2 Research pg 8
Short questions
Aurrent area analysis
Previous works
Users
Ethics
3 A new direction pg 24
Birds
Interview
Ecosystems, Soil, Plants
Bird boxes
Crimson rosella
4 Idea development pg 44
Initial sketches
Mapping sites
Refinment
Materials
5 References pg 66
Biography
Anthony Despotellis
CONTACT DETAILS
Anthony
0420203621
s3605079@student.rmit.edu.au
Brief
S W O T
This project shows how modern The website boasts about the The manufacturing process It is possible that birds are not
technology can enable people product but not its impact. is fine, but they need to be living healthily in these nests. It
to connect and share their There is no information on if thinking about the birds safety could also be unlikely that the
works and ideas. These nests the nests have regular residents and health more. designs will not change
are aimed at birds that nest or why the design is good for
in tree hollows. The nests are birds.
interesting in visual appearance
and the materials used are
environmentally friendly
Inner city bird homes
These nests are designed to
live in urban environments,
attaching to exsisting urban
furniture and infrustructure.
The box however has life
before installation. It asks kids
to use pencil for a week to
generate sharpenings, which
remain in the nest.
After the week, the pencil and
sharpener are removed, and
the owner looks for a place to
put it.
The house itself is made of
corrigated soft plastic, and
comes in different colours.
S W O T
This project does really well to The simplicity of the home lacks This project could be improved It is possible that birds are not
enguage the local community a strong bird focus. The home is by developing different types living healthily in these nests.
and raise awareness for birds. only one size which limits certain of boxes, that have varied Birds may not use them.
The nest is simple to set up species. the materials are also not materials and shapes.
and can be diployed rapidly, to greatly suited to life in england. people also do not know how
exsisting street furniture. the hole inside the house is large to position boxes for best
and temperature ranges would conditions, so instructions could
fluctuate. be added.
Users of the space
Commuters: People relating to this group are ones
who travel to a workplace, university or just pass
through the space on a regular basis. On weekdays,
large amounts of people walk north for their tasks,
but on weekends a different pattern is observed.
It has been noted by interviewing locals, that the
parks are a short refuge from the city, after work or
university during lunch, groups of people relax in the
parks.
Students: in the north of the district, there is
Melbourne university, which provides a regular
transit route through the space. These students
are mostly travelling on weekdays and rarely on
weekends. Students mainly use the park space
during lunch or in-between classes. One attempted
interviewee was holding a meeting in university
square, which suggests that the park can also be a
place to conduct work for students.
On the other hand, after interviewing some students
who lived far from the city, information was received
that students who have longer than a 40-50 min
commute are less likely to spend time in the area
after or before classes.
Parents: parents also frequently use the parks,
whether for relaxation, letting the kids play or
meeting up with other parents. For parents, it is
important to have a place to stop and recuperate
from the business of raising a child.
Locals: locals have easy and direct access to the
parks. If they are not using the parks currently, then
one aim could be to encourage them to use the green
spaces.
Mind Map +
Immersion
When tasked with crating maps
in an area, it is very easy to
struggle with finding a concept
to map. A mind map helped me
to not only have ideas on topics
and themes but also what the
map will do. For instance, if I
followed the pathway food /
drink and then bars, I would
be walking around looking for
bars. But should I combine that
path with roads, now I am
mapping the roads to the bars.
This is how the mind map can
help to create interesting maps
that do not look like normal fold
out ones.
Can nature live amongst cities and its people
in harmony, and should it?
What does this mean? It means that Their diet has also subsequently
nature is good with change, and our changed as our rubbish disposal
world has changed significantly over system leaves opportunities for
the last two thousand years. Giant them to obtain food scraps.
cities of concrete and steel have (Corporation, 2015a) birds that
risen into the air, in tight clusters consume fried chips, bread, fried
with almost exclusively paved ground chicken and other man made foods
space. What this leaves, is no room are at more risk of death than
for nature to function as it should in birds living of natural foods. To
modern cities. further this, birds have also shown
to have their biological clocks
It seems that man acknowledges the changed due to living in urban
requirement of greenery in our lives environments, with some birds
through parks. The implementation of staying awake some 40 minutes
a patch of greenery, became common longer than one living in a forest.
refuges from the noise and lack of (staff, 2013)
colour in all cities. Outside of parks
and manmade efforts to re-introduce An interesting study into the
nature, large avian life can be spotted changes of animals living in cities
and small rodents are prominent at has shown many species are
night, but their life styles have shifted getting smarter, larger, braver and
slightly. Behaviors have shifted, where healthier. (Soniak, 2015) (Dell'Amore,
birds once gathered in large groups 2016)
building nests in trees and tree
canopies, now they can be observed It's also not all bright stars ahead.
