P689 02C ARP Lec 02 Well Test Anal (021204)

(Formation Evaluation and the Analysis of Reservoir Performance)
Module for:
Analysis of Reservoir Performance
Pressure Transient Testing
T.A. Blasingame, Texas A&M U.

Department of Petroleum Engineering
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77843-3116
(979) 845-2292 t-blasingame@tamu.edu
(04 December 2002) PETE 689 (02C) Pressure Transient Testing Slide 1
Orientation This module focuses on familiari-
zation with deliverability tests and the analysis
and interpretation pressure transient test data.
The following issues must be clear: test design,
data acquisition/data quality control, and test
execution are critical activities.
Deliverability Testing:
"4-point" tests are appropriate (analyze as well tests).
Isochronal/modified isochronal testing is difficult.
Pressure Transient Test Analysis/Interpretation:
Conventional analysis specialized plots.
Model identification type curves, simulation, etc.
Test design simplicity is the key.
Deliverability Testing Basics
a. "Standard" 4-point test deliverability test note c. Modified "Isochronal" test sequence note that
that the rates increase (to protect the reservoir). each "buildup" is not required to achieve pi.
b. "Isochronal" test sequence note that each d. Governing equations for "deliverability" test
"buildup" is required to achieve pi. analysis/interpretation.
Deliverability Testing Orientation
a. Basic "pressure-squared" relation that is pre-

sumed to describe gas flow analogous form
can be derived from steady-state flow theory c.Traditional "deliverability" plot probably
(Darcy's law). derived from empirical plotting of data.
b."Rate-squared" (or velocity-squared) formula-

tion analogous form can be derived from d. Modified "deliverability" plot note that bqsc2
steady-state flow theory (Forchheimer Eq.). must be known (... need alternative approach).
Deliverability Testing 4-Point Tests
b. "Standard" 4-point test deliverability test note

that the rates increase (to protect the reservoir).
Discussion:
The value "value" of deliverability
tests is in the process the data
can be be more effectively analyz-
ed as "well test data" than as
deliverability data. However, deli-
verability analysis can serve as a
quality control (data checking).
a.Basic deliverability test analysis note the

difference in the simplified and "LIT" cases.
Deliverability Testing Isochronal Tests
Isochronal Test Analysis Note the multiple trends.
Well Test Analysis Multirate Testing
a. Multirate (4-point) rate sequence (note pressure

match (solid trend through the data).
c. Results summary note that non-Darcy flow,

changing wellbore storage, and an infinite-
acting reservoir system were considered in this
analysis.
b. Log-log "summary plot" note good agreement
in comparison of data and model.
Well Test Analysis "Well Interference"
a. "Well Interference" plot note the linear trend c. Horner semilog plot note the two semilog
through the data functions (confirms interference) . trends confirm the radial composite model.
Discussion:
"Well interference" is much more
common than previously thought
and we must recognize the
characteristic behavior on each
plot:
Log-log plot (b)
Semilog plot (c)
Specialized plot (a)
b. Log-log "summary plot" note the corrected and
uncorrected data (well interference).
Well Test Analysis Basic Plots
a. Log-log "preliminary analysis" c. Semilog "middle-time" plot e. Cartesian "Arps" plot used
plot wellbore storage and used to analyze radial flow to estimate average reservoir
radial flow (Cs, k). behavior (k, s). pressure.
b. Cartesian "early-time" plot d. Horner "middle-time" plot f. Log-log "summary" plot

used to analyze wellbore used to analyze radial flow summary of all analysis (Cs, k,
storage (p0, Cs). behavior (k, s, p*). s, A, etc).
Well Test Analysis Basic Plots (1)
Example: "Preliminary Analysis" (log-log).

Example: "Horner Semilog Analysis" (semilog).

Example: "Analysis Summary Plot" (log-log).

Well Test Analysis Work Relations
Given data Lee text (1st edition), Working relations Lee text (1st
Example 2.2. edition), Example 2.2).
Well Test Analysis WBS Type Curves
a. Type Curve: Radial flow with b. Type Curve: Radial flow with c. Type Curve: Radial flow with
wellbore storage and skin wellbore storage and skin wellbore storage and skin
effects (pD, pDd). effects (pD, pDd, pDr1). effects (pD, pDdd).
d. Type Curve: Radial flow with e. Type Curve: Radial flow with f. Type Curve: Radial flow with
wellbore storage and skin wellbore storage and skin wellbore storage and skin
effects (pDi, pDid). effects (pDi, pDid, pDir1). effects (pDi, pDir2).
Well Test Analysis WBS Type Curves (1)
Type Curve: "Gringarten-Bourdet" (pD, pDd).

Type Curve: "Second Derivative) (pD, pDdd).

Type Curve: "Integral Functions" (pDi, pDid).

