Anda di halaman 1dari 5

22nd International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT 2015)

A Wavelet Compression Based Channel Feedback


Protocol for Spatially Correlated Massive MIMO
Systems

Pengbiao Wang*, Junfeng Wangt, Chenglin Zhao* and Xiaokai Liu*


*Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications,
School of Information and Telecommunication Engineering, Beijing, China
Email: {pbwang, clzhao, liu_xiaokai}@bupt.edu.cn
^The State Radio Monitoring Center Testing Center, Beijing, China
Email: wangjunfeng@srtc.org.cn

AbstractEquipped with large scale antenna arrays, massive uplink and downlink respectively. To get CSI, a common way
multiple input multiple output systems are qualified with several is to occupy part of uplink resources to feed back CSI to the
benefits including enhanced throughput, power efficiency, and BS [4], [5]. This kind of limited feedback mechanism has been
anti-interference ability, etc. The acquisition of such advantages studied for a long time.
requires adequate channel state information at transmitter. In
frequency division duplex multiple input multiple output systems, A large body of literature devoted to accurate CSI acquisi-
channel state information is extracted through channel feedback tion for MIMO FDD systems is presented in [6]. Performance
mechanism which is not easy to implement due to the fact of a series of feedback approaches applied in different sce-
that the feedback overhead is critical with so many antennas. narios is analyzed theoretically and verified by simulations.
However, large scale antenna arrays may introduce correlation
elements into channel state information due to the limit of the base Among these, codebook based feedback algorithms including
station size. Therefore, we propose a wavelet compression based vector quantizaiton approach are the most commonly adopted
channel feedback protocol aiming to reduce the feedback load feedback designs and have gained excellent performance in
by exploiting the correlation features among large scale antenna conventional MIMO systems [7]. When it turns to massive MI-
arrays. We take a point-to-point massive multiple input multiple MO systems, however, due to the fact that feedback overhead,
output system into consideration, and both Jakes correlation storage requirement and codeword searching computational
model and exponential correlation model are applied to make the complexity would be substantial with excess antennas, these
numerical simulations and verify the performance of the proposed codebook based approaches appear to be infeasible. This
wavelet compression based feedback scheme. motivates designing highly efficient CSI feedback mechanisms.
In [8], a new hierarchical codebook and an adaptive se-
I. INTRODUCTION
lection algorithm are proposed to make a tradeoff between
Massive multiple input multiple output (MIMO) has attract- the system performance and feedback overhead and to reduce
ed the attention of academia for several years since Marzetta the feedback overhead without impacting the precoding per-
firstly introduced this concept in 2010 [1]. Equipped with an formance in some case. It is worth noting further, the increase-
order of magnitude more elements than systems like long-term ment in the number of antennas with space constraints reduces
evolution (LTE) that is being built today, massive MIMO offers inter-antennas spacing and brings correlation among antennas
a plethora of advantages over conventional MIMO systems [9]. To adapt spatially correlated regime, a noncoherent trellis
including huge improvements in throughput, potential power coded quantization method is developed in [10]. In addition,
savings, inexpensive low-power components, simplification of compression based method provides another view of reducing
the media access control (MAC) layer, robustness to inter- feedback load. Junho Lee used sparse approximation to exploit
ference and others. It thus contains a new research field in the correlation information and project large dimensional CSI
communication theory and propagation theory etc. High di- onto low dimensional random sequences [9]. And compressive
mensional channel vectors bring in overwhelming overhead to sensing (CS) based channel feedback protocols to reduce
acquire channel state information (CSI) [2], [3]. Consequently, feedback overhead are also provided in [11].
obtaining accurate CSI plays a key role in promoting system
performance in massive MIMO systems. In this paper, we propose to adopt wavelet compression
to reduce CSI feedback data size. Wavelets, rooted in ap-
In general, there have two threads to achieve the acquisition proximation theory, are a mathematical tool for hierarchically
of CSI in MTMO systems corresponding to their duplex modes: decomposing functions which have been widely applied to
time division duplex (TDD) mode and frequency division image compression and shown to be pretty effective [12].
duplex (FDD) mode. In TDD mode, the leading advantage However, its rare to see wavelet transformation (WT) based
is base station (BS) can implicitly get CSI profit from channel compression used in channel state acquisition. This paper, to
reciprocity if adequate training method and pilots designed our knowledge, is the first to study how to use WT to exploit
in the uplink [1]. In FDD mode, however, a given range of the sparse structure of CSI with purpose to reduce the feedback
spectrum is divided in two uncorrelated parts allocated to overhead under spatially correlated antenna arrays.

