To,

The Under Secretary

Ministry of Finance,
Department of Revenue,
Room No. 137/North Block,
New Delhi 110001.

Subject : Income Tax Evasion Petition and Tax Recovery on Rs.40 Lakhs against Shri Prasanta
Sircar , R/o FLAT -5, 1ST FLOOR, 102 JODHPUR GARDEN, NEAR LAKE GARDENS,
KOLKATA WEST BENGAL - 700045
(PAN NO : AMBPS6940A).

Dear Sir/Madam,

This is to inform you that, Shri Prasanta Sircar has been evading Taxes & has not
been disclosing the expenses to the Income Tax Authorities & hampering the
investigation through his/her links.

Background

1. Smt Sirsha Sircar(Ghose) D/o Shri Prasanta Sircar has framed a false dowry complaint
under section 498a/406/34 of IPC and under section Dowry prohibition act .It has been
claimed by Smt Sirsha Sircar(Ghose)in her own admission that her parents i.e. Shri Prasanta
Sircar & Smt Moumita Sircar had spent over Rs 40 lakhs in their daughters( Sirsha Sircars)
marriage on 26.01.2011 i.e. financial year ( 2010-2011).

2. Please refer to my correspondence held with offices concerning the jurisdiction of the
person may be, who has committed fraud & has mislead the Income Tax Officials.

LIST OF DATES & INDEX OF CORRESPONDANCE ATTACHED WITH THIS APPLICATION

FOR YOUR PERSUAL

Description Date Page No.

CPIOs reply...............................................................................

Order of the first appellate authority...................................................

Submissions on First Appeal...............................................................

First Appeal...............................................................................

CPIOs reply...............................................................................

RTI application............................................................................

TEP application............................................................................

FIR with Complain Letter on which fir was registered through ........................
Ground for complaint

1. With reference to CPIOs replay of dated _________ it clearly indicates that in financial year
2010-2011, Shri Prasanta Sircar did not file any income tax return as per income tax
authorities (hence it can be assumed his income for the financial year to be less than the basic
exemption limit of 2 lakhs) and he has not shown any expenses of marriage & Smt Moumita
Sircar( wife of Prasanta Sircar) is a house wife and she does not have any source of income
BUT as per FIR they have spend Rs.40 lakhs in her daughter marriage (Total Value of items
given in FIR-40 lakhs.)
2. Shri Prasanta Sircar, has unaccountable flow of income which is not shown anywhere in the
returns Income. I request the learned Income Tax authorities to look into the matter by
verifying cash flow history of Shri Prasanta Sircar, so as to recover valuable revenue in the
form of Income tax which has been concealed from the tax Authorities with malafide
intentions of cheating with the Government machinery.
3. As per section 133(5) it is mandatory to file income tax return on the expenditure incurred
on marriage.
4. As Shri Prasanta Sircar (as claimed) had spent Rs 40 lakhs in financial Year 2010-2011 and
his income as per Income tax return is less than(basic exemption limit as he did not even file
income tax returns as per income tax authorities for F.Y-2010-2011) Rs 2lakhs, Since he has
not disclosed the expenses occurred in his daughters marriage and source of fund of Rs 40
lakhs, it means, the balance amount i.e. 38 lahks may be a black money on which Shri
Prasanta Sircar has not paid INCOME & OTHER APPLACABLE taxes, I request to authorities
that tax should be collected as per provision of Income Tax.
5. Further careful perusal of the FIR & Attached Complain letter on which FIR have taken
place, hints provision of section 68,69,69A, 69B, 69C & 69D under Income Tax Act of 1961 are
applicable on Shri Prasanta Sircar as far as in my knowledge. However there may be many
other provisions of income tax which is best known to Honorable Income tax authority.
6. The section 68 deals with cash credits proving identity of the creditor, capacity of the
creditor, genuineness of the transaction are the important things of this section. Section 69 &
69A, B deals with unexplained investment, unexplained money & investment not fully
disclosed in books of accounts.
7. Section 69C deals with the unexplained expenditure, the important requirement of this
section is that an expenditure has been found to have been incurred by an assessee in any
financial year and the assesses fails to indicate satisfactory source of such expenditure.

But I believe till date no action has been taken against Shri FIL to recover the income tax,
wealth tax & any other tax on Rs.40 lakhs.

Request & Relief sought

Shri Prasanta Sircar & Smt Moumita Sircar, may give a baseless plea that the fir is not done
by them, because the FIR has taken place through Lake Police Station where the FIR
application was submitted by Smt Sirsha Sircar(Ghose) D/o Shri Prasanta Sircar , further
misusing & misguiding the Government Machinery.

Shri Prasanta Sircar, may misguide the Income Tax Authorities with malafide intentions of
cheating with the Government machinery by evading taxes and also evading all kinds of
wealth tax, luxury tax.

Shri Prasanta Sircar does not even file taxes till date as per CPIO reply hence his income and
source of fund is less than the basic exemption limit as per income tax records in financial
year 2010-2011. Kindly recover the tax on Rs 40 lakhs and start proceedings against Shri
Prasanta Sircar as per provision of Income Tax and the authority is under bounden duty, since
it relates and its refusal may prejudice the appellant upon which an FIR has been registered.
I may be given the due prize money as per income tax guidelines for revealing this
to the authorities.I request the authorities to kindly intervene & investigate the matter as it
is causing huge revenue loss of Rs. And other applicable penalties better known to authorties.

------Example to calculate tax (30% ON BAL AMOUNT i.e ( 40 lakhs amount said in fir 2
lakhs(basic exemption limit) As per Income tax records multiply by 2) Say dowry as per fir is
40lacks as per income tax record income is 2lakhs= 40-2=38lakhs x 30% =11,40,000/- x
penalty which is 100% of tax = 22,80,000/-

I request you to initiate investigation through appointing High Level IRS to recover the
revenue in the form of Taxes from Shri Prasanta Sircar.

Yours sincerely,

Arjun Ghose

Copy To :
Honorable Shri. Arun Jaitley
Finance Minister of India
Room No.134, North Block,
New Delhi 110 001.

The Prime Minister's Office,

152, South Block, Raisina Hill,
New Delhi,
India-110 011.