98 2013.Fascicule4[OctoberDecember]
ACTATECHNICACORVINIENSISBulletinofEngineering
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 20C and 25C to 60C. The temperature that used to
As is illustrated in Figure 3, based on the results of determine the equations was considered above 25C
the experiments in form of normal working flow rate and under 20C because the measured values with
(0.2Qmax) the reduction of temperature from 20C to the master and experimental gas meters were the
-25C caused the reduction of approximately linear in same between 20C to 25C.
the measurement error of the gas meter. QQmax = 5844.3 + 9.9t
Nevertheless, the measurement error of meters (7)
remained constant between -25C to -30C. At 30 t 20 and 25 t 60
temperatures above 25C to 55C, the measurement Where t is the ambient temperature (C), QQmax was
error of gas meters were remained approximately estimated value of the flow rate in the form of Qmax
constant, but between 55C to 60C this error was (l/h). Equation 6 was able to evaluate the amount of
risen. As shown in Figure 3, a part of the diagram had using gas in the form of Qmax between -30C to 20C
more slope and a part of this diagram had less slope. and 25C to 60C with a coefficient of determination
The value of Q0.2Qmax was the same for 20C to 25C. 0.98 (R=0. 99). A statistical model for estimating the
Therefore, two equations were determined to measurement error of gas meters in the form of Qmax,
measure the gas consumption to determine Q0.2Qmax at is presented as below.
different temperatures appropriately by statistical E Q max = ( 6000 ( 5844 . 3 + 9 . 9 t )) / 6000
(8)
models: 30 t 20 and 25 t 60
Q 0 .2 Qmax = 1089 + 4 .95 t 30 t 20 (3) where EQmax represents the measurement error in the
Q 0.2Qmax = 1168 .5 + 1.18t 25 t 60 (4) form of Qmax in l/h. As shown in Figure 4, the stretch
line belongs to the obtained data during the
Where t is the ambient temperature (C), Q0.2Qmax was
experiments and slash line belongs to the fitted line
estimated value of the flow rate in the form of
with equation 7.
0.2Qmax (l/h). Equations 3 and 4 were able to
In this research, the effects of ambient temperature
evaluate the gas consumption measurement in the
on the measured flow rate of meters in 0.2Qmax and
form of 0.2Qmax between -30C to 20C and 25C to
Qmax forms and also measurement errors between
60C with a coefficient of determination 0.98 (R=0.
them have been considered, but Nath and Dietrich
99) and 0.69 (R=0.83), respectively.
(1997) considered the temperature behavior of
Statistical models for estimating the measurement
diaphragm gas meters.
error of gas meters in the form of 0.2Qmax, are
Errors below and above room temperature condition
presented as below.
are named positive and negative errors,
E 0.2 Qmax = (1200 (1089 + 4.95t )) / 1200 respectively. Cold temperature caused the meter's
(5)
30 t 20 measurement show less amount (positive errors),
E0.2Qmax = (1200 (1168.5 + 1.18t )) / 1200 and warm temperature caused the meter's
(6) measurement show more amount (negative errors).
25 t 60
where E0.2Qmax represents the measurement error in Measured Predicted
the form of 0.2Qmax in l/h. As shown in Figure 3, the
stretch line belongs to the obtained data during the 6600
6450
experiments and slash line belongs to the fitted line
with equations (3) and (4). 6300
Q m ax (Lit)
6150
Measured Predicted 6000
5850
1300 5700
1250 5550
1200 5400
0.2Q m ax (Lit)
2013.Fascicule4[OctoberDecember] 99
ACTATECHNICACORVINIENSISBulletinofEngineering
figure, national gas company of Iran had a large error 4. In the countries that the gas consumption is done
and lost about 40.7 million dollars in gas consumption by diaphragm gas meters, National Gas Company
of Tehran in 2008. will be lost for cold cities and will be profited for
Table 1. Consumed gas amount of Tehran warm cities and the amount of fee estimation
during the year 2008 error is significant.
Month Gas consumption Average REFERENCES
(1000, 000 m3) temperature (C) [1.] Cardelius, E., Skoglund, L.: U.S. Pat. No. 6817250,
January 2877 -1 2004.
February 1821 6 [2.] Douglas, R.R.: U.S. Pat. No. 4040296, 1977.
March 1543 10 [3.] Gas Meters - Diaphragm Gas Meters- English Version
April 997 15 of DIN EN 1359; 1993.
May 886 21 [4.] IGS-MS-IN, 101(3), 1998.
June 896 31 [5.] Kolpatzik, S.J., Hilgenstock, A., Dietrich, H., Nath,
July 835 27 B.: The location of temperature sensores in pipe
August 874 22 flows for determinig the mean gas temperature in
September 837 16 flow metering applications, Flow Measurement and
October 1067 13 Instrumentation, 9, 4357, 1998.
November 1294 7 [6.] Massah, J., Mohammadifar, H., Khazaei, J.:
December 1921 2 Consideration of Effects of Ambient Temperature On
Total 15848 - Measuring Accuracy of Diaphragm Gas Meters,
Modelling and Optimization in the Machines Building
fields, 16(1), 7075, 2010.
[7.] Measurement Instrument Directive (MID),
2004/22/EC
[8.] Nath, B., Dietrich, H.: Analysis of the recovery
effect on the accuracy in gas metering, XIV IMEKO
world Congress, Tampere , Finnland, 1997.
[9.] Nilsson, U.R.C.: A new method for finding inaccurate
gas flow meters using billing data: finding faulty
meters using billing data, Flow Measurement and
Instrumentation, 9, 237242, 1998.
[10.] Petunin, V.I.: GTE gas temperature determination
with the use of indirect measurements, Russian
Aeronautics (Iz.VUZ), 51(1), 6774, 2008.
Figure 5. The value of E0.2Qmax (%) for each month [11.] Vanderkamp, P.: Accuracy of high pressure gas
meter calibration in the Netherlands, Conference of
problems of large gas flow measurements at high
and low pressures, Germany, 117144, 1985.
100 2013.Fascicule4[OctoberDecember]