Author:
Joseph A Garcia-Prats, MD
Section Editors:
Donald H Mahoney, Jr, MD
Leonard E Weisman, MD
Deputy Editor:
Carrie Armsby, MD, MPH
Contributor Disclosures
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review
process is complete.
Literature review current through: Dec 2016. | This topic last updated: Sep 19,
2016.
DEFINITIONS
Normal newborn physiology Compared with older infants and children, term
newborns have an increased red cell mass caused by the fetal response of increased
hemoglobin production to a relatively hypoxic intrauterine environment and possibly
vasomotor instability and venous pooling in newborn immediately after birth. The mean
hematocrit (hct) and hemoglobin concentrations from capillary samples in healthy term
infants at birth are 617 standard deviations (SD) percent and 19.32.2
(SD) g/dL, respectively [1].
Even for hct values >65 percent, the relationship between hct and hyperviscosity is
somewhat inconsistent. This was examined in a study of cord blood in 2461 infants of
>34 weeks gestation [10]. Hyperviscosity was defined as >2 SD above the mean for
viscosity at each week of gestation, and polycythemia as an hct >65 percent.
Hyperviscosity occurred in only 47.4 percent of infants with polycythemia.
Time delay between birth and clamping of the umbilical cord The amount of
placental transfusion is increased when cord clamping is delayed [13].
(See "Management of normal labor and delivery", section on 'Cord clamping'.)
Site of blood sampling Hct values can vary substantially depending on the type
of blood sample obtained. Hct values are highest in capillary samples,
intermediate in peripheral venous samples, and lowest in samples drawn from the
umbilical vein [6]. In one study of newborns with peripheral venous hcts 65
percent, the mean values for capillary, peripheral venous, and umbilical venous
hcts were 75, 71, and 63 percent, respectively [14].
Age at the time of sampling Hcts increase from birth, reaching a maximum at
approximately two hours of age, then decrease to levels in cord blood by 18 hours
of age [14-16].
Method of hct measurement Values obtained from centrifuged samples are
higher than those using cell counters and correlate better with blood viscosity [17].
R = 8hL / r(4)
CAUSES The causes of polycythemia are multifactorial but are due to two major
mechanisms: passive (erythrocyte transfusion) and active (increased intrauterine
erythropoiesis). The table lists those conditions that have been associated with
polycythemia (table 1) [20].
Intrapartum hypoxia has also been associated with increased placental transfusion.
Other associations include twin-to-twin transfusion, which occurs in 10 to 15 percent of
monochorionic twins, and maternal-fetal transfusion [23], which is less common.
(See "Twin-twin transfusion syndrome and twin anemia polycythemia sequence:
Pathogenesis and diagnosis".)
Symptoms, when present, often begin by two hours after birth, after fluid shifts have
occurred and the hematocrit (hct) is at its peak [9]. Onset may be delayed to the
second or third day of life in some infants who develop an increased hct because of
excessive extracellular fluid loss. In this case, the volume depletion may exaggerate
the expression of an already increased red cell mass or, in extreme cases, it may be
the primary cause of the high hct. Infants with no symptoms by 48 to 72 hours of age
are likely to remain asymptomatic [15,33].
Symptoms usually attributed to this disorder are thought to be due to reduced tissue
perfusion or associated metabolic abnormalities. However, animal data raise some
questions as to whether this indeed is the pathophysiology [19]. These signs and
symptoms occur with many other neonatal disorders and may be associated with, but
not caused by, the polycythemia.
DIAGNOSIS
Laboratory testing The hct is often first measured on a capillary blood sample,
usually taken from a warmed heel. If the capillary hct is >65 percent, testing should be
repeated on a sample of venous blood. The venous hct usually will be 5 to 15 percent
lower than the capillary hct. The diagnosis of polycythemia is made if the venous hct is
>65 percent.
As noted above, less than half of infants with polycythemia have hyperviscosity [14].
Conversely, some infants with hyperviscosity are not polycythemic. However,
measurement of viscosity is not widely available. Thus, hct remains the best laboratory
tool to consider initiating evaluation and intervention. (See 'Hyperviscosity' above.)
If the symptoms are not severe, these possibilities usually can be excluded by a
thorough physical examination and close observation. However, if these symptoms
worsen or persist, then a thorough review of the maternal labor and delivery course,
and metabolic screening tests of glucose and ionized calcium and a chest radiograph
are warranted.
