Anda di halaman 1dari 60

GENERAL HEALTH CONDITION, LIVING ARRANGEMENTS,

AND SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS AS CONTRIBUTING

FACTORS OF DEPRESSION AMONG THE

ELDERLY POPULATION

A Thesis

Presented to

The Faculty of the School of Social Work

California State University, Los Angeles

In Partial Fulfillment

of the Requirements for the Degree

Master of Social Work

By

Carmen Avalos

June 2016
ProQuest Number: 10141090

All rights reserved

INFORMATION TO ALL USERS


The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.

In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed,
a note will indicate the deletion.

ProQuest 10141090

Published by ProQuest LLC (2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author.

All rights reserved.


This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code
Microform Edition ProQuest LLC.

ProQuest LLC.
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346
2016

Carmen Avalos

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

ii
The thesis of Carmen Avalos is approved.

Sei-Young Lee, Ph.D., Committee Chair

Nikola Alenkin, Ph.D., LCSW

Siyon Rhee, Ph.D., School Director

California State University, Los Angeles

June 2016

iii
ABSTRACT

General Health Condition, Living Arrangements, and Socioeconomic Status as

Contributing Factors of Depression Among the Elderly Population

By

Carmen Avalos

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between general health

condition, living arrangements, socioeconomic status, and depression among elderly

adults. The California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) 2011-2012 dataset was utilized in

order to conduct the secondary analysis of variables for this study. This study found that

there is a significant relationship between general health condition, socioeconomic status,

ethnicity, gender, and depression among the sample of elderly adult participants. The

results from this study found that elderly participants who reported a poor general health

condition (self-rated health) had higher levels of depression, and elderly adults who

reported an excellent general health condition had lower levels of depression. A low

socioeconomic status was correlated to higher levels of depression among elderly adults.

This study also found that elderly minorities have higher levels of depression when

compared to their counterparts. Female elderly adults were found to have higher levels

of depression than males in this study. The results of this study serve to raise awareness

and contribute knowledge of significant contributing factors correlated to depression

among the elderly population.

iv
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I would like to thank my family for being very supportive of my education.

Everything I have achieved thus far is all thanks to them. A special thank you to my

mother for always encouraging me to become the strong, educated, and independent

woman I am today. Also, a huge thank you to my cohort friends who have been very

kind and supportive throughout our program. Thank you to all my close friends from Cal

State LA who have helped me in way or another throughout my years on this campus. To

those who took the time to read my thesis, I am very thankful for your time. I am very

grateful to have all of you in my life as I continue following my career goals.

I would also like to thank my mentors and role models who have helped me

develop as a student and professional social worker throughout my education at Cal State

LA. Thank you Dean Yorker, Dr. Brown, Dr. Corley, Dr. Huynh-Hohnbaum, Dr.

Altschuler, Dr. Villa, and many others who have supported me throughout my

undergraduate and graduate education on this campus.

Lastly, I would like to express my sincere gratitude and admiration to my thesis

advisor Dr. Lee. I am very thankful to have end up with you as my advisor after a

difficult start to thesis. I am very glad that there is faculty like yourself in our department

who are dedicated to the success of their students. Your time and support was much

appreciated throughout this year. Thank you very much Dr. Lee!

v
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iv

Acknowledgments................................................................................................................v

List of Tables ................................................................................................................... viii

Chapter

1. Introduction .............................................................................................................1

Statement of the Problem ...................................................................................2

Scope of the Problem .........................................................................................3

Purpose of Study ................................................................................................5

Objectives ..........................................................................................................5

Hypothesis..........................................................................................................6

Variable and Operational Definitions ................................................................7

Theoretical Framework ......................................................................................7

2. Literature Review..................................................................................................10

Review Process ................................................................................................10

General Health Condition and Depression ......................................................10

Living Arrangements and Depression .............................................................12

Socioeconomic Status and Depression ............................................................13

Ethnicity and Depression .................................................................................16

Gender and Depression ....................................................................................17

Summary ..........................................................................................................19

3. Methodology .........................................................................................................21

Research Design...............................................................................................21

vi
Sampling ..........................................................................................................21

Data Collection ................................................................................................22

Instrumentation ................................................................................................23

Data Analysis ...................................................................................................26

Limitations and Strength of Research Design .................................................27

4. Results ...............................................................................................................28

Demographic Characteristics ...........................................................................28

Living Arrangements .......................................................................................29

Socioeconomic Status ......................................................................................29

General Health Condition ................................................................................30

Depression among Elderly Adults 65 and Older .............................................31

Bivariate Analysis ............................................................................................34

Multivariate Analysis .......................................................................................38

5. Discussion .........................................................................................................40

Significance of the Findings ............................................................................40

Implications for Social Work ...........................................................................43

Recommendations for Future Research ...........................................................45

Conclusion .......................................................................................................46

References ..........................................................................................................................47

vii
LIST OF TABLES

Table

1. Independent & Dependent Variables .......................................................................7

2. Independent Variables ...........................................................................................25

3. Dependent Variables ..............................................................................................26

4. Demographic Characteristics of Elderly Adults 65 and Older ..............................29

5. Living Arrangements of Elderly Adults 65 and Older...........................................29

6. Socioeconomic Status of Elderly Adults 65 and Older .........................................30

7. General Health Condition of Elderly Adults 65 and Older....................................31

8. Depression among Elderly Adults 65 and Older ...................................................33

9. Depression by Gender (t-test) ................................................................................34

10. Depression by Living Armaments (t-test)..............................................................35

11. Correlation between Depression and Age; Poverty Level; General Health

Condition................................................................................................................36

12. Depression by Ethnicity (one-way ANOVA) ........................................................37

13. Depression by Educational Attainment (one-way ANOVA).................................38

14. Linear Multiple Regression of Depression with Age, Gender, Latino, Asian,

African American, White, Poverty Level, High School Degree, Some College,

College and Above, Living Arrangements, and General Health Condition ..........39

viii
CHAPTER 1

Introduction

In the United States, it is expected by the year 2050, that the older population age

65 and older will consist of 83.7 million (U.S. Census Bureau, 2015). This estimate was

considerably doubled as the estimated older adult population consisted of 43.1 million

people in the year 2012 in the United States (U.S. Census Bureau, 2015). A higher

number of elderly individuals is due to the aging cohort of baby boomers, who started to

reach the age of 65 in the past few years.

Aging individuals are more susceptible to mental illnesses in later adulthood.

Therefore, it is no surprise that two million elderly individuals are affected by depression

after the age of 65 (Ashford & LeCroy, 2013, p. 623). A person can experience

depressive symptoms at any age. However, its usually more difficult to recognize and

understand when an elderly individual is experiencing depression.

Depression is a common, but very serious mental illness that is characterized by a

combination of symptoms that interfere with a person's ability to work, sleep, study, eat,

and enjoy once-pleasurable activities (National Institute of Mental Health [NIMH],

2015). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5;

American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013) defined depression as a period of at least

two weeks in which an individual experiences a loss of interest or pleasure in almost all

activities. Additionally, at least four supplementary symptoms from a list of criteria have

to be experienced by the individual, symptoms include: changes in appetite or weight,

difficulty thinking, difficulty concentrating, decreased energy, sleepiness, feelings of

1
worthlessness or guilt, trouble making decisions, regular thoughts of death, and plans or

ideas of suicide (APA, 2013).

Recognizing these depressive symptoms can be difficult as they are commonly

associated with the aging process of elderly individuals. Mortality in the elderly

population is affected by the emergence of ego integrity versus despair as individuals

have more time to reflect on their past. Therefore, it is important to examine contributing

factors of depression that elderly individuals might not be able to change or control as

independence begins to decrease with age. General health conditions, living

arrangements, and socioeconomic status are factors of concern in regards to the influence

they might have on the psychological well-being of elderly individuals.

Statement of the Problem

Identifying depression among the elderly population might be difficult as some

may think sadness and isolation is part of the aging process. It has been reported that

older adults have an increased risk of experiencing depression (Center for Disease

Control and Prevention, 2015). This increased risk of depression among elderly adults

could be due to changing, new, and existing stressors that come along with the aging

process. Most of the research that has been conducted on this topic has found that

depression is the most commonly diagnosed mental illness among the elderly population

(Djernes, 2006). Due to the known prevalence of elderly adults being at an increased risk

for depression, it is important that influencing factors be identified for the benefit of

increasing awareness of depression among the elderly population.