picking up rubbish to use in their The urbanization has led to the
nesting, which often are built on top increase in numbers of pest birds.
of buildings. The common Indian Myna is one
such example, which was first
introduced into Australia to deal Kensington used to have land for
with pest insects. with numbers keeping cattle and equestrienne
rising over the last decade of animals (Unknown, 1886), but then
rapid urbanization, the bird now were removed a few years later.
is considered a pest itself, it is
smart and shows signs of learning vContinuing this shift, today there
which makes it increasingly to is almost zero encouragement for
control. (Corporation, 2004) The animals to live in the city and
birds like nesting in the roofs of it shows in the lack of habitats.
houses and rooftops with good Most parks are not designed to be
nesting prospects. animal friendly, but people friendly,
and from my observations of the
On the human side of things, parks in the north Carlton area
there is a mix of positives and and viewing imagery of other major
negatives also. cities, the situation is evident.
Humans have converted
architecture into weapons, with A French urban conservation
windowsills and roofs having anti- program tried getting people
avian defenses, trees with anti- involved, and to give them an
possum defenses. This shows experience that hopefully would raise
that whilst nature is residing in awareness of urban wildlife. Well, it
the city, people try to control seems that the participants were
their behaviors. So, from here I positive during the program, and
ask, can we really co-exist with actively sought to participate, but
nature? And in what way? A co- in the long term it struggled. The
existence where the wildlife may report says that the participants did
as well live in a zoo is not co- not seem to extend this interest
existence. to participating in other related
activities (Shwartz, 2012). It is one
Chris Philo describes the city as example, but it brings to light the
a place of civilized living, away real issue with people and animals
from the primitive rural world in the city, people just don't care
(Cloke, 2014). Livestock used enough to care.
to have their place in cities,
Direction moving
forward
Moving forward I am refining my broad
initial approach to bring back nature
and considering the elements of it.
After my research into the co-existence
of animals and humans I have decided
to continue with this path. I believe it
will become a larger problem as the
population increases and such a delict
balance could go either way.
Bees, wasps, butterflies, and interestingly birds, act as pollinators around the world, aiding
Bees, wasps,
indirectly butterflies,
to help and interestingly birds, act as pollinators around the world, aiding
flora germinate.
indirectly
to help flora germinate.
It seems that birds are pivotal in a healthy ecosystem as they play many roles, including
It seems that
predators, birds are
pollinators, pivotal in
scavengers, a healthy
seed ecosystem
dispersers, as they play
and ecosystem many roles,
engineers. including
(Sekercioglu
predators,
2006) pollinators, scavengers, seed dispersers, and ecosystem engineers. (Sekercioglu
2006)
Ecosystem services are "natural processes that benefit humans. Honeybees pollinating
Ecosystem services
orchards provide are "natural
a service processes
that benefits that benefit
humans throughhumans. Honeybees
the production of pollinating
apples. In
orchards
contrast, provide a service
native bees that benefits
pollinating milkweedshumans
providethrough the for
a service production of apples.
the milkweed, they In
contrast, native bees pollinating milkweeds provide a service for the milkweed,
facilitate its reproduction. Both are services, but only the former can reasonably theybe argued
facilitate
to have aits reproduction.
direct Both
or extrinsic are services,
benefit but only
for humans" the former
(Wallace 2007) can reasonably be argued
to have a direct or extrinsic benefit for humans" (Wallace 2007)
Below are 3 principal types of ecosystem services that birds contribute to:
1| Provisioning services, such as production of fiber, clean water, and food
1
2| Provisioning services, obtained
Regulating services, such as through
production of fiber, processes
ecosystem clean water,
thatand food climate, water,
regulate
2 Regulating services,
and human disease obtained through ecosystem processes that regulate climate, water,
and human services,
3| Cultural disease such as spiritual enrichment, cognitive development, reflection,
3 Cultural services,
recreation, such as spiritual enrichment, cognitive development, reflection,
and aesthetics
recreation, and aesthetics
Provisioning services are provided by both domesticated and non-domesticated species.
- Non-domesticated birds have been important parts of human diets historically (Moss & Bowers 2007),
and many are still today (Peres 2001).
- Bird feathers provide bedding, insulation.
- Scavengers contribute regulating services, as their consumption of bird carcass helps regulate disease deadly to humans.
- Through art, photography, religious custom, and bird watching, birds contribute cultural services. Bird watching, is one of
the most popular outdoor recreational activities around the world. (Sekercioglu 2002)
Targeting native birds for this project Introduced species to Melbourne include
is a moral direction, that will also have Blackbirds, Common Starling, Common
benefits to the ecosystem. Native birds are Myna, Spotted Turtle-Dove, Feral Pigeon
ones that occur naturally without human and House Sparrows. These are more likely
intervention. why this is important is to be seen in many areas then are native
because over the thousands of years, the birds in Melbourne.
ability of life to adapt created a natural Some native species which were formerly
balance. This means that the system can uncommon and are now locally widespread
perform efficiently, and sustainably. in suitable habitats include Musk Lorikeet,
Rainbow Lorikeet, Galah and Wood Duck.
