Anda di halaman 1dari 13

The IASPEI Standard Seismic Phase List

Dmitry A. Storchak
International Seismological Centre

Johannes Schweitzer
NORSAR

Peter Bormann
GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam

INTRODUCTION ically predicted onset times of phases. Finally, the newly


adopted IASPEI Seismic Format (ISF) is much more flexible
At a meeting in Hanoi on 23 August 2001, the IASPEI Com- then the older formats used by NEIC, ISC, and other data
mission on Seismological Observation and Interpretation centers (see http://www.isc.ac.uk/Documents/isf.pdf ). It allows
decided to set up a Working Group on Standard Phase the reporting, computer parsing, and archiving of phases with
Names. The working group has put together a modified stan- long or previously uncommon names. ISF also accepts com-
dard nomenclature of seismic phases that is meant to be con- plementary parameters such as onset quality, measured back
cise, consistent, and self-explanatory on the basis of agreed azimuth and slowness, and amplitudes and periods of other
rules. We did not try to create a complete list of all phases. phases in addition to P and surface waves, for components
The list is open to further development. The list is not meant other than vertical ones, and for instruments with nonstand-
to satisfy specific requirements of seismologists to name vari- ard response characteristics.
ous phases used in a particular type of research. Instead, it is This increased flexibility of the parameter-reporting for-
hoped that the new list will ensure expanded standardized mat requires improved standardization, which limits the
data reporting and exchange by data analysts and other users. uncontrolled growth of incompatible and ambiguous param-
This should result in a broad and unambiguous database for eter data. Therefore, the WG agreed on certain rules. They
research and practical applications. At the same time the list are outlined below prior to the listing of the standardized
and the principles outlined below may provide useful guid- phase names. To facilitate the understanding of the phase
ance for naming previously unknown seismic phases. names, ray diagrams are presented below. They have been cal-
The new nomenclature partially modifies and comple- culated for local seismic sources on the basis of an average
ments an earlier one published in the last edition of the Man- one-dimensional two-layer crustal model and for regional
ual of Seismological Observatory Practice (Willmore, 1979) and and teleseismic sources using the global 1D Earth model
in the seismic bulletins published by ISC. It is more in tune AK135 (Kennett et al., 1995).
with modern Earth and travel-time models. As opposed to Before assigning abbreviated seismic phase names one
former practice, the working group (hereinafter WG) tried to should agree first on the language to be used and its rules. As
make sure that the phase name generally reflects the type of in any other language we need a suitable alphabet (here plain
wave and the path it has traveled. Accordingly, symbols for Latin letters); numbers (here Arabic numbers); +/ signs; an
characterizing onset quality, polarity, etc. will no longer be part orthography, which regulates, for example, the use of capital
of the phase name. The WG is also aware that seismic phases and lower-case letters; and a syntax, which describes the rules
exist that are common in some regions but are only rarely or of correct order and mutual relationship of the language ele-
not found in other regions, such as Pb (P*), PnPn, PbPb, etc. ments. One should be aware, however, that as with any his-
The extended list of phase names as presented below torically developed language, the seismological nomenclature
reflects significantly increased detection capabilities of mod- will inevitably develop exceptions to the rules and depend on
ern seismic sensors and sensor arrays, even of rather weak the context in which it is used. Although not fully docu-
phases which were rarely observed on the classical analog mented below, some exceptions will be mentioned. Note that
records. It also accounts for improved possibilities of proper our efforts are mainly aimed at standardized names to be used
phase identification by means of digital multichannel data in international data exchange so as to build up unique,
processing such as frequency-wave number (f-k) analysis and unambiguous global databases for research. Many of the
polarization filtering, by modeling the observations with syn- exceptions to the rules are related to specialized, mostly local
thetic seismograms or by showing on the records the theoret- research applications. The identification of related seismic

Seismological Research Letters November/December 2003 Volume 74, Number 6 761


phases often requires specialized procedures of data acquisi- Individual or double capital letters that stand for surface
tion and processing that are not part of seismological routine waves include:
data analysis. Also, many of these exceptional phases are L: (relatively) long-period surface wave, unspecified,
rarely or never used in seismic event location, magnitude from undae longae (Latin) = long waves (Borne, 1904);
determination, source mechanism calculations, etc., which R: Rayleigh waves (short-period up to very long-period
are the main tasks of international data centers. We focus mantle waves) (Angenheister, 1921);
therefore on phases that are particularly important for seis- Q: Love waves, from Querwellen (German) = transverse
mological data centers as well as for the refinement of waves (Angenheister, 1921);
regional and global Earth models on the basis of widely G: (very long-period) global (mantle) Love waves, firstly
exchanged and accumulated parameter readings. In addition, observed and reported by Gutenberg and Richter
we added references to the first definition of some wave types (1934); in honor of Gutenberg, Byerly proposed the
and phase names. usage of G for these waves (Richter, 1958);
LR: long-period Rayleigh waves, usually relating to the
STANDARD LETTERS, SIGNS, AND SYNTAX USED Airy phase maximum in the surface-wave train; and
FOR DESCRIBING SEISMIC PHASES LQ: long-period Love waves.