It has been found that elderly individuals are at risk of experiencing depression

due to several factors (Rogers, 1999). The perception elderly individuals have of their

2
own general health condition is a significant contributing factor for depression. (Jahn &

Cukrowicz, 2012). The aspects of the living arrangements are an important contributing

factor, as a correlation between living arrangements and the risk of elderly depression has

been found in research (Chan, Malhotra, Malhotra & stbye, 2011). Economic hardship

has been found to be associated with depression among the elderly population (Fukunaga

et al., 2012). In the United States, many elderly minorities significantly depend on

public assistance from the government for food, rent, and transportation. Elderly adults

living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods have a greater prevalence to

depression (Almeida et al., 2012). Elderly adults are usually expected to have a higher

socioeconomic status because of the perception that they have worked all their life, and in

return they get to enjoy their retirement. This perception is not accurate as many elderly

adults live in poverty and rely on financial assistance from the government. Living in

poverty can impact the likelihood of elderly adults seeking and receiving treatment for

depression. Therefore, socioeconomic status is also a significant contributing factor of

depression among the elderly population that should be further examined. Elderly adults

might be less motivated to seek treatment for depression when experiencing symptoms

because of the stigma that is associated to depression among this population. Therefore,

it is imperative that we examine these contributing factors of depression among the

elderly population.

Scope of the Problem

In the last couple decades, modern medicine has made it possible for people to

live longer. As people experience longer longevity, the prevalence of mental illness

might increase as well. One in four older adults have a mental disorder, and by the year

3
2030, it is expected that 15 million older adults will experience some type of mental

illness (National Council on Aging [NCOA], 2015).

Depression can impact activities of daily life as the desire to accomplish simple

tasks are affected due to a loss of interest (Ganatra, Zafar, Qidwai, & Rozi, 2008). In the

United States of America, seven million elderly individuals experience depression

(NCOA, 2015). A study found that depression in elderly adults has a prevalence of

22.9% (Ganatra et al., 2008). It is likely that the prevalence of depression among these

elderly individuals is also influenced by other variables. Ethnicity is a factor that

contributes to the level of poverty an elderly individual might face in their lifetime

(Cawthorne & Americans, 2008). A high percent of elderly minorities of color were

found to most likely live in poverty when compared to the 7.9 percent of white

Americans who live in poverty (Cawthorne & Americans, 2008). In regard to gender,

Katsumata et al. (2005) found that elderly women have a higher prevalence for

depressive symptoms than elderly men. According to a report by the Center for

American Progress, over 3.4 million older adults 65 and older in the Unites States, live

below the poverty line (Cawthorne & Americans, 2008). In 2006, 9.4 percent of elderly

adults were surviving with an income that was below the poverty threshold ($9,669) for

individuals (Cawthorne & Americans, 2008). Elderly adults who depend on their income

for basic needs are not going to take the initiative to use their money on mental health

services. Therefore, elderly adult minorities with depressive symptoms are likely to

continue living under poor conditions that are contributing to their risk of depression.

The lack of awareness and treatment services available for elderly adults with

depression is significantly evident. Research from Satcher (1999), reported that

4
depression is a directly associated with suicide among older adults. Two thirds of suicide

cases in adults 65 years old and older, report depression as the main cause for every one

out of four suicides (Blazer, 2002; McDougall, Blixen & Suen, 1997). The statistics of

elderly individuals who committed suicide is an example of the consequences of letting

depression go unrecognized and untreated among the elderly population. Therefore,

raising awareness of this problem is essential as it could make a difference in the overall

well-being of elderly adults.

Purpose of Study

The purpose of this study is to examine contributing factors influencing

depression among the elderly population. Using data from the California Health

Interview Survey, (2011-2012), general health condition, living arrangements, and

socioeconomic status were examined as contributing factors influencing depression

among elderly adults. The results of this study serve to contribute knowledge of

significant contributing factors found to be associated with depression among the elderly

population. Lastly, this study serves to raise awareness of this mental illness as stigma is

commonly associated to depression diagnosis and treatment among the elderly

population.

Objectives

The research objectives for this study are:

1. To examine sociodemographic characteristics among elderly adults.

2. To examine general health condition among elderly adults.

3. To examine living arrangements among elderly adults.

4. To examine socioeconomic status among elderly adults.

5
5. To examine depression among elderly adults.

6. To examine the relationship between general health condition and depression

among elderly adults.

7. To examine the relationship between living arrangements and depression among

elderly adults.

8. To examine the relationship between socioeconomic status and depression among

elderly adults.

9. To examine the relationship between ethnicity and depression.

10. To examine the relationship between gender and depression.

11. To investigate which independent variables (general health condition, living

arrangement, socioeconomic status, age, ethnicity and gender) predict depression

among elderly adults.

Hypothesis

Research hypotheses for this study include:

1. A lower general health condition is more likely to influence the level of

depression among elderly adults.

2. Living alone is more likely to predict an increased risk of depression among

elderly adults.

3. A lower socioeconomic status influences an increased risk of depression among

elderly adults.

4. Elderly minorities are more likely to be at risk for depression than their

counterparts.

6
5. Female elderly adults are more likely to have higher levels of depression than

male elderly adults.

Variables and Operational Definitions

The main dependent variable in this study is depression among elderly adults.

Depression was defined in the mental health section of the CHIS (2011-2012) dataset

using the Kessler 6 psychological distress scale that is presented in details in chapter 3.

Three major independent variables were examined for the purposes of this study,

which are general health condition, living arrangements, and socioeconomic status (SES).

Ethnicity, gender, and age are the only sociodemographic variables that was addressed in

this study. The adult data set of the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) (2011-

2012) was used to identify and define the three independent variables of the study.

Table 1

Independent & Dependent Variables


________________________________________________________________________

Independent Variables Dependent Variables


________________________________________________________________________
Psychological Distress

General Health Condition (1) Feel Nervous Past 30 Days


Living Arrangements (2) Feel Hopeless Past 30 Days
Socioeconomic Status (SES) (3) Feel Restless Past 30 Days
Educational Attainment (4) Feel Depressed Past 30 Days
Poverty Level (5) Feel Everything An Effort Past 30 Days
Age (6) Feel Worthless Past 30 Days
Ethnicity
Gender
________________________________________________________________________

Theoretical Framework

This research is guided by the theoretical framework of Erick Ericksons

psychosocial development theory. Ericksons psychosocial development theory has eight

7
stages. For the purpose of this study, only the eighth stage of ego integrity versus despair

will be addressed. In this stage, older adults reflect on their life as they are closer to

death. According to Hearn et al., (2012) elderly individuals who achieve ego integrity

are realistic, optimistic, self-aware and are not depressed nor self-critical. Ego integrated

elderly individuals achieve life satisfaction because they affirm their lifes worth, values,

and have accepted their accomplishments without feeling overwhelmed by feelings of

regret (Hearn et al., 2012). According to Hearn et al., (2012) elderly individuals in

despair are willing to reflect on their life course, but are not able to accept their

accomplishments and therefore, feelings of regret end up leaving them unsatisfied with

life. Despairing persons in this stage are depressed about missed chances in life,

disappointments, and failures (Hearn et al., 2012). Acknowledgment and achievement of

the challenges that arise in this final psychosocial crisis is vital for the psychological

well-being of elder individuals (Dezutter, Wiesmann, Apers, and Luyckx, 2013).

According to Dezutter et al. (2013) loss of independence, physical and mental

decline, and bereavement of a partner are outcomes elderly individuals face in the final

stage of psychosocial development and therefore, depressive feelings can result from

these new experiences. A study of a longitudinal sample of elderly adults concluded that

life satisfaction and depressive symptoms are independent predictors of elderly mortality

over time (Collins, Glei, and Goldman 2009). This means that elderly individuals who

are in Ericksons stage of integrity versus despair are more likely to be at risk of

depression if they are in despair. Elderly individuals in despair are unsatisfied with life,

hence they are more likely to contemplate suicide if they have depressive symptoms. The

research available correlating depression and Ericksons eighth stage of ego integrity

8
versus despair is very minimal. Therefore, more studies are needed for the purpose of

raising awareness of contributing factors that influence depression among the elderly

population.

9
CHAPTER 2

Literature Review

This literature review examined contributing factors of depression among elderly

adults. The three primary contributing factors are general health condition, living

arrangements, and socioeconomic status. The variables ethnicity and gender were also

examined in this literature review in regards to depression among elderly adults.

Review Process

The data base Academic Search Complete and Google Scholar were used for this

literature review. The primary terms that were researched in the search engines included

elderly adults, depression, general health condition, living arrangements, and

socioeconomic status. When the search term elderly did not give a significant variety of

results, the terms such as older adults and seniors were also included in the search engine.