978-1-4799-8078-9/15/$31.00 2015 IEEE 303


22nd International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT 2015)

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section B. Brief Illustration of Wavelet Compression Based Channel
II introduces the system model and illustrates how to realize Feedback
wavelet compression feedback briefly. Section i n provides
the detail design of the channel feedback mechanism and In this paper, we consider a single-user MIMO (SU-
the analysis of the performance theoretically. In section IV, MIMO) regime with large scale antenna arrays. We focus
simulation results are presented. Finally, section V concludes on H as the target signal going to be processed by the
the paper. proposed feedback mechanism. CSI matrice H should be
processed and returned as a whole at receiver. In this case,
two-dimensional (2D) wavelet analysis should be considered.
II. SYSTEM DISCRIPTION
In 2D wavelet analysis the signal to analyze is a matrice, so
In this paper, we focus on a point-to-point massive MIMO at every level of decomposition the horizontal data is filtered
system. Antenna arrays at both ends are assumed to be uniform and the approximation and details produced from this are
linear arrays (ULA) that are spatially correlated with equal afterwards filtered on columns. Consequently, four sub-signals
antenna spacing. Optimal precoding scheme is adopted at the are produced [13].
transmitter and the feedback channel is assumed to be an ideal
(error-free, zero delay) channel. Further, temporal channel Note that these sub-signals can be vectorized to form a
correlation is ignored here. We also assume perfect CSI can vector as the output of wavelet analysis which is namely the
be estimated at the receiver considering CSI compression is coefficients we desire to get. A minority of the coefficients
our main focus. concentrate on some critical values, while others are distributed
near zero. We could discard all but feed back the T largest
A. System Model coefficients along with their indexes which can provide a
compression ratio of roughly 2T/P. Here, P denotes the total
The input-output relation of the MIMO system is described number of the coefficients. At the transmitter, the received
by the following vector notation: vector with 2T elements can be matriculated to reconstruct the
yt = Hxt + nt (1) original signal by performing inverse wavelet transform. This
is the compression strategy we adopt in this paper to reduce
NtXl
where t is the discrete time index, xt C and yt e the feedback load. The schematic of the proposed feedback
CNrXl are the signal vector transmitted and received at time t. mechanism is illustrated in Figure 1.
nt ~ AA(0,1) denotes the AWGN noise with zero-mean and
unit variance. The correlated channel matrix can be formulated
III. WAVELET COMPRESSION BASED FEEDBACK
as:
PROTOCOL ANALYSIS
H RR HufiRj, (2)
A. Implementation of Wavelet Compression Based Feedback
where Hud, representing a Nrx Nt matrix with independent
and identically distributed (i.i.d) complex zero-mean, unit vari- As aforementioned, we take the full channel matrix H to be
ance and Gaussian random entries, is the Rayleigh block fading the target signal. For the sake of convenience, we use notation
propagation channel between antenna arrays at both ends. RT H to denote the target signal matrice in rest of the paper,
and RR are the spatial correlations corresponding to transmit which represents either the real part or imaginary part. In
antenna arrays and receive antenna arrays, respectively. And practical implement, the discrete form of wavelet transform
R,{ denotes the square root of R(.y (DWT) is mostly considered. And we consider 2D wavelet
transformation due to reasons that the target signal is a matrix.
Here, we take into account two commonly used spatial The scaling and wavelet functions are functions with two
correlation models. The first is the Jakes model, thus any variables, denoted by <j>(x,y) and i/j(x,y). They are defined
element of RT and RR (the correlation coefficient between as
the ith and j t h antenna in an antenna array) is
(l>j,m,n(x>y) = 22 0(2 J x -m,23y-n) (6)
nj = J0(2irdij/d0) (3)
where d\j is the distance between the marked antennas, do
$,m,n(*.V) = zh^Vx-rn, Vy-n), = {H, V,D} (7)
is the carrier wavelength, and Jo(-) denotes the zeroth-order where m and x range from 0 to M 1; n and y range
Bessel function of first kind. And the second is the exponential from 0 to N 1, assuming the target signal is a M x N
model which is given as matrix [14]. Formula (7) contains three wavelet functions
.Nt-1 of separable directions, i/jH(x,y) along horizontal direction,
a tpv(x, y) along vertical direction and ipD(x, y) along diagonal
1 direction.
Ri (4)
Nt-1 Thus wavelet analysis of the target signal can be formulated
La as
-Nr-1 M-liV-l
1 a
a 1 W(j>{jQ,m,n) = ^2 ^2 H(x,y)cf>jo,mtn(x,y) (8)
RR = (5) x=0 j/=0