Capital Letters Lower-case Letters and Signs


Individual capital letters that stand for primary types of seis- Single lower-case letters generally specify the part of the
mic body waves include: Earths crust or upper mantle in which a phase has its turning
P: longitudinal wave that has traveled through the Earths point or at which discontinuity it has been reflected and/or
crust and mantle, from undae primae (Latin) = first eventually converted:
waves (Borne, 1904); g: following the phase name characterizes waves bot-
K: longitudinal wave that has traveled through the toming (i.e., having their turning point in case of P or S
Earths outer core, from Kern (German) = core (Sohon, body waves) or just travel (surface waves) within the
1932; Bastings, 1934); upper (granitic) Earths crust (e.g., Pg, Sg, Rg) (Jeffreys,
I: longitudinal wave that has traveled through the Earths 1926);
inner core (Jeffreys and Bullen, 1940); b: following the phase name characterizes body waves
S: transverse wave that has traveled through the Earths bottoming in the lower (basaltic) Earths crust (Jef-
crust and mantle, from undae secundae (Latin) = second freys, 1926) (e.g., Pb, Sb; alternative names for these
waves (Borne, 1904); phases are P*, S*, [Conrad, 1925]);
T: wave that traveled partly as a sound wave in the sea, n: following the phase name characterizes a P or S wave
from undae tertiae (Latin) = third waves (Linehan, that is bottoming or traveling as a head wave in the
1940); and Earths uppermost mantle (e.g., Pn, Sn); introduced after
J: transverse wave that has traveled through the Earths Andrija Mohorovicic discovered the Earths crust and
inner core (Bullen, 1946). separated the crustal from the normal (= n) mantle phase
(Mohorovicic, 1910);
Exceptions m: (upward) reflections from the outer side of the
A capital letter N used in the nomenclature does not Mohorovicic (Moho) discontinuity (e.g., PmP, SmS);
stand for a phase name but rather for the number of legs c: reflections from the outer side of the core-mantle
traveled (or N 1 reflections made) before reaching the boundary (CMB); usage proposed by James B. Macel-
station. N should usually follow the phase symbol to wane (see Gutenberg, 1925);
which it applies. For examples see syntax below. i: reflections from the outer side of the inner core bound-
The lower-case letters p and s may stand, in the case of ary (ICB); and
seismic events below the Earths surface, for the relatively z: reflections from a discontinuity at depth z (measured
short upgoing leg of P or S waves, which continue, after in km) (other than free-surface, CMB, or ICB). Upward
reflection and possible conversion at the free surface, as reflections from the outer side of the discontinuity may
downgoing P or S waves. Thus seismic depth phases (e.g., additionally be complemented by a + sign (e.g., P410+P;
pP, sP, sS, pPP, sPP, pPKP, etc.) are uniquely defined. The this, however, is not compulsory), while downward
identification and reporting of such phases is of utmost reflections from the inner side of the discontinuity must
importance for source depth determinations (Scrase, be complemented by a sign (e.g., P660P).
1931; Stechschulte, 1932).
Many researchers working on detailed investigations of Double lower-case letters following a capital-letter phase
crustal and upper mantle discontinuities denote both the name indicate the travel-time branch to which this phase
up- and downgoing short legs of converted or multiply belongs. Due to the geometry and velocity structure of the
reflected P and S phases as lower-case letters p and s, Earth the same type of seismic wave may develop a triplica-
respectively. tion of its travel-time curve with different, in some cases well