MANAGEMENT
The use of partial exchange transfusion (PET) is generally limited to patients with
severe polycythemia and/or marked symptoms. (See 'Partial exchange
transfusion' below.)
For infants with a peripheral venous hct >65 percent and symptoms that may be
attributed to hyperviscosity:
Partial exchange transfusion Isovolumetric PET reduces the hct without causing
hypovolemia. There is some evidence that PET has beneficial short-term effects on
measures of perfusion. However, PET does not appear to affect long-term outcome in
infants with polycythemia. (See 'Outcome' below.)
Short-term effects In clinical studies, PET has been found to have beneficial
effects on physiologic measures related to viscosity (eg, cerebral blood flow, cardiac
index, and oxygen transport) [7,35,41-45]; however, PET has not been demonstrated
to alter the symptoms associated with polycythemia [38].
Long-term effects Based on the available evidence, PET does not appear to
improve long-term outcomes. Several small clinical trials and two meta-analyses have
found that long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes are similar among infants
managed with and without PET [28-31,35,46-48]. In addition, the risk of gastrointestinal
injury may be increased with PET [47,48]. (See 'Complications' below
and 'Outcome' below.)
It is important to note, however, that in most studies evaluating PET, the intervention
was usually performed after six hours of life, so the effect of earlier intervention is
unknown.
Exchange volume = [(observed hct desired hct) x blood volume] observed hct
Where hct = hematocrit, and blood volume is calculated at 80 to 100 mL/kg body
weight. Higher volumes are associated with lower gestational ages and/or delayed cord
clamping. The desired hct is usually set at 55 percent.
In general, the exchange volume is 15 to 20 mL/kg body weight. Blood can be removed
and saline infused continuously (isovolumetric technique, the best approach in unstable
infants) or the process can be accomplished using serial aliquots of 10 to 15 mL/kg.
A study evaluating three-year outcomes of 111 newborns with hyperviscosity (of whom
42 received PET) compared with 110 controls found that infants with hyperviscosity
had more motor and neurologic abnormalities (38 versus 11 percent) than controls did.
These findings did not differ according to treatment [29]. Maternal preeclampsia and
neonatal hypoglycemia were more common in the hyperviscosity group than in the
control group. In addition, many infants in both groups were lost to follow-up, including
approximately one-third of the patients with hyperviscosity.
There are important limitations to these studies that preclude a clear understanding of
the effects of polycythemia, or a firm answer on the clinical benefits of PET. Most
reports include patients with polycythemia detected by routine screening who also had
documented hyperviscosity. Thus, the results may not apply to infants with
polycythemia alone or those in whom polycythemia was detected because they were
symptomatic. Most studies did not control for preexisting confounders such as maternal
diabetes, smoking, or intrauterine growth retardation, so the observed differences in
neurodevelopmental outcomes may not be caused by the polycythemia. In studies
evaluating PET, the intervention was usually performed after six hours of life, so the
effect of earlier intervention is unknown.
REFERENCES
1. Gallagher PG. The neonatal erythrocyte and its disorders. In: Nathan and Oski's
Hematology and Oncology of Infancy and Childhood, 8th ed, Orkin SH, Fisher DE,
Look T, Lux SE, Ginsburg D, Nathan DG (Eds), WB Saunders, Philadelphia 2015.
p.52.
2. Luchtman-Jones L, Wilson DB. Hematologic problems in the fetus and neonate. In:
Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, 9, Martin RJ, Fanaroff AA, Walsh MC (Eds), Elsevier
Mosby, St. Louis 2011. p.1303.
3. Oski FA, Naiman JL. Polycythemia and hyperviscosity in the neonatal period. In:
Hematologic Problems in the Newborn, 3 ed, Oski FA (Ed), WB Saunders, New York
1982. p.87.
4. Wiswell TE, Cornish JD, Northam RS. Neonatal polycythemia: frequency of clinical
manifestations and other associated findings. Pediatrics 1986; 78:26.
5. Stevens K, Wirth FH. Incidence of neonatal hyperviscosity at sea level. J Pediatr 1980;
97:118.
