[Type the document title]

Comparison in between the Group NG and Group NGB by Unpaired T test

1. Neck pain
The comparison of the effects on neck pain in between the groups Group-NK and Group-
NGB reveals that the mean value of BT-AT in group-NK was 1.2 (SD=0.422) & the
same value after the follow up BT-AF was 1.6(SD=0.516) having a mean difference of
0.40.Whereas the mean value BT-AT in Group-NGB was 1.2(SD=0.422) & the same
after the follow up BT-AF was 1.8(SD= 0.632) with a mean difference of 0.60.
Comparison reveals that there is statistically significant difference observed in Group-
NGB, with a p value 0.022.

On comparing the both groups by paired t test , BT-AF mean percentage of Group NK was
72.70% and that of Group NGB was 81.80%. This signifies that the effect of nasya karma
and Greeva basti is more significant in neck pain than that of nasya karma alone.

Showing the comparative results in Neck pain

N Group Mea Diff Unpaired t test S

n (d) SD SE t P
2 NK BT-AT 1.2 0.40 0.42 0.13 1.89 0.07 N
0 2 3 7 4 S
BT-AF 1.6 0.51 0.16
6 3
NGB BT-AT 1.2 0.60 0.42 0.13 0.00 0.02 S
2 3 0 2
BT-AF 1.8 0.63 0.20
2 0

[Type text] Page 1

 [Type the document title]

Graph No. .: Showing the comparative results in Neck pain

1.8
1.6 Group-NK Group-NGB
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
BT-AT BT-AF

2. Radiation of neck pain

The comparison of the effects on radiation of neck pain in between the groups Group-
NK and Group-NGB reveals that the mean value of BT-AT in group-NK was
1.0(SD=1.000) & the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 1.6(SD=1.200)
having a mean difference of 0.20.Whereas the mean value BT-AT in Group-NGB was
0.9(SD=0.994) & the same after the follow up BT-AF was 1.3(SD= 0.823) with a
mean difference of 0.40. Comparison reveals that the statistically significant
difference was not observed in either groups, Group-NK with p value 0.548 and
Group-NGB with p value 0.340.
On comparing the both groups by paired t test, BT-AF mean percentage of group NK
was 57.14% and that of group NGB was 65.0%. This signifies that the effect of nasya
karma and Greeva basti in Group-NGB is more significant in radiation of pain than
that of nasya karma in Group-NK.
Showing the comparative results in radiation of Neck pain

N Group Mea Diff Unpaired t test S

n (d) SD SE t P
2 NK BT-AT 1.0 0.20 1.00 0.81 0.61 0.54 N
0 0 6 2 8 S
BT-AF 1.2 1.20 0.63
0 2
NGB BT-AT 0.9 0.40 0.99 0.31 0.98 0.34 N
4 4 0 0 S
BT-AF 1.3 0.82 0.26
3 0

[Type text] Page 2

 [Type the document title]

Graph No. .: Showing the comparative results in radiation of Neck pain

1.4
Group-NK Group-NGB
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
BT-AT BT-AF

3. Neck stiffness
The comparison of the effects on neck stiffness in between the groups Group-NK and
Group-NGB reveals that the mean value of BT-AT in group-NK was 0.5(SD=0.972)
& the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 0.5(SD=0.972) having a mean
difference of 0.00. Whereas the mean value BT-AT in Group-NGB was
0.8(SD=0.789) & the same after the follow up BT-AF was 0.8(SD= 0.789) with a
mean difference of 0.00. Comparison reveals that the statistically significant
difference was not observed in either groups, Group-NK with p value 1.000 and
Group-NGB with p value 1.000.
On comparing the both groups by paired t test, BT-AF mean percentage of group NK
was 83.33% and that of group NGB was 100.0%. This signifies that the effect in neck
stiffness is higher in Group-NGB than in Group-NK.
Showing the comparative results in Neck stiffness
N Group Mea Diff Unpaired t test S
n (d) SD SE t P
2 NK BT-AT 0.5 0.00 0.97 0.30 0.00 1.00 N
2 7
0 0 0 S
BT-AF 0.5 0.97 0.30
2 7
NGB BT-AT 0.8 0.00 0.78 0.24 0.00 1.00 N
9 9 0 0 S
BT-AF 0.8 0.78 0.24