762 Seismological Research Letters Volume 74, Number 6 November/December 2003


separated, branches. Thus it is customary to differentiate is just repeated, e.g., PP, SS (Geiger, 1909), PPP, SSS,
between different branches of core phases and their multiple KK, KKK, etc.
reflections at the free surface or the CMB. Examples are The case of (upward) reflections from the outer side of
PKPab, PKPbc, PKPdf, SKSac, SKKSac, etc. The separation the Moho, the CMB, or the ICB is indicated by inserting
of the different PKP branches with letters ab, bc, and df was m, c, or i, respectively, between the phase symbols, e.g.,
introduced by Jeffreys and Bullen (1940). PmP, PcP, ScS; PKiKP.
Three lower-case letters may follow a capital-letter phase Reflections from any other discontinuity in mantle or
name to specify its character, e.g., as a forerunner (pre) to the crust at depth z may be from the inner side (; i.e.,
main phase caused by scattering (e.g., PKPpre) or as a dif- downward back into the mantle) or from the outer side
fracted wave extending the travel-time branch of the main (+; i.e., back toward the surface). To differentiate
phase into the outer core shadow (e.g., Pdif in the outer core between these two possibilities, the sign has to follow z
shadow for P). (or the respective number in km); for example, P410+P
or P660P.
Syntax of Generating Complex Phase Names To abbreviate names of multileg phases due to repeated
Due to refraction, reflection, and conversion in the Earth reflections one can also write PhasenameN. This type of
most phases have a complex path history before they reach abbreviation is customary in the case of multiple phases
the station. Accordingly most phases cannot be described by with long phase names such as PmP2 for PmPPmP (free-
a single capital letter code in a self-explanatory way. By com- surface reflection of PmP), SKS2 for SKSSKS (the alter-
bining the capital and lower-case letters as mentioned above, native name for S2, the free-surface reflection of SKS),
one can describe the character of even rather complex PKP3 for PKPPKPPKP (double free-surface reflection of
refracted, reflected, or converted phases. The order of sym- PKP; alternative name for P3), or P4KP for PKKKKP
bols (syntax) regulates the sequence of phase legs due to (triple reflection of P at the inner side of the CMB).
refraction, reflection, and conversion events in time (from left
to right) and in space. Two additional notes are to be mentioned. First, PKP2 =
PKPPKP are now alternative names for P2 or PP, respec-
EXAMPLES FOR CREATING COMPLEX STANDARD tively. This should not be mistaken for the old usage of PKP2
PHASE NAMES for PKPab. Second, in the case of multiple reflections from
the inner side of the CMB, the WG followed the established
Traditional examples of complex phase names are as follows. tradition of placing the number N not after but in front of
the related phase symbol K.
Refracted and Converted Refracted Waves
PKP is a pure refracted longitudinal wave. It has traveled Reflected Waves with Conversion at the Reflection Point
the first part of its path as P through crust and mantle, When a phase changes its character from P to S, or vice versa,
the second through the outer core (K), and the third one writes:
again as P through mantle and crust. An alternative PS (first leg P, second leg S) or SP (first leg P, second leg
name for PKP is P (Angenheister, 1921), which should S) in the case of reflection from the free surface down-
be read as P prime. ward into the mantle (Geiger and Gutenberg, 1912a,
PKIKP (alternative to PKPdf ) is also a pure refracted 1912b);
longitudinal wave. It has traveled the first part of its path PmS or SmP, respectively, for reflections/conversions
as P through crust and mantle, the second through the from the outer side of the Moho;
outer core, the third through the inner core, and the PcS or ScP for reflections/conversions from the outer
fourth and fifth parts back again through outer core and side of the CMB; and
mantle/crust. Pz+S or SzP for reflection/conversion from the outer
SKS is a converted refracted wave. It has traveled as a side or inner side, respectively, of a discontinuity at depth
shear wave through crust and mantle, being converted z. Note that the is compulsory; the + is not.
into a longitudinal P wave when refracted into the outer
core and converted back again into an S wave when In this context it is worth mentioning that mode conversion
entering the mantle. is impossible for reflections from the inner side of the CMB
SKP and PKS are converted refracted waves with only back into the outer core because the liquid outer core does
one conversion from S to P when entering the core or not allow the propagation of S waves.
from P to S when leaving the core, respectively. The WG determined the new IASPEI standard phase
names along these lines and rules. Where the new names
Pure Reflected Waves deviate from other traditionally used names the latter are
In the case of (downward only) reflections at the free sur- given as well. Either the traditional names are still acceptable
face or from the inner side of the CMB the phase symbol alternatives (alt) or they are old names (old) which should no
longer be used.

Seismological Research Letters November/December 2003 Volume 74, Number 6 763



Pg/Sg
upper crust

Pb/Sb
lower crust
PmP/SmS

Pn/Sn
uppermost mantle
P/S


Pb/Sb
upper crus t

Pb/Sb
lower crust
PmP/SmS

Pn/Sn
uppermost mantle
P/S

upper crust

Pn/Sn lower crust

Pn/Sn
uppermost mantle

P/S

Figure 1. Seismic crustal phases observed in the case of a two-layer crust in local and regional distance ranges (0 < D < about 20) from the seismic
source in the upper crust (top), lower crust (middle), and uppermost mantle (bottom).

RAY-PATH DIAGRAMS FOR SOME OF THE IASPEI ratio VP/VS does not change enough to give very different ray
STANDARD PHASES pictures. In these cases, we calculated only the ray paths for
the P-type ray (i.e., P, Pdif, pP, PP, P660P, P660-P, PcP, PcP2,
We show ray paths through the Earth for many of the men- and PcP4) and assume that the corresponding ray paths of
tioned phases. The three diagrams for crustal phases are the respective S-type phases are very similar. To show the dif-
sketches illustrating the principal ray paths in a two-layer ferent ray paths for phases with similar phase names, we plot-
crust (Figure 1). The rays in all other figures (Figures 26) ted on many diagrams rays leaving the source once to the left
were calculated by using the ray picture part of the WKBJ3 and once to the right in different colors. The three most
code (Chapman, 1978; Dey-Sarkar and Chapman, 1978); as important discontinuities inside the Earth are indicated as
the velocity model we chose the Earth model AK135 (Ken- black circles (i.e., the border between upper and lower man-
nett et al., 1995). For some types of P and S phases the ray tle, the CMB, and the ICB).
paths through the Earth are very similar because the velocity

764 Seismological Research Letters Volume 74, Number 6 November/December 2003


0.

0.
350 .

10.

3 5 0.

10.
3 40

20.

340

20.
.
33

33

3
.
0.

0.
0

0.
.
32

40

32

40
0.

0.
.

.
31 50 31 50
0. . 0. .

30
P/S 60 30 60
0. . 0. .

290 70. 290 70.


. .

2 80 . 80. 280 . 80.

270. 90. 270.


PP/SS 90.

260. 100. 260 . 100 .


Pdif pP/sS
250
.
Sdif 11 0
.
250
. .
110

0. 0. .
0.
24 24
0
12 12

0. 0. 0. 0.
23 13 23 13
0.

0.

0.

0.
22

14

22

14
.

0.

0.

0.
0
21

15

21

15
.
.

