A. B e r t u c c o
I s t i t u t o di I m p i a n t i Chimici, Universit& di P a d o v a , via M a r z o l o , 9, 1-35131 P a d o v a P D ,
Italy
G. S c a l a b r i n
I s t i t u t o di Fisica T e c n i c a , Universitfi di P a d o v a , via Venezia, 1, 1-35131 P a d o v a P D ,
Italy
Received 22 February 1995; revised 15 June 1995
This paper is a contribution to the development of a method for the prediction of the thermodynamic
behaviour of refrigerant mixtures at low and moderate pressure, for which experimental data are not always
available. The proposed model is based on a modified Redlich-Kwong-Soave equation of state, with
mixing rules as proposed by Huron and Vidal. The calculation of the attractive parameter is based on
infinite-pressure activity coefficients according to Soave et al. Activity coefficients are expressed by a group-
contribution model derived from UNIFAC. A list of groups and subgroups is proposed for CFCs, HCFCs,
HFCs and FCs. Two interaction parameters are regressed from experimental infinite-dilution activity
coefficients of binary mixtures. As a result, only the structure, critical constants and vapour pressure of pure
components are needed to calculate thermodynamic properties of refrigerant mixtures. The proposed
approach is able to predict experimental data with satisfactory accuracy over the full composition range.
(Keywords: refrigerant mixtures; vapour-liquid equilibria; group contribution; prediction; equation of state)
The search for alternatives to substitute the chlorofluor- means of a model able to correlate and predict their
ocarbons as refrigerants is mainly devoted to mixtures, behaviour with reasonable accuracy; then the actual
of both azeotropic and non-azeotropic type. However, measurement of mixture properties would be carried out
the number of mixtures of potential interest for use as on a smaller list of candidates only.
working fluids is very large. As it is too expensive to The aim of this study is to develop and test a predictive
measure directly the thermodynamic properties of all of method for the calculation of vapour-liquid equilibria
these alternatives, a first screening could be done by (VLE) of mixtures of CFCs, HCFCs, H F C s and FCs.
Classical models based on a group-contribution concept
* Present address: Istituto di Impianti Chimici, Universit~ di Padova, and an excess Gibbs free-energy approach, such as
via Marzolo, 9, 1-35131 Padova PD, Italy U N I F A C 1, are not suitable to the scope, as they can be
550
Prediction of v&pour-liquid equilibria of refrigerant mixtures 551
Nomenclature
a Attractive parameter of the EOS Greek letters
art,m Interaction coefficient ct Temperature dependence function of
A Reduced attractive parameter of the EOS parameter a
b Repulsive parameter of the EOS 7 Component activity coefficient
bn,g¢l Interaction coefficient F Group activity coefficient
B Reduced repulsive parameter of the EOS O Group surface area fraction
BV Second virial coefficient u Number of groups
G Gibbs free energy q~ Fugacity coefficient
H Enthalpy Correction factor in Equation (15)
kij Binary interaction coefficient Interaction parameter
Ki Equilibrium ratio Superscripts
nc Number of components oe Infinite pressure reference state
np Number of experimental data points E Excess property
P Pressure L Liquid phase
pvap
Vapour pressure R Residual part of UNIFAC activity
Q Group surface area coefficient
R Universal gas constant V Vapour phase
T Temperature Subscripts
U Molar volume c Critical condition
X Mole fraction in the liquid phase i,j Component indices
X Group mole fraction i(j) Component i infinitely diluted i n j
Y Mole fraction in the vapour phase k, m, n Group indices
Z Mole fraction (generic) r Reduced property
Z Compressibility factor
applied successfully only at low pressure, while there is of the model is an EOS, which is profitably applicable
a need to work up to 3-4 MPa; on the other hand, not only at low pressure.
