Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Caraga Administrative Region
Division of Surigao del Sur

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM FOR TEACHERS (TI - TIII)

Name of Employee: MARRY ANN E. ONES Name of Rater: ADELINE A. MEJO

Position: TEACHER II Position: Master Teacher I
Review Period: SECOND SEMESTER Date of Review: 4/20/2017
School:

TO BE FILLED DURING
KEY RESULT AREAS TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING
OBJECT EVALUATION
(KRA) IVES
of POSITION & of
WEIG ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE QET HT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RATING SCORE
KRA
Q E T Ave.

5 4 3 2 1
All daily lesson logs had a
96-100% of lesson plans 91-95% of lesson plans 80-90% of lesson plans
71-79% of lesson plans 78% and below of lesson plans complete part. Each part had a full
prepared with prepared with prepared with
prepared with appropriate prepared with appropriate description of what to do with an
Q appropriate objectives, appropriate objectives, appropriate objectives, 5
objectives, activities and objectives, activities and example.Objective was specific,
activities and activities and activities and
instructional materials. instructional materials. measurable, attainable, result-
instructional materials. instructional materials. instructional materials.
oriented and time-bound

Prepared lesson 96-100% of lesson plans 91-95% of lesson plans 80-90% of lesson plans Only 90% lesson plans were
71-79% of lesson plans 78% and below of lesson plans
plans and daily logs of utilized with appropriate utilized with appropriate utilized with utilized with appropriate objectives,
utilized with appropriate utilized with appropriate objectives,
activities including June 2016- E objectives, activities objectives, activities appropriate objectives, activities & instructional materials 4
8.50% objectives, activities and activities and instructional 4.00 4.00 0.34
appropriate, adequate March 2017 and instructional and instructional activities and because of time constraints/extra
instructional materials. materials.
and updated materials materials. instructional materials. activities conducted.
instructional materials
96-100% of lesson plans 80-90% of lesson plans
objectives obtained 91-95% of lesson plans objectives obtained Only 90% lesson plans objectives
71-79% of lesson plans
with appropriate objectives obtained with appropriate 78% and below of lesson plans were obtained with appropriate
objectives obtained with
instructional materials, with appropriate instructional materials, objectives obtained with
T appropriate instructional instructional materials because 3
activities and instructional materials, activities and appropriate instructional materials,
materials, activities and of time constraints/extra
instructional materials activities and instructional materials activities and instructional materials
instructional materials activities conducted.
updated all the lesson instructional materials updated all the lesson
plan for the day. plan for the day.
The teacher established The teacher
The teacher clearly The teacher did not have a clear The teacher developed a
challenging & developed a
communicated a focus The teacher did not have a focus for student learning or the
measurable goal/s for measurable goal/s for measurable goal/s for student
Q for student learning clear focus for student objective is too general to guide 4
student learning that is student learning that is learning that is aligned with the
that is aligned with the learning. lesson planning or the objective is
Facilitated learning aligned with the PSLC aligned with the PSLC PSLC curriculum.
PSLC curriculum. inappropriate for students.
in the elementary and curriculum. curriculum.
secondary schools Teaching methods and Teaching methods and Teaching methods and
daily/year Teaching methods and Teaching methods and strategies Teaching methods and
through functional 10.00% strategies elicited 90- strategies elicited 80- strategies elicited 70- 3.67 3.67 0.37
round E strategies elicited 55-69% elicited 54% and below interaction strategies elicited 80-89% 4
lessons plans, daily 100% interaction from a 89% interaction from a 79% interaction from a
interaction from a class. from a class. interaction from a class.
logs and innovative class. class. class.
teaching strategies Has provided individual activities
Has provided individual Has provided individual Has provided individual Has provided individual
Has provided individual activities for a 75-84% of the classes handled
Teaching-Learning Process (35%) activities for a 95-100% activities for a 85-94% activities for a 75-84% activities for a 65-74% of the
T for a 64% and below of the classes for the rating period because the 3
of the classes handled of the classes handled of the classes handled classes handled for the
handled for the rating period. teacher have to attained to other
for the rating period. for the rating period. for the rating period. rating period.
administrative works.
Initiated discipline of Students were 90-100% Students were 80-89% Students were 60-79%
Students were 50-59% Students were 80-89% guided in
students including guided in the guided in the guided in the Students were not guided in the
guided in the observation of the observation of classroom
classroom rules, observation of observation of observation of observation of classroom rules and
classroom rules and
guidelines and Q classroom rules and classroom rules and classroom rules and guidelines as evidence by rules and guidelines as evidence 4
guidelines as evidence by
individual and group guidelines as evidence guidelines as evidence guidelines as evidence descriptive rating in the report by descriptive rating in the
descriptive rating in the
tasks by descriptive rating in by descriptive rating in by descriptive rating in card/journal. report card/journal.
report card/journal.
the report card/journal. the report card/journal. the report card/journal.
ICT integration is only 60-79%
daily/year ICT integration is 90-100% ICT integration is 80-89% ICT integration is 60-79% ICT integration is 50-59% evident since other sections
E 8.50% ICT integration is not evident. 3 3.67 3.67 0.31
round evident. evident. evident. evident. handled could not be
accomodated.
 daily/year
8.50% 3.67 3.67 0.31
round

