Modals (also called modal verbs, modal auxiliary verbs, modal auxiliaries) are special verbs which
behave irregularly in English. They are different from normal verbs like "work, play, visit..." They
give additional information about the function of the main verb that follows it. They have a great
variety of communicative functions.
Here are some characteristics of modal verbs:
They never change their form. You can't add "s", "ed", "ing"...
They are always followed by an infinitive without "to" (e.i. the bare infinitive.)
They are used to indicate modality allow speakers to express certainty, possibility,
willingness, obligation, necessity, ability
The verbs or expressions dare, ought to, had better, and need not behave like modal auxiliaries to
a large extent and my be added to the above list
1. Permission
2. Ability
3. Obligation
4. Prohibition
5. Lack of necessity
6. Advice
7. possibility
8. probability
Strong obligation You must stop when the traffic lights turn red.
must
He must be very tired. He's been working all day
logical conclusion / Certainty
long.
Remember
Modal verbs are followed by an infinitive without "to", also called the bare infinitive.
Examples:
There are a lot of tomatoes in the fridge. You need not buy any.
Example:
Present:
You should see a doctor.
Past:
You should have seen a doctor
Obligation:
Present = I must / have to work hard. -- Past = I had to work hard.
Ability:
Present = I can run fast. -- Past = I could run fast when I was young.
Lack of necessity:
Present = You don't have to / needn't take your umbrella. -- Past = You didn't have to /
didn't need to take your umbrella.
Modals in the Present Modals in the Past
Advice You should see a doctor. You should have seen a doctor
Prohibition You mustn't smoke here. You mustn't have smoked there.
He has a Rolls Royce. He must be very He must have been rich. He had a big
rich. house and an expensive car.
Certainty
He can't be American. His English is He can't have written that poem. He
terrible. was illiterate.
It may / can / could / might rain. It's I guess it may / can / could / might
Possibility
cloudy. have been Lacy on the phone.
Lack of You don't have to / needn't buy any You didn't have to / didn't need to
necessity tomatoes. There are plenty in the fridge. buy tomatoes.
Uses of Need
Need is used both as an ordinary verb and as an auxiliary verb. As an ordinary verb need is used in
the sense of require. The ordinary verb need has -s in the third person singular. Questions and
negatives are made with do.
The auxiliary verb need remains unchanged, whatever be the number or person of the subject. It
is common in negative clauses. It does not have -s in the third person singular.
You need only sign this paper and I will do the rest.
If the answer is in the negative, say No, you need not. If the answer is in the positive, say Yes,
you must.
When referring to past time, need is followed by the perfect infinitive (have + past participle).
We need not have wasted our time and energy on that project.
Modality: forms
Modal verbs
Core modal verbs have only one form. They have no to-infinitive form, -ing form, past form or -ed
form. We have to reword what we want to say by using other expressions:
Modal verbs are placed first in the verb phrase (after the subject) and are followed by a verb in the
base form. The next verb may be a main verb or an auxiliary verb (be, have):
Modal verbs do not change form for tense or person. Modal verbs can be followed by the
substitute verb do:
A:
B:
Not: You can swimming, go for a long walk or visit the exhibition.
Modal verbs can only be used alone when the main verb is clearly understood:
A:
Yeah, thats true. She could. (She could take the bus.)
A:
B:
Negative () forms
Warning:
Negatives are formed by adding not after the modal verbs. We dont use dont/doesnt/didnt
with modal verbs:
Warning:
The subject and the modal verb change position to form questions. We dont use do/does/did:
Will it be a problem?
See also:
Question tags
Tags
Contracted forms
In speaking shall and will are often contracted to ll and would is contracted to d, especially when
they follow a pronoun:
can cannot (usually written as one word not two) cant /knt/
We usually put adverbs in mid position between the modal verb and the main verb:
When the main verb is understood, we can put the adverb between the subject and the modal
verb:
A:
B:
Dare, need, ought to and used to are often called semi-modal because in some ways they are
formed like modal verbs and in some ways they are like other main verbs.
Like modal verbs, ought to and used to do not change form for person. Neednt and darent do not
have a third person -s in the present:
Like main verbs, the negative form of need, dare and used to is made by using do. But it can also
be made without using do (like modal verbs).
Compare
Like main verbs, the question form for need, dare and used to is made by using do:
See also:
Dare
Need
Ought to
Used to
(Modality: forms from English Grammar Today Cambridge University Press. Need grammar
practice? Try English Grammar Today with Workbook.)
Modal verbs
The modal verbs include can, must, may, might, will, would, should. They are used with other
verbs to express ability, obligation, possibility, and so on. Below is a list showing the most useful
modals and their most common meanings:
Modal verbs are unlike other verbs. They do not change their form (spelling) and they have no
infinitive or participle (past/present). The modals must and can need substitute verbs to express
obligation or ability in the different tenses. Here are some examples:
Present perfect I haven't been able to solve this problem. Can you help?
Modals are auxiliary verbs. They do not need an additional auxiliary in negatives or questions. For
example: Must I come? (Do I must come?), or: He shouldn't smoke (He doesn't should smoke).
Important: The explanations and examples on this page are just an introduction to this extensive
and complex area of English grammar. Students of English who want to learn more should consult
a good reference work, such as Swan's Practical English Usage.
Modal verbs
This lesson has two parts. Part 1 explains the grammar of modal verbs and where they are placed
in a sentence or question. Part 2 explains the meaning of each modal verb and provides example
sentences.