even the most recent modifications of UNIFAC 2'3 do Recently, several models involving cubic EOSs com-
not contain all the subgroups necessary to represent the bined with the UNIFAC excess free-energy expression
compounds of interest in refrigeration. An example of have also been proposed for the prediction of VLE; a
the use of UNIFAC to calculate excess properties work by Voutsas et al. 12 reviews a number of them.
of absorption refrigeration mixtures is reported by However, it has to be noted that, so far, they have not
Borde4. been applied to refrigerant mixtures•
In our opinion, however, it is convenient to apply an In our work the Redlich-Kwong-Soave (RKS) cubic
equation of state (EOS), as many authors have proposed EOS 13 is used with non-classical mixing rules for
in these last years. Traditionally, cubic EOSs with parameter a; this is related to the value of the excess
classical mixing rules are mostly used; a review in this Gibbs free energy1at infinite pressure (as suggested by
area is
• given, for example, by Gow 5. In other cases, non- Huron and Vidal 4), which is in turn expressed by a
cubic EOSs have been proposed 6'7, but all of these UNIFAC-type group-contribution model. Following a
methods require the knowledge of empirical mixing rules procedure recently devised • 15 • -
, lnfimte-dilution 1
activty
with interaction parameters kq, which are calibrated on coefficients were selected as data source for parameter
binary data and are often of a non-predictable nature. calculation. This was done essentially for two reasons:
Sometimes, as done by Fransson et al. 8, a temperature their experimental determination is relatively easy; and
dependence of kij is considered to reproduce experi- interpolation from infinite dilution towards the middle
mental data better. However, as outlined by Morrison composition range generally yields acceptable values of
and McLinden7, in order to represent binary VLE data the activity coefficients, while the reverse may not be true.
properly the kij should also have a composition The scope of the work is to test the ability of the
dependency. With these limitations, such models are proposed model to predict the VLE of binary mixtures
useful for data reduction purposes, but cannot be applied including CFCs, HCFCs, HFCs and FCs over the full
as predictive tools because, when the kq are set to zero, composition range at low and moderate pressure.
large errors arise in the calculation of mixture properties,
such as VLE, PVTx, and H E (see for example the work
by Bertucco et al.9). The model
A predictive method has already been proposed by
Fransson et a/. l°, who developed a group-contribution Equation o f state
EOS based on the Abdoul-Rauzy-P+neloux method ll The Redlich-Kwong cubic EOS as modified by Soave 13
previously derived for hydrocarbons. In this case, as for is considered
UNIFAC, the mixture properties are calculated as a
combination of properties of functional groups, which RT a
P - (1)
are contained in the components involved, but the frame v - b v ( v + b)
552 M. Barolo et al.
where P, T and v are pressure, temperature and molar activity coefficients at infinite pressure (superscript oc):
volume of the mixture; R is the universal gas constant;
and a, b are the mixture parameters. By defining the In 7~ = In 7i°oR = Z tyk,i( In Fk -- In Fk,i) (8)
dimensionless variables k
aP bP
A R2T2, B = RT' In r k = Qk 1 - In (~mff)m,k --
A a Pv ) ~ (gn~n,,,
n
= bRr; Z = RT (2)
(9)
Equation (1) can be rewritten as
with
Z3 Z2 ÷ Z.B(A_B -1- B ) - - ~A B z = O (3) XmQm (10)
For pure and subcritical components, A and B are
Om -- ZXnQ"
n
functions of P, T, critical pressure Pc, critical tempera-
ture Tc, and vapour pressure pvap: y ~ Um,jZj
Pr J (11)
A = 0.427 484(P yap) ~ (4a)
j n
B = 0.086 64 Pr (4b)
Vr where Umd is the number of groups of type m in
component j, and %,m is defined by
In Equations (4a) and (4b), a is a generalized function of
pvap as reported by Soave 16, and subscript r indicates
reduced properties. Mixture parameters are derived from
~)n,m = exp(-an'm +~ n'm/T) (12)
pure component ones A i and Bi by means of combina-
tion and mixing rules. According to Huron and Vida114 Note that, with respect to original UNIFAC 1, neglecting
the combinatorial part means that only group surface
B= E ziBi (5) areas Qk are needed. Moreover, the temperature
i
dependence of the interaction parameters ~,,m (Equation
A ~i (Ai ln"/~.'~ (12)) has been improved, in order to take into account
-~= zi -ffi ln2 J (6) also polar effects. Finally, according to Equation (12),
where zi is the mole fraction of component i (in either the either symmetrical or asymmetrical parameters can be
liquid or vapour phase), and "y~ is its activity coefficient used.