When depression was not used as a search term, the term depressive symptoms and

psychological distress were also searched in the data bases.

General Health Condition and Depression

General health condition is interchangeably referenced as subjective health, self-

perceived health and self-rated health in the literature. Depression is a mood disorder

that affects many aspects of a persons life. Depression is often underdiagnosed among

the elderly as depression symptoms are often mistaken as part of the aging processes. A

study by Han and Jylha (2006) examined the relationship between changes in self-rated

health and the improvement of depressive symptoms among community-dwelling

disabled and non-disabled older adults. In a two year follow up period, 4766 older adults

took part in the study. The results from Han and Jylha (2006) study indicate that from

10
1993 to 1995, a decrease in depressive symptoms was found in both disabled and

nondisabled community-dwelling elderly adults. Decreased depressive symptom were

correlated to an increased chance of improvement in self-rated health, and also to a

decreased chance of decline in self-rated health for these particular participants (Han &

Jylha, 2006). In addition to Han & Jylha (2006) study, another study also explored self-

rated health and depressive symptoms.

Similarly, Jahn and Cukrowicz (2012) sought to examine the association between

depressive symptoms and functional impairment, and self-rated health with a sample of

98 elderly adults. They hypothesized that self-rated health in elderly adults was a

moderating factor in relation to depressive symptoms and functional impairment. The

results from their study found that increased levels of functional impairment were

correlated with fewer depressive symptoms as these individuals reported having a better

self-rated health, but poor self-rated health reported by elderly adults was associated to

higher severe depressive symptoms in functionally impaired individuals (Jahn &

Cukrowicz, 2012). They also reported that little functional impairment in elderly adults

was associated with the least amount of severe depressive symptoms when self-rated

health was better (Jahn & Cukrowicz, 2012). The findings help to further establish that

self-rated health is a mediator between depressive symptoms and functional impairment.

Therefore, elderly adults with a functional impairment who might not rate their health as

high as other elderly adults, will most likely have an increased prevalence for higher

depression levels.

Based on the results from the previous studies, the review of literature in regards

to general health condition among elderly adults has found that self-rated health is a

11
significant contributing factor to depression. Additionally, Pu, Bai, and Chou (2013)

conducted a study were they hypothesized that self-rated health by itself could explain

the relationship between the utilization of medical care and depression among older

adults. The study measured depressive symptoms and self-rated health in 2,727

participants. They found that self-rated health alone has an influence on the relationship

between medical care utilization and depression among older adults. The study also

found that elderly adults with higher depressive symptoms reported a poorer general

health condition when compared to those who reported having an excellent general health

condition (Pu, et al., 2013). Therefore, an improvement in self-rated health among

elderly adults with depression can lead to an increased rate of medical care utilization by

this population. The results of the studies reviewed were found to contribute to the

significance of general health condition as it has been established in the literature that the

perception of a poor health condition can influence higher depressive symptoms among

elderly adults.

Living Arrangements and Depression

Depression symptoms can be influenced significantly by the living arrangements

of an elderly individual. Most typical living arrangements among elderly adults are

comprised of living alone, living with a spouse and living with others. Several studies

have look at such living arrangements and their association to depression among elderly

adults. Lin and Wang (2011) examined the risk factor associated with depressive

symptoms and the prevalence of depressive symptoms among 192 community-dwelling

elderly adults living alone. They found that women have a 74% increased prevalence of

depressive symptoms when living alone, and men have a 45% increased prevalence of

12
higher depressive symptoms when living alone. The study also reported gender

differences, which indicated that self-perceived health, chronic illness, educational level,

religious beliefs, and social support are risk factors influencing depressive symptoms in

men who live alone, while social support and age are risks factors influencing depressive

symptoms in women who live alone (Lin & Wang, 2011).

Similarly to Lin and Wangs (2011) study, Fukunaga et al. (2012) sought to

examine the association between depression and living arrangements, and the differences

in factors influencing depression among elderly adults. Such living arrangements

consisted of participants living with others or living alone (without a partner or spouse).

They hypothesized that living alone influenced the risk of depression symptoms, and

therefore, postulated a correlation of increased suicidal ideation and living alone. The

study found that living alone in its self was significantly associated to depression.

Factors such as suicide ideation, long-term care insurance, financial strain, loss of

appetite, worries in life, and low levels of social support are the only factors that were

significantly associated to depression and elderly adults who lived alone or with others

(Fukunaga et al., 2012). Factors only associated among elderly adults who live with

others, included sleep loss, hospital visits, absence of work with income, and the number

of generations living together (Fukunaga et al., 2012). These results contribute to the

significance of living arrangements as it has been established in the literature that both

types living arrangements can influence the risk of depression among elderly adults.

Socioeconomic Status and Depression

Socioeconomic status (SES) is a risk factor of concern when it comes to its

influence on the level of depression among elderly adults. Murata, Kondo, Hirai, Ichida,

13
and Ojima (2008) conducted a research study examining depression and SES among

elderly Japanese adults. The study also looked at depression among elderly adults and

whether their area of residence is associated to the prevalence of depression. The sample

of participants in the study consisted 29,860 elderly adults 65 and older. The results of

the study found that low-income elderly adults were 2.35 times more likely to be

depressed then their high-income elderly adults (Murata et al., 2008). Their study also

found that rural elderly adults had a 1.3 higher likelihood of being more depressed than

then elderly adults in urban areas. The study also adjustments for age, sex, marital status,

self-rated health, illness, and higher levels of ADL. After controlling for these

covariates, the findings also showed that the SES gradient of depression still existed

(Murata et al., 2008).

Socioeconomic status can be defined in different ways. Income and educational

level of attainment are commonly used to define and identify a persons socioeconomic

status. Socioeconomic status has been reported to influence the prevalence, and the

treatment of depression among the elderly population. Koster et al. (2006) examined

correlations between the onset of depression and SES among older adults. The study

utilized a longitudinal data collection method that followed older adults over 9 years.

Educational attainment and income were used to define the SES. The study found that

SES was a predictor of the incidence of depression in older adults. The study also found

that older adults with low SES had two times higher incidence rate of depression, which

predicted more depressive symptoms when compared to a person with high SES. Low

SES people had lower education and income levels that were correlated to being a

smoker and also less physically active when compared to high SES older adults. Low

14
SES in the study also indicated that a higher prevalence of diseases and were more

vulnerable to end up with higher hazard ratios of physical health when compared to those

with high-SES. The study also reported that low SES was significantly associated to a

decline in physical health, psychological and behavioral problems. They reported that

older adults with lower SES showed a smaller network, less emotional support, lower

feelings of mastery, and lower self-efficacy when compared to those with higher SES

(Koster et al., 2006).

In addition to Koster et al.s (2006) study on SES and depression, Almeida et al.

(2012) study also investigated the relationship between socioeconomic disadvantage and

depression. This study examined 21,417 older adults age 60 and over who were recruited

over a three-year period in Australia. The Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas of

Australia were used to measure socioeconomic disadvantage and depressive symptoms

were measured by a primary health questionnaire that measured nine items (PHQ-9)

(Almeida et al., 2012). The results of the study indicated that 6% of participants in the

least disadvantaged quintile were affected by depression, while 10% of participants in the

most disadvantaged quintile were affected as well. The study also indicated that the risk

of depressive symptoms in later life increases with socioeconomic disadvantage, and

particularly this study reported a possible two years of depressive symptoms to be present

when socioeconomic disadvantages are experienced (Almeida et al., 2012). The

literature established that SES is a significant contributing factor of depression among

elderly adults. Therefore, the more socioeconomic disadvantaged experienced by this

population, the more likely they are to experience higher levels of depression.

15
Ethnicity and Depression

Ethnicity is an important factor to consider when looking at contributing factors

that may influence depression among the elderly population. A study by Falcon and

Tucker (2000) examined the association of situational factors and the prevalence of

depressive symptomatology among Hispanic elderly adults living in the same

neighborhood in Massachusetts. The different situational factors included health

problems, household arrangements, socioeconomic status, and acculturation. The sample

of participants consisted of Hispanic and non-Hispanic White elderly adults. The sample

included 238 non-Hispanic White, 429 Puerto Rican, 128 Dominican, and 149 elderly

adults who were considered as other Hispanic. Falcon and Tucker (2000) found that

health problems were significantly associated to higher depressive symptoms for both

Hispanic and non-Hispanic White elderly adults. Their study found an association

between living alone and higher depression symptoms as living with a spouse or with

others was correlated to lower depression symptoms among both Hispanic and non-

Hispanic Whites. Falcon and Tucker (2000) report that elderly Puerto Ricans and elderly

Dominicans were found to have a low socioeconomic status which influenced a higher

prevalence of depression symptoms when compared to other Hispanic or non-Hispanic

Whites. Among the sample, only Dominicans had a significant association between

acculturation and depressive symptoms. The studys results established that ethnic

minorities such as Hispanics in this sample, are more likely to have a higher prevalence

of depression symptoms than other ethnicities among the elderly adult population.