Modal verbs are also called modal auxiliary verbs, modal auxiliaries, or simply
modals. These verbs are a subcategory of auxiliary verbs , which means they Read lesson
cannot be used without a main verb. English has ten modal verbs. * en espaol
* en franais
can could
may might
shall should
will would
must ought
While the meaning and usage of modal verbs is complicated, the grammar is simple. Modal verbs
are not conjugated: they have no tense and no person, so they never change.
All modal verbs must be followed by a main verb in the base form except for ought which is
followed by an infinitive.
subject modal main verb
verb (base form)
You must go
We will wait.
Attention: many English learners make the mistake of placing an infinitive after every modal verb.
This is incorrect.
When forming negative statements, the negative adverb not is placed between the modal verb
and the main verb.
When asking questions in the negative, the modal verb and a negative adverb not are always
contractions.
English grammar lesson on-line for advanced level students or teachers - Complete overview of
modal auxiliary verbs.
Modal Auxiliary Verbs are a very rich area of the English language. They are used with great
frequency and with a wide range of meanings.
All of them (except for NEED) can express degress of certainty, probability or possibility of an
event. But they can also express ideas such as willingness and ability, permission and refusal,
obiligation and prohibition, suggestion, necessity, promise and intention.
In order of certainty:
WILL and WON'T are used to predict a future event or action which are seen as certain. The truth
or certainty of what is asserted is more or less taken for granted.
WILL and WON'T are also used to express what we believe or guess to be true about the present.
They indicate an assumption based on our knowledge of people and things, their routine,
character and qualities.
Don't take the meat out of the oven. It won't be ready yet.
MUST is used to assert what we infer or conclude to be the most logical or rational interpretation
of a situation or event. As we do not have all the facts, it is less certain than will. The negative form
is CAN'T.
She can't have a ten-year old daughter! She's only twenty-five herself!
SHOULD expresses what may reasonably be expected to happen. Expectation means believing that
things are or will be as we want them to be.This use of SHOULD carries the meaning of "if
everything goes according to the plan, then something should happen"; therefore it doesn't
suggest negative or unpleasant ideas.
If the flight was on time, he should have arrived in Jakarta early this morning.
MAY expresses the possibility that something will happen or is already happening.
MIGHT, like may, expresses possibility, but is more tentative and slightly less certain.
I might not be back in time for supper, so don't wait for me.
We also use CAN to indicate that there is a very real possibility of a future event happening.
COULD expresses the theoretical possibility of something happening. It is used in a similar way to
might.
It could be expensive to keep a dog (if we had one, it could or it may not be expensive)
It also suggests that something is less likely or that there is some doubt about it.
Could not is not used to express a future possibility. The negative of could is MIGHT NOT.
Couldn't has a similar meaning to can't, but only slightly weaker. Compare it to the previous
example.
She couldn't have a ten-year old daughter! She's only twenty-five herself!
OUGHT TO, as well as SHOULD, + HAVE + PAST PARTICIPLE are used to talk about an expectation
that something happened, has happened, or will happen.
If the flight was on time, he should/ought to have arrived in Paris early this morning.
The builders should/ought to have finished by the end of the week.
MUST and MUST NOT are used in formal rules and regulations and in warnings. They express
strong obligation, the opinion of the speaker and are associated with a more formal, written style.
We can also use it to remind ourselves to do something.
Bookings must be made at least seven days before departure (formal rule)
You mustn't steal. It's very naughty (strong negative obligation, opinion of the speaker)
I must phone Steve when I get home. I said I'd call him last night, but I forgot (to remind
ourselves to do something)
HAVE TO expresses a general obligation based on a law or rule, or based on the authority of
another person.
Sometimes we can use either HAVE TO or HAVE GOT TO. But we use HAVE TO with frequency
adverbs such as always, never, normally, rarely, sometimes, etc.
With the past simple HAD TO is used especially in questions and negative sentences.
If HAVE is contracted, then we must include GOT. It is often preferred in informal speech.
The experiment has failed twice before, so it's got to work this time.
Sometimes it is possible to find MUST and HAVE TO together. In this case MUST signifies a logical
interpretation and HAVE TO an obligation. For a present situation:
I don't know where Sarah is. I presume she must have had to go out to meet someone.
We can often use either SHOULD or OUGHT TO to talk about obligations and recommendations,
although SHOULD is much more common. They describe a sort of obligation where you have a
choice.
I think you should wear your glasses whenever you feel like watching TV.
I haven't heard from Evelyn for ages. Do you think I should give her a ring?
We can use HAD BETTER instead of SHOULD/OUGHT TO, especially in spoken English, to say that
we think it is a good idea to do something. We prefer it if we want to express particular urgency
and in demands and threats.
If you are not well, you'd better ask Ann to go instead (good idea to do something)
There's someone moving about downstairs. We'd better call the police, quickly. (urgency)
The negative form is HAD BETTER NOT. In question forms the subject comes after HAD.
They are used asking for permission, or saying whether we or other people have it. To talk about
permission generally, or permission in the past, we use CAN or COULD. MAY is used to ask for and
give permission but it sounds very formal.
CAN expresses ability or is used to say what someone knows how to do, or what is possible. The
past is expressed by COULD.
Thanks to his new glasses, he could make out what was written on the notice.
In these sentences we can also use ABLE TO without any important change of meaning. To express
a fulfilled ability on one particular occasion in the past, COULD is not used. Instead, we use WAS
ABLE TO or MANAGED TO.
There is a useful difference of meaning between COULD and WAS/WERE ABLE TO: the latter form
says not only that you could do something (it was possible for you), but also that you did it.
b) The door was open and he was able to go into the room.
In sentence a) (COULD) we only know for sure that it was possible; Sentence b) (WAS ABLE) tells us
also that he managed to get in, he succeeded in getting in.