in the mixture, which is evaluated in the reference state at As not all the values of Qk were available from
infinite pressure. UNIFAC, they were calculated from Bondi 17, and are
Thus the fugacity coefficient of component i in the listed in Table 1.
mixture at the system temperature and pressure is
expressed by Parameter determination
ln~i = ~ 2 ( Z - 1 ) - I n ( Z - B ) A complete table including all functional groups of
interest for refrigeration applications is beyond the scope
of this work; in order to verify the proposed procedure
(~ lnT~.~ln2
J ln(1 + ! ) (7) and show the potential of the method, only two main
groups and ten subgroups have been considered, as
reported in Table 1. More details on group subdivision
Group contributions are presented in the section 'Results'.
A simplified UNIFAC model, reduced to the residual According to Soave et al. 15, in order to determine the
part (superscript R), is proposed to reproduce the interaction parameters it is useful to refer to infinite-
dilution activity coefficients of component i in j, % (j). If
Table 1 List of main groups and subgroups considered in this work
Equation (7) is applied twice to calculate both pure
compound and infinite-dilution fugaeity coefficients, the
Tableau 1 Liste des groupes principaux et des sous groupesfaisant following relationship can be finally derived for a binary
l'objet de ce rapport
mixture of i infinitely diluted in j:
Main group Subgroup Qk
yiPcbi
~i- r~vap (15) Results
AiF i
The method currently proposed can be used for the
For the calculation of the activity coefficient "~i a calculation and prediction of VLE of binary and
predictive model is needed. For low to moderate pressure multicomponent refrigerant mixtures in the full compo-
the correction factor Oi can be estimated through a virial sition range.
equation of state, truncated after the second .term, as In the case of a bubble-point problem with nc
suggested by Van Ness and Abbott21: components, the system of equations is given by
~i = exp I yi-Kixi=O
tic
13 330
12 - ~ .\ . mm
320
J~mu)m
"~.~m • mm •
11 310
~--~ • •
(I)
i
.
300
m..
¢/) ~ 290
9~ E
280
i
8 i 270 •
T~---I
260
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
x,y x,y
Figure 1 Predictions for the system CFCI2-HCFC22 at Figure 3 Predictions for the system FC116-CFC115 at P = 1.52 MPa
T = 303.15K (experimental data from Maczynski and Niedziela 19) (experimental data from Gmehling et al. z°) with interaction parameters
with interaction parameters set to zero set to zero
Figure 1 Pr~visions pour le systkme CFC12-HCFC22 it T = 303,15 K Figure 3 Pr~visions pour le systbme FC116-CFC115 h P = 1,52 MPa
(donn~es expdrimentales de Maczynski et Niedzielal9), les parambtres (donn~es exp~rimentales de Gmehling et al.2°), les parambtres d'interac-
d'interaction ~tant fix~s it zdro tion btant fixOs it z~ro
301 i=..