6. Ramamurthy, RS. Neonatal polycythemia and hyperviscosity; state of the art.
Perinatology-Neonatology 1979; 3:38.
7. Swetnam SM, Yabek SM, Alverson DC. Hemodynamic consequences of neonatal
polycythemia. J Pediatr 1987; 110:443.
8. Lowe GD. Rheological influences on thrombosis. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin
Haematol 1999; 12:435.
9. Gross GP, Hathaway WE, McGaughey HR. Hyperviscosity in the neonate. J Pediatr
1973; 82:1004.
10. Drew JH, Guaran RL, Grauer S, Hobbs JB. Cord whole blood hyperviscosity:
measurement, definition, incidence and clinical features. J Paediatr Child Health 1991;
27:363.
11. Brooks GI, Backes CR. Hyperviscosity secondary to polycythemia in the appropriate for
gestational age neonate. J Am Osteopath Assoc 1981; 80:415.
12. Rawlings JS, Pettett G, Wiswell TE, Clapper J. Estimated blood volumes in
polycythemic neonates as a function of birth weight. J Pediatr 1982; 101:594.
13. McDonald SJ, Middleton P, Dowswell T, Morris PS. Effect of timing of umbilical cord
clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev 2013; :CD004074.
14. Ramamurthy RS, Brans YW. Neonatal polycythemia: I. Criteria for diagnosis and
treatment. Pediatrics 1981; 68:168.
15. Shohat M, Reisner SH, Mimouni F, Merlob P. Neonatal polycythemia: II. Definition
related to time of sampling. Pediatrics 1984; 73:11.
16. Ramamurthy RS, Berlanga M. Postnatal alteration in hematocrit and viscosity in normal
and polycythemic infants. J Pediatr 1987; 110:929.
17. Villalta IA, Pramanik AK, Diaz-Blanco J, Herbst JJ. Diagnostic errors in neonatal
polycythemia based on method of hematocrit determination. J Pediatr 1989; 115:460.
18. Wirth FH, Goldberg KE, Lubchenco LO. Neonatal hyperviscosity: I. Incidence.
Pediatrics 1979; 63:833.
19. Rosenkrantz TS, Stonestreet BS, Hansen NB, et al. Cerebral blood flow in the newborn
lamb with polycythemia and hyperviscosity. J Pediatr 1984; 104:276.
20. Mentzer WC, Glader BE. Erythrocyte disorders in infancy. In: Avery's Diseases of the
Newborn, 7 ed, Taeusch HW, Ballard RA (Eds), WB Saunders, Philadelphia 1998.
p.1080.
21. Capasso L, Raimondi F, Capasso A, et al. Early cord clamping protects at-risk
neonates from polycythemia. Biol Neonate 2003; 83:197.
22. Strauss RG, Mock DM, Johnson K, et al. Circulating RBC volume, measured with
biotinylated RBCs, is superior to the Hct to document the hematologic effects of
delayed versus immediate umbilical cord clamping in preterm neonates. Transfusion
2003; 43:1168.
23. MICHAEL AF Jr, MAUER AM. Maternal-fetal transfusion as a cause of plethora in the
neonatal period. Pediatrics 1961; 28:458.
24. GOLD AP, MICHAEL AF Jr. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia associated with
polycythemia. Pediatrics 1959; 23:727.
25. Weinblatt ME, Fort P, Kochen J, DiMayio M. Polycythemia in hypothyroid infants. Am J
Dis Child 1987; 141:1121.
26. Bussmann YL, Tillman ML, Pagliara AS. Neonatal thyrotoxicosis associated with the
hyperviscosity syndrome. J Pediatr 1977; 90:266.
27. Mentzer WC. Polycythaemia and the hyperviscosity syndrome in newborn infants. Clin
Haematol 1978; 7:63.
28. Black VD, Lubchenco LO, Koops BL, et al. Neonatal hyperviscosity: randomized study
of effect of partial plasma exchange transfusion on long-term outcome. Pediatrics
1985; 75:1048.
29. Black VD, Lubchenco LO, Luckey DW, et al. Developmental and neurologic sequelae
of neonatal hyperviscosity syndrome. Pediatrics 1982; 69:426.
30. Malan AF, de V Heese H. The management of polycythaemia in the newborn infant.
Early Hum Dev 1980; 4:393.