.
16 0

16 0
2 00

200

180.
190.

170.

1 90 .

1 70 .
1 8 0.

0.
0.

3 5 0.

10.
350.

10 .

340

20.
34 0

2 0.

.
.

33

3
3

0.
0.
3

0.
0

32

40
32

40
.

0.
0.

.
.

31 50 31 50
0. . 0. .

30
P660P/S660S 60 30 60
0. . 0. .

290 70. 290 70.


. .

280. 80. 280 . 80.

270. 90. 270. 90.

260 . 100. 260 . 100 .


SP
.
P660-P/S660-S .
250 250
. .
11 0 110

0. 0. 0. 0.
24 12 24 PS 12

0. 0. 0. 0.
23 13 23 13
0.

0.

0.
0.
22

14

22

14
0

0.

0.
1.

0.

21

15
15
2

.
.

16 0
20 0

200
1 60

180.
1 9 0.

1 7 0.
1 9 0.

180.

1 7 0.
0.

0.
350 .

10.

350.

10.
3 40

20.

340

20.
.

.
33

30

33

30
0

0.
.

.
.
32

40

32

40
0.

0.
.

31 50 31 50
0. . 0. .

30 60 30 60
0. . 0. .

290 70. 29 0 70.


. .

280. 80. 280 . 80.

270. PPS 90. 270. PSP 90.

SSP SPS
2 60 . 100. 260 . 100 .

. .
250 250
. .
110 110

0. 0. 0. 0.
24 12 24 12

. 0.
30 0. .
2 13 23 30 1
0.

0.

0.

0.
22

14

22

14
0.

0.

0.

0.
21

15

21

15
.
.

.
16 0

16 0
200

200
180.

180.
1 90 .

1 70 .

1 90 .

1 70 .

Figure 2. Mantle phases observed at the teleseismic distance range D > about 20.

Seismological Research Letters November/December 2003 Volume 74, Number 6 765


0.

0.
3 50 .

10.

350.

10.
340

20.

340

20.
.
.
33

30

33

30
0.

0.
.

.
32

40

32

40
0.

0.
.

.
31 50 31 50
0. . 0. .

30 60 30 60
0. . 0. .

290 70. 29 0 70.


. .
PcP/ScS
280. 80. 280. ScP PcS 80.

270 . 90. 270. 90.

2 6 0. 100. 260. 100.

250
. PcP2/ScS2 .
11 0 25 0
. .
11 0

0. 0. 0. 0.
24 12 24 12

0. 0. 0. 0.
23 13 23 13
0.

0.

0.

0.
22

14

22

14
0.

0.

0.

0.
21

15

21

15
.

.
160

200

16 0
200

1 90 .

1 70 .

190.

170.
1 8 0.
180.
0.

0.
350.

10.

350.

10.
34 0

20.

340

20.
.

.
33

30

33

30
0.

0.
.

.
32

40

32

40
0.

0.
.

.
31 50 31 50
0. . 0. .

30 60 30 60
0. . 0. .

290 70. 29 0 70.


. .

PcP4/ScS4
280. 80. 2 80 . 80.

270. 90. 270. 90 .

2 6 0. 100. 2 60 . 10 0 .

. .
250 25 0
. .
110 11 0

0.
ScSP PScS 0. 0. 0.
24 12 24 12

0. 0. 0. 0.
23 13 23 13
0.

0.

0.

0.
22

14

22

14
0.

0.

0.

0.
21

15

21

15
.

.
.
20 0

16 0

200

160
190.

170.

190.

170.
1 80.
180.

Figure 3. Reflections from the Earths core.


0.

0.
350.

1 0.

350.

10.
340

2 0.

340

20.
.
.
33

30

33

30
0

0.
.

.
.
32

40

32

40
0

0.
.

.
.

31 50 31 50
0. . 0. .
SKSdf
30 30
0. .
60
0. SKSac .
60

PKPab
290 70. 290 70.
. .

280. 80. 2 80 . 80.


PKPdf
270. 90. 270. 90.

260. 1 00 . 2 60 . 100.

250
.
PKPbc .
110 25 0
. .
11 0

0. 0. 0. 0.
24 12 24 12

. 0.
30 0. .
2 13 23 30 1
.

0.

0.

0.
0

22

14
22

14
0.

0.

0.
0.

15

21

15
21

.
200

200

16 0
1 60
190.

170.

190.

170.
180.

180.

Figure 4. Seismic rays of direct core phases.

766 Seismological Research Letters Volume 74, Number 6 November/December 2003


0.

0.
35 0.

10.

3 50 .

10.
340

20.

340

20.
.
.
33

30

33

30
0.

0.
.

.
32

40

32

40
0.

0.
.

.
31 50 31 50
0. . 0. .

30 60 30 60
0. . 0. .

29 0 70. 29 0 70.
. .

2 80 . 80. 2 80 . 80.

270. 90. 270. 90.

260. 100. 2 60 . 100.

.
SKiKS .
SKiKP
25 0 25 0
. .
11 0 11 0

0. 0. 0. 0.
24 12 24 12

23
0. PKiKP 0.
13 23
0. PKiKS 0.
13
0.

0.

0.

0.
22

14

22

14
0.

0.

0.
0.
21

15

21

15
.

.
.
.

160

16 0
200

200
19 0 .