Introducing non-native spieces will throw The numbers of Sulphur-crested Cockatoo,
out the balance formed over time, and Little Corella, Long-billed Corella, Pied
species native to the area will be affected. Currawong, Little Wattlebird and Crested
This also leads onto avain homogenisation, Pigeon are currently increasing. Most of
the reduction of a divesity of species these species can be found in the Carlton
which will result in a few common species gardens.
dominating. Peregrine Falcons may nest on city
buildings and electricity pylons in addition
to natural sites, and Australian Goshawks
nest in big trees in parks and gardens.
Nest Boxes
Family: Parrot
Average size: 129g
34cm
Appearance
There are several colour forms of the Crimson Rosella. The
form it is named for has mostly crimson (red) plumage
and bright blue cheeks. The feathers of the back and
wing coverts are black broadly edged with red. The flight " To attract them to your garden and nest
feathers of the wings have broad blue edges and the tail is box, try planting some native grasses and
blue above and pale blue below and on the outer feathers.
shrubs and retain any eucalypt trees you
movements have "
Throughout its range, the Crimson Rosella is commonly
associated with tall eucalypt and wetter forests
Diet
Natural foods include seeds of eucalypts, grasses and
shrubs, as well as insects and some tree blossoms.
Breeding
The Crimson Rosella's nest is a tree hollow, located high in
a tree, and lined with wood shavings and dust. The female
alone incubates the white eggs, but both sexes care for the
young
Status in Carlton gardens Common all year round
Early ideation
Initial Concept
As discussed in the Bird boxes section, the nest Using timber materials for the entire unit
boxes should be made of wood. It provides the is probably not a good idea, because as it is
most natural habitat possible, but also, is good exposed to the elements, it has a good chance of
for insulation and usability for the birds. The disintegrating over time. But also, wood is a fairly
aim would be to either source sustainable timber heavy material, and the unit will likely be high
for the box and features, or source logs to be up on the side of a building and mounting could
hollowed out from tree farms. become an issue
Plastic
Plastics are an incredibly versatile material, which Medium density Polyethylene, PLA or even
have many options for form and manufacturing. composites would complete the function, but the
It is possible that the outer unit of the design question then becomes, is it sustainable?
the bulk of it, would be suited to a few types of
plastic. The main reasons for this is that organic
shapes are hard to create in wood, which leaves
the methods for manufacturing to plastics.
Modeling
SWOT Analysis
S W O T
The concept features a full bird There are a few uncertainties at Should this unit be deemed The unit may not gain support
box, to the exact dimensions for this stage suitable and it proves successful from building owners
a Eastern rosella. Birds will defecate where in that, birds take up residence,
It has both native food bearing they eat, and how this will be then it could be replicated in The unit may not "look" that
plants and decorative ones. managed is still unclear. the other suburbs. good on the wall in some
it has a water catchment which stations should not be a major peoples opinions
would allow bathing and attraction, it is not a bird feeder This unit has the opportunity to
drinking but will provide some food help conservation agencies and Bird defecation in the area may
The unit is relatively light source. increase the bird population in increase
weight, and a good size for Also, mounting the unit to walls the area.
moving and installing is a small concern. Currently People may seek out the The box may increase conflict
the unit can be attached to any they could be bolted to double locations of them to hear or see between birds of the same or
surface that can support being bricked buildings, but a way the birds living or visiting them differing specie, as competition
bolted to of mounting them to rendered for food and water could
With multiple replications near modern building still is unclear. escalate.
parks and green spaces, these
installations could help boost Heavy residential areas may
the bird numbers dislike the increase in noise
production or bird activity
Endozoochory- Seed dispersal via ingestion by vertebrate animals, is the dispersal mechanism for most tree and plant species.
Germinate- (of a seed or spore) begin to grow and put out shoots after a period of dormancy.
Pollination- The transfer of pollen to a stigma, ovule, flower, or plant to allow fertilization.
Taxa- is a group of one or more populations of an organism or organisms seen by taxonomists to form a unit.
References
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20130530-bringing-nature-back-into-cities
VINCE, G. 2013 Why we need to bring nature back into cities.
https://www.domain.com.au/news/hamburger-deckel-project-in-germany-is-burying-the-a7-autobahn-to-make-parks-and-new-land-
20150119-12taln/
https://theconversation.com/is-there-room-for-nature-in-our-cities-12145
MATTHEWS, D. M. & JENKS, S. M. 2013. Ingestion of Mycobacterium vaccae decreases anxiety-related behavior and improves learning in
mice. Behav Processes, 96, 27-35. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23454729
2000 - 2017. The High Line - Sustainable practices [Online]. Available: http://www.thehighline.org/about/sustainable-practices
[Accessed].