31. Goldberg K, Wirth FH, Hathaway WE, et al. Neonatal hyperviscosity. II. Effect of partial
plasma exchange transfusion. Pediatrics 1982; 69:419.
32. Katz J, Rodriguez E, Mandani G, Branson HE. Normal coagulation findings,
thrombocytopenia, and peripheral hemoconcentration in neonatal polycythemia. J
Pediatr 1982; 101:99.
33. Phibbs RH. Neonatal polycythemia. In: Rudolph's Pediatrics, 20 ed, Rudolph AM (Ed),
Appleton & Lange, Stamford, CT 1996. p.252.
34. Black VD, Lubchenco LO. Neonatal polycythemia and hyperviscosity. Pediatr Clin
North Am 1982; 29:1137.
35. Bada HS, Korones SB, Pourcyrous M, et al. Asymptomatic syndrome of polycythemic
hyperviscosity: effect of partial plasma exchange transfusion. J Pediatr 1992; 120:579.
36. Sankar MJ, Agarwal R, Deorari A, Paul VK. Management of polycythemia in neonates.
Indian J Pediatr 2010; 77:1117.
37. Schimmel MS, Bromiker R, Soll RF. Neonatal polycythemia: is partial exchange
transfusion justified? Clin Perinatol 2004; 31:545.
38. Mimouni FB, Merlob P, Dollberg S, et al. Neonatal polycythaemia: critical review and a
consensus statement of the Israeli Neonatology Association. Acta Paediatr 2011;
100:1290.
39. Acunas B, Celtik C, Vatansever U, Karasalihoglu S. Thrombocytopenia: an important
indicator for the application of partial exchange transfusion in polycythemic newborn
infants? Pediatr Int 2000; 42:343.
40. Kumar A, Ramji S. Effect of partial exchange transfusion in asymptomatic polycythemic
LBW babies. Indian Pediatr 2004; 41:366.
41. Rosenkrantz TS, Oh W. Cerebral blood flow velocity in infants with polycythemia and
hyperviscosity: effects of partial exchange transfusion with Plasmanate. J Pediatr 1982;
101:94.
42. Bada HS, Korones SB, Kolni HW, et al. Partial plasma exchange transfusion improves
cerebral hemodynamics in symptomatic neonatal polycythemia. Am J Med Sci 1986;
291:157.
43. Maertzdorf WJ, Tangelder GJ, Slaaf DW, Blanco CE. Effects of partial plasma
exchange transfusion on cerebral blood flow velocity in polycythaemic preterm, term
and small for date newborn infants. Eur J Pediatr 1989; 148:774.
44. Ergenekon E, Hirfanoglu IM, Turan O, et al. Partial exchange transfusion results in
increased cerebral oxygenation and faster peripheral microcirculation in newborns with
polycythemia. Acta Paediatr 2011; 100:1432.
45. Murphy DJ Jr, Reller MD, Meyer RA, Kaplan S. Effects of neonatal polycythemia and
partial exchange transfusion on cardiac function: an echocardiographic study.
Pediatrics 1985; 76:909.
46. Delaney-Black V, Camp BW, Lubchenco LO, et al. Neonatal hyperviscosity association
with lower achievement and IQ scores at school age. Pediatrics 1989; 83:662.
47. Dempsey EM, Barrington K. Short and long term outcomes following partial exchange
transfusion in the polycythaemic newborn: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal
Neonatal Ed 2006; 91:F2.
48. Ozek E, Soll R, Schimmel MS. Partial exchange transfusion to prevent
neurodevelopmental disability in infants with polycythemia. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev 2010; :CD005089.
49. de Waal KA, Baerts W, Offringa M. Systematic review of the optimal fluid for dilutional
exchange transfusion in neonatal polycythaemia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
2006; 91:F7.
50. Dempsey EM, Barrington K. Crystalloid or colloid for partial exchange transfusion in
neonatal polycythemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr 2005;
94:1650.
51. Black VD, Rumack CM, Lubchenco LO, Koops BL. Gastrointestinal injury in
polycythemic term infants. Pediatrics 1985; 76:225.
52. Hein HA, Lathrop SS. Partial exchange transfusion in term, polycythemic neonates:
absence of association with severe gastrointestinal injury. Pediatrics 1987; 80:75.