17 0 .

1 90 .

170.
180.

180.
0.

0.
350.

10.

350.

10.
34 0

20.

340

20.
.

.
33

30

33

30
0.

0.
.

.
32

40

32

40
0.

0.
.

.
31 50 31 50
0. . 0. .

30 60 30
SSdf 60
0. . 0. .

290 70. 290 70.


. .
SSac
280. 280.
PP 80. 80.

270. 90. 270. 90 .

2 6 0. 1 00 . 260. 100.

. .
250 250
. .
110 11 0

0. 0. 0. 0.
24 12 24 12

0. 0. 0. 0.
23 13 23 13
0.

0.

0.

0.
22

14

22

14
0.

0.

0.

0.
21

15

21

15
.

.
20 0

160

20 0

16 0
190.

170.

190.

170.
180.

180.
0.
0.

350.

10.
350.

1 0.

340

20.
34 0

20.

.
.

33

30
33

30
0.

0.

.
.

32

40
32

40

0.
0.

.
.

31 50 31 50
0. . 0. .

30
PKKPdf 60 30 60
0. . 0. .

290 70. 29 0 70.


. .

PKKPbc
280. 80. 2 80 . SKKSac 80.

270. 90. 270. 90.

260. 10 0 . 2 60 . 100.

. .
250 25 0
. .
110 11 0

0. 0. 0. 0.
24 12 24 12
PKKPab
30
. 0. 0. .
2 13 23 30 1
0.

0.
0.

0.

22

14
22

14

0.

0.
0.
0.

21

15
15
21

.
200

16 0
20 0

160

190.

170.
190.

170.

18 0.
180.

Figure 5. Seismic rays of singly reflected core phases.

Seismological Research Letters November/December 2003 Volume 74, Number 6 767


0.

0.
350.

1 0.

350.

10.
340

2 0.

340

20.
.

.
33

30

33

30
0.

0.
.

.
32

40

32

40
0.

0.

.
.
31 50 31 50
0. 0.
.
P4KPab .

30
0. .
60 30
0. + .
60

29 0 7 0. 29 0
P4KPbc 7 0.
. .

280. S3KSac 80. 2 80 . 80.

270. 90. 270. 90.

2 6 0. 100. 2 60 . 100.

. .
25 0 25 0
. .
11 0 11 0

0. 0. 0. 0.
24 12 24 12

0. 0. 0. 0.
23 13 23 13

0.

0.

0.
0.
22

14

22

14
0.

0.

0.

0.
15

21

15
21

.
.
200

160

200

160
190.

170.

190.

170.
180.

180.
0.

0.
350.

10.

350.

10.
340

2 0.

340

20.
.

.
33

30

33

30
0.

0.
.

.
32

40

32

40
0.

0.
.

.
31 50 31 50
0. . 0. .
SKKPab
30 30
SKKPbc
60 60
0. . 0. .

290 70. 29 0 70.


. .

280. 80. 280. 80.

270. SKP PKS 90. 2 70. 90.

260. 1 00 . 2 6 0. 100.

. .
250 25 0
. .
110 110

0. 0. 0. 0.
24 12 24 12

0. 0. 0.
PKKSab 0.
23 13 23 13
PKKSbc
0.

0.

0.

0.
22

14
22

14

0.

0.
0.
0.

15

21

15
21

.
.
200

160
160

200
190.

170.

190.

170.
180.

180.
0.

0.
350.

10.

350.

10.
340

20.

340

20.
.
.
33

30

33

30
0.

0.
.

.
32

40

32

40
0.

0.
.

31 50 31 50
0. . 0. .

30
0. .
60 30
0.
SKJKP PKJKS .
60

290
PK2IKP 70. 29 0 70.
. .

280. 80. 2 80 . 80.

270. 90. 270. 90.

260. 100. 2 60 . 100.

. .
250 25 0
. .
11 0 11 0

0. 0. 0. 0.
24 12 24 12

. 0.
30 0. .
2 13 23 30 1
0.

0.

0.

0.
22

14
22

14

0.

0.
0.
0.

15

21

15
21

.
200

200

16 0
160
190.

170.

190.

170.
180.

180.

Figure 6. Seismic rays of multiply reflected and converted core phases.