In addition to Falcon and Tuckers (2000) study, another research study by

Akincigil et al. (2012) examined racial and ethnic differences in the diagnosis of

16
depression and treatment of depression among community-dwelling elderly adults. The

study consisted of a sample size of 12,353 Medicare beneficiaries who were 65 years old

and older. In regards to ethnicity, the sample of participants consisted of 2.5 % of non-

Hispanic other, 1.9% were Hispanic, 8.3% were African American and 87.3% were non-

Hispanic White. Akincigil et al. (2012) study found that Hispanics had higher levels of

depressive symptoms than the other ethnic groups in the sample. The results of the study

also indicate that African American elderly adults have a lower odd of being diagnosed

with depression when compared to non-Hispanic Whites. Their study reports that among

Hispanic and non-Hispanic Whites, the diagnosis of depression was more likely for both

groups. The study also found that treatments of depression were similar among all four

groups, but elderly African Americans and elderly non-Hispanic Whites were half as

likely to receive any treatment for a diagnosis of depression. While the type of

treatments are the same among all ethnic groups, the actual acceptance of treatment

varies among minorities as it was found that non-Hispanic Whites are less likely to

proceed with any treatment for depression (Akincigil et al., 2012). The findings in the

literature suggest that among elderly adults, minorities are less likely to receive a

depression diagnosis despite having depressive symptoms. Such findings are of concern

as it infers that health professionals are less likely to recognize and treat depression

among elderly minorities.

Gender and Depression

A study by Kockler and Heun (2002) sought to examine gender differences in

relation to depressive symptoms among depressed and non-depressed elderly adults. The

study examined different hypotheses for depressed and non-depressed elderly adults.

17
Among depressed elderly adults, it was hypothesizes that elderly women present more

symptoms of major depression than elderly men and that depressive symptoms differ

among elderly women and men with major depression. Among non-depressed elderly

adults, it was hypothesized that depressive symptoms differ among elderly men and

women, and that more depressive symptoms are suffered by elderly woman then elderly

men. The study consisted if a sample of 236 depressed elderly participants and 357 non-

depressed elderly participants. The results of the study indicated that the number of

symptoms did not differ significantly between genders, but that depressed elderly women

presented different significant symptoms such as more appetite disturbances when

compared to elderly men who suffered from more agitation (Kockler and Heun, 2002).

Their study also found that among non-depressed elderly adults, symptoms of depression

differed as females suffered from more joylessness and reduced appetite than men due to

the influence of different demographic and psychosocial variables. It was also found that

non-depressed elderly women have more depressive symptoms than non-depressed

elderly men (Kockler and Heun, 2002). The literature suggest that the number of

symptoms does not differ between depressed elderly females and males, but the type

symptomology does differ, indicating different sub-types of depression among both

genders.

In addition to Knockler and Heuns (2002) study, other research studies have also

examined contributing factors of depression and whether gender outweighs the impact of

these risk factors. A cross-sectional study by Minicuci, Maggi, Pavan, Enzi & Crepaldi

(2002) examined physical, social and psychological factors associated to the prevalence

of depressive symptoms and gender among elderly adults in Italy. The sample of

18
participants consisted of a random sample of 2,398 individuals aged 65 and older. The

Italian version the Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) was used to

measure depression among the sample of participants. Minicuci et al. (2002) study found

that there is a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms in women (58%) than in men

(34%). Their study also found that women are at more risk of depressive symptoms,

even when other risk factors such as a lack of support, physical impairment, or poor self-

rated health, are considered (Minicuci et al., 2002). The research findings suggest that

most associated factors of depressive symptoms tend to always put elderly women at a

higher risk for depression when compared to elderly men, which parallels existing

literature on gender and depression among the elderly population.

Summary

The literature on general health condition, living arrangements, socioeconomic

status and depression has shown that all of the independent variables are significantly

correlated to the main dependent variable. The literature points out that self-rated health

is one of the most significant contributing factors influencing the risk of depression

among the elderly population. Living arrangements were correlated to higher depression

symptoms when participants lived alone. Indicating that elderly adults who live alone

will have an increased risk for depression when there is a lack of support in the home.

The review of literature correlated socioeconomic status significantly to an increased risk

of depression among elderly adults. Educational attainment and income seem to be

significant factors that help to further establish and support the correlation of the

independent and dependent variables. Additionally, when ethnicity was considered,

elderly minorities were more at risk for depression than their counterparts in the

19
literature. Thus, indicating the significance culture plays to the prevalence and treatment

of depression among the elderly population. The literature review on depression and

gender among elderly adults correlates females significantly more to be at risk for

depression. Other gender difference where found, but in regard to the different

symptomatology that the elderly adults might experience. This study will further

explore the reviewed contributing factors and examine how they correlate to depression

among the elderly population.

20
CHAPTER 3

Methodology

This chapter discusses the research methodology used for this thesis. This section

describes the research design, sampling methods, instrumentation, data collection, and

data analysis of research design used. This study utilized secondary data to examine the

contributing factors influencing depression among the elderly population.

Research Design

The UCLA 2011-2012 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS 2011-2012),

Adult Data File was used for this thesis project. The CHIS 2011-2012 is a population-

based random-digit dial telephone survey of the population in California. The CHIS has

been conducted every other year since 2001. The UCLA Center for Health Policy

Research (UCLA-CHPR), in conjunction with the Department of Health Care Services,

First 5 California and the California Department of Public Health, The California

Endowment, Kaiser Permanente, and the National Cancer Institute worked

collaboratively to conduct CHIS. CHIS gathered comprehensive information for all age

groups in the areas of health status, health conditions, health related behaviors, health

insurance coverage, access to health care services, and other issues related to health.

Sampling

The sample from CHIS 2011-2012 was designed to provide estimates of the

overall population in California and, for the majority of counties and groups of counties

with small populations. It was also designed to provide estimates of larger racial and

ethnic groups, including smaller ethnic subgroups as well. CHIS utilized a multi-stage

sample design in order to achieve their objectives. The state of California was dived into

21
56 geographic sampling strata which included 41 single-county strata, three multi-county

strata and 2 counties with sub-county strata. The Random-digit-dial (RDD) sample was

utilized to choose phone numbers of California residents. In the sample, 80 percent of

phone numbers were from landlines and 20 percent were cellular service phone numbers.

Within each household selected, one adult (18 years and older) was randomly chosen.

Households with adolescents (12-17 years old) and children under the age of 12, allowed

for one adolescent and one child to be randomly selected. For adolescents, interviews

were conducted directly, but for children, the parent who was more knowledgeable of the

child, completed the interview. Cellular service could not be stratified at geographically

by counties like landlines could and therefore cellular RDD was stratified into 28 strata

using 7 CHIS regions and telephone area codes. If the cellular number randomly selected

was shared by two or more adults, only one adult completed the interview. Cellular

numbers belonging to individuals under 18 years of age were excluded.

Data Collection

A private company that specializes in statistical research and large-scale sample

surveys known as Westat, conducted the CHIS 2011-2012 data collection. Westat

conducted data collection under a contact with the UCLA Center for Health Policy

Research. All interviews were administered using Westats computer-assisted telephone

interviewing (CATI) system. In order to maximize participation and cooperation from

California population, an advance letter in five languages was mailed to all landline

sampled phone numbers of which an address could be obtained from reverse directory

services. Along with the advance letter, a $2 bill was attached to encourage cooperation.

In order to ensure diversity through data collection, interviews were conducted in

22
English, Spanish, Chinese (Mandarin and Cantonese dialects), Vietnamese, and Korean.

These languages were chosen based on the 2000 Census data which identified the largest

ethnic groups in California. On average, adult interviews took about 38.5 minutes to

complete, child and adolescent interviews took about 14.5 minutes and 21.5 minutes.

Interviews conducted in languages other than English were completed in a longer time

frame. An estimate of 7 percent of all adolescent interviews and 28 percent of all child

and 15 percent of adult interviews were conducted in languages other than English.

