Research article
The effect of sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide
on the strength of aggregates made from coal fly ash using
the geopolymerisation method
Hamzah Fansuri,1,2 * Didik Prasetyoko,1 Zezhi Zhang2 and Dongke Zhang2
1
Department of Chemistry, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
2
Centre for Energy (M473), University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
ABSTRACT: Geopolymerisation of coal fly ash to produce synthetic aggregates as a potential means of utilising coal
combustion by-product has been investigated. It has been revealed that the geopolymerisation strongly depends on
the physicochemical properties of fly ash, the availability of soluble silicates and aluminates, and the concentration of
added sodium hydroxide. The presence of sodium hydroxide increases the amount of soluble silicates and aluminates
in the mixture through fly ash solubilisation. Solubility tests on various fly ash samples have shown that solubility
increases as the concentration of sodium hydroxide in the fly ash increases, which also increases the strength of the
resulting geopolymer aggregates. The compression strength of the geopolymer aggregates also increases to a maximum
before decreasing again as the amount of sodium silicate is increased. 2010 Curtin University of Technology and
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Silicon and aluminium leaching tests Table 3. An example of variation in the amounts of
sodium hydroxide and water added to the geopolymer
Silicon and aluminium leaching tests were carried out matrix in preparations with 45 g of added sodium
silicate.
using a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1 : 5. As the alkaline
solution, various concentrations of NaOH were used, NaOH
SiO2 / H2 O
specifically 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 mol L1 . To leach the Code Na2 O mol g g
silicon and aluminium, the fly ash was stirred in the
alkaline solution for 24 h at room temperature. The A-1 3.36 0.00 0.00 0.00
leached silicon and aluminium were analysed by means A-2 3 0.01 0.55 0.08
of atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS). A-3 2.5 0.04 1.59 0.24
A-4 2 0.08 3.15 0.47
A-5 1.5 0.14 5.75 0.86
A-6 1 0.27 10.95 1.64
Geopolymer preparation and compressive B-1 3.36 0.00 0.00 30.75
strength tests B-2 3 0.01 0.55 30.75
B-3 2.5 0.04 1.59 30.75
All geopolymers were prepared on the basis of 300- B-4 2 0.08 3.15 30.75
B-5 1.5 0.14 5.75 30.75
g samples of fly ash. The mixtures contained fly ash, B-6 1 0.27 10.95 30.75
sodium silicate solution, sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and C-1 3.36 0.00 0.00 69.75
distilled water. A certain amount of water was added to C-2 3 0.01 0.55 69.75
each mixture to produce a workable geopolymer gel. C-3 2.5 0.04 1.59 69.75
In the mixtures, both fly ash and sodium hydroxide are C-4 2 0.08 3.15 69.75
regarded as solids, while additional water and sodium C-5 1.5 0.14 5.75 69.75
silicate solution are regarded as liquids. C-6 1 0.27 10.95 69.75
D-1 3.36 0.00 0.00 69.75
The amount of sodium silicate added during geopoly- D-2 3 0.01 0.55 69.75
mer preparation was varied from 45 to 120 g. The D-3 2.5 0.04 1.59 69.75
amounts of sodium hydroxide and water added were D-4 2 0.08 3.15 69.75
also varied, as indicated in Table 3. In the table, the D-5 1.5 0.14 5.75 69.75
SiO2 /Na2 O ratio indicates the ratio in the liquid phase, D-6 1 0.27 10.95 69.75
i.e. in the solution containing sodium silicate, sodium E-1 3.36 0.00 0.00 39.75
hydroxide and water. The concentrations of silicate and E-2 3 0.01 0.55 39.75
E-3 2.5 0.04 1.59 39.75
alkali metal ions in the fly ash were considered con- E-4 2 0.08 3.15 39.75
stant. Therefore, their influence on the total SiO2 /Na2 O E-5 1.5 0.14 5.75 39.75
ratio was assumed to be the same in each experiment. E-6 1 0.27 10.95 39.75
The combined materials were mixed in a mechanical
mixer for 10 min to form a geopolymer gel. The thus
formed gel was then moulded in a cylindrical plastic
mould with 2 : 1 height to diameter ratio and left in reactant, which affected the workability of the resulting
an oven at 60 C for 4 days to cure the geopolymer geopolymer gel (here it is discussed as L/S ratio). Fly
into aggregate pellets. Following the curing process, ashes have very narrow ranges of L/S ratio. Fly ash A,
the formed aggregates were left at room temperature for example, can only be used to prepare a geopolymer
and humidity for a further 24 days for ageing prior to at an L/S ratio of 0.15, not more or less. In contrast,
carrying out the compressive strength tests. The total fly ash BE adsorb much more water than fly ash and,
time for curing and ageing thus amounted to 28 days. therefore, more water need to be added. Hence, the L/S
The strengths of the geopolymer aggregates were ratios were much higher than 0.15. In attempting to
tested using an INSTRON 1196 universal testing prepare geopolymers outside of this L/S range, their
machine operating at a speed of 2 mm min1 . The workability was either very poor or the paste became
strength of the aggregate pellets is reported in terms too thin. In such cases, the geopolymer aggregates were
of the maximum load needed to break the aggregate. ultimately very weak. The suitable L/S ratio ranges of
fly ashes are shown in Table 4.