-,Nr-l M-lN-1
Wj(i.m,n) = J2 H(x,y^i^x,y) i = {H, V, D}
where 0 < a < 1 is the correlation parameter which is a real x=0 y=0
number. (9)

304
22nd International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT 2015)

AWGN

bits Coding & bits


X Detection &
Modulation Decoding

VX H
AWGN
Matriculated Extract real and imaginary parts
Inverse 2D Wavelet Transformation 2D Wavelet Compression
Combine real and imaginary parts Vectorization
SVD
Finite Feedback Channel

Fig. 1: Flowchart of the proposed wavelet compression based feedback regime

where H(x,y) represents the target signal elements and energy to full expansion coefficients energy to get the energy
{H, V, D} denote horizontal, vertical and diagonal direc- loss performance of the wavelet compression method. Suppose
tion respectively. So {W^(jo,m,n)} and {W^(j,m,n)\i = the T largest elements of w(/3) is denoted by WT(/3). The
H,V,D} consist of the coefficients which are the sparse energy loss ratio at the given compression ratio /3 is
representation of H.
Eio..(P) = 1
iitMAir (12)
The inverse wavelet transformation is formulated as:
\w\
H{x, y)=^2^2 W^ijo, m, n)4>j0im<n(x, y) C. Sum-Rate Capacity Performance Analysis
Assuming it's a rayleigh block fading channel that may re-
],m,n\xiV) main approximately constant for one block period and change
i=H,V,D j=jo *n n independently in next period. The feedback channel is assumed
(10) to be ideal and without delay. Thus the transmitter can get the
error-free compressed CSI information sent by the receiver. In
The wavelet transformation coefficient matrix of H is SU-MIMO systems, the singular value decomposition (SVD)
denoted as W. And we denote the vectorization of the original has been proved to yield the optimum precoding solution [16].
CSI H and that of the sparse CSI W as h and w respectively. To illustrate, the SVD of i f is i f = *7EV f , where U is the
After the T largest elements of w along with their indexes Nr x Nr left singular matrix and V is the Nt x Nt right singular
are received at the transmitter, they can be matriculated to matrix and S is the Nr x Nt singular value matrix with rank
approximately reconstruct CSI matrix denoted as H by inverse r. And with the precoding operation, the NT x Nt channel can
be transformed into r (1 < r < min(Nr,Nt)) parallel single
wavelet transformation shown in formula (10).
input single output (SISO) subchannels, where r is the rank of
the channel matrix. Consequently, the input-output relationship
B. Compression and Reconstruction Performance Analysis becomes
The wavelet compression we adopted above is a kind of
lossy compression method, because the coefficients we neglect yt =Sa; t + ht (13)
are around zero though, they still contain some energy. So the
CSI we reconstruct cannot be identical to the practical CSI Then we get
if the compression ratio j3 is smaller than 200%(compression At k 1,-
ratio is denoted as the number of coefficients remained divided Vt (14)
k JVr
by that of the total coefficients). We can use Grassmannian
subspace packing to verify the restore performance of the where x\ are the bits transmitted through the kth sub-channel
compression scheme [15]. Denote the vectorization of the at time t. The total sum-rate capacity is the sum of the r sub-
reconstructed H(/3) as h(/3) under the given compression ratio channels' rate. The transmitter transmits multiple independent
/3, then the chordal distance between the two lines generated zero mean complex Gaussian data streams simultaneously with
from h and h{fl) can be expressed as waterfilling power allocation mechanism. Assume the transmit
power allocated to the kth antenna is pk (i.e., E(xk xk) = pk)
and the overall transmit power constraint requires YH:=i Pk =
\\tih{P)\\
dis{p) =
i i-
\\h\w\Hm
(ii) P. The transmit power over the parallel channels can be
expressed as
where |||| denotes the Frobenius norm. Meanwhile, we can
compute the ratio of the remained expansion coefficients Pfe = ( M - ^ ) + l<k<r (15)