768 Seismological Research Letters Volume 74, Number 6 November/December 2003


IASPEI STANDARD SEISMIC PHASE LIST Lg A wave group observed at larger regional
distances and caused by superposition of multiple
After numerous consultations with the seismological commu- S-wave reverberations and SV to P and/or P to
nity this list was finalized in May 2002 by the IASPEI Work- SV conversions inside the whole crust. The
ing Group on Phase Names, chaired by D. A. Storchak. Other maximum energy travels with a group velocity
members of the WG were R. D. Adams, P. Bormann, E. R. around 3.5 km/s.
Engdahl, J. Havskov, B. N. L. Kennett, and J. Schweitzer. The Rg Short-period crustal Rayleigh wave
list has finally been approved by the IASPEI Commission on
Seismological Observation and Interpretation (CoSOI) and Mantle Phases
adopted by IASPEI in Sapporo on 9 July 2003.
P A longitudinal wave, bottoming below the
uppermost mantle; also an upgoing longitudinal
Crustal Phases
wave from a source below the uppermost mantle
Pg At short distances, either an upgoing P wave from
a source in the upper crust or a P wave bottoming PP Free-surface reflection of P wave leaving a source
in the upper crust. At larger distances also arrivals downward
caused by multiple P-wave reverberations inside PS P, leaving a source downward, reflected as an S at
the whole crust with a group velocity around the free surface. At shorter distances the first leg is
5.8 km/s. represented by a crustal P wave.
Pb Either an upgoing P wave from a source in the PPP Analogous to PP
lower crust or a P wave bottoming in the lower PPS PP to S converted reflection at the free surface;
crust (alt: P*) travel time matches that of PSP
Pn Any P wave bottoming in the uppermost mantle PSS PS reflected at the free surface
or an upgoing P wave from a source in the PcP P reflection from the core-mantle boundary
uppermost mantle (CMB)
PnPn Pn free-surface reflection PcS P to S converted reflection from the CMB
PgPg Pg free-surface reflection PcPN PcP multiple free-surface reflection; N is a
PmP P reflection from the outer side of the Moho positive integer. For example PcP2 is PcPPcP.
PmPN PmP multiple free surface reflection; N is a Pz+P P reflection from outer side of a discontinuity at
positive integer. For example, PmP2 is PmPPmP. depth z; z may be a positive numerical value in
PmS P to S reflection from the outer side of the Moho km. For example, P660+P is a P reflection from
Sg At short distances, either an upgoing S wave from the top of the 660 km discontinuity. (alt: PzP)
a source in the upper crust or an S wave PzP P reflection from inner side of discontinuity at
bottoming in the upper crust. At larger distances depth z. For example, P660P is a P reflection
also arrivals caused by superposition of multiple from below the 660 km discontinuity, which
S-wave reverberations and SV to P and/or P to means it is precursory to PP.
SV conversions inside the whole crust. Pz+S P to S converted reflection from outer side of
Sb Either an upgoing S wave from a source in the discontinuity at depth z (alt: PzS)
lower crust or an S wave bottoming in the lower PzS P to S converted reflection from inner side of
crust (alt: S*) discontinuity at depth z
Sn Any S wave bottoming in the uppermost mantle PScS P (leaving a source downward) to ScS reflection
or an upgoing S wave from a source in the at the free surface
uppermost mantle Pdif P diffracted along the CMB in the mantle (old:
SnSn Sn free-surface reflection Pdiff )
SgSg Sg free-surface reflection S Shear wave, bottoming below the uppermost
SmS S reflection from the outer side of the Moho mantle; also an upgoing shear wave from a source
SmSN SmS multiple free-surface reflection; N is a below the uppermost mantle
positive integer. For example, SmS2 is SmSSmS. SS Free-surface reflection of an S wave leaving a
SmP S to P reflection from the outer side of the Moho source downward
SP S, leaving source downward, reflected as P at the
free surface. At shorter distances the second leg is
represented by a crustal P wave.
SSS Analogous to SS

Seismological Research Letters November/December 2003 Volume 74, Number 6 769


SSP SS to P converted reflection at the free surface; PS PKP to SKS converted reflection at the free
travel time matches that of SPS. surface; other examples are PPKS, PSKP (alt:
SPP SP reflected at the free surface PKPSKS)
ScS S reflection from the CMB PS P (leaving a source downward) to SKS reflection
at the free surface (alt: PSKS)
ScP S to P converted reflection from the CMB
PKKP Unspecified P wave reflected once from the inner
ScSN ScS multiple free-surface reflection; N is a
side of the CMB
positive integer. For example ScS2 is ScSScS.
PKKPab PKKP bottoming in the upper outer core
Sz+S S reflection from outer side of a discontinuity at
depth z; z may be a positive numerical value in PKKPbc PKKP bottoming in the lower outer core
km. For example S660+S is an S reflection from PKKPdf PKKP bottoming in the inner core
the top of the 660 km discontinuity. (alt: SzS) PNKP P wave reflected N 1 times from inner side of
Sz-S S reflection from inner side of discontinuity at the CMB; N is a positive integer.
depth z. For example, S660S is an S reflection PKKPpre A precursor to PKKP due to scattering near the
from below the 660 km discontinuity, which CMB
means it is precursory to SS. PKiKP P wave reflected from the inner core boundary
Sz+P S to P converted reflection from outer side of (ICB)
discontinuity at depth z (alt: SzP) PKNIKP P wave reflected N 1 times from the inner side
Sz-P S to P converted reflection from inner side of of the ICB
discontinuity at depth z PKJKP P wave traversing the outer core as P and the
ScSP ScS to P reflection at the free surface inner core as S
Sdif S diffracted along the CMB in the mantle (old: PKKS P wave reflected once from inner side of the
Sdiff ) CMB and converted to S at the CMB
PKKSab PKKS bottoming in the upper outer core
Core Phases PKKSbc PKKS bottoming in the lower outer core
PKP Unspecified P wave bottoming in the core (alt: PKKSdf PKKS bottoming in the inner core
P) PcPP PcP to PKP reflection at the free surface; other
PKPab P wave bottoming in the upper outer core; ab examples are PcPS, PcSP, PcSS, PcPSKP,
indicates the retrograde branch of the PKP PcSSKP. (alt: PcPPKP)
caustic (old: PKP2) SKS unspecified S wave traversing the core as P (alt: S)
PKPbc P wave bottoming in the lower outer core; bc SKSac SKS bottoming in the outer core
indicates the prograde branch of the PKP caustic
SKSdf SKS bottoming in the inner core (alt: SKIKS)
(old: PKP1)
SPdifKS SKS wave with a segment of mantleside Pdif at
PKPdf P wave bottoming in the inner core (alt: PKIKP)
the source and/or the receiver side of the ray path
PKPpre A precursor to PKPdf due to scattering near or at (alt: SKPdifS)
the CMB (old: PKhKP)
SKP Unspecified S wave traversing the core and then
PKPdif P wave diffracted at the inner core boundary the mantle as P
(ICB) in the outer core
SKPab SKP bottoming in the upper outer core
PKS Unspecified P wave bottoming in the core and
SKPbc SKP bottoming in the lower outer core
converting to S at the CMB
SKPdf SKP bottoming in the inner core
PKSab PKS bottoming in the upper outer core
SS Free-surface reflection of SKS (alt: SKSSKS)
PKSbc PKS bottoming in the lower outer core
SN SKS reflected at the free surface N 1 times; N is
PKSdf PKS bottoming in the inner core
a positive integer
PP Free-surface reflection of PKP (alt: PKPPKP)
SzS SKS reflected from inner side of discontinuity at
PN PKP reflected at the free surface N 1 times; N is depth z outside the core, which means it is
a positive integer. For example, P3 is PPP. (alt: precursory to SS; z may be a positive numerical
PKPN) value in km.
PzP PKP reflected from inner side of a discontinuity SP SKS to PKP converted reflection at the free
at depth z outside the core, which means it is surface; other examples are SSKP, SPKS. (alt:
precursory to PP; z may be a positive numerical SKSPKP)
value in km.
SP SKS to P reflection at the free surface (alt: SKSP)