Geopolymers with lower L/S ratio are normally
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION stronger than those prepared with higher L/S,[21 23] as
is also the case upon the hydration of OPC. Analo-
Variation in the liquid-to-solid (L/S) ratio gous results were also seen with fly ash geopolymer, as
and strength of FA (fly ash)-geopolymers shown in Fig. 1. The strength of the geopolymer aggre-
gates increases with decreasing L/S, and aggregates
Each fly ash used in this research was unique, especially prepared from fly ash A with the lowest L/S ratio were
in its ability to adsorb water and interact with liquid much stronger than the others. Water provides a medium
2010 Curtin University of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2012; 7: 7379
DOI: 10.1002/apj
76 H. FANSURI et al. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering
Table 4. L/S ratio ranges of fly ash for preparing geopolymer gel.
Fly ash A B C D E
L/S (mass ratio) ranges 0.15 0.250.27 0.370.47 0.370.47 0.270.32
(a) (b)
(c)
concentration was added to make the FA-C geopoly- (Fig. 5(b)). The geopolymer has its ideal composition
mer. The figure seemingly shows a saturation trend when the geopolymer gel acts as a binder of the insol-
with respect to the sodium silicate concentration, which uble ash particles and fills the gaps between them.
shows a limitation when making FA-C geopolymer The strength of the geopolymer stems mainly from
aggregate. the strength of the particles. When more sodium sil-
The saturation process may be explained schemati- icate is available, most of the space is occupied by
cally, as illustrated in Fig. 5. When less sodium sili- the geopolymer binder and the particles merely act
cate is available in the mixture, empty spaces between as fillers (Fig. 5(c)). The geopolymer matrix becomes
the particles in the geopolymer matrix will result the main contributor to the strength of the aggre-
(Fig. 5(a)). These particles are fly ash particles that were gate.
not soluble during the geopolymerisation process. At Under the conditions depicted in Fig. 5(c), the
optimum sodium silicate addition, these gaps are filled strength of the geopolymer aggregate depends on the
2010 Curtin University of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2012; 7: 7379
DOI: 10.1002/apj
78 H. FANSURI et al. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering
1600 strength of geopolymer matrix. The matrix consists
1400 mainly of solid sodium silicate, which has a strength
of 9.8 MPa.[24] When the geopolymer is in a state as
Concentration of Si in the
1200
depicted in Fig. 5(b), bonded fly ash particles contribute
solution (ppm)
1000
F
to the strength of the aggregate. The particles consist
800
E
mainly of mullite and/or quartz, which are stronger than
A
600 C sodium silicate (1310 and 1110 MPa, respectively). On
400
the other hand, a lack of particle binding, as shown
in Fig. 5(a), results in the weakness of the aggregate.
200
Thus, it can be seen why geopolymer aggregate is weak
0 at low added sodium silicate concentration, reaches a
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
maximum, and then becomes weaker when there is too
NaOH concentration (mol.L-1)
much silicate.
500
450
CONCLUSIONS
400 A
Concentration of Al in the
E
350 The geopolymerisation strongly depends on the physic-
solution (ppm)
160 140
Compressive Strength (MPa)
(a) (b)
140 120
120 g (expected)
120 100
75 g
100
80
80 105 g
60
60 75 g
40
40
45 g 20
20 45 g
120 g
0 0
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Molar ratio of SiO2 to Na2O Molar ratio of Na2SiO3 to Na2O
120
Compressive Strength (MPa)
(c)
100 75 g
80
60
40 60 g
20 45 g
0
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Molar ratio of Na2SiO3 to Na2O
Figure 4. Compressive strength vs molar ratio of SiO2 in the sodium silicate solution and Na2 O in NaOH
solution of geopolymers made from (a) fly ash C, (b) fly ash D, and (c) fly ash E. The amounts (in g) of sodium
silicate solution added to 300 g of fly ash is indicated.
2010 Curtin University of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2012; 7: 7379
DOI: 10.1002/apj
Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering STRENGTH OF AGGREGATES MADE FROM COAL FLY ASH 79
REFERENCES
[1] Ash Development Association of Australia (ADAA). Total ash
production and beneficial usage, 2007; [cited 16 May 2007].