Within each sampled household, one randomly selected adult was interviewed, one

sampled adolescent and one child if the sampled adult was present and was the parent or

legal guardian of child. Overall, a possible of three interviews could have been

conducted per household. After all follow-up attempts were conducted to complete the

full questionnaire, adults who completed at least 80 percent of the questionnaire were

considered as completed. Overall, a total of 42,935 adults, 7,334 children and 2,799

adolescents were part of the CHIS 2011-2012 sample size.

Instrumentation

The variables used in this study were adopted from the CHIS 2011-2012 Adult

Survey Public Use File. The independent variables were specific to general health

condition, living arrangements, socioeconomic status, and general-demographic

variables. Socioeconomic status data included educational attainment, and poverty level.

General demographic variable data included age, ethnicity and self-reported gender.

The main dependent variable, psychological well-being was measured by the

following questions: feeling nervous, feeling hopeless, feeling restless, feeling depressed,

23
feeling everything an effort, and feeling worthless. Table 2 and 3 present independent

and dependent variables for the current study.

In order to conduct further data analysis, gender was recoded as to male (=0) and

female (=1). Ethnicity was regrouped and recoded as to (0) Latino, (1) Asian, (2) White,

(3) African American, and (4) Other. For socioeconomic status variables, educational

attainment was originally collected with 11 levels and recoded into four groups of (0)

Less Than High School, (1) High School Diploma, (2) Some College, and (3) College

and Above. Poverty levels was computed into federal poverty levels by annual income

and number of household size that were supported by annual income with four levels of

(1) 0-99% FPL, (2) 100-199% FPL, (3) 200-299% FPL, and (4) 300% FPL. Living

arrangement was measured on whether the elderly adult was currently living with a

spouse in the same household (1) yes or (2) no. General health condition was measured

by asking in general, how the elderly adult would rate their health condition from

excellent (=1), very good (=2), good (=3), fair (=4) or poor (=5). For data analysis, it was

reverse coded from poor (=0) to excellent (4).

Finally, depression was measured by the Kessler 6-item Psychological Distress

Scale with the following questions in the past 30 days: feeling nervous, feeling hopeless,

feeling restless, feeling depressed, feeling everything is effort, and feeling worthless. All

six items were reverse coded so that the greater the frequency of symptoms, the higher

the score. A value of four is assigned to answers equaling all of the time. A value of

zero is assigned to not at all answers. A score of 24 is the highest score available for

severe psychological distress. Elderly adults with a cumulative score of thirteen or more

is determined to have experienced psychological distress in the past thirty days. The

24
operational definitions, the re-coded variables and the details of the variables used are

provided (see Table 2 and Table 3).

Table 2

Independent Variables
________________________________________________________________________
Variable Level of Measurement Variable Information
Age Ratio 65 and older
Ethnicity (Recoded) Nominal (0) Latino, (1) Asian, (2) African American,
(3) White, (4) Other

Gender (recoded) Dichotomous Self-Reported (0) Male, (1) Female

Poverty Level Ordinal Was your total annual household income before taxes
less than or more than ${POVRT50}?

(1)0-99% FPL, (2)100-199% FPL, (3)200-299% FPL,


(4)300% FPL and Above

Educational Attainment Ordinal What is the highest grade of education you have
(recoded) completed and received credit for?

(0)Less Than High School, (1)High School Diploma,


(2)Some College, (3) College and Above

Living Arrangements
Nominal Spouse living in the same household?
(recoded)
(1).Yes, (0) No

General Health Ordinal In general, would you say your health is excellent, very
Condition (recoded) good, good, fair or poor?"

(4) Excellent, (3) Very Good, (2) Good, (1) Fair,


(0) Poor
________________________________________________________________________

25
Table 3

Dependent Variables

PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS
Composite Score
(Interval)

Feeling Nervous
Ratio (recode) (0)Not At All, (1)A Little of the Time, (2)Some of the Time,
(3)Most of the Time, (4)All of the Time

Feeling Hopeless
Ratio (recode) (0)Not At All, (1)A Little of the Time, (2)Some of the Time,
(3)Most of the Time, (4)All of the Time

Feeling Restless
Ratio (recode) (0)Not At All, (1)A Little of the Time, (2)Some of the Time,
(3)Most of the Time, (4)All of the Time

Feeling Depressed
Ratio (recode) (0)Not At All, (1)A Little of the Time, (2)Some of the Time,
(3)Most of the Time, (4)All of the Time

Feeling Everything An Effort


Ratio (recode) (0)Not At All, (1)A Little of the Time, (2)Some of the Time,
(3)Most of the Time, (4)All of the Time

Feeling Worthless
Ratio (recode) (0)Not At All, (1)A Little of the Time, (2)Some of the Time,
(3)Most of the Time, (4)All of the Time

Data Analysis

The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 was utilized to

analyze the data in this study. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were completed to

analyze independent, and dependent variables including sample frequencies, means,

standard deviations and percentages. Bivariate analysis were utilized to examine

statistical associations between independent and dependent variables. Multivariate

26
analysis was used to examine which independent variables were predictors of

psychological distress.

Limitations and Strengths of Research Design

This study was limited to only the available variables in the dataset, and so the use

of secondary data did not allow for as much flexibility as primary data because questions

were extracted from an existing questionnaire of a previous study. The purpose of this

study was to examine 65 and older adults perceptions of their own psychological well-

being. Therefore, further limitations of this study may include the presence of

subjectivity since data was collected directly from elderly adults in regard to their

psychological distress. Their own perceptions might be significantly different from

clinical depression diagnosed by mental health professionals based on DSM-IV. Further

research is suggested to compare these perceptions to objective data.

There were also significant strengths of the research design in this study. Data

was collected from a large-scale survey of randomly chosen elderly adults 65 and older

throughout the state of California. Therefore, the results of this study can be generalized

to all elderly adults 65 and older in California. In addition, the original study had already

been approved by the Institutional Review Board and other data previously collected.

The use of secondary data for this study resulted in cost and time effective benefits.

27
CHAPTER 4

Results

This chapter displays the results of the statistical analysis of data obtained from

the CHIS (2011-2012). Using univariate, bivariate, and multivariate data analyses,

general health condition, living arrangements, and socioeconomic status were examined

as contributing factors influencing depression in the elderly population.

Demographic Characteristics

Table 4 shows the sociodemographic characteristics of elderly adults 65 and

older. The variables examined for sociodemographic characteristics are age, gender and

ethnicity. There was a total of 2,867 participants in this study. The average age of the

sample was 74.69 years with a standard deviation of 6.622. The minimum age for the

sample was 65 years and the maximum age was 85 years. With respect to gender, 1,138

(39.7%) of the participants were male, while 1729 (60.3%) of participants were female.

In regards to ethnicity, 5.8% (n =165) were Latino, 8.6% (n = 247) were Asian, 76.5% (n

= 2192) were White, 3.8% (n = 109) were African Americans, and 5.46% (n = 154) were

classified as others.

28
Table 4

Demographic Characteristics of Elderly Adults 65 and Older

Variable Total N Mean SD Min Max N (%)


Age N=2867 74.69 6.622 65 85
Gender
Male N=2867 1138(39.7%)
Female 1729 (60.3%)

Ethnicity
Latino N=2867 165 (5.8%)
Asian 247 (8.6%)
White 2192 (76.5%)
African American 109 (3.8%)
Other 154 (5.4%)

Living Arrangements

Table 5 displays living arrangements of participating elderly adults who

responded to this question. Participants were asked if their spouse lives in the same

household, 96.7% (n = 1301) responded Yes while 3.3% (n = 45) answered No.

Table 5

Living Arrangements of Elderly Adults 65 and Older

Variable Total N N (%)

Spouse lives in same household

Yes N=1346 1301 (96.7%)


NNNN=1346
No 45 (3.3%)

Socioeconomic Status

Table 6 shows the socioeconomic status (SES) of elderly adults 65 and older. The

variables examined for SES were poverty level and educational attainment. With respect

to poverty level, 10.7% (n=307) reported living in the lowest level of poverty (0-99%

29
FPL), 20.7% (n=594) reported living in the 100-199% FPL range, 17.2% (n=492)

reported living in the 200-299% FPL range, and 51.4% (1474) reported living at the

300% FPL or above. To reduce the selection of educational attainment, values were

recoded for this study. Of the participants, 45.0% (n = 1,291) reported having a college

degree and above while 21.3% (n = 610) attended some college, 22.4% (n =642) had a

high school diploma, and 11.3% (n = 324) had education less than high school.

