Anda di halaman 1dari 8

Science of the Total Environment 598 (2017) 9931000

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Science of the Total Environment

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv

Maximizing the production of butyric acid from food waste as a precursor


for ABE-fermentation
Ullrich Heinz Stein a,, B. Wimmer a, M. Ortner b, W. Fuchs a, G. Bochmann a
a
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Institute for Environmental Biotechnology, Vienna, Austria
b
Bioenergy 2020+ GmbH, Graz, Austria

H I G H L I G H T S G R A P H I C A L A B S T R A C T

At mesophilic conditions and pH 9.0 to-


tal volatile fatty acids (TVFA) produc-
tion is increased.
Thermophilic conditions at neutral pH
show the highest butyric acid produc-
tion and share of tVFA.
Volumetric productivity is increased at
HRTs of 2 days.

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: The current study reports on the maximization of butyric acid production from food waste using a mixed microbial
Received 4 October 2016 fermentation. In semi-continuous fermentations the effect of three different pH values (5.5, 7.0 and 9.0), three dif-
Received in revised form 31 March 2017 ferent temperatures (37 C, 55 C and 70 C) and two levels of hydraulic retention time (HRT, 2 days and 6 days) on
Accepted 19 April 2017
the formation of butyric acid as well as total volatile fatty acid production (tVFA) were investigated.
Available online xxxx
Overall, pH 5.5 provided the lowest butyric acid concentrations regardless of the temperature and the HRT. At
Editor: Chennai Guest Editor mesophilic temperature (37 C) alkaline conditions (pH 9.0) lead to a strong incline of tVFA as well as butyric
acid concentration probably due to a decreased solubilization of the substrate. However, most efcient in
Keywords: terms of butyric acid production was the fermentation conducted at 55 C and pH 7 where a butyric acid concen-
Acidogenesis trations of 10.55 g/L (HRT 2 days) and 13.00 g/L (HRT 6 days) were achieved. Additional experiments at 70 C
Volatile fatty acids showed declining butyric acid production. Increase of the HRT from 2 days to 6 days provided an increment of
Temperature butyric acid concentration throughout almost all experimental settings. However, regarding volumetric produc-
Hydraulic retention time tivity the increase in concentration does not compensate for the bigger reactor volume required to establish a
pH
higher HRT. At pH 7 and 55 C the resulting volumetric production rates were 5.27 g/L d at a HRT 2 days and
only 2.17 g/L d at a HRT of 6 days.
2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction

Corresponding author. Sustainable waste management is inevitable for all societies to break
E-mail address: ullrich.stein@boku.ac.at (U.H. Stein). the link between economic growth and waste production. Beside waste

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.139
0048-9697/ 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
994 U.H. Stein et al. / Science of the Total Environment 598 (2017) 9931000