12
11
um
tm
11)
L.. 15 ~ " "~ =.-- 10 U •
• m
L-. 9 a •
5 ~ 8
r
I I 7 T ~ l , ]
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
x,y x,y
Figure 2 Predictions for the system HCFC22-HFC23 at Figure 4 Predictions for the system CFC12-HCFC22 at
T = 273.15K (experimental data from Maczynski and Niedziela ]9) T = 303.15 K (experimental data from Maczynski and Niedziela 19)
with interaction parameters set to zero Figure 4 Pr~visions pour le systkme CFC12-HCFC22 it T= 303,15 K
Figure 2 Pr~visions pour le systbme HCFC22-HFC23 h T= 273,15 K (donn~es exp~rimentales de Maczynski et Niedziela I9)
(donn~es exp~rimentales de Maczynski et Niedziela19), les parambtres
d'interaction ~tant fix~s gl z~ro
containing both F and C1 atoms are considered:
chlorinated subgroups appear in main groups number
where ~b~ and q~v are expressed by Equation (7), applied 21, 22, 23, 24 (the difference is the number of CI atoms),
twice, to the liquid and vapour phases respectively, with while only part of fluorinated ones are included in main
7~ given by Equations (8)-(13). group number 40. We suspect that such division is
The VLE calculation can be performed following a questionable when one needs to calculate VLE of binary
standard procedure as indicated for example by Van mixtures of two chloro-fluorinated refrigerants: unfortu-
Ness and Abbott 2t. nately, no examples of such systems are provided in the
Many simulations of binary refrigerant mixtures have quoted paper. On the other hand, according to the results
been performed, and some examples are provided below; presented in a work by Morrison and McLinden 7, which
most of them are completely predictive, in the sense that deals with azeotropy in refrigerant mixtures, it is possible
the binary systems considered were not included in the to argue that, for all azeotropes experimentally detected
database to which the parameters were fitted. so far, the involved components contain subgroups both
However, a brief discussion is presented first concern- of CFC (or FC) and of HCFC (or HFC) types; when only
ing the definition of Table 1. In fact, as the currently either CFC (or FC) or HCFC (or HFC) groups are
proposed approach relies on a group-contribution scheme, present in the mixture, a non-azeotropic behaviour is
the definition of groups and subgroups is of paramount usually detected. As the recalled division of UNIFAC
importance. In a recent version of UNIFAC 2, groups includes subgroups both with and without a hydrogen
Prediction of vapour-fiquid equilibria of refrigerant mixtures 555
Table 3 Predictions for the system HCFC23-CFC13 at T = 199.72K (experimental data from Maczynski and Niedziela16)
Tableau 3 Pr+visions pour le systrme HCF23-CFC13 ~ T = 199,72 K (donnees exprrimentales de Maczynski et Niedziela 16)
Pexp Pcalc
x Yexp Ycalc Ay x 102 (bar) (bar) A p / p x 102
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 1.543 1.523 1.30
0.0485 0.1416 0.1606 1.90 1.740 1.747 0.402
0.0868 0.2074 0.2396 3.22 1.839 1.873 1.85
0.1472 0.2909 0.3215 3.06 1.953 2.013 3.07
0.2126 0.3430 0.3789 3.59 2.044 2.108 3.13
0.2507 0.3760 0.4039 2.79 2.081 2.146 3.12
0.2873 0.3960 0.4242 2.82 2.104 2.174 3.33
0.4120 0.4820 0,4778 -0.42 2.144 2.228 3.92
0.5380 0.5350 0,5231 -1.19 2.159 2.239 3.71
0.5650 0.5480 0,5331 1.49 2.158 2.236 3.61
0.6350 0.5800 0.5612 -l.88 2.143 2.222 3.69
0.6570 0.5910 0.5710 -2.00 2.137 2.214 3.60
0.6675 0.5990 0.5759 -2.31 2.130 2.210 3.76
0.7544 0.6460 0.6243 2.17 2.103 2.157 2.57
0.7839 0.6733 0.6452 2.81 2.076 2.130 2.60
0.8148 0.6912 0.6704 -2.08 2.057 2.094 1.80
0.8538 0.7392 0.7090 -3.02 2.002 2.037 1.75
0.9118 0.8121 0.7869 -2.52 1.902 1.919 0.89
0.9747 0.9252 0.9205 -0.47 1.734 1.727 0.40
1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.00 1.641 1.625 0.98
40 . . . . . . . . . . i
~' ~ 333.15 K
30 * 313.15 K
t..