Table 6

Socioeconomic status of Elderly Adults 65 and Older

Variable Total N N (%)

Poverty Level
0-99% FPL 307 (10.7%)
100-199% FPL N=2867 594 (20.7%)
200-299% FPL 492 (17.2%)
300% FPL and Above 1474 (51.4%)
Educational Attainment
Less Than High School 324 (11.3%)
High School Diploma N=2867 642 (22.4%)
Some College 610 (21.3%)
College and Above 1291 (45.0%)

General Health Condition

As displayed in Table 7, general health condition was self-reported by elderly

adult participants 65 and older. Among the elderly participants, 15.0% (n=430) reported

being in poor health, 30.0% (n=860) reported being in fair health, 29.0% (n=831)

reported being in good health, 17.0% (n=486) reported being in very good health, and

9.1% (n=260) reported being in excellent health when asked to self-rate their general

health condition.

30
Table 7

General Health Condition of Elderly Adults 65 and Older

Variable Total N N (%)

General Health Condition N=2867


Poor 430 (15.0%)
Fair 860 (30.0%)
Good 831 (29.0%)
Very Good 486 (17.0%)
Excellent 260 (9.1%)

Depression among Elderly Adults 65 and Older

Table 8 provides a summary of results from a 6 question distress scale utilized to

measure depression expressed by the respondents. Respondents were ask the following 6

questions: feeling nervous in the past 30 days, feeling hopeless in the past 30 days,

feeling restless in the past 30 days, feeling depressed in the past 30 days, feeling that

everything is an effort in the past 30 days, and feeling worthless in the past 30 days.

Possible responses for the 6 items were: all of the time, most of the time, some of

the time, a little of the time, and not at all. When asked about feeling nervous in the past

30 days, 1.6% (n=44) reported feeling nervous all of the time, 2.4% (n=67) reported

feeling nervous most of the time, 13.0% (n=367) reported feeling nervous some of the

time, 29.2% (n=821) reported feeling nervous a little of the time, and more than half of

the respondents 53.9% (n=1517) reported feeling nervous not at all. More than half of

the respondents 83.3% (n=2346) reported feeling hopeless not at all, 9.2% (n=259)

reported feeling hopeless a little of the time, 6.0% (n=168) reported feeling hopeless

some of the time, 1.0% (n=28) reported feeling hopeless most of the time, and .5%

(n=15) reported feeling hopeless all of the time. In reference to feeling restless in the

past 30 days, 1.60% (n=45) reported all the time, 1.5% (n=42) reported feeling restless

31
most of the time, 11.7% (n=329) reported feeling restless some of the time, 23.5%

(n=662) reported feeling restless a little of the time, and 61.7% (1738) reported feeling

restless not at all. The majority of respondents 87.0% (n=2449) reported feeling

depressed not at all, 6.8% (n=191) reported feeling depressed a little of the time, 4.3%

(n=121) reported feeling depressed some of the time, 1.1% (n=32) reported feeling

depressed most of the time, and .8% (n=23) reported feeling depressed all of the time.

When asked about feeling everything is an effort in the past 30 days, 2.7% (n=77)

reported feeling everything is an effort all of the time, 2.9% (82) reported feeling

everything is an effort most of the time, 10.9% (n=306) reported feeling everything is

an effort some of the time, 16.8% (n=474) reported feeling everything is an effort little

of the time, and 66.7% (1877) reported feeling everything is an effort not at all. Lastly,

majority of respondents 88.9% (n=2503) reported feeling worthless not at all, 5.4%

(n=153) reported feeling worthless a little of the time, 3.7% (104) reported feeling

worthless some of the time, 1.2% (n=33) reported feeling worthless most of the time,

and .8% (n=23) reported feeling worthless all of the time.

32
Table 8

Depression among Elderly Adults 65 and Older

Total
Variable N (%) Mean SD Min. Max.
N
Depression Composite Score N=2816 2.52 3.418 0 24

Feel Nervous the Past 30 Days


All the Time 44 (1.6%)
Most of the Time 67 (2.4%)
Some of the Time N=2816 367 (13.0%)
A Little of the Time 821 (29.2%)
Not At All 1517 (53.9%)

Feel Hopeless the Past 30 Days


All the Time 15 (.5%)
Most of the Time N=2816 28 (1.0%)
Some of the Time 168 (6.0%)
A Little of the Time 259 (9.2%)
Not At All 2346 (83.3)

Feel Restless the Past 30 Days


All the Time 45 (1.60%)
Most of the Time N=2816 42 (1.5%)
Some of the Time 329 (11.7%)
A Little of the Time 662 (23.5%)
Not At All 1738 (61.7%)

Feel Depressed the Past 30 Days


All the Time 23 (.8%)
Most of the Time N=2816 32 (1.1%)
Some of the Time 121 (4.3%)
A Little of the Time 191 (6.8%)
Not At All 2449 (87.0%)

Feel Everything an Effort the Past


30 Days
All the Time 77 (2.7%)
Most of the Time N=2816 82 (2.9%)
Some of the Time 306 (10.9%)
A Little of the Time 474 (16.8%)
Not At All 1877 (66.7%)

Feel Worthless the Past 30 Days


All the Time 23 (.8%)
Most of the Time N=2816 33 (1.2%)
Some of the Time 104 (3.7%)
A Little of the Time 153 (5.4%)
Not At All 2503 (88.9%)

33
Bivariate Analysis

Different bivariate analyses were used to understand the relationships between the

independent variables and the dependent variable. An independent sample t- tests was

conducted to examine the levels of depression by gender. The difference in the level of

depression between males and females was examined. The results are presented in Table

9. Results indicated that there is a statistically significant difference in depression

between male and female respondents in this sample. The average level of depression for

the female participants was 2.71 (SD = 3.458), while the average for the male

respondents was 2.24 (SD = 3.338). The level of depression for females was higher than

males with a statistical significance of (t = 3.554, df = 2814, p =.047).

Table 9

Depression by Gender (t-test)

Gender N Mean SD t df p

Male 1111 2.24 3.338 3.554 2814 .047

Female 1705 2.71 3.458

Table 10 presents the difference in the level of depression between elderly adults

who reported living with a spouse in the same household and those who reported their

spouse not living in the same household. Results indicated that there is not a statistically

significant difference in depression between the two groups (t = .255, df = 1313, p =

.217) in this sample. Therefore, the level of depression among elderly adults who do not

live in the same household as their spouse (M=2.07, SD= 2.654) were not significantly

34
lower when compared to elderly adults who do live with their spouse (M=2.19, SD=

3.038).

Table 10

Depression by Living Armaments (t-test)

Spouse lives in
same household N Mean SD t df p

Yes 1271 2.19 3.038 .255 1313 .217

No 44 2.07 2.654

Correlation analysis was performed to investigate a relationship between

depression and age, poverty level, and general health condition. Results are presented in

Table 11. Results indicated that there is not a significant relationship in the sample

between depression and age (r= -.033; p= .081) at the p<0.05. Additionally, though the

relationship is low, there is a significant negative correlation between depression and

poverty level (r = -.242; p = .000) at the p<0.001, indicating that the higher income older

adults earn the less they suffer from depression. A significant relationship was found

between depression and general health condition (r = -.374; p = .000) at the p<0.001,

suggesting that older adults who report a better general health condition suffer from

lower levels of depression.

35
Table 11

Correlation between Depression and Age; Poverty Level; General Health


Condition

Variable r p

Age -.033 .081

Poverty Level -.242 .000

General Health Condition -.374 .000

One-way ANOVA tests were conducted to examine the bivariate relationship

between depression and the variables of ethnicity and educational attainment among

elderly adults. As indicated in Table 12, there is a significant group difference in the

level of depression (F = 17.171, df = 2815, p = 0.000) between the different ethnicities.

A Post Hoc test was used to determine differences within this independent variable. The

test revealed that Latino had a significantly higher level of depression (M = 4.14, SD =

5.113), than Asian (M = 2.75, SD = 4.154, p=.002), White (M = 2.28, SD = 3.009,

p=.000), and African American (M = 2.81, SD = 3.373, p=.043).

36
Table 12

Depression by Ethnicity (one-way ANOVA)

Depression N Mean SD F df p

Latino 162 4.14 5.113 17.171 2815 .000

Asian 246 2.75 4.154

White 2148 2.28 3.009

African
American 107 2.81 3.373

Other 153 3.71 4.456

Significance level: p<.05

The results of the analyses are presented in Table 13, which indicate that the

difference in education and level of depression is statistically significant (F = 42.357, df

= 2815, p = 0.00). A Post Hoc test was used to determine differences in this independent

variable. Elderly participants with less than high school (M = 4.47, SD = 5.168) had a

significantly higher depression level when compared to participants with a high school

degree (M = 2.56, SD = 3.395, p=.000), participants with some college education (M =

2.33, SD = 3.024, p=.000), and participants with an education of college and above (M =

2.12, SD = 2.857, p=.000).