[Type text] Page 3

 [Type the document title]

9 9

Graph No. .: Showing the comparative results in Neck stiffness

0.8
Group-NK Group-NGB
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
BT-AT BT-AF

4. Weakness in upper limbs

The comparison of the effects on weakness in hands, in between the groups Group-
NK and Group-NGB reveals that the mean value of BT-AT in group-NK was
0.3(SD=0.483) & the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 0.5(SD=0.527)
having a mean difference of 0.2. Whereas the mean value BT-AT in Group-NGB was
0.2(SD=0.789) & the same after the follow up BT-AF was 0.8(SD= 0.789) with a
mean difference of 0.4. Comparison reveals that the statistically significant difference
was not observed in either groups, Group-NK with p value 0.388 and Group-NGB
with p value 0.074.
On comparing the both groups by paired t test, BT-AF mean percentage of group NK
was 62.50% and that of group NGB was 75.0%. This signifies that the effect in neck
stiffness is higher in Group-NGB than in Group-NK.

Showing comparative effect on weakness in hand

N Group Mea Diff Unpaired t test S
n (d) SD SE t P
2 NK BT-AT 0.3 0.2 0.48 0.15 0.88 0.38 N
3 3
0 5 8 S
BT-AF 0.5 0.52 0.16
7 7
NGB BT-AT 0.2 0.4 0.42 0.13 1.89 0.07 N
2 3 7 4 S
BT-AF 0.6 0.51 0.16
6 3

[Type text] Page 4

 [Type the document title]

Graph No. .: Showing comparative effect on weakness in hands

0.6
Group-NK Group-NGB
0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
BT-AT BT-AF

5. Paraesthesia in hands
The comparison of the effects on paraesthesia in hands, in between the groups Group-
NK and Group-NGB reveals that the mean value of BT-AT in group-NK was
0.2(SD=0.422) & the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 0.8(SD=0.422)
having a mean difference of 0.6. Whereas the mean value BT-AT in Group-NGB was
0.3(SD=0.483) & the same after the follow up BT-AF was 0.6(SD= 0.483) with a
mean difference of 0.3. Comparison reveals that there was statistically significant
difference was observed in Group-NK with p value 0.005 and in Group-NGB
statistically significant difference was not observed with p value 0.196.
On comparing the both groups by paired t test, BT-AF mean percentage of group NK
was 80.00% and that of group NGB was 85.71%. This signifies that the effect in
paraesthesia is higher in Group-NGB than in Group-NK.

Table Showing comparative effect on paraesthesia

N Grou Mea Diff Unpaired t test S

p n (d) SD SE t P
2 NK BT-AT 0.2 0.6 0.42 0.13 3.182 0.00 S
2 3
0 5
BT-AF 0.8 0.42 0.13
2 3
NGB BT-AT 0.3 0.3 0.48 0.15 01.34 0.19 N
3 3 2 6 S
BT-AF 0.6 0.51 0.16

[Type text] Page 5

 [Type the document title]

6 3

Graph No. .: Showing the comparative results in paraeshesia in hands

0.8
Group-NK Group-NGB
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
BT-AT BT-AF

6. Clumsy finger movements

The comparison of the effects on clumsy finger movements, in between the groups
Group-NK and Group-NGB reveals that the mean value of BT-AT in group-NK was
0.1(SD=0.316) & the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 0.3(SD=0.483)
having a mean difference of 0.2. Whereas the mean value BT-AT in Group-NGB was
0.0(SD=0.000) & the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 0.1(SD= 0.316)
with a mean difference of 0.1. Comparison reveals that the statistically significant
difference was not observed in either group, Group-NK with p value 0.288 and
Group-NGB with p value 0.331.
On comparing the both groups by paired t test, BT-AF mean percentage of group NK
was 75.0% and that of group NGB was 50.0%. This signifies that the effect on clumsy
finger movement is higher in Group-NK than in Group-NGB.
Table Showing comparative effect on clumsy finger movements