770 Seismological Research Letters Volume 74, Number 6 November/December 2003


SKKS Unspecified S wave reflected once from inner side R Mantle wave of Rayleigh type
of the CMB RN Mantle wave of Rayleigh type; N is integer and
SKKSac SKKS bottoming in the outer core indicates wave packets traveling along the minor
SKKSdf SKKS bottoming in the inner core arcs (odd numbers) or major arc (even numbers)
SNKS S wave reflected N 1 times from inner side of of the great circle
the CMB; N is a positive integer. PL Fundamental leaking mode following P onsets
SKiKS S wave traversing the outer core as P and reflected generated by coupling of P energy into the
from the ICB waveguide formed by the crust and upper mantle
SKJKS S wave traversing the outer core as P and the SPL S wave coupling into the PL waveguide; other
inner core as S examples are SSPL, SSSPL.
SKKP S wave traversing the core as P with one reflection
from the inner side of the CMB and then Acoustic Phases
continuing as P in the mantle H A hydroacoustic wave from a source in the water,
SKKPab SKKP bottoming in the upper outer core which couples in the ground
SKKPbc SKKP bottoming in the lower outer core HPg H phase converted to Pg at the receiver side
SKKPdf SKKP bottoming in the inner core HSg H phase converted to Sg at the receiver side
ScSS ScS to SKS reflection at the free surface; other HRg H phase converted to Rg at the receiver side
examples are ScPS, ScSP, ScPP, ScSSKP, I An atmospheric sound arrival which couples in
ScPSKP. (alt: ScSSKS) the ground
IPg I phase converted to Pg at the receiver side
Near-source Surface Reflections (Depth Phases) ISg I phase converted to Sg at the receiver side
pPy All P-type onsets (Py), as defined above, which
IRg I phase converted to Rg at the receiver side
resulted from reflection of an upgoing P wave at
the free surface or an ocean bottom. WARNING: T A tertiary wave. This is an acoustic wave from a
The character y is only a wild card for any seismic source in the solid earth, usually trapped in a low-
phase, which could be generated at the free velocity oceanic water layer called the SOFAR
surface. Examples are pP, pPKP, pPP, pPcP, etc. channel (SOund Fixing And Ranging).
sPy All Py resulting from reflection of an upgoing S TPg T phase converted to Pg at the receiver side
wave at the free surface or an ocean bottom; for TSg T phase converted to Sg at the receiver side
example, sP, sPKP, sPP, sPcP, etc. TRg T phase converted to Rg at the receiver side
pSy All S-type onsets (Sy), as defined above, which
resulted from reflection of an upgoing P wave at Amplitude Measurement Phases
the free surface or an ocean bottom; for example, A Unspecified amplitude measurement
pS, pSKS, pSS, pScP, etc. AML Amplitude measurement for local magnitude
sSy All Sy resulting from reflection of an upgoing S AMB Amplitude measurement for body-wave
wave at the free surface or an ocean bottom; for magnitude
example, sSn, sSS, sScS, sSdif, etc.
AMS Amplitude measurement for surface-wave
pwPy All Py resulting from reflection of an upgoing P magnitude
wave at the oceans free surface
END Time of visible end of record for duration
pmPy All Py resulting from reflection of an upgoing P magnitude
wave from the inner side of the Moho
Unidentified Arrivals
Surface Waves x unidentified arrival (old: i, e, NULL)
L Unspecified long-period surface wave
rx unidentified regional arrival (old: i, e, NULL)
LQ Love wave
tx unidentified teleseismic arrival (old: i, e, NULL)
LR Rayleigh wave
Px unidentified arrival of P type (old: i, e, NULL,
G Mantle wave of Love type (P), P?)
GN Mantle wave of Love type; N is integer and Sx unidentified arrival of S type (old: i, e, NULL,
indicates wave packets traveling along the minor (S), S?)
arcs (odd numbers) or major arc (even numbers)
of the great circle

