0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
11 tayangan4 halaman
The document provides basic statistics and analysis of variables for 476 participants, including their OHIP scores, age, number of comorbidities, remaining teeth, and nutritional assessment scores. It finds that OHIP scores are negatively correlated with nutritional assessment scores and number of remaining teeth, but are positively correlated with number of comorbidities. An analysis of variance shows that participants who reported their economic status as "barely enough for living" had significantly higher OHIP scores than those who reported "enough for living" or "just enough for living."
The document provides basic statistics and analysis of variables for 476 participants, including their OHIP scores, age, number of comorbidities, remaining teeth, and nutritional assessment scores. It finds that OHIP scores are negatively correlated with nutritional assessment scores and number of remaining teeth, but are positively correlated with number of comorbidities. An analysis of variance shows that participants who reported their economic status as "barely enough for living" had significantly higher OHIP scores than those who reported "enough for living" or "just enough for living."
The document provides basic statistics and analysis of variables for 476 participants, including their OHIP scores, age, number of comorbidities, remaining teeth, and nutritional assessment scores. It finds that OHIP scores are negatively correlated with nutritional assessment scores and number of remaining teeth, but are positively correlated with number of comorbidities. An analysis of variance shows that participants who reported their economic status as "barely enough for living" had significantly higher OHIP scores than those who reported "enough for living" or "just enough for living."
Basic Statistics for OHIP Scores, Age, Number of Comorbidity, Number
of Remaining Teeth, and Mini Nutritional Assessment Scores Variables n mean sd median 95% CI OHIP 476 35.58 30.62 29.00 32.82, Scores 38.33 Age 476 78.02 7.60 78.00 77.33, 78.70 Number of 476 1.31 1.10 1.00 1.21, Comorbidity 1.41 Number of 476 13.31 10.78 12.50 12.34, Remaining 14.28 Teeth Mini 476 23.70 3.27 24.50 23.41, Nutritional 24.00 Assessment Scores
Basic Statistics for Sex and Economic Status
Variables n % Sex Males 179 37.60 Females 297 62.40 Total 476 100.00 Economic Status Enough for 143 30.00 Living Just Enough 214 45.00 for Living Barely for 119 25.00 Living Total 476 100.00 2. Analysis of t-test for investigating the association of sex and OHIP Scores Variable n mean t df P- (sd) value Sex -0.36 474 0.718 Males 179 34.92 (31.20) Females 297 35.97 (30.32)
Analysis of ANOVA for investigating the association of sex and OHIP
Variable n Mean (sd) ANOVA Significant pairs from post-hoc comparison Economic F= 8.50 Mean of OHIP Status Df=2, 473 in Enough for Enough for 143 28.83 (28.47) P-value= Living group < Living <0.0001 that of in Just Enough 214 35.27 (31.06) Barely for for Living Living group Barely for 119 44.24 (30.46) Mean of OHIP Living in Just Enough for Living group < that of in Barely for Living group 3. Analysis of Person Correlation for Investigating Association of age, number of comorbidity, number of remaining teeth, and mini nutritional assessment scores vs. OHIP Scores Variable 1 Variable 2 r P-value OHIP Mini -0.39 <0.0001 Scores nutritional assessment scores OHIP Age in -0.07 0.157 Scores years OHIP Number of 0.07 0.112 Scores comorbidity OHIP Number of -0.11 0.020 Scores remaining teeth Mini Age in -0.05 0.278 nutritional years assessment scores Mini Number of -0.14 0.002 nutritional comorbidity assessment scores Mini Number of 0.16 0.001 nutritional remaining assessment teeth scores Age in Number of 0.07 0.111 years comorbidity Age in Number of -0.27 <0.0001 years remaining teeth Number of Number of 0.00 0.953 comorbidity remaining teeth
“Comparative Evaluation between Physics Forceps and Conventional Extraction Forceps in Orthodontic Extraction of Maxillary Premolars: A Prospective, Interventional, Single Blind, Randomized Split Mouth Study”