doi:10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01121.x
modalities. Burstein et al. investigated heat, cold and Table 1 A questionnaire to assess symptoms of allodynia.
static, but not dynamic, mechanical allodynia (1, 2). Allodynia index is the sum of positive answers
There is evidence that allodynia in migraine is asso-
ciated with a poor response to triptans (3). Therefore, Is your headache made worse by:
identifying and using the optimal method to test Tilting or bending down your head ( ) yes; ( ) no
Coughing ( ) yes; ( ) no
migraine patients for allodynia is of clinical value. In
Climbing stairs ( ) yes; ( ) no
this study, we compared the prevalence of brush and
Do any of the following bother you when you have a
pressure allodynia in migraine patients. We also headache:
propose a systematic and practical method to test Touching your scalp or face ( ) yes; ( ) no
patients for allodynia and suggest the use of a brief Wearing any object on your head/neck ( ) yes; ( ) no
questionnaire to determine the presence of allodynia (hat, jewelry, glasses, necklaces, etc.)
in migraine patients. Wearing any object on your arms/wrist ( ) yes; ( ) no
(watch, jewelry, long sleeves, etc.)
Exposure of your face/head to wind ( ) yes; ( ) no
Methods
This study was approved by the Institutional Review
Board for Studies with Human Subjects of Jefferson s as we previously described (7). Pressure allodynia
University Hospital. All patients signed a document (PA) was tested by applying von Frey hairs (VFH)
of informed consent prior to enrolment in the study. (Touch-Test Sensory Evaluators; North Coast
Patients with International Headache Society Medical, Inc. Morgan Hill, CA, USA) of three differ-
(HIS)-dened episodic migraine (EM) or trans- ent weights, 1.4 g, 8 g and 60 g, three times to each
formed migraine (TM) as dened by Silberstein and area, holding down for 1 s and releasing. Since there
Lipton were prospectively recruited from the Jeffer- are no standardized measures for the amount of
son Headache Center out-patient clinic (46). Briey, pressure that causes pain in normal subjects, the
the criteria for TM were: (i) headache for >15 days/ selection of these weights was somewhat arbitrary.
month for >1 month; (ii) average headache duration The skin areas tested for both BA and PA were the
of >4 h/day (untreated); (iii) at least one of the fol- forehead (V1), posterior neck (C2, C3) and inner
lowing: (a) history of IHS-dened episodic migraine, forearm (C8), bilaterally. The degree of pain or
(b) history of increasing headache frequency with unpleasant sensation upon stimulation was mea-
decreasing severity, (c) current headache meets IHS sured using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS).
criteria for migraine other than duration; (iv) exclu- A potential confounder in the comparison of the
sion of secondary causes of headache (5). Control two modalities is the subjective distinction between
subjects were recruited to determine cut-off values pressure and pain. While any pain sensation result-
for pressure allodynia. These were spouses and rel- ing from light cutaneous stimulation with a gauze
atives of patients, recruited from the clinics waiting pad is dened as allodynia, some patients may have
room, who did not suffer from migraine headaches. difculty in the distinction between a sensation of
Exclusion criteria for both groups were the presence pressure and pain. To dene PA, we used the control
of peripheral neuropathy or other neurological dis- group. A number of control subjects did report pain
eases that may affect sensory function, dermatolog- in response to VFH application. To classify a sub-
ical disease that may affect skin sensation, secondary jects response as allodynic in a standardized man-
headaches (e.g. headache resulting from Lyme dis- ner, the cut-off value for allodynia was dened as the
ease, post-traumatic headache) or a diagnosis of new pain level on the VAS below which 95% of control
daily persistent headache. Patients were allowed to subjects responded. These cut-off values were 5 mm,
be on headache-preventive medications while par- 34 mm and 43 mm for the 1.4-g, 8-g and 60-g VFHs,
ticipating in the study. A questionnaire of demo- respectively.
graphic data, migraine history, migraine attack An allodynia score was determined as the sum of
features and symptoms of allodynia was adminis- allodynia levels as determined by VAS at the differ-
tered. A seven-point allodynia index was deter- ent sites. This score was correlated with head pain
mined by the results of the questionnaire (Table 1). level at the time of testing. The prevalence of BA and
Migraine patients were tested for both static PA was determined for all the patients, as well as for
mechanical (pressure) and dynamic mechanical each group (EM and TM) separately.
(brush) cutaneous allodynia. Brush allodynia (BA) Data were analysed for the following subgroups:
was tested by gently applying a folded 4 4-in patients with and without BA, patients with or with-
gauze pad to the skin, 10 times at a frequency of 2/ out PA to thin, medium or thick VFHs. Fischers
%
30
Both BA and PA
1.8 BA only 20%
20 16%
Neither 12%
PA only 10
0
BA PA (medium hair) PA (thick hair)
54.6
Figure 3 Prevalence of brush allodynia (BA) and pressure
allodynia (PA) in patients with transformedd migraine ( )
b Percent distribution of patients with both PA and and episodic migraine ().
BA, BA only, PA only or neither for medium VFH
29.1
7.3
70
61.90%
Both BA and PA
60 57.10%
3.6 BA only
Neither 50
PA only
40
32.7%
%
60.0 30
20 17.6%
c Percent distribution of patients with both PA and
BA, BA only, PA only or neither for thick VFH 10
23.6 0
BA PA
9.1
Figure 4 Prevalence of brush allodynia (BA) and pressure
9.1 Both BA and PA allodynia (PA) (for thin von Frey hairs) in patients with
BA only migraine with aura (, n = 21) and in those with migraine
without aura (, n = 34).