305
22nd International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT 2015)

where (j, is the waterfill level, x+ is defined as max(x, 0). If Fig.2.(a) and Fig.3.(a) show the chordal distance perfor-
the feedback channel is ideal without compression scheme, the mance between the perfect CSI vector before compression
ergodic sum-rate capacity can be computed: and the reconstructed CSI vector after compression. With
the decrease of the antenna spacing or the growth of the
correlation parameter, the correlation level of the CSI matrix
Cideal=Ej2log2(l + ^ ) (16)
becomes strong. Consequently, at a given compression ratio,
k=l the reconstructed CSI is more approximated to the perfect CSI
where the additive noise covariance matrix of the r sub- which can produce a relatively smaller chordal distance in both
channels is assumed to be Rfr a2Ir. However, wavelet correlation models.
compression is a lossy compression method, so the CSI matrix
Fig.2.(b) and Fig.3.(b) present the energy loss performance
H reconstructed is not ideal, thus the parallel data-pipes are
of the compressed CSI compared to that before wavelet
degraded due to the interference from other channels. With a
compression. Stronger correlation level means energy can be
given compression ratio /3, the received signal bit at the kth
concentrated on a smaller amount of coefficients. So with a
sub-stream is
given compression ratio, the energy loss performance decreases
as the antenna spacing reduces or correlation parameter rises.
We can also notice that the energy performance goes in
> ~ ' rrr coincidence with the chordal distance performance.
signal desired
interference
(17)
Fig.2.(c) and Fig.3.(c) say the performance gap between the
+ fikt k,l = 1, ,r sum-rate with perfect CSI and that with the reconstructed CSI,
respectively. We can conclude that with a strong correlation
noise
level, the sum-rate loss is tiny. The sum-rate loss increases
where Vk(P) is the kth column of the right singular matrix of as the antenna spacing grows or the correlation parameter
the reconstructed CSI matrix H(/3) at the given compression decreases. Further, sum-rate loss decreases with the growth
ratio p. According to Shannon theory, the capacity of the kth of compression ratio due to the reasons that more feedback
sub-channel is load can be used to reconstruct better CSI. However, because
half of the feedback load is occupied by the index of the mass
C(k,/3) = log2(l + llv^lW)lf ) (18)
coefficients, the sum-rate loss is not able to touch 0 although
the compression ratio reaches 1.
Ullv>!wii +*
The compressed sum-rate is V. CONCLUSION

In this paper, we propose a wavelet compression based


Ccom(/3) = E^C(k,p) feedback strategy for spatially correlated point-to-point mas-
fe=i sive MIMO systems. Wavelet compression is able to com-
r press the CSI estimated at the receiver. The outputted sparse
= EY,log2{l + representation would be sent to transmitter aiming to be
fe=i
EUI|V^^^(^)||2 + CT2 reconstructed and enhance the system performance. Simulation
(19) results reveal the compression and reconstruction performance
of wavelet compression scheme and analyze the system perfor-
The sum-rate loss is mance under different compression ratios and varying corre-
lation level using two kinds of correlation models. In general,
Closs\P) = Cideal ~ Ccom(p) (20) this paper provides a novel mechanism to reduce the feedback
load in spatially correlated massive MIMO systems.
which calculates the sum-rate loss using the wavelet compres-
sion feedback scheme when compared to the ideal feedback
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
channel.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
IV. NUMERICAL SIMULATION Foundation of China (F010301).