N Group Mea Diff Unpaired t test S

n (d) SD SE t P
2 NK BT-AT 0.1 0.2 0.31 0.10 1.09 0.28 N
6 0
0 5 8 S
BT-AF 0.3 0.48 0.15
3 3
NGB BT-AT 0.0 0.1 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.33 N
0 0 0 1 S
BT-AF 0.1 0.31 0.10

[Type text] Page 6

 [Type the document title]

6 0

Graph No. .: Showing the comparative results in clumsy finger movemnts

0.3
Group-NK Group-NGB
0.25

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0
BT-AT BT-AF

7. Vertigo
The comparison of the effects on vertigo, in between the groups Group-NK and
Group-NGB reveals that the mean value of BT-AT in group-NK was 0.0(SD=0.000)
& the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 0.1(SD=0.316) having a mean
difference of 0.1. Whereas the mean value BT-AT in Group-NGB was
0.2(SD=0.422) & the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 0.2(SD= 0.422)
with a mean difference of 0.0. Comparison reveals that the statistically significant
difference was not observed in either group, Group-NK with p value 0.331 and
Group-NGB with p value 1.000.
On comparing the both groups by paired t test, BT-AF mean percentage of group NK
was 100.0% and that of group NGB was 100.0%. This signifies that the effect on
clumsy finger movement is higher in Group-NK than in Group-NGB.

Table Showing comparative effect onVertigo

N Group Mea Diff Unpaired t test S

n (d) SD SE t P
2 NK BT-AT 0.0 0.1 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.33 N
0 0
0 0 1 S
BT-AF 0.1 0.31 0.10
6 0
NGB BT-AT 0.2 0.0 0.42 0.13 1.00 1.00 N
2 3 0 0 S

[Type text] Page 7

 [Type the document title]

BT-AF 0.2 0.42 0.13

2 3

Graph No. .: Showing the comparative results on vertigo

0.2
0.18 Group-NK Group-NGB
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
BT-AT BT-AF

8. Tenderness in neck
The comparison of the effects on tenderness in neck, in between the groups Group-
NK and Group-NGB reveals that the mean value of BT-AT in group-NK was
0.4(SD=0.699) & the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 0.7(SD=0.823)
having a mean difference of 0.3. Whereas the mean value BT-AT in Group-NGB was
0.8(SD=0.422) & the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 1.5(SD= 0.707)
with a mean difference of 0.7. Comparison reveals that the statistically significant
difference was observed in Group NGB with p value 0.015, whereas in Group-NK
with p value 0.399 there was not significant effect .
On comparing the both groups by paired t test, BT-AF mean percentage of group NK
was 44.44% and that of group NGB was 53.33%. This signifies that the effect on
tenderness in neck is higher in Group-NGB than in Group-NK.
Table No 104 Showing comparative effect on tenderness in neck
N Group Mea Diff Unpaired t test S
n (d) SD SE t P
2 NK BT-AT 0.4 0.3 0.69 0.22 0.87 0.39 N
9 1
0 8 1 S
BT-AF 0.7 0.82 0.26

[Type text] Page 8

 [Type the document title]

