3 16 0 0 561 2067 1 116.7 2400.0 0
A-Fix: Seismic longitudinal 01 - max reaction case (case 04)
1.3 16 0 0 1128 4579 63 175.0 3600.0 0
A-Fix: Seismic longitudinal 02 - max transverse moment case (case 05)
1.3 16 0 0 1125 4579 63 175.0 3600.0 0
A-Fix: Seismic longitudinal 03 - span dislodge case (case 06)
1.3 16 0 0 561 3198 1 175.0 3600.0 0
A-Fix: Seismic transverse 01 - max reaction case (case 07)
1.3 16 0 0 1128 3090 1293 175.0 3600.0 0
A-Fix: Seismic transverse 02 - max transverse moment case (case 08)
1.3 16 0 0 1125 3090 1293 175.0 3600.0 0
A-Fix: Seismic transverse 03 - span dislodge case (case 09)
1.3 16 0 0 561 2769 1 175.0 3600.0 0
MJB 24 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
MJB 25 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
MJB 26 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
MJB 27 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
MJB 28 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
6.2.1.3 Stress Summary
2 Seismic longitudinal
2.1 LL max reaction case 141.55 3475.18 14.16 347.52
2.2 LL max trans. moment case 141.54 3476.44 14.15 347.64
2.3 Span dislodged 97.83 2523.69 9.78 252.37
3 Seismic transverse
3.1 LL max reaction case 102.81 2253.01 10.28 225.30
3.2 LL max trans. moment case 102.80 2254.28 10.28 225.43
3.3 Span dislodged 84.93 2150.57 8.49 215.06
Normal Seismic
Load Case unit
Longitudinal Longitudinal Transverse
MJB 29 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
6.3 Design of Abutment Cap (by STM)
6.3.1 Design Data
Material Property
Grade of concrete c.f ck 35
Permissible bending strength of concrete c. cbc 11.67
Grade of shear reinforcement c.f y .sh 500
Permissible tensile strength of shear reinforcement c. st .sh 240
6.3.3 Design
MJB 30 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
CHAPTER - 7
Design of Dirt wall
Dimensional Data
Dirtwall thickness dw.thk 0.300
Dirtwall height dw.ht 2.750
Material Property
Grade of concrete dw.f ck 35
Permissible bending strength of concrete dw. cbc 11.67
Grade of flexure reinforcement dw.f y .fl 500
Grade of shear reinforcement dw.f y .sh 415
Permissible tensile strength of flexure reinforcement dw. st .fl 240
Permissible tensile strength of shear reinforcement dw. st .sh 200
Modulus of elsticity of concrete dw.E c 3.15E+04
Modulus of elsticity of reinforcement dw.E s 2.00E+05
Modular ratio dw.m 10.000
clear cover dw.ccov 0.050
Design constants:
neutral axis depth factor dw.k 0.33
lever arm facror dw.j 0.89
moment of resistance factor dw.Q 1.70
reinf. on reinf. on
dist. reinf.
Component unit earth face inner face
(vertical) (vertical) (horizontal)
design bending moment kN-m 69 34 21
effective depth required mm 201 142 110
dia of bar mm 16 10 10
effective depth available mm 242 245 245
required area of reinforcement mm2 1333 658 395
minimum area of reinforcement mm2 290 294 250
required spacing of reinforcement mm 151 119 199
provided spacing of reinforcement mm 125 110 180
MJB 31 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
CHAPTER - 8
Design of Return wall
The End Return Wall has been designed as a plate, fixed on its two faces i.e. at the base and on one of
its vertical sides with reference by Roark & Young (Table 26 of Formula of Stress & Strain).