Well Test Analysis Bounded Reservoir
a. Type Curve for sealing faults (pDd). b. Type Curve for conductive (leaky) faults (pDd).
c. Type Curve for pressure buildup test in a d. Type Curve for pressure buildup test in a
closed rectangular reservoir (pDd). closed rectangular reservoir (pDid).
Well Test Analysis Bounded Reservoir (1)
Type Curve: "Sealing Faults" (pDd).

Well Test Analysis Bounded Reservoir (2)
Type Curve: "Closed Reservoir" (Buildup Only) (pDd).

Well Test Analysis Composite Systems
a. Composite Reservoir (r=1x10-3). b. Composite Reservoir (r=1x10-2). c. Composite Reservoir (r=1x10-1).
d. Composite Reservoir (r=1x100). e. Composite Reservoir (all r cases).
Well Test Analysis Composite Systems (1)
Type Curve: all r cases (Tang-Brigham).

Well Test Analysis Fractured Wells
a. Type Curve: CfD= various, b. Type Curve: CfD=1, CDf = various. c. Type Curve: CfD=2, CDf = various.
no CDf cases.
d. Type Curve: CfD=5, CDf = various. e. Type Curve: CfD=10, CDf = various. f. Type Curve: CfD=1x103,
CDf = various.
Well Test Analysis Fractured Wells (1)
Type Curve: Various CfD (Cinco-Samaniego).

"Pseudoradial flow" skin factor correlation for a

fractured well (Cinco-Samaniego).
Type Curve: CfD=2, various CDf cases.

Type Curve: CfD=1x103, various CDf cases.

Well Test Analysis Dual Porosity Reservoirs
a. Type Curve: ,= various, b. Type Curve: CD= 1x10-1, pss c. Type Curve: CD= 1x10-4, pss
pss interporosity flow. interporosity flow. interporosity flow.
d. Type Curve: ,= various, tran- e. Type Curve: CD= 1x10-1, f. Type Curve: CD= 1x10-4,
sient interporosity flow. transient interporosity flow. transient interporosity flow.
Well Test Analysis Dual Porosity Reservoirs (1)
Type Curve: Pseudosteady-State Interporosity

Flow (Onur, et al format).
Type Curve: Transient Interporosity Flow (Onur,

et al format).
Type Curve: CD= 1x10-4, pss interporosity flow.
Type Curve: CD= 1x10-4, transient interporosity flow.
Well Test Analysis Scaling
Pressure transient analysis
"sees" the reservoir as a volume-
averaged set of properties.
New solutions/models will also
have this view of the reservoir
but, quantifying heterogeneity
may (or may not) be possible by
the analysis of pressure transient
test data.
Scaling will remain a major issue
regardless of the mechanism
used to analyze reservoir
performance.
From: Simulator Parameter Assignment

and the Problem of Scaling in Reservoir
Engineering Halderson (1986).
(Formation Evaluation and the Analysis of Reservoir Performance)
Module for:
Analysis of Reservoir Performance
End of Presentation
T.A. Blasingame, Texas A&M U.
Department of Petroleum Engineering
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77843-3116
(979) 845-2292 t-blasingame@tamu.edu

P689 02C ARP Lec 02 Well Test Anal (021204)

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

P689 02C ARP Lec 02 Well Test Anal (021204)

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

(Formation Evaluation and the Analysis of Reservoir Performance)

T.A. Blasingame, Texas A&M U.

a. Basic "pressure-squared" relation that is pre-

b."Rate-squared" (or velocity-squared) formula-

b. "Standard" 4-point test deliverability test note

a.Basic deliverability test analysis note the

Isochronal Test Analysis Note the multiple trends.

a. Multirate (4-point) rate sequence (note pressure

c. Results summary note that non-Darcy flow,

b. Cartesian "early-time" plot d. Horner "middle-time" plot f. Log-log "summary" plot

Example: "Preliminary Analysis" (log-log).

Example: "Horner Semilog Analysis" (semilog).

Example: "Analysis Summary Plot" (log-log).

Type Curve: "Gringarten-Bourdet" (pD, pDd).

Type Curve: "Second Derivative) (pD, pDdd).

Type Curve: "Integral Functions" (pDi, pDid).

Type Curve: "Sealing Faults" (pDd).

Type Curve: "Closed Reservoir" (Buildup Only) (pDd).

a. Composite Reservoir (r=1x10-3). b. Composite Reservoir (r=1x10-2). c. Composite Reservoir (r=1x10-1).

d. Composite Reservoir (r=1x100). e. Composite Reservoir (all r cases).

Type Curve: all r cases (Tang-Brigham).

Type Curve: Various CfD (Cinco-Samaniego).

"Pseudoradial flow" skin factor correlation for a

Type Curve: CfD=2, various CDf cases.

Type Curve: CfD=1x103, various CDf cases.

Type Curve: Pseudosteady-State Interporosity

Type Curve: Transient Interporosity Flow (Onur,

Type Curve: CD= 1x10-4, pss interporosity flow.

Type Curve: CD= 1x10-4, transient interporosity flow.

From: Simulator Parameter Assignment

Anda mungkin juga menyukai