Neither
PA only
complete, overlap between the PA and BA groups, is therefore not likely to be signicant. Another
regardless of the weight of VFH used. This suggests limitation of this study is that patients with EM
that PA and BA in migraine result from central sen- and those with TM were not analysed separately.
sitization of similar, but not identical, neuronal Although data on the occurrence of cutaneous allo-
populations. It also suggests that there are separate dynia in TM are sparse, patients with TM and those
pathways through which sensitization to brush and with EM may differ as regards central sensitization
to pressure stimuli occur. and the occurrence of cutaneous allodynia. Further
Both PA and BA were more common in patients studies are needed to examine the value of PA mea-
with TM than in those with EM. In a previous study, surement in migraine, to analyse its occurrence in
we demonstrated a high prevalence of BA in TM EM and in TM separately and to correlate it with
both during baseline headaches and during head- treatment outcome.
ache exacerbations (10). The prevalence of BA in EM
in that study was lower than that of TM, but
increased signicantly when EM patients were References
tested during an acute attack. The ndings of the 1 Burstein R, Yarnitsky D, Goor-Aryeh I, Ransil BJ, Bajwa
current study are consistent with these results and ZH. An association between migraine and cutaneous all-
suggest that migraine patients with little or no head- odynia. Ann Neurol 2000; 47:61424.
ache are unlikely to have allodynia. 2 Burstein R, Cutrer MF, Yarnitsky D. The development of
The higher prevalence of allodynia in patients cutaneous allodynia during a migraine attack clinical
with TM suggests that allodynia may result from a evidence for the sequential recruitment of spinal and
supraspinal nociceptive neurons in migraine. Brain 2000;
process of repeated neuronal sensitization in the
123:17039.
TNC over time. It is of interest to note that similar 3 Burstein R, Collins B, Jakubowski M. Defeating migraine
results were found in cluster headache (CH) pain with triptans: a race against the developing allodynia.
patients: the prevalence of BA in these patients was Ann Neurol 2004; 55:1926.
higher in chronic, compared with episodic CH, fur- 4 Headache Classication Committee. The International
ther supporting the above notion (11). In this study, Classication of Headache Disorders, 2nd Edition.
however, we found no signicant difference in dis- Cephalalgia 2004;24:1160.
5 Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Sliwinski M. Classication of
ease duration between patients with allodynia and
daily and near-daily headaches: eld trial of revised IHS
those without allodynia. This may be due to the criteria. Neurology 1996; 47:8715.
small number of patients. 6 Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Steiner TJ, Silberstein SD, Olesen J.
Both BA and PA were more common in MA Classication of primary headaches. Neurology 2004;
compared with MoA in this study. There is no satis- 63:42735.
factory explanation to this interesting nding. It sug- 7 Ashkenazi A, Young WB. The effects of greater occipital
gests, however, that in patients with MA there is a nerve block and trigger point injection on brush allodynia
and pain in migraine. Headache 2005; 45:3504.
lower threshold for neuronal sensitization in the
8 Kawasaki Y, Kohno T, Zhuang ZY, Brenner GJ, Wang H,
TNC compared with that of patients with MoA. This Meer C et al. Ionotropic and metabotropic receptors,
hypothesis needs further study. protein kinase A, protein kinase C, and Src contribute to
Finally, our study demonstrates that self-reporting C-ber-induced ERK activation and cAMP response
of allodynic symptoms correlates with the presence element-binding protein phosphorylation in dorsal horn
of allodynia upon testing. This conrms the useful- neurons, leading to central sensitization. J Neurosci 2004;
ness of the seven-point questionnaire in rapidly 24:831021.9 Khasabov SG, Rogers SD, Ghilardi JR, Peters
CM, Mantyh PW, Simone DA. Spinal neurons that possess
assessing the presence of allodynia in the clinic.
the substance P receptor are required for the development
Patients in this study were allowed to remain on of central sensitization. J Neurosci 2002; 22:908698.
migraine-preventive drugs. This may have had an 10 Ashkenazi A, Sholtzow M, Young WB. Prevalence of
effect on our results since some migraine-preventive mechanical (brush) allodynia in migraine. Neurology
drugs (e.g. gabapentin) have been shown to reduce 2004; 62:A83A84 (Abstract).
allodynia (12). The use of acute migraine drugs was 11 Ashkenazi A, Young WB. Dynamic mechanical (brush)
also allowed in the study, but only two patients had allodynia in cluster headache. Headache 2004; 44:10102.
12 Berry JD, Petersen KL. A single dose of gabapentin
used them less than 2 h prior to allodynia testing.
reduces acute pain and allodynia in patients with herpes
Sumatriptan has been shown to cause transient all- zoster. Neurology 2005; 65:4447.
odynia in migraine patients, but this effect was short 13 Linde M, Elam M, Lundblad L, Olausson H, Dahlof CG.
lasting (<40 min) (13). The effect of acute migraine Sumatriptan (5-HT1B/1D-agonist) causes a transient allo-
drugs on the results of allodynia testing in this study dynia. Cephalalgia 2004; 24:105766.