DevelopmentofConcreteContainingWaste
Glass
G.D.Perkins,CivilEngineeringResearchUnit,DivisionofCivil&MechanicalEngineering,
FacultyofAdvancedTechnology,UniversityofGlamorgan,Pontypridd,CF371DL
ProcessedglassELV,containerandarchitectural
AbstractThe large scale production of Portland cement glassoffractionsize5mmdust
andtheacquisitionofaggregatesfromdredgingandquarrying
Glass powder a much finer material which is
have a dramatic impact on the environment. Consequently
collected in the air filtration system whilst
extensiveresearchisongoingintotheuseofPortlandcement
producingtheprocessedglass
replacements,usingmanywastematerialsandindustrialby
products,forexample,pulverisedfuelash(PFA)andground
granulatedblastfurnaceslag(GGBS).Thecontinuingdebate
relatingtoUKgovernmentpolicyonlandfilltaxdictatesthat
theuseofwastefromothersourcesishighonthepoliticaland The glass powder is being used for partial binder
researchagenda. replacementinproportionsof10%,20%and30%binder
Inadditiontotheuseofbinderreplacementmaterialsfrom
replacementwhereastheprocessedglassisbeingusedfor
waste, there is somewhat less regard given to the subjectof
100%replacementoffineaggregate.Thecoarseaggregate
usingwastematerialtoreplacethefineaggregatecontentof
componentoftheconcreteisstandardisedat10mmcrushed
concrete.
limestone.
traditionalmaterials. 100%
90%
80%
IndexTermsconcrete,wasteglass
PercentagePassing
70%
60%
50%
I.INTRODUCTION 40%
30%
T HEglassbeingutilisedinthisresearchprojectisderived
frompostconsumercontainerglass,endoflifevehicle
20%
10%
(ELV)glassandarchitecturalglass. 0%
0 0.063 0.15 0.212 0.3 0.425 0.6 1.18 2 3.35 5
ParticleSizemm
TheglasswhichisusedinthisprojectissuppliedbyVirador
RichardsonsLtd,andissuppliedastwodifferentproducts: Figure1Particlesizedistributionchart
ManuscriptreceivedOctober26,2007.
p
GaryD.PerkinsisaResearchStudentCivilEngineeringResearchUnit,
Division of Civil & Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Advanced
Technology,UniversityofGlamorgan,Pontypridd,MidGlamorgan,CF37
1DL,UnitedKingdom(email:gperkins@glam.ac.uk).
2
Glasspowderparticleanalysis
Figure3Workabilityofofstandardconcretevs.glass
100 derivedsand
80
%passing
100
Slump(mm)
80
Onincorporatingcrushedglassintotheconcretemixinlieu
60 of the natural sand, workability became impaired
40 significantly when compared to the control mix. Several
20 factors have been considered in this respect and this
0 phenomenoncanbeattributedinpartto:
0 10 20 30 Theangularinterlockingnatureoftheparticles
Binderreplacementlevels(%) Suctionbetweenthelargerparticlesontheaddition
ofwater
3
[2] [2]AScmidt,WHFSaia,AlkaliAggregatereactiontestsonglass
Strength development of the concrete containing 100%
usedforexposedaggregatewallpanelwork,ACIMater.J.60(1963),
crushedglassasthefineaggregatecomponentofthemix pp.12351236.
comparedfavourablywiththatofthecontrolat thesame
age.Thecontrolat28daysachievedacompressivestrength [3] [3]C.D. Johnston Waste glassascoarseaggregateforconcrete,J.
Test.Eval.2(1974),344350.
of 49.1N/mm2 (Figure 4) whereas the concrete containing
glass aggregate achieved a compressive strength of [4] [4]C.Meyer,S.Baxter,W.Jin,Alkaliaggregatereactioninconcrete
49.5N/mm2 (Figure5).Strengthtestingisongoing.Despite with waste glass as aggregate, Proceedings of the 4th Materials
the favourable strength results obtained, the visual EngineeringConference:MaterialsfortheNewMillennium,ASCE,
appearanceoftheglassaggregateconcretedemonstrateda Reston,VA,1996,pp.13881397.
0 10 20 30Replacementlevel(%)
60
CompressiveStrength(N/mm2)
50
40
30
7 14 28 90
Days
IV.CONCLUSIONS
Crushedglassisasuitablematerialforuseas100%
replacementforfineaggregate.
Glasspowderexhibitspozzolanicpropertiesbutis
dependantuponfinenessofthepowder.
Concrete containing glass as fine aggregate can
achievecomparablestrengthstothatofnaturalsand
aggregates.
Fluidityofthefreshconcreteisinhibited.