Dimensional Data
Return wall thickness rw.thk 0.500
Return wall height rw.ht 13.600
Material Property
Grade of concrete rw.f ck 35
Permissible bending strength of concrete rw. cbc 11.67
Grade of flexure reinforcement rw.f y .fl 500
Grade of shear reinforcement rw.f y .sh 415
Permissible tensile strength of flexure reinforcement rw. st .fl 240
Permissible tensile strength of shear reinforcement rw. st .sh 200
Modulus of elsticity of concrete rw.E c 3.15E+04
Modulus of elsticity of reinforcement rw.E s 2.00E+05
Modular ratio rw.m 10.000
clear cover rw.ccov 0.075
Design constants:
neutral axis depth factor rw.k 0.33
lever arm facror rw.j 0.89
moment of resistance factor rw.Q 1.70
b
Y -dir
Loading 1 2 1 2
For uniform load over entire plate 0.173 0.247 0.540 0.320
For linearly varying load over entire plate 0.137 0.114 0.378 0.211
MJB 32 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
8.2 Analysis
load
b a MX MY
Component intensity
(kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN-m) (kN-m)
LL surcharge 4.63 -594 -846 -98.94 -479.17
Earth pressure 52.53 -5322 -4444 -887.01 -2518.37
load
R1 R2 FX FY
Component intensity
(kN*m2) (kN/m) (kN/m) (kN) (kN)
LL surcharge 4.63 34.02 20.16 136.07 274.18
Earth pressure 52.53 269.75 151.08 1079.01 2054.63
8.3 Design
8.3.1 Design for Flexure
Design face
Component unit
A'-B' (MX) B-B' (MY)
design bending moment kN-m -986 -2998
effective depth required mm 381 360
dia of bar mm 25 16
effective depth available mm 412.5 417
required area of reinforcement mm2 11178 33617
minimum area of reinforcement mm2 1980 6805
required spacing of reinforcement mm 176 81
provided spacing of reinforcement mm 120 75
Check for
Component unit
FX FY
Shear force kN 1215 2329
area of tension reinforcement mm2 16362 36459
percentage of tension reinforcement % 0.99 0.64
permissible shear stress MPa 0.41 0.36
permissible shear force kN 674 2017
design shear force kN 541 311
MJB 33 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
Annexure - A
Seismic Data
Z I Sa
h
2 R g
where,
Zone factor Z 0.16
Importance factor I 1.20
Response reduction factor R 3.00
Spectral accn coefficient in x - direction S a /g.x 2.50
Spectral accn coefficient in z - direction S a /g.z 2.50
Spectral accn coefficient in y - direction S a /g.y 2.50
MJB 34 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
Annexure - B
Calculation of earth pressure coefficients
2
1 Av cos 2 1
Ca x 1/ 2
cos cos cos
1 sin sin i
2
cos i sin
2
1 Av cos 2 1
Cp x 1/ 2
cos cos cos
2
sin sin i
1
cos i sin
where
angle of internal friction of soil
angle which earth face of the wall makes with the vertical
i slope of earthfill
angle of friction between the wall and earthfill
Ah horizontal seismic coefficient
Av vertical seismic coefficient
Ah
tan 1
1 Av
here Ah 0.08
Av 0.05
Solving
Dynamic design dynamic static dynamic
max min
Coefficient coefficient coefficient change
Ca 0.29 0.27 0.29 0.23 0.06
Cp 10.98 9.80 9.80 11.15 -1.35
MJB 35 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
Annexure - C
Calculation of earth pressure
Earth pressure has been calculated separately for dry soil and submerged soil. The point of application of resultant
of earth pressure in terms of fraction of total height has been assumed as below:
Dry Submerged
Static condition
Triangular pressure f.a.d.1 0.42 f.a.s.1 0.33
Uniform pressure f.a.d.2 0.50 f.a.s.2 0.50
Seismic condition
(on dynamic incr. only)
Triangular pressure f.a.d.3 0.50 f.a.s.3 0.50
Uniform pressure f.a.d.4 0.66 f.a.s.4 0.66
Dry Submerged
Static condition
Triangular pressure f.p.d.1 0.33 f.p.s.1 0.33
Uniform pressure f.p.d.2 0.50 f.p.s.2 0.50