3 0
NGB BT-AT 0.8 0.7 0.42 0.13 2.68 0.01 S
2 3 9 5
BT-AF 1.5 0.70 0.22
7 4

Graph No. .: Showing the comparative results in tenderness in neck

1.6
Group-NK Group-NGB
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
BT-AT BT-AF
9. Neck movement
The comparison of the effects on tenderness in neck, in between the groups Group-
NK and Group-NGB reveals that the mean value of BT-AT in group-NK was
0.2(SD=1.333) & the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 2.7(SD=0.949)
having a mean difference of 0.7. Whereas the mean value BT-AT in Group-NGB was
1.5(SD=1.434) & the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 2.4(SD= 1.776)
with a mean difference of 0.9. Comparison reveals that statistically significant
difference is not observed in either group- Group NK with p value 0.193, whereas in
Group-NGB with p value 0.288.
On comparing the both groups by paired t test, BT-AF mean percentage of group NK
was 85.7% and that of group NGB was 100.00%. This signifies that the effect on
movement of neck is higher in Group-NGB than in Group-NK.

N Group Mea Diff Unpaired t test S

n (d) SD SE t P
2 NK BT-AT 2.0 0.7 1.33 0.42 1.35 0.19 N
3 2
0 3 3 S
BT-AF 2.7 0.94 0.30
9 0
NGB BT-AT 1.5 0.9 1.43 0.45 1.24 0.22 N

[Type text] Page 9

 [Type the document title]

4 3 7 8 S
BT-AF 2.4 1.77 0.56
6 2

Graph No. .: Showing the comparative results in Neck pain

3
Group-NK Group-NGB
2.5

1.5

0.5

0
BT-AT BT-AF

10. Sensory loss in hands Out of 20 patients; none of the patients presented with
symptom of sensory loss. Hence there were no grading found for this subjective
parameter.
11. Neurological deficit -
The comparison of the effects on tenderness in neck, in between the groups Group-
NK and Group-NGB reveals that the mean value of BT-AT in group-NK was
0.0(SD=0.000) & the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 0.2(SD=0.422)
having a mean difference of 0.2. Whereas the mean value BT-AT in Group-NGB was
0.1(SD=1.434) & the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 0.1(SD= 0.316)
with a mean difference of 0.0. The statistically significant difference is not observed
in either group- Group NK with p value 0.151, whereas in Group-NGB with p value
1.000.
On comparing the both groups by paired t test, BT-AF mean percentage of group NK
was 25.0%% and that of group NGB was 11.11%. This signifies that the effect on
neurological deficit is higher in Group-NGB than in Group-NK.

N Group Mea Diff Unpaired t test S

n (d) SD SE t P
2 NK BT-AT 0.0 0.2 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.15 N

[Type text] Page 10

 [Type the document title]

0 0 0 0 1 S
BT-AF 0.2 0.42 0.13
2 3
NGB BT-AT 0.1 0.0 0.31 0.10 0.00 1.00 N
6 0 0 0 S
BT-AF 0.1 0.31 0.10
6 0

Graph No. : Showing the comparative results in Neck pain

0.2
0.18 Group-NK Group-NGB
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
BT-AT BT-AF

12. Deep Tendon reflexes

The comparison of the effects on tenderness in neck, in between the groups Group-
NK and Group-NGB reveals that the mean value of BT-AT in group-NK was
0.0(SD=0.471) & the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 0.0(SD=0.149)
having a mean difference of 0.0. Whereas the mean value BT-AT in Group-NGB was
0.1(SD=0.316) & the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 0.4(SD= 0.516)
with a mean difference of 0.3. The statistically significant difference is not observed
in either input group- Group NK with p value 1.000, whereas in Group-NGB with p
value 0.135.
Table: Showing the comparative effect on Deep tendon reflexes
N Group Mea Diff Unpaired t test S
n (d) SD SE t P
2 NK BT-AT 0.0 0.0 0.47 0.47 0.00 1.00 N
1 1
0 0 0 S
BT-AF 0.0 0.14 0.14
9 9
NGB BT-AT 0.1 0.3 0.31 0.10 1.56 0.13 N

[Type text] Page 11

 [Type the document title]