37
Table 13

Depression by Educational Attainment (one-way ANOVA)

Depression N Mean SD F df p

Less than
High School 315 4.47 5.168 42.357 2815 .000

High School 627 2.56 3.395

Some College 597 2.33 3.024

College and
Above 1277 2.12 2.857

Significance level: * p<.05; ** p<.01; *** p<.001

Multivariate Analysis

A multiple regression analysis of independent variables was conducted to

determine the degree of how demographics (age, gender and ethnicity), socioeconomic

status (poverty level and educational attainment), living arrangements (spouse lives in the

same household), and general health condition are predictors of depression among the

elderly. As indicated in Table 14, results showed that the regression model was

statistically significant (F = 13.610, df =1314, p = 0.00). The model summary coefficient

showed that approximately 10.3% (R2 =.103) of the variation in the dependent variable

(depression) is explained by the overall model. Variables such as age ( = -.06, p =

.025), gender ( = -.081, p = .002), general health condition ( = -.274, p = .000), Asian

( = -.128, p = .004), and educational attainment [high school ( = -.153 p = .001), some

college ( = -.161, p = .000), college and above ( = -.164, p = .003)] are significant

predictors of depression among elderly participants when all the other independent

variables are held constant. The results suggest that being male, higher income, higher in

38
general health condition, higher levels of educational attainment, and being Asians

decrease the levels of depression.

Table 14

Linear Multiple Regression of Depression with Age, Gender, Latino, Asian,


African American, White, Poverty Level, High School Degree, Some College,
College and Above, Living Arrangements, and General Health Condition

Predictor
Variables B p

Age -.030 -.060 .025

Gender -.509 -.081 .002

Latino -.906 -.071 .084

Asian -1.343 -.128 .004

African American -1.174 -.056 .078

White -.497 -.067 .220

Poverty Level -.132 -.040 .210

High School Degree -1.225 -.153 .001

Some College -1.282 -.161 .000

College and Above -1.026 -.164 .003

Living Arrangments -.206 -.012 .654

General Health Condition -.753 -.274 .000

Model Summary: R2 = .103, F(12, 1314) = 13.610, p = .000

39
CHAPTER 5

Discussion

This research sought to identify factors that contribute to depression among the

elderly population. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship general

health condition, living arrangements, socioeconomic status (independent variables), and

depression (dependent variable) among elderly adults. This chapter discusses the

significance of the findings, recommendations for future research and implications for

social work practice.

Significance of the Findings

The results of the data analysis indicated that general health condition,

socioeconomic status (educational attainment and poverty), ethnicity, and gender were

statically significant factors for depression among elderly adult as hypothesized. The

results from this study showed that elderly participants who reported a poor general

health condition (self-rated health) had higher levels of depression, and elderly adults

who reported an excellent general health condition had lower levels of depression. The

significant finding in regard to general health condition are consistent with existing

studies, Pu, et al. (2013) found that elderly adults with higher depressive symptoms

reported a poorer general health condition when compared to those who reported having

an excellent general health condition. Such findings suggesting that an improvement in

general health condition will decrease the level of depressive symptoms experienced by

elderly adults.

Socioeconomic status was also explored in the study using the variables of

educational attainment and poverty level. In the current study it was found that both

40
educational attainment and poverty level were significant predictors of depression among

elderly adults. Additionally, elderly participants with a low poverty level and less than a

high school degree were also found to be statistically and significantly correlated with

higher levels of depression in the current study. This studys findings parallel those in

the literature, which indicated an increased risk of depressive symptoms for elderly adults

with a socioeconomic disadvantage. One study found that elderly adults with a low SES

had two times a higher incidence rate for depression, which predicted more depressive

symptoms when compared to a person with high SES (Koster et al. 2006). The current

studys significant findings support the hypothesis in regard to SES and suggest that

either a higher or lower SES could significantly impact both the incidence and level of

depression among the elderly population.

Another factor that was explored in the study was ethnicity. Specifically the

study intended to further research the significance of elderly depression in relation to

ethnic minorities. It was found that among the different ethnicities, elderly Latinos had

higher levels of depression and, Whites were associated to lower levels of depression

when compared to all other ethnic minorities in this study. Furthermore, results indicate

that ethnicity was significantly associated a as predictor of depression among elderly

adults. The current studys findings are consistent with the literature as another study

also found among their sample of participants that Hispanics elderly adults experience

higher levels of depression than other ethnic groups (Akincigil et al., 2012). The

correlations between ethnicity and depression are significant, which contributes to the

emerging literature that seeks to further examine the associations of the two variables,

specifically when looking at ethnic minorities and their counterparts.

41
Studies have suggested that living arrangement such as living alone are an

influence on the risk of depression among the elderly population. A study by Fukunaga

et al. (2012) found that living alone in its self was significantly associated to depression

among elderly adults. The findings on living arrangements did not support the hypothesis

of this study. Results also did not consist with the existing literature on living

arrangements and depression among elderly adults. One research study found that living

alone increased the prevalence of depressive symptoms among elderly adults (Lin &

Wang, 2011). Results suggest that the inconstancy between this studys findings on

living arrangements and depression among elderly adults is due to a significantly low

number of elderly participants reporting that they live alone. Additionally, there was a

significant number of missing cases in the data analysis which also limited the results for

this studys hypothesis.

Gender and depression among the elderly population has been explore throughout

multiple studies and it has been suggested that elderly women experience higher

depressive symptoms than elderly men (Kockler and Heun, 2002). The current study

provides support for existing literature that has found gender to be significantly

associated with the risk of depression among elderly adults. The results of this study

indicated that there is a statistically significant difference in depression between female

and male elderly respondents in the sample. As hypothesized, female elderly adults were

found to have higher levels of depression than males in the study. Furthermore,

Katsumata et al. (2005) found in their study that female elderly adults are significantly

associated to a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms as well as being at risk for

more depressive symptoms than elderly males. Findings from both the current study and

42
existing literature suggest that females for the most part will always out number males in

regard to the different correlations between depression and gender.

Implications for Social Work

This study found that there is a significant relationship between general health

condition, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and gender, and depression among elderly

adult participants. The most statistically significant relationship was between general

health condition and depression among elderly adults. This suggests that there is a

correlation between the perceptions of health and depression among the elderly

population. This study also highlights the importance of continuing the dialogue and

cooperation between the medical and mental health field to further explore the

significance of the findings for the elderly population.

It is imperative that social workers, medical and mental health professionals

develop strategies to respond to psychological issues as they tend to physical health

concerns. Existing literature has shown that the elderly population is expected to

encounter increased vulnerability to illnesses and, therefore, to be more prone to suffering

from depression. An increased risk of health issues among the elderly speaks to the

importance of implementing additional programs or services that target the elderly

population. The implementation and use of a screening tool by physicians to assess the

level of general health condition among elderly patients would be of significant benefit

for his population. Additionally, establishing programs that focus on increasing levels of

self-rated health, as well as programs targeting the female elderly (given the findings

correlate depression more to females) are of the uttermost importance for this population.

Raising levels of self-rated health will not only address the increasing levels of

43
depression issues among the elderly, but also carry the potential to address depression

and other mental health issues across various cultures and aging populations. It is also

important that all medical professionals and social workers are knowledgeable and

culturally competent on elderly minorities and the risk of depression among the different

groups. They should particularly be experienced with Latino, African American and

Asian elderly adults perceived health and the stigma associated with depression when

working with these different ethnic groups.

Additionally, addressing the outcomes of socioeconomic status (educational

attainment and poverty) and its implications for depression among the elderly population

is critically important. The concept and implementation of lifelong learning among the

elderly population could be beneficial in many ways. An increase in classes or programs

seeking to promote educational levels among elderly adults within impoverished

communities, could prove to be highly beneficial. When lifelong learning is practiced by

the elderly population, individuals are more aware and prepared with knowledge that may

benefit their overall well-being. The creation of such classes or programs within

impoverished communities also carries the potential for promoting changes within these

communities, which are populated primarily by ethnic minorities. Moreover, such

stimulating activities could serve to assist the development of strong, motivational elderly

role models, who may have the ability to influence younger aging populations to be more

aware of their psychological well-being as they age. Through initiatives like these, social

workers and elderly adults can both decrease the stigma associated with depression and

the treatment of depression among the elderly population.