[2] R.C. Joshi, R.P. Lothia. Fly Ash in Concrete: Production,
Properties and Uses, Advances in Concrete Technology, Vol
2, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers: Amsterdam, 1997.
[3] H.W. Wu, A.D. Elliot, A. Rossiter, J.N. Zhu, D.K. Zhang. An
economic analysis of manufacturing aggregates from coal ash:
an Australian scenario. ICCS&T, Okinawa, 2005.
Figure 5. The effect of increasing sodium silicate [4] H. Fansuri, H.M. Yan, J.N. Zhu, H.W. Wu, D.K. Zhang.
concentration on the binding of insoluble fly ash Suitability of coal fly ashes to aggregate manufacture by
particles by geopolymer matrix. sintering. 11th APCChE Congress, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,
2006.
[5] J. Davidovits. World Res. Rev., 1994; 6(2), 263278.
[6] J. Davidovits. Environmentally driven geopolymer cement
The amounts of sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide applications. Geopolymer 2002, Melbourne, Australia, 2002.
that can be added are limited by the intrinsic properties [7] E. Gartner. Cem. Concr. Res., 2004; 34(9), 14891498.
of the fly ash and the workability of the geopolymer [8] J.G.S. van Jaarsveld, J.S.J. van Deventer, L. Lorenzen.
Metallogr. Mater. Trans. B, 1998; 29B(1), 283.
mixture. The strength of the geopolymer increases with [9] J.G.S. van Jaarsveld, J.S.J. van Deventer. Ind. Eng. Chem.
increasing amounts of sodium hydroxide added. This Res., 1999; 38, 39323941.
increase is related to the dissolution of silicates and [10] J.S.J. Sindhunata, G.C.L. van Deventer, H. Xu. Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res., 2006; 45, 35593568.
aluminates from the fly ash. Solubility tests on vari- [11] H. Xu, J.S.J. van Deventer. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2003; 42,
ous fly ashes have shown that the solubility of silicates 16981706.
and aluminates from fly ashes increases with increasing [12] J. Davidovits, J.L. Sawyer. Early high-strength mineral
polymer, Pyrament Inc. (Houston, TX), US Patent No.
sodium hydroxide concentration and at the same time 4509985, 1985.
the strength of the resulting geopolymer also increases. [13] J. Davidovits. Mineral polymers and methods of making them,
The strength of the geopolymer also increases with US Patent No. 439386, 1982.
[14] J.G.S. van Jaarsveld, J.S.J. van Deventer. Miner. Eng., 1996;
increasing amount of sodium silicate solution added, 10(7), 659669.
up to a certain limit. After this point, further addition [15] H. Rahier, B. Mele, M. Biesemans, J. Wastiels, X. Wu.
of sodium silicate solution reduces the strength of the J. Mater. Sci., 1996; 31(1), 7179.
[16] H. Fansuri, H. Yan, D.K. Zhang. Aggregate Manufacture from
geopolymer. Coal Fly Ash by High-temperature Sintering Method, CRC for
Coal in Sustainable Development: Perth, 2007.
[17] P. Chindaprasirt, T. Chareerat, V. Sirivivatnanon. Cem. Concr.
Compos., 2007; 29, 224229.
Acknowledgements [18] J.L. Provis, J.S.J. van Deventer. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2007; 62(9),
23182329.
[19] J. Faimon. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1996; 60, 29012907.
This research has been funded by the CRC on Coal [20] P. Duxson, A. Fernandez-Jimenez, J.L. Provis, G.C. Lukey,
in Sustainable Development (CCSD) and partly funded A. Palomo, J.S.J. van Deventer. J. Mater. Sci., 2007; 42,
29172933.
by the Indonesian State Ministry of Research and [21] D. Hardjito, B.V. Rangan. Development and Properties of
Technology under the Insentif Riset Terapan program Low-calcium Fly Ash-based Geopolymer Concrete, Faculty of
on fly ash leaching tests. The writing of this manuscript Engineering, Curtin University of Technology: Perth, 2005.
[22] D. Khale, R. Chaudhary. J. Mater. Sci., 2007; 42(3), 729746.
was funded by the Indonesian Ministry of Education [23] D. Panias, I.P. Giannopoulou, T. Perraki. Colloids Surf. A:
under the 2009 PAR-B project. H. Fansuri wishes to Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 2007; 301(13), 246254.
thank Abdul Hakim, who carried out most of the [24] http://www.championceramics.com/Prod Page7.htm 2007;
retrieved 18/10/2007.
leaching tests in the Inorganic Laboratory, Department
of Chemistry, Institut of Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
(ITS) Surabaya.
2010 Curtin University of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2012; 7: 7379
DOI: 10.1002/apj