THE MOORISH NATIONAL REPUBLIC

THE MOORISH DIVINE AND NATIONAL MOVEMENT OF THE WORLD

Aboriginal and Indigenous Natural Peoples of North America

Affidavit of Fact
Writ of Discovery and Disclosure
Exhibit I: Instruments of Misrepresentation
September 4th, 2017
Citation: G257498
LEA: 1924

To: TORRANCE COURTHOUSE

c/o 825 MAPLE AVENUE
Torrance, California [90503]

“VO, COLIN ANH” is an artificial corporation, it cannot walk, speak, hear, touch, taste, nor see, because it,
is not a living or breathing being. I, Colin Hoang Anh Vo Bey, am a natural person, ‘In Full Life’, flesh and
blood being. Any fraudulent names written in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS should not be confused as me, as I
am NOT any of those artificial constructs. I affirm that I am, Colin Hoang Anh Vo Bey, a living human
being.

This is a Lawful Demand and Request, and is hereby issued under the ‘Rules of Discovery’ and
forwarded to Torrance Courthouse or its Agents / Personnels, according to Law and the ‘Disclosure Rules’;
giving them Notice to satisfy the following within Twenty-One (21) Days of the Receipt of this ‘Notice of
Discovery and Disclosure’.

1. Where is the contract that I, Colin Hoang Anh Vo Bey, have made with you bearing wet ink
signature? Send a Copy, Produce it for the Record, and have it entered into the Record.

2. Who is the person or persons constructing these paper instruments? I demand that person or
persons, to come forth, bearing wet ink signature, and to provide answers in evidence to the
following question above and questions below. Produce it for the record, and have it entered
into the Record.

3. Are you a corporate person or natural person? Produce the evidence for the Record, and have
it entered into the Record. Send me a Copy of Proof.

4. Where is your nationality card or national identification card? Send a Copy, Produce it, and
have it entered into the Record.

5. Where is your proof of nationality or nationalization? Send a Copy, Produce the written
documents for the record, and have it entered into the Record.

6. What nation do you represent along with your national flag?

7. What is your political status and social status set by nationality and domicile respectively?
Produce the evidence for the Record, and have it entered into the Record.

8. Why was this paper instrument sent through the mail asking for obligations and demands to
make an appearance in a courthouse without first providing proof of status set by nationality,
then original jurisdiction, jurisdiction over subject matter, and jurisdiction over the natural
person?

9. Does this supposed courthouse have Article III original jurisdiction from the United States
Constitution? Send proof, Produce it for the Record, and have it entered into the Record.

10. Is this organization / corporation foreign or domestic to the United States Republic?

11. Where is the registration number that can be verified? i.e. (Articles of Incorporation) Send a
Copy of Proof, Produce it for the Record, and have it entered into the Record.

12. Did you take an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution? Send a copy of the ‘Oath of
Office’, Oath of Ethics, and Bond Number for all state / government officials, employees,
 magistrates, prosecutors, agents, clerks, and anyone who has touched or is in anyway involved
with this case. Produce it for the Record, and have it entered into the Record.

13. Where in the United States Constitution did you derive your authority from?

14. Which branch of government did you derive your authority from, in accordance to the
Supreme Law of the Land, being the United States Constitution? Send a Copy of proof,
Produce it for the record, and have it entered into the Record.

15. Where is your verified Delegation of Authority Order issued from Congress, United States
Republic, North America? Send a Copy, Produce it for the record, and have it entered into the
Record. Include the Reference Number for Certificate of Confirmation.

Failure to answer or satisfy one question / demand / request is a failure to answer or satisfy them all, as I
need proof of any claims made against me so I can verify or dismiss it for validity or lack thereof. Let it be
noted for the record, on the record, and let the record show, if the (14) questions are not satisfied within the
given (21) days, the instrument that was sent to my mailing location is NOT lawful, and an attempt at
‘Extortion’, ‘Fraud’, ‘Racketeering’, and ‘Misrepresentation’ under ‘Threat’, ‘Duress’, and
‘Coercion’. If no copies of the following Demands and Requests are received within the specified time
frame, this Affidavit of Fact - Writ of Discovery and Disclosure shall stand as Law affirming that any agent,
personnel, employee, officer, official, clerk, or magistrate of this court does not have Jurisdiction as per
Article III, Section II of the United States Constitution, and have not, first, properly establish status set by
nationality before proceeding to claim jurisdiction.

This Writ shall stand as firm and ‘Lawful Evidence’ of the Affiant exercising his or her ‘due process’
right to Discovery and Disclosure; and establishes ‘For The Record’ an honorable and ‘Good Faith’
attempt on his or her part to clear up any flawed entries; any insensate misrepresentations; or any other
misprints, mistakes, or confusion concerning his or her intent to make clear, unvarnished, and corrective
resolutions in this matter, before accepting any vague assumptions, and before taking any further actions.

“If any Tribunal (court) finds absence of proof of jurisdiction over a person and subject matter, the
case must be dismissed. Louisville v. Motley 211 US 149, 29S. CT 42. “The accuser bears the burden of
proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”

“Once Challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proved to exist.”

Stuck v Medical Examiners 94 Ca 2d 751.211,P2d 389.

“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation,
which would abrogate them.” Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436, 125:

“The claim and exercise of Constitutional Rights cannot be converted into a crime. Miller v.
Kansas 230 F 2nd 486, 489: “

"When acting to enforce a statue and its subsequent amendments to the present date, the judge of
the municipal court is acting as an administrative officer and not in a judicial capacity; courts in
administering or enforcing statues do not act judicially, but merely ministerially."
Thompson v Smith 154 SE 583

“A judge ceases to sit as a judicial officer because the governing principle of administrative law
provides that courts are prohibited from substituting their evidence, testimony, record, arguments, and
rationale for that of the agency. Additionally, courts are prohibited from substituting their judgment for that
of the agency. Courts in administrative issues are prohibited from even listening to or hearing arguments,
presentations, or rational." ASIS v US 568 F2d, 284

“Ministerial officers are incompetent to receive grants of judicial power from the legislature, their
acts in attempting to exercise such powers are necessarily nullities.”
Burns v Sup Ct. SF, 140 Cal 1.

Thank You,
I Am: ______________________________
Colin Hoang Anh Vo Bey
Natural Person, In Propria Persona, Sui Juris
Ex Relatione: COLIN HOANG ANH VO
All Rights Reserved: U.C.C. 1-207/ 1-308; U.C.C. 1-103
c/o 1113 West Gardena Boulevard Apt. C.
Gardena Territory, California State Republic
[Zip Exempt]
Non-Domestic

Cc: California Attorney General’s Office

Xavier Becerra