Seismic condition
(on dynamic decr. only)
Triangular pressure f.p.d.3 0.66 f.p.s.3 0.66
Uniform pressure f.p.d.4 0.66 f.p.s.4 0.66
MJB 36 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
C.2 Calculation of earth pressure at base of abutment shaft
C.2.1 For active earth pressure
C.2.1.1 LWL case
MJB 37 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
C.3.1.2 HFL case
At base of foundation
LWL case 6583 36719 1669 10737 8251 47456
HFL case 5353 29373 1357 9712 6710 39086
At base of foundation
LWL case 312364 1636326 -37852 -269499 ######## 1366826
HFL case 254025 1385333 -30783 -243747 ######## 1141586
MJB 38 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
Annexure - D
Calculation of Buoyancy
D.1 Calculation of buoyancy at base of abutment shaft along centre line shaft
weight of
Moment
S.No. Component concrete Buoyancy eccn
(ML)
submerged
1 LWL Case
1.1 Abutment cap 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0
1.2 Abutment shaft 1926.1 -115.6 0.0 0.0
1.3 Return wall 430.4 -25.8 -2.7 68.4
2 HFL Case
2.1 Abutment cap 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0
2.2 Abutment shaft 4680.0 -280.8 0.0 0.0
2.3 Return wall 960.0 -57.6 -2.7 152.6
weight of
concrete/ Moment
S.No. Component Buoyancy eccn
soil (ML)
submerged
1 LWL Case
1.1 Substructure 2356.5 -141.4 -0.1 21.2
1.2 Backfill 4648.3 -2065.9 -2.7 5474.7
1.3 Soil weight over toe 3782.2 -1681.0 2.3 -3782.2
1.4 Footing 5412.0 -324.7 -0.3 108.6
2 HFL Case
2.1 Substructure 5640.0 -338.4 -0.1 50.6
2.2 Backfill 10368.0 -4608.0 -2.7 12211.2
2.3 Soil weight over toe 3782.2 -1681.0 2.3 -3782.2
2.4 Footing 5412.0 -324.7 -0.3 108.6
Note: Buoyancy effect through pore pressure of concrete has been limited to 15% of full buoyancy as per
IRC:6-2010, Cl. 213.3 .
MJB 39 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
Annexure - E
Calculation of Longitudinal Forces and Transverse Moment
E.1 Tabulation of reaction and transverse moment for different IRC Loadings
E.1.1 For individual of class A and class 70R
E.1.2 For combined loading of class A and class 70R with impact (1 lane class 70R + 1 lane class A)
Vertical Transvers
Loading Reaction Braking
load e Moment
Class A
1 lane 500.0 386.7 1802 100.0
2 lane 1000.0 773.3 2103 200.0
3 lane 1500.0 1044.0 811 225.0
Class 70R
70R Wheel 1000.0 799.0 2576 200.0
70R Track 700.0 664.3 2367 140.0
70R Bogie 400.0 398.7 1285 80.0
Class 70R + Class A
70R Wheel + Class A 1500.0 1185.6 3130 225.0
70R Track + Class A 1200.0 1051.0 2920 165.0
70R Bogie + Class A 900.0 785.4 1840 105.0
Vertical Transvers
Loadcase Reaction Braking
load e Moment
Maximum reaction case 1500 1186 3130 225
Maximum vertical load case 1500 1044 811 225
Maximum transverse moment case 1500 1044 3130 225
MJB 40 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
E.4 Calculation of horizontal force due to horizontal movement of elastomeric bearing
E.4.1 Tabulation of maximum and minimum reaction
side cover c 6 mm
overall length of bearing l0 400 mm
overall width of bearing b0 250 mm
effective length of bearing l 388 mm
effective width of bearing b 238 mm
total no. of internal elastomer layers n 4
thickness of individual layer of elastomer hi 10 mm
thickness of top/bottom outer layer of elastomer he 5 mm
thickness of steel laminate hs 3 mm
total elastomer thickness h 50 mm
total height of elastomeric bearing ho 65 mm
shape factor S 7
effective plan area of bearing A 92344 mm2
MJB 41 of 42
Proposed High level Bridge over SuwarnRekha river (2nd bridge) Design Report
Design of Abutment
Annexure - D
Reactions
4068.20
Reactions 1361.70
MJB 42 of 42