minimization, it is necessary to promote the valorization of the waste Besides ABE fermentation, butyric acid can be used for additional ap-
derived from a huge number of sources either by conversion into new plications such as precursor for pharmaceutical applications (Heidor
products with high added value or generation of energy (Loizidou, et al., 2012; Kumar et al., 2014), building block in the chemical industry
2015). (Cao et al., 2011; El-Shafee et al., 2001) or avoring agent in cosmetic,
Moreover, depletion of fossil resources, which are not only used as food and beverage industries (Ben Akacha and Gargouri, 2015; Shu
energy carriers but also for the production of various chemicals, in- et al., 2011).
creases the need to look for alternatives. Food waste is a promising
source material for the production of various compounds that are cur-
rently made from crude oil (Angenent et al., 2004; Jang et al., 2012; 2. Materials and methods
Liu and Wu, 2016) and avoids the food or fuel discussion often associ-
ated with bio-based products (Lin et al., 2013). The massive generation 2.1. Substrate and inoculum
of food waste is currently a major problem in the EU as it has a direct im-
pact on environmental, economic and social issues. In 2012 for example Food waste derived from the food waste bunker of the biogas plant
87.6 13.7 million tons of food waste were generated in the EU Vienna, Austria, operated by the Vienna Municipal Department for
(Stenmarck et al., 2016) and 37 million tons in the US (United States, Waste Management (MA48). It was sampled immediately after fresh
2015). About one third of the worldwide produced food goes to waste waste material was delivered and consists mainly of canteen waste
directly (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and street market waste. Depending on the source of collection the
2013) and the absolute amount is expected to even increase within food waste was quite inhomogeneous. To obtain representative materi-
the next 40 years (Foley et al., 2011; Tilman et al., 2011). Using food al, samples were taken from different locations within the food waste
waste as a raw material on the one hand reduces dependency on bunker.
petrol-based resources and on the other hand helps to solve a serious The waste material was blended and subsequently sieved to remove
waste problem. tendons, bone particles and large impurities using a 0.25 cm2 mesh.
Food waste has been in the scope of researchers as a resource for var- Samples for characterization of the substrate were taken from the ob-
ious applications. Examples are biogas production (Agler et al., 2011; tained homogenized food waste.
Kim et al., 2006; Lin et al., 2013; Liu and Wu, 2016), hydrogen produc- Preliminary fermentation tests revealed severe mixing problems
tion (Han et al., 2016; Hosseini and Wahid, 2016; Yasin et al., 2013) within the fermenter and build-up of a oating layer. To prevent this,
and various platform chemicals (Angenent et al., 2004; Liu and Wu, the food waste was diluted to a total solid (TS) content and volatile
2016; Uckun Kiran et al., 2015). Another application is the use of food solid (VS) content of 5.89% and 5.01%, respectively.
waste for the production of liquid energy carriers such as butanol via The characteristics of the food waste after blending and dilution are
the acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) fermentation using solventogenic presented in Table 1.
clostridia strains (Patkov et al., 2009). The ABE-fermentation is bi- The biogas plant Vienna is constructed with a substrate suspension
phasic: during the lag and exponential growth phase (rst phase, storage tank to ensure continuous operation. The inoculum used in
acidogenesis) volatile fatty acids (VFAs) are produced. During the late the current study was taken from this substrate suspension storage
exponential and stationary phase (second phase, solventogenesis) the tank which also acts as a mesophilic pre-acidication ahead of the bio-
VFAs are metabolized and further converted into acetone, butanol and gas reactor. Prior to further use, the inoculum was adapted to three dif-
ethanol. The second phase which is initiated by the formation of organic ferent temperatures. As other researchers have demonstrated,
acids during acidogenesis and the associated lowering of the pH is close- mesophilic cultures can serve as sources of thermophilic and even hy-
ly related to induction of sporulation. This leads to problems during con- perthermophilic microorganisms (De la Rubia et al., 2012). Adaptation
tinuous fermentations as sporulated Clostridia do not proliferate, to the different temperatures (37, 55 and 70 C) was performed in
hindering an efcient continuous production process (Talukdar et al., three 6L-glass reactors (constructed in house) by a one-step tempera-
2015). To avoid or at least minimize this drawback ABE-fermentation ture raise approach as described by Boukov et al. (2005). The reactors
is usually performed in semi-continuous manner. According to the bi- were operated at a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 14 days. To bal-
phasic nature of the process it is split into two separate fermentation ance organic acid production pH was readjusted to 7.0 every time the
steps (Mutschlechner et al., 2000). Since VFAs aren't solely produced reactor was fed with new substrate. These setups were operated for
by Clostridia strains but by a variety of different and ubiquitous species 6 months until acid concentrations became stable in the reactors before
(Zhang et al., 2009) the rst phase can be conducted as a mixed micro- containing cultures were used as nal inoculum. Prior to use the reac-
bial fermentation. tors for adaption of the inoculum were not fed for 10 days to minimize
The VFAs generated in acidogenic fermentations comprise primarily the entry of VFAs through the inoculum. The corresponding values are
butyric acid, acetic acid and propionic acid, moreover, to a lower extent, presented in Table 2. When feeding was started again the reactors
iso-butyric acid, valeric acid, formic acid and caproic acid. The VFA con- reached their former level of acid concentrations within one day (data
centrations as well as their distribution pattern are inuenced by the not shown). The VFAs incorporated in the inoculum have been consid-
composition of the mixed microbial consortia and by various process ered for results and they were corrected accordingly.
parameters.
Certain research has been already done on acidogenesis of food
waste, investigating the effect of different temperatures, HRTs and
pH values (Han et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2013; Li et al., 2010; Lim
et al., 2008; Xu et al., 2011). However, an approach with such a Table 1
wide scope that includes comparison of 18 different semi- Characteristics of the blended and diluted food waste used in this study.
continuous test runs covering a wide temperature range from
Homogenized food waste Diluted food waste
mesophilic over thermophilic to hyperthermophilic conditions has
TS [%] 18.15 1.40 5.89 1.46
not been conducted yet. In the current study focus was laid on en-
VS [%] 16.46 0.61 5.01 1.63
hancement of butyric acid production. Butyric acid can act as a pre- VS/TS [%] 90.69 2.01 85.06 3.09
cursor and as an enhancer for ABE fermentations as it was shown to COD [g/L] 288.92 0.66 100.84 6.45
increase butanol production (Chang, 2010), the butanol yield NH4-N [g/L] 0.61 0.03 0.22 0.01
(Tashiro et al., 2004) and the butanol to acetone ratio (Li et al., pH 4.45 0.12 4.57 0.09