6 0 7 5 S
BT-AF 0.4 0.51 0.16
6 3

Graph No. : Showing the comparative results in deepa tendon reflexes

0.4
Group-NK Group-NGB
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
BT-AT BT-AF

13. Neck disability index

The effect on tenderness in neck, in between the groups Group-NK and Group-NGB
reveals that the mean value of BT-AT in group-NK was 8.5(SD=2.799) & the same
value after the follow up BT-AF was 14.0(SD=2.749) having a mean difference of
5.5. Whereas the mean value BT-AT in Group-NGB was 8.7(SD=3.622) & the same
value after the follow up BT-AF was 13.3(SD= 4.084) with a mean difference of
4.6. There is statistically highly significant difference is observed in Group NK with p
value <0.001, whereas in Group-NGB with p value 0.016, it is statistically
significant.
Table showing the effect on Neck disability index
N Group Mea Diff Unpaired t test S
n (d) SD SE t P
2 NK BT-AT 8.5 5.5 2.79 0.88 4.43 <0.00 H
9 5
0 4 1 S
BT-AF 14.0 2.74 0.86
9 9
NGB BT-AT 8.7 4.6 3.62 1.14 2.66 0.016 S
2 6 5
BT-AF 13.3 4.08 1.29
4 1

[Type text] Page 12

 [Type the document title]

Graph No: Table showing the effect on Neck disability index

14 Group-NK Group-NGB
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
BT-AT BT-AF

14. Visual analogue scale

The effect on pain observed on visual analogue scale, in between the groups Group-
NK and Group-NGB reveals that the mean value of BT-AT in group-NK was
1.5(SD=0.527) & the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 1.9(SD=0.568)
having a mean difference of 0.4. Whereas the mean value BT-AT in Group-NGB was
1.5(SD=0.707) & the same value after the follow up BT-AF was 2.0(SD= 0.943)
with a mean difference of 0.5. There is not statistically significant difference is
observed in either group - Group NK with p value 0.120, whereas in Group-NGB
with p value 0.196.

Table showing the effect on pain on Visual analogue scale

N Group Mea Diff Unpaired t test S
n (d) SD SE t P
2 NK BT-AT 1.5 0.4 0.52 0.16 1.63 0.12 N
7 7
0 3 0 S
BT-AF 1.9 0.56 0.18
8 0
NGB BT-AT 1.5 0.5 0.70 0.22 1.34 0.19 N
7 4 2 6 S
BT-AF 2.0 0.94 0.29
3 8

[Type text] Page 13

 [Type the document title]

Graph No: showing the effect on pain on Visual analogue scale

2 Group-NK Group-NGB
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
BT-AT BT-AF

15. Verbal pain scale

The effect observed on verbal pain scale, in the groups Group-NK and Group-NGB
reveals that the mean value of BT-AT in group-NK was 7.0(SD=0.943) & the same
value after the follow up BT-AF was 8.0(SD=1.054) having a mean difference of
1.0. Whereas the mean value BT-AT in Group-NGB was 7.2(SD=1.033) & the same
value after the follow up BT-AF was 8.2(SD= 0.1.317) with a mean difference of
1.0. There is statistically significant difference is observed in Group NK with p value
0.038, whereas in Group-NGB with p value 0.075 the difference is not statistically
significant.
Table showing effect observed on pain on Verbal pain scale
N Group Mea Diff Unpaired t test S
n (d) SD SE t P
2 NK BT-AT 7.0 1.0 0.94 0.29 2.23 0.03 S
3 8
0 6 8
BT-AF 8.0 1.05 0.33
4 3
NGB BT-AT 7.2 1.0 1.03 0.32 1.89 0.07 N
3 7 0 5 S
BT-AF 8.2 1.31 0.41
7 6

[Type text] Page 14

 [Type the document title]

Graph No. .: Table showing effect observed on pain on Verbal pain scale
8.2
8 Group-NK Group-NGB
7.8
7.6
7.4
7.2
7
6.8
6.6
6.4
BT-AT BT-AF

[Type text] Page 15