Copyright: Beyond (My Ken/Wikimedia Commons) http://www.thehighline.org/about/sustainable-practices
URRY, A. 2014. To make our cities green, we have to think blue. http://grist.org/cities/to-make-our-cities-green-we-have-to-think-blue/
NEWMAN, P. 2014. Biophilic urbanism: a case study on Singapore. Australian Planner.
PLOURDE-ARCHER, L. 2013. Montreals Ruelles Vertes: Green Alleyways Help the Environment and Create a Sense of Community.
2000 - 2017. The High Line - Sustainable practices [Online]. Available: http://www.thehighline.org/about/sustainable-practices
[Accessed].
ATLEGRIM, O. 1989. Exclusion of birds from bilberry stands: impact on insect larval density and damage to the bilberry. Oecologia, 79,
136-139.
BIB 2017. Galah - basic infomation.
CLOKE, P. 2014. Introducing Human Geographies.
CORPORATION, A. B. 2004. Myna fightback.
CORPORATION, A. B. 2015a. Don't feed the animals: Why your chips are killing Sydney's birds.
CORPORATION, A. B. 2015b. Magpies, kookaburras among Aussie birds 'starting to disappear'.
DEBORAH GOUGH, C. B. 2013. Cats are top dog in inner-city suburbs.
DELL'AMORE, C. 2016. How Wild Animals Are Hacking Life in the City.
FERRO, S. 2015. These 3D Printed Nests Make Homes for City Birds.
KHAN 2017. What is an ecosystem?
KOODZIEJSKA 2006. Bees substitute birds in pollination of ornitogamous climber Campsis radicans.
KOOCH, Y. & JALILVAND, H. 2008. Earthworms as ecosystem engineers and the most important detritivors in forest soils. Pak J Biol Sci,
11, 819-25.
MAYNTZ, M. 2017. What Do Birds Eat? Learn Bird Diet Types!
MOORMAN, C. E., DEPARTMENT OF, F., ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, N. C. S. U. C. B. R. N. C. U. S. A., BOWEN, L. T., DEPARTMENT
OF, F., ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, N. C. S. U. C. B. R. N. C. U. S. A., KILGO, J. C., SOUTHERN RESEARCH STATION, U. F. S. S. R. P.
O. B. N. E. S. C. U. S. A., SORENSON, C. E., DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY, N. C. S. U. C. B. R. N. C. U. S. A., HANULA, J. L., USDA
FOREST SERVICE, G. S. A. G. U. S. A., HORN, S., USDA FOREST SERVICE, G. S. A. G. U. S. A., ULYSHEN, M. D. & USDA FOREST SERVICE,
G. S. A. G. U. S. A. 2007. Seasonal diets of insectivorous birds using canopy gaps in a bottomland forest. Journal of Field Ornithology,
78, 11-20.
PRODUCTION, S. 2007. Benefits of a Healthy Soil Food Web.
RSPB 2017. Are cats causing bird declines?
SHWARTZ, A. 2012. Urban Biodiversity, City-Dwellers and Conservation: How Does an Outdoor Activity Day Affect the Human-Nature
Relationship?
SMITHMATTHIAS. 2017. Flat Pack Bird House [Online]. Available: http://www.smithmatthias.com/flat-pack-bird-house/ [Accessed].
SONIAK, M. 2015. We Arent Alone in Our Cities: 12 Ways Animals Have Adapted to Urban Life by Matt Soniak YES! Magazine.
STAFF, I. 2013. Feeling tired? Blame city living: Living in urban areas could have.
TRIBILLON, J. 2016. How nature turned a failed communist plan into Bucharest's unique urban park.
UNKNOWN 1886. THE BOROUGH OF Flemington & Rensington. - PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE. - North Melbourne Advertiser (Vic. :
1873 - 1894) - 29 Oct 1886.
WILSEY, S. 2008. High Line, Low Aims.
Sekercioglu 2004. Ecosystem consequences of ecosystem declines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA101: 1804218047.
Wallace, 2007. Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Con. 139: 235246.
Moss, Bowers. 2007. Migratory bird harvest in northwestern Alaska: a zooarchaeological analysis of Ipiutak and Thule occupations
from the Deering archaeological district. Arctic Anthrop. 44: 3750.
Peres, 2001. Synergistic effects of subsistence hunting and habitat fragmentation on Amazonian forest Vertebrates. 15: 14901505.
Sekercioglu, 2002. Impacts of birdwatching on human and avian communities. Cons.29: 282289.
Imegry