In this section, we present simulation results. The num- REFERENCES


ber of transmit and receive antenna arrays is set to be
[1] T. L. Marzetta, "Noncooperative cellular wireless with unlimited num-
Nt = 128, Nr = 128. The carrier frequency is assumed bers of base station antennas," IEEE Transactions on Wireless Commu
to be 800MHz and the wavelength is denoted as d. Fur- nications, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 3590-3600, 2010.
ther, for the Jakes correlation model, the identical uni- [2] D. J. Love, J. Choi, and P. Bidigare, "A closed-loop training approach
form antenna distance at both ends is set to cover sets for massive MIMO beamforming systems," in 2013 47th IEEE Annual
{8d/24,7d/24,6d/24,5d/24,4d/24,3d/24,2d/24,d/24}, which pro- Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS), March 2013,
duces varying correlation levels. For the exponential correla- pp. 1-5.
tion model, the parameter a is set to cover sets {0.1, 0.2, 0.3, [3] Z. Xiang, M. Tao, and X. Wang, "Massive MIMO multicasting in
noncooperative cellular networks," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in
0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8}, which produces spatial correlation from Communications, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1180-1193, June 2014.
weak level to strong level. The transmit signal-to-noise-ratio
[4] H. Zhang, Y. Li, V. Stolpman, and N. Van Waes, "A reduced CSI
(SNR) is assumed to be 15dB. Additionally, the classical Haar feedback approach for precoded MIMO-OFDM systems," IEEE Trans
wavelet compression of three layers is adopt to illustrate. actions on Wireless Communications, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 55-58, Jan 2007.

306
22nd International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT 2015)

10.4

0.9 , .J24-
antenna spacing spacing antenna spacing
compression ratio compression ratio compression ratio

(a) Chordal Distance (b) Energy Loss (c) Sum Rate Loss

Fig. 2: Feedback Protocol's Performance Under the Jakes Spatial Correlation Model in a 128 x 128 SU-MIMO system

1 0.8 "-riu117' correlation parameter


correlation parameter
comprssskmiallD compression ratio compression ratio

(a) Chordal Distance (b) Energy Loss (c) Sum Rate Loss

Fig. 3: Feedback Protocol's Performance Under the Exponential Spatial Correlation Model in a 128 x 128 SU-MIMO system

[5] A. Paulraj, R. Nabar, and D. Gore, Introduction to Space-Time Wireless (WCNC), April 2012, pp. 492-497.
Communications. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003. [12] B. E. Useviteh, "A tutorial on modern lossy wavelet image compression:
[6] D. J. Love, R. W. Heath, V. K. Lau, D. Gesbert, B. D. Rao, and M. An- foundations of JPEG 2000," IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 18,
drews, "An overview of limited feedback in wireless communication no. 5, pp. 22-35, Sep 2001.
systems," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 26, [13] L. Chun-Lin, "A tutorial of the wavelet transform," ed: NTUEE, Taiwan,
no. 8, pp. 1341-1365, October 2008. Feb 2010.
[7] A. D. Dabbagh and D. J. Love, "Feedback rate-capacity loss tradeoff for [14] R. C. Gonzalez and R. E. Woods, "Digital image processing," 2002.
limited feedback MIMO systems," IEEE Transactions on Information
[15] D. J. Love, R. W. Heath, and T. Strohmer, "Grassmannian beamforming
Theory, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 2190-2202, May 2006. for multiple-input multiple-output wireless systems," IEEE Transactions
[8] X. Su, S. Yu, J. Zeng, Y. Kuang, N. Fang, and Z. Li, "Hierarchical on Information Theory, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 2735-2747, Oct 2003.
codebook design for massive MIMO," in 2013 8th International ICST
[16] G. Raleigh and J. M. Cioffi, "Spatio-temporal coding for wireless
Conference on Communications and Networking in China (CHINA- communication," IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 46, no. 3,
COM), Aug 2013, pp. 178-182. pp. 357-366, Mar 1998.
[9] J. Lee and S.-H. Lee, "A compressed analog feedback strategy for
spatially correlated massive MIMO systems," in 2012 IEEE Vehicular
Technology Conference (VTC Fall), Sept 2012, pp. 1-6.
[10] J. Choi, Z. Chance, D. Love, and U. Madhow, "Noncoherent trellis
coded quantization: A practical limited feedback technique for massive
MIMO systems," IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 61,
no. 12, pp. 5016-5029, December 2013.
[11] R-H. Kuo, H. Kung, and R-A. Ting, "Compressive sensing based chan-
nel feedback protocols for spatially-correlated massive antenna arrays,"
in 2012 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference

307