Gents,
Email from RGV. Just to keep you informed.
(b) (6)
SBInet / TI
(b) (6) office
(b) (6) mobile
(b) (6) fax
(b) (6)
-----Original Message-----
From: (b) (6)
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 12:30 PM
To: (b) (6)
Cc: (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) ; (b) (6)
Subject: FW: Concerns from Irrigation Districts
(b)
(6)
I don't know if Brian Martin or anybody on the OBP side was privied to this info but we think it needs to
be addressed and clarified.
On Friday, (b) sent out some concerns expressed by Irrigation Districts 1, 5 and 19 regarding various
restrictions(6)
and/or requirements. These issues arose due to various real estate and engineering
obstacles. The result of these obstacles created the need to tweak or deviate from the original
alignment. According to (b) (6) if the irrigation district's needs cannot be met then they
become non-feasible and we revert back to the original alignment. As you know this will take us back
to square one....isn't this the reason (b) was down here to begin with? If it doesn't work then (b)
should come up with a design to make (6) it work and not revert back to an alignment that was not(6) going
to be feasible in the first place.
Please clarify
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: (b) (6)
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 10:36 AM
To: (b) (6) ; (b) (6) ; (b) (6) (b) (6)
Subject: FW: Concerns from Irrigation Districts
-----Original Message-----
From: prvs=(b) (6) On Behalf Of
(b) (6)
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 8:45 PM
To: (b) (6)
Cc: (b) (6) ; (b) (6) (b) (6) ; (b) (6) (b) (6) ; (b)
; (b) (6) ; (b) (6) (b) (6) ; (b) (6) (6)
(b) (6)
Subject: RE: Concerns from Irrigation Districts
OBP004741
-----Original Message-----
From: (b) (6)
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 8:07 PM
To: (b) (6)
Cc:(b) (6) (b) (6) ; (b) (6) ; (b) (6) ; (b) (6)
(b) (6) ;(b) (6) ; (b) (6) ; (b)
; (b) (6) (b) (6) ; (6)
(b) (6)
Subject: Fwd: Concerns from Irrigation Districts
Thanks
(b)
(6)
Thanks