Results of student Results of student Results of student Results of student Results of student
Results of student observation
observation/appraisal observation/appraisal observation/appraisal observation/appraisal are
T /appraisal are not used as basis for observation/appraisal are 85- 4
are 100% used as basis are 85-99% used as are 70-84% used as 55 - 89% used as basis for
follow-up. 99% used as basis for follow-up.
for follow-up. basis for follow-up. basis for follow-up. follow-up.

Safety, orderliness & Safety, orderliness & Safety, orderliness & Safety, orderliness & cleanliness
Safety, orderliness & Safety, orderliness & cleanliness of
Monitored cleanliness of floors, cleanliness of floors, cleanliness of floors,
cleanliness of floors, toilets floors, toilets & proper waste of floors, toilets & proper waste
attendance, diversity Q toilets & proper waste toilets & proper waste toilets & proper waste 4
& proper waste disposal disposal were 49% below disposal were 80-89%
appreciation, safe, disposal were 90-100% disposal were 80-89% disposal were 65-79%
were 50-64% maintained. consistently maintained. maintained.
positive and maintained. maintained. maintained.
motivating Studentsdaily assigned tasks are 65-
daily/year Studentsdaily assigned Studentsdaily assigned Studentsdaily assigned 79% carried out since the adviser
environment, overall 8.00% Studentsdaily assigned tasks Students daily assigned tasks were 3.67 3.67 0.29
round E tasks are 90-100% carried tasks are 80-89% carried tasks are 65-79% carried could not monitored them daily 4
physical atmosphere, are 50-64% carried out. not carried out.
cleanliness and out. out. out. because of some extra office
orderliness of works.
Attendance checking Attendance checking Attendance checking
classrooms including Attendance checking was
was 90-100% was 80-89% was 65-79% Attendance checking was 65-
proper waste disposal. T 50-64% systematically No checking of attendance. 3
systematically carried systematically carried systematically carried 79% systematically carried out.
carried out.
out. out. out.

The teacher explained

Evidences showed that There is evidence of The teacher explained the
the various uses &
the teacher purposely more than one various uses & limitations of the
limitations of the
plans assesssments & measuire of student The teacher planned different kinds of
different kinds of
varies assessment performance but there instructions without No evidence of student monitoring
Q assessments/tests. assessments/tests. Evidences 4
choices to match the is difficulty in analyzing analyzing student learning or evaluation of student progress.
Evidences showed that showed that students needs an
different student needs, data to inform data.
students needs an avenues for growth were clearly
abilities, and learning instructional planning
avenues for growth
Monitored and styles. and delivery. identified.
were clearly identified.
evaluated and
quarterly 20% 4.00 4.00 0.80
maintained students
progress Class record reflected Class record reflected Class record reflected
Class record reflected the
the bases of 100% of the bases of 85-99% of the bases of 70-84% of Class record reflected the bases of Class record reflected the bases
bases of 55-69% of students'
E students' rating in all students' rating in all students' rating in all 54% and below of students' rating in of 85-99% of students' rating in all 4
rating in all classes/subject
classes/subject areas classes/subject areas classes/subject areas all classes/subject areas handled. classes/subject areas handled.
areas handled.
handled. handled. handled.