44
Lastly, it is important for social workers to advocate for policies that can

influence the production of such services that will assist in addressing mental health

issues such as depression among the elderly population. The impactions for social work

on this subject lie not only on the micro level, but on the macro level as policy is directly

associated with the initiatives that will address the issue of mental illness among the

elderly population.

Recommendations for Future Research

The existing literature in regard to mental health of elderly adults 65 and older is

very limited. Specifically, studies on the contributing factors influencing depression

among the elderly population are also limited. The present study, although limited on

sample size, sampling methods, and representation of population, has made an important

contribution to understanding some of the factors that lead to depression among elderly

adults. It is recommended that future studies should focus on the following areas:

1. Future research should continue to explore the correlation that ethnic elderly

minorities have to the risks depression.

2. Future studies should also examine the relationship of physical illnesses and

disabilities that may contribute to general health condition and depression

among elderly adults.

3. Further research should explore how different forms socioeconomic

disadvantage correlate to depression among elderly adults.

4. It is also critical for studies to continue to explore living arrangements among

the elderly population and, the relationship between depression and elderly

adults who live alone.

45
Conclusion

The findings in this study highlighted some of the unique factors that are likely to

contribute to both the incidence and level of depression experienced among the elderly

population. Specific factors that were found to have a statistically significant relationship

with depression among elderly adults include general health condition, socioeconomic

status, ethnicity, and gender. Limitations in this study suggest living arrangements

among elderly adults in regard to depression should continue to be explored.

Understanding contributing factors of depression among the elderly population is

essential for the development and utilization of best practices and long-term interventions

for this specific mental illness.

46
REFERENCES

Akincigil, A., Olfson, M., Siegel, M., Zurlo, K. A., Walkup, J. T., & Crystal, S. (2012).

Racial and ethnic disparities in depression care in community-dwelling elderly in

the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 102(2), 319-328.

doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300349

Almeida, O. P., Pirkis, J., Kerse, N., Sim, M., Flicker, L., Snowdon, J., & Pfaff, J. J.

(2012). Socioeconomic disadvantage increases risk of prevalent and persistent

depression in later life. Journal of Affective Disorders, 138(3), 322-331.

doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.01.021

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental

Disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Ashford, J. B. & LeCroy, C. W. (2013) Human Behavior in the Social Environment: A

Multidimensional Perspective, Fifth Edition. Belmont, CA: Jon-David Hague, p.

623

Blazer, D. G. (2002, March). The Prevalence of Depressive Symptoms. Journals of

Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences. pp. M150-M151.

Retrieved from

http://biomedgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/3/M155.short

Cawthorne, A., & Americans, A. (2008). Elderly poverty: The challenge before us.

Washington, DC: Center for American progress. Retrieved from

https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/poverty/report/2008/07/30/4690/elderly-

poverty-the-challenge-before-us/

47
Chan, A., Malhotra, C., Malhotra, R., & stbye (2011). Living arrangements, social

networks and depressive symptoms among older men and women in Singapore.

International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 26(6), 630-639.

doi:10.1002/gps.2574

Collins, A. L., Glei, D. A., & Goldman, N. (2009). The role of life satisfaction and

depressive symptoms in all-cause mortality. Psychology and Aging, 24(3), 696-

702. doi:10.1037/a0016777

Depression is Not a Normal Part of Growing Older. (2015) Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention. Retrieved from

http://www.cdc.gov/aging/mentalhealth/depression.htm

Dezutter, J., Wiesmann, U., Apers, S., & Luyckx, K. (2013). Sense of coherence,

depressive feelings and life satisfaction in older persons: a closer look at the role

of integrity and despair. Aging & Mental Health, 17(7), 839-843.

doi:10.1080/13607863.2013.792780

Djernes, J. K. (2006). Prevalence and predictors of depression in populations of elderly: a

review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 113(5), 372-387. doi:10.1111/j.1600-

0447.2006.00770.x

Falcon, L. M., & Tucker, K. L. (2000). Prevalence and Correlates of Depressive

Symptoms Among Hispanic Elders in Massachusetts. Journals Of Gerontology

Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 55B(2), S108. Retrieved

from https://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/content/55/2/S108.full

Fukunaga, R., Abe, Y., Nakagawa, Y., Koyama, A., Fujise, N., & Ikeda, M. (2012).

Living alone is associated with depression among the elderly in a rural

48
community in Japan. Psychogeriatrics, 12(3), 179-185. doi:10.1111/j.1479-

8301.2012.00402.x

Ganatra, H. A., Zafar, S. N., Qidwai, W., & Rozi, S. (2008). Prevalence and predictors of

depression among an elderly population of Pakistan. Aging & Mental Health,

12(3), 349-356. doi:10.1080/13607860802121068

Han, B., & Jylha, M. (2006). Improvement in depressive symptoms and changes in self-

rated health among community-dwelling disabled older adults. Aging & Mental

Health, 10(6), 599-605. doi:10.1080/13607860600641077

Hearn, S., Saulnier, G., Strayer, J., Glenham, M., Koopman, R., & Marcia, J. (2012).

Between Integrity and Despair: Toward Construct Validation of Erikson's Eighth

Stage. Journal 0f Adult Development, 19(1), 1-20. doi:10.1007/s10804-011-9126-

Jahn, D. R., & Cukrowicz, K. C. (2012). Self-rated health as a moderator of the relation

between functional impairment and depressive symptoms in older adults. Aging &

Mental Health, 16(3), 281-287. doi:10.1080/13607863.2011.598847

Katsumata, Y., Arai, A., Ishido, K., Tomimori, M., Denda, K., and Tamashiro, H. (2005).

Gender differences in the contributions of risk factors to depressive symptoms

among the elderly persons dwelling in a community, Japan. International Journal

of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20, 1084-1089. doi:10.1002/gps.1403

Kockler, M., & Heun, R. (2002). Gender differences of depressive symptoms in

depressed and nondepressed elderly persons. International Journal of Geriatric

Psychiatry, 17(1), 65-72. doi:10.1002/gps.521

49
Koster, A., Bosma, H., Kempen, G.I.J.M., Pennix, B.W.J.H., Beekman, A.T.F., Deeg,

D.J.H., & Van Eijk, J.T.M. (2006). Socioeconomic differences in incident

depression in older adults: The role of psychosocial factors, physical health status,

and behavioral factors. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 61, 619-627.

doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.05.009

Lin, P., & Wang, H. (2011). Factors associated with depressive symptoms among older

adults living alone: An analysis of sex difference. Aging & Mental Health, 15(8),

1038-1044. doi:10.1080/13607863.2011.583623

McDougall, G. J., Blixen, C. L., & Suen, L. J. (1997). The process and outcomes of life

review psychotherapy with depressed homebound older adults. Nursing Research,

46(5), 277283. Retrieved from

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2562588/

Minicuci, N., Maggi, S., Pavan, M., Enzi, G., & Crepaldi, G. (2002). Prevalence Rate and

Correlates of Depressive Symptoms in Older Individuals: The Veneto Study.

Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences,

57A(3), M155-M161. Retrieved from

http://biomedgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/3/M155.full.pdf

Murata, C., Kondo, K., Hirai, H., Ichida, Y., & Ojima, T. (2008). Association between

depression and socio-economic status among community-dwelling elderly in

Japan: The Aichi gerentological evaluation study (AGES). Health & Place, 14,

406-414. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.08.007

50
National Council on Aging. NCOA Fact Sheet on Healthy Aging. Retrieved November

20, 2015, from https://www.ncoa.org/news/resources-for-reporters/get-the-

facts/healthy-aging-facts/

National Institute of Mental Health (2013). Depression. Retrieved November 20, 2015,

from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/depression/index.shtml

Ortman, Jennifer M., Victoria A. Velkoff, and Howard Hogan. 2014. An aging nation:

The older population in the United States; Current population reports. Current

Population Reports P25-1140. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau, Population

Projections Branch. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-

1140.pdf?cssp=SERP

Pu, C., Bai, Y., & Chou, Y. (2013). The impact of self-rated health on medical care

utilization for older people with depressive symptoms. International Journal of

Geriatric Psychiatry, 28(5), 479-486. doi:10.1002/gps.3849

Rogers, A. (1999). Factors Associated with Depression and Low Life Satisfaction in the

Low-Income, Frail Elderly. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 31(1/2), 167-

194. doi:10.1300/J083v31n01_10

Satcher, D. (1999). Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Public Health

Service: The Surgeon Generals Call to Action to Prevent Suicide, Washington,

DC. Retrieved from

http://www.sprc.org/sites/sprc.org/files/library/surgeoncall.pdf

51

Anda mungkin juga menyukai