Seismological Research Letters November/December 2003 Volume 74, Number 6 771


REFERENCES Kennett, B. L. N., E. R. Engdahl, and R. Buland (1995). Constraints
on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes, Geophysical
Angenheister, G. H. (1921). Beobachtungen an pazifischen Beben, Journal International 122, 108124.
Nachrichten von der Kniglichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Linehan, D. (1940). Earthquakes in the West Indian region, Transac-
Gttingen, Mathematisch-physikalische Klasse, 113146. tions of the American Geophysical Union 30, 229232.
Bastings, L. (1934). Shear waves through the Earths core, Nature 134, Mohorovicic, A. (1910). Potres od 8. X 1909, Godisnje izvjesce Zagre-
216217. backog Meteoroloskog Opservatorija za godinu 1909, Dio IV, Potresi
Borne, G. von dem (1904). Seismische Registrierungen in Gttingen, u Hrvatskoj i Slavonij godinu 1909 (Das Beben vom 8. X 1909, Jahr-
Juli bis Dezember 1903, Nachrichten von der Kniglichen Gesell- buch des meteorologischen Observatoriums in Zagreb (Agram) fr das
schaft der Wissenschaften zu Gttingen, Mathematisch-physikalische Jahr 1909, 4. Teil Erdbeben in Kroatien und Slavonien im Jahre
Klasse, 440464. 1909) 9, 163.
Bullen, K. E. (1946). A hypothesis on compressibility at pressures of the Richter, C. F. (1958). Elementary Seismology, San Francisco and Lon-
order of a million atmospheres, Nature 157, 405. don: W. H. Freeman and Company, 768 pp.
Conrad, V. (1925). Laufzeitkurven des Tauernbebens vom 28. Novem- Scrase, F. J. (1931). The reflected waves from deep focus earthquakes,
ber, 1923, Mitteilungen der Erdbeben-Kommission der Akademie der Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A-132, 213235.
Wissenschaften in Wien, Neue Folge 59, 23 pp. Sohon, F. W. (1932). Seismometry, Part II of J. B. Macelwane and F. W.
Chapman, C. H. (1978). A new method for computing synthetic seis- Sohon, Introduction to Theoretical Seismology, New York, 149 pp.
mograms, Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 54, Stechschulte, V. C. (1932). The Japanese earthquake of March 29,
481518. 1928, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 22, 81137.
Dey-Sarkar, S. K. and C. H. Chapman (1978). A simple method for the Willmore, P. L. (1979). Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice,
computation of body wave seismograms, Bulletin of the Seismolog- World Data Center A for Solid Earth Geophysics, Report SE-20,
ical Society of America 68, 1,5771,593. September 1979, Boulder, Colorado, 165 pp.
Geiger, L. (1909). Seismische Registrierungen in Gttingen im Jahre
1907 mit einem Vorwort ber die Bearbeitung der Erdbebendia- ISC
gramme, Nachrichten von der Kniglichen Gesellschaft der Wissen- Pipers Lane
schaften zu Gttingen, Mathematisch-physikalische Klasse, 107151. Thatcham
Geiger, L. and B. Gutenberg (1912a). Konstitution des Erdinnern,
Berkshire RG19 4NS
erschlossen aus der Intensitt longitudinaler und transversaler Erd-
bebenwellen, und einige Beobachtungen an den Vorlufer, Phys- U.K.
ikalische Zeitschrift 13, 115118. dmitry@isc.ac.uk
Geiger, L. and B. Gutenberg (1912b). Ueber Erdbebenwellen. VI. Kon- (D.A.S.)
stitution des Erdinnern, erschlossen aus der Intensitt longitudina-
ler und transversaler Erdbebenwellen, und einige Beobachtungen NORSAR
an den Vorlufern, Nachrichten von der Kniglichen Gesellschaft der
Wissenschaften zu Gttingen. Mathematisch-physikalische Klasse,
Instituttveien 25
623675. P.O. BOX 53
Gutenberg, B. (1925). Bearbeitung von Aufzeichnungen einiger Welt- N-2027 Kjeller
beben, Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Norway
Gesellschaft 40, 5788. johannes@norsar.no
Gutenberg, B. and C. F. Richter (1934). On seismic waves (first paper), (J.S.)
Gerlands Beitrge zur Geophysik 43, 56133.
Jeffreys, H. (1926). On near earthquakes, Month. Not. Royal Astronom-
ical Society, Geophysical Supplement 1, 385402. GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam
Jeffreys, H. and K. E. Bullen (1940). Seismological Tables, London: Brit- Telegrafenberg
ish Association for the Advancement of Science, Gray Milne Trust, D-14473 Potsdam
50 pp. Germany
course@gfz-potsdam.de
(P.B.)

772 Seismological Research Letters Volume 74, Number 6 November/December 2003

Anda mungkin juga menyukai