¢tl •l ~ / •
c 293.15 K
• 20 • 273.15 K
I!
I,-- 20 253.15 K
z/
¢/3 /
(3,)
I,.. ,,J
10
m
f ,, 15
! e'~ ' ~i~
,,---, ~ #0 ~¢
devised, and interaction parameter values o f Table 2 2 Hansen, H., Rasmussen, P., Fredenslund, A., Schiller, M., Gmehl-
were obtained. By using these tables, V L E calculations o f ing, J. Vapor liquid equilibria by UNIFAC group contribu-
binary refrigerant systems were performed. F o r example, tions. 5. Revision and extension h~d Eng Chem Res (1991) 30
2352-2355
Figure 4 refers to the system C F C 1 2 / H C F C 2 2 already 3 Gmehling,J., Li, J., Schiller, M. A modified UNIFAC model: 2.
presented in Figure 1: the i m p r o v e m e n t is remarkable. Present parameter matrix and results for different thermody-
Table 3 presents the results for the azeotropic system namic properties Ind Eng Chem Res (1993) 32 179-193
H F C 2 3 / C F C 1 3 : prediction o f the azeotrope composition 4 Borde,I., Jelinek, M. Evaluation of thermodynamic properties
of binary fluid mixtures Heat and Mass Transfer in Refrigeration
is good, and deviations in the calculation o f boiling and Cryogenics J. Bougard and N. Afgan (eds) Hemisphere Phi.
pressures are within an acceptable range. N o t e that Co., Washington (1987) 381 392
refrigerant H F C 2 3 is not included in the U N I F A C 2 5 Gow, A.S. A modified Clausius equation of state for calculation
table. The system F C 1 4 / H F C 2 3 is considered in Figure 5, of multicomponent refrigerant vapor-liquid equilibria Fluid
Phase Equilib (1993) 90 219 249
showing satisfactory behavior up to 3.5 M P a . Finally,
6 Striim,K. H., Gren, U. B. A study of vapour-liquid equilibria
Figure 6 refers to the system H C F C 2 2 / C F C 1 14 over a for the binary mixtures HCFC22/CFC114, HCFC22/
wide range o f pressure an temperature. HCFCI42b and HCFC22/HFCI52a Can J Chem Eng (1993)
The relative R M S D in pressure ( R M S D - P ) for the 71 940 947
whole data presented was 3.91 x 10 -2, while the maxi- 7 Morrisou,G., McLinden, M. O. Azeotropy in refrigerant mix-
tures Int J ReJrig (1993) 16 129-137
m u m relative R M S D - P was 7.98 x 10 -2 (for the system 8 Fransson,E., Barreau, A., Vidal, J. Vapor liquid equilibrium in
R 2 2 / R l 1 4 at 253.15K); the R M S D in v a p o u r composi- binary systems of n-pentane + chlorodifluoromethane or +
tion ( R M S D - y ) for the whole data was 1.48 x 10 -2, while l,l,-difluoroethane J Chem Eng Data (1992) 37 521 525
the m a x i m u m R M S D - y was 2.28 x 10 -2 (for the system 9 Bertuceo,A., Pallado, P., Sealabrin, G. Evaluation of mixture
enthalpies through a predictive method based on the MHV2
R23/R13). Therefore, in all the cases examined, the cubic group-contribution equation of state Proc hit Con[
agreement with experimental data is acceptable. CFCs. the Day After Padova, Italy (1994) 471-478
10 Fransson,E., Vamling, L., Vidal, J. The Abdoul-Rauzy Pene-
loux group contribution equation of state extended to CFC-con-
Conclusions taining mixtures Chem Eng Sci (1993) 48 1753 1759
11 Abdoul, W., Rauzy, E., P~neloux, A. Group-contribution
The prediction o f v a p o u r - l i q u i d equilibria o f mixtures o f equation of state for correlating and predicting thermodynamic
refrigerants can be achieved by coupling an equation o f properties of weakly polar and non-associating mixtures. Binary
state model with a g r o u p - c o n t r i b u t i o n approach. In any and multicomponent systems Fluid Phase Equilib (1991) 68 47-