2014). Standard deviations were calculated from triplicates.


U.H. Stein et al. / Science of the Total Environment 598 (2017) 9931000 995

Table 2 VFAs are weak acids that do not completely dissociate in aqueous so-
VFAs in the adaption reactors during stable production and after feed stop for 10 days prior lution. The concentration of the two forms were calculated by the law of
to use as an inoculum.
dilution according to Oswald solved for the undissociated Eq. (1) as well
Adaption reactors 37 C 55 C 70 C as for the dissociated acids Eq. (2).
Butyric acid [g/L] 2.55 0.03 9.01 0.07 0.75 0.03
Acetic acid [g/L] 4.45 0.04 2.05 0.07 2.94 0.04 c0  10pH
cHA pH pKa
1
Propionic acid [g/L] 1.86 0.02 1.96 0.03 1.44 0.06 10 10
Inoculum 37 C 55 C 70 C
Butyric acid [g/L] 0.13 0.12 0.11
c0  10pKa
Acetic acid [g/L] 0.54 0.72 0.50 cA pH pKa
2
Propionic acid [g/L] 0.21 0.17 0.57 10 10
Standard deviations for the VFA concentrations of the adaption reactors were calculated
from the stable VFA concentrations, n = 9, 10 and 10 for 37 C, 55 C and 70 C, The following pKa values (25 C) were used: acetic acid 4.76, butyric
respectively. acid 4.82, iso-butyric acid 4.86 and propionic acid 4.87.

2.2. Experimental set-up 3. Results and discussion

2.2.1. Fermentation set-up 3.1. Effect of pH


Reactors were constructed from 1L glass asks equipped with gas
supply and gas discharge lines at the top. Each had a working volume To investigate the inuence of pH on the production of butyric acid,
of 0.8 L and the reactors were operated in a semi-continuous mode. At semi-continuous reactors (HRT 2d, 37 C) were operated at three differ-
the beginning of the experiments, 400 mL of the adapted inoculum ent pH levels. At the beginning the pH values of the reactors were ad-
was mixed with 400 mL of diluted food waste and introduced into justed to pH 5.5, 7 and 9. In the course of the experiments the pH
each reactor. The reactors were mechanically mixed at 900 rpm at con- dropped below the set pH levels due to the production and accumula-
stant speed using magnetic stirrers. Temperature was controlled using tion of VFAs. Therefore the pH was readjusted daily by manual addition
electrical heat jackets. The pH levels were adjusted manually every of NaOH. Fig. 1 shows butyric acid concentration over the course of time.
day using either 9 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or 9 M hydrochloric The fermentations carried out at pH 9 and 5.5 reached stable butyric
acid (HCl). Acid and base of high molarity were used to minimize the di- acid concentrations within 4 and 5 days, respectively. The fermentation
lution effects. To ensure anaerobic conditions the reactors were ushed carried out at pH 7 reached a stable butyric acid concentration even
with oxygen-free nitrogen (purity 5.0) for 5 