Table of Specifications is Table of Specifications Table of Specifications Table of Specifications is 50-

Table of Specifications is not Table of Specifications is 65-79%
T 100% prepared for tests is 80-89% prepared for is 65-79% prepared for 64% prepared for tests that 4
prepared. prepared for tests that require it.
that require it. test that require it. tests that require it. require it.
Remediation/Enrichmen Remediation/Enrichme Remediation/Enrichme Remediation/Enrichment Remediation/Enrichment
Remediation/Enrichment Program is
Q t Program is offered to nt Program is offered to nt Program is offered to Program is offered to 50-64% Program is offered to 65-79% 4
not offered to those who need it.
Pupils/Students Outcomes (40%) 90-100% who need it. 80-89% who need it. 65-79% who need it. who need it. who need it.
Conducted
remediation/enrichme Increased in promotion Increased in promotion Increased in promotion Increased in promotion rate Increased in promotion rate is Increased in promotion rate by
E 4
nt programs to quarterly 5% rate by 90-100%. rate by 80-89%. rate by 65-79%. by 50-64%. below 50%. 80-89%. 3.67 3.67 0.18
improve performance
indicators Remediation was administered
Remediation was
Remediation was Remediation was Remediation was
administered two two months after the assessment
T administered outrightly administered one week administered two months No remediation was conducted. 3
weeks after the because the teacher have
after the assessment. after the assessment. after the assessment.
assessment. other office functions.

Students have attained Students have attained Students have attained Students have attained 50- Students have attained 49% and Students have attained 65-79%
Q 3
90-100% MPS/GPA. 80-89% MPS/GPA. 65-79% MPS/GPA. 64% MPS/GPA. below MPS/GPA. MPS/GPA.

Attained the required

GPA for grade level quarterly 15% Inccreased by 5% in Inccreased by 3% in Inccreased by 2% in Inccreased by 1% in 1.33 1.33 0.20
E No inccreased in MPS/GPA. Inccreased by 2% in MPS/GPA. 3
and learning areas MPS/GPA. MPS/GPA. MPS/GPA. MPS/GPA.

Gradesheets/MPS was Gradesheets/MPS was Gradesheets/MPS was

Gradesheets/MPS was Gradesheets/MPS was
submitted one week submitted two weeks Gradesheets/MPS was submitted a
T submitted on the submitted three weeks late submitted one week late on the 4
late on the required late on the required month late on the required time.
required time. on the required time. required time.
time. time.

Conducted planned Conducted planned Conducted planned Conducted planned Conducted planned meetings
meetings was 90-100% meetings was 80-89% meetings was 65-79% meetings was 50-64% Conducted planned meetings was
Q was 80-89% accomplished with 4
accomplished with set accomplished with set accomplished with set accomplished with minimal 49% and below with no results.
of agreements. of agreements. of agreements. results. set of agreements.

HRPTA Parents attendance

Parents attendance was Parents attendance was Parents attendance was 50-
meetings/conferences quarterly 7% was 65-79% Parents attendance was 65-79% 4.33 4.33 0.30
E 90-100% systematically 80-89% systematically 64% systematically carried No meeting conducted. 4
organized systematically carried systematically carried out.
carried out. carried out. out.
out.

Community Involvement (15%)

 HRPTA
meetings/conferences quarterly 7% 4.33 4.33 0.30
organized

HRPTA meeting was HRPTA meeting was HRPTA meeting was

HRPTA meeting was HRPTA meeting was conducted
T conducted once every conducted thrice a conducted twice a HRPTA meeting was not conducted. 5
conducted once a year. once every quarter.
quarter. year. year.

Home visitation was 80- Home visitation was 80-89% with

Home visitation was 90- Home visitation was 65- Home visitation was 50-64%
89% with partial success Home visitation 49% and below partial success in the
Q 100% successful as an 79% successful as an successful as an 4
in the implementation accomplished with no intervention. implementation of the
intervention. intervention. intervention.
Visited parents of of the intervention. intervention.
students needing
academic Conducted 90-100% Conducted 80-89% Conducted 65-79 % Conducted 50-64% home
Community Involvement (15%) quarterly 3% Conducted 49% home visitation to Conducted 65-79 % home 4.00 4.00 0.12
monitoring/follow-up E home visitation to home visitation to home visitation to visitation to identified 4
identified SARDO's. visitation to identified SARDO's.
within the rating identified SARDO's. identified SARDO's. identified SARDO's. SARDO's.
period
Identified SARDO'S was Identified SARDO'S was Identified SARDO'S was
Identified SARDO'S was Identified SARDO'S was visited
T visited two weeks after visited one month after visited after two months No home visitation conducted. 4
visited outhrightly. one month after the evaluation.
the evaluation. the evaluation. after the evaluation.

Initiated & implemented Initiated/participated Initiated an HRPTA Participated in the HRPTA Initiated/participated an HRPTA
Q an HRPTA project with an HRPTA project with project with project without No HRPTA project. project with documented 4
documented results. documented results. documented results. documented results. results.

Initiated
HRPTA projects was 90- HRPTA projects was 80- HRPTA projects was 65-
Projects/events/activiti HRPTA projects was 50-64% HRPTA projects was not HRPTA projects was 80-89%
year round E 5% 100% initiated & 89% initiated & 79% initiated & 4 4.00 4.00 0.20
es with external initiated & implemented. implemented. initiated & implemented.
implemented. implemented. implemented.
funding/sponsors

HRPTA project wasHRPTA project was

HRPTA project was HRPTA project was HRPTA project was implemented
implemented one implemented two HRPTA project was not
T implemented on the implemented three months two months after the agreed 4
month after the agreed
months after the implemented.
agreed time. after the agreed time. time.
time. agreed time.
Conducted 3 action Conducted 2 action
Conducted 1 action
research with full research with full
research with full Identified classroom/ Identified classroom/ learning
Only classroom/ learning
Q documentation on documentation on documentation on learning problems with problems with research 3
problems/issues identified.
completion of completion of completion of research proposals. proposals.
interventions. interventions. interventions.
Action research was
Action research was Action research was Action research was
Action Research year-round 3% presented and Action research was adapted in 2.33 2.33 0.07
E presented and adapted presented and adapted adapted in the classroom Action research was not presented. 2
adapted in the School the classroom level.
in the Division level. in the District level. level.
level.
Action research was
Action research was Action research was
conducted three Action research was Action research was conducted
T conducted within the conducted two months No action research was conducted. 2
months after the target conducted . .
target date. after the target date.
date.

90-100% actively 80-89% actively 65-79% actively 65-79% actively participated in

50-64% participated in the 49% and below participated in the
participated in the participated in the participated in the
Q professional/community professional/community the professional/community 4
professional/community professional/communit professional/communit
organizations. organizations. organizations.
organizations. y organizations. y organizations.

Professional 90-100% enhancement 80-89% enhancement 65-79% enhancement 50-64% enhancement on

Professional Growth and membership and/or year round 4% 49% and below enhancement on 65-79% enhancement on the 4.00 4.00 0.16
on the professional & on the professional & on the professional & the professional & social
Development (10%) community linkages E the professional & social professional & social 4
social development of social development of social development of development of the
development of the teacher. development of the teacher.
the teacher. the teacher. the teacher. teacher.

At least member of 4 At least member of 3 At least member of 2 At least member of 1

Not a member of any At least member of 3
T professional/civic professional/civic professional/civic professional/civic 4
professional/civic organizations professional/civic organizations
organizations organizations organizations organizations
Awarded/given citation Awarded/given citation Awarded/given Awarded as outstanding coach
Awarded/given citation as
as outstanding as outstanding citation as outstanding
outstanding coach/training No awards/citation/recognition in S.I.P. Regional level & training
Q coach/training coach/training coach/training 5
manager/facilitator in the received. manager in seminars conducted
manager/facilitator in manager/facilitator in manager/facilitator in
School level. in school.
the National/Regional the Division level. the District/Cluster

Certificates of 80-89% development of 65-79% development of

Awards/Citation/Reco year round 3% 90-100% development of 50-64% development of 49% and below.development of 80-89% development of 4.67 4.67 0.14
E professional professional 4
gnition professional skills/talents. professional skills/talents. professional skills/talents. professional skills/talents.
skills/talents. skills/talents.

Received at least 5 Received at least 4 Received at least 3 Received at least 2 Received at least 1 Received at least 5
T awards/citation/recogni awards/citation/recogni awards/citation/recogn awards/citation/recognition awards/citation/recognition in a awards/citation/recognition in a 5
tion in a year. tion in a year. ition in a year. in a year. year. year.
 * To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned 3.5 3.488

Ratee: Approving Authority:

Rater:
MARRY ANN E. ONES ADELINE A. MEJO REMYSON C. TRUGILLO
Teacher II Master Teacher I Principal I