case, the g r o u p divisions of the existing U N I F A C 102
12 Voutsas, E. C., Spiliotis, N., Kalospiros, N. S., Tassios, D. Pre-
m e t h o d s have to be modified into a f o r m more suitable diction of vapor-liquid equilibria at low and high pressures
for treating refrigerant mixtures. using UNIFAC-based models Ind Eng Chem Res (1995) 34
Based on a cubic R K S EOS and a U N I F A C - t y p e 681-687
model for the excess Gibbs free energy at infinite 13 Soave, G. Equilibrium constants from a modified Redlich
Kwong equation of state Chem Eng Sci (1972) 27 1197 1203
pressure, a predictive m e t h o d has been developed and 14 Huron, M. J., Vidal, J. New mixing rules in simple equations of
presented for application to mixtures containing C F C , state for representing vapour-liquid equilibria of strongly non-
H C F C , H F C and F C subgroups with no m o r e than one ideal mixtures Fluid Phase Equilib (1979) 3 255 270
h y d r o g e n a t o m Tables o f groups and interaction 15 Suave,G., Bertucco, A., Vecchiato, L. Equation of state group
contributions from infinite-dilution activity coefficients Ind
parameters have been provided.
Eng Chem Res (1994) 33 975-980
Several examples have been reported for binary 16 Snare, G. Direct calculation of pure compound vapour pres-
systems. The calculated curves reproduce satisfactorily sures through cubic equations of state Fluid Phase Equilib
the experimental behaviour and ensure similar perfor- (1986) 31 203- 207
mances as equations o f state with classical mixing rules, 17 Bondi,A. Catalog of molecular properties Physical Properties of
Molecular Crystals. Liquids. and Glasses Wiley, New York
but with interaction parameters adjusted on binary data. (1968) 450-471
A l t h o u g h the m e t h o d needs to be tested for m o r e 18 Tiegs, D., Gmehling, J., Medina, A., Soares, M., Bastos, J.,
systems and extended to different functional groups, it Alessi, P., Kikic, I. Activity Coefficients at Infinite Dilution
proved to be an interesting and reliable tool for mixture DECHEMA, Frankfurt (1986)
screening in refrigeration applications. 19 Maczynski, A., Niedziela, J. TRC Data Bases for Chemistry and
Engineering Floppy Book on Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium Data
Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw (1993)
20 Gmehling,J., Onken, U., Arit, W., Grenzheuser,P., Wiedlich, U.,
Acknowledgement Kolbe, B. Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium Data Collection
DECHEMA, Frankfurt (1980)
One o f the authors (M.B.) would like to thank the C N R 21 Van Ness, H. C., Abbott, M. M. Classical Thermodynamics of
- Istituto per la Tecnica del Freddo, P a d o v a - for Non-Electrolyte Solutions With Applications to Phase Equilibria
McGraw-Hill, New York (1982)
financial s u p p o r t
22 Reid,R. C., Prausnitz, J. M., Poling, B. E. The Properties of
Gases and Liquids McGraw-Hill, New York (1988) 40, 80
23 Abbotl,M. M., Van Ness, H. C. Vapor liquid equilibrium: Part
IIL Data reduction with precise expressions for GE AIChEJI
References (1975) 21 62 71
24 Kruse, H., Gerdsmeyer, K., Kuever, M., Aruemann, M.
Fredenslund, A., Gmelding, J., Rasmussen, P. Vapour-Liquid Measurements and calculations of thermodynamic data for the
Equilibria using UNIFAC Elsevier Science Publ., Amsterdam binary refrigerant mixture R22/Rll4 Int J Refrig (1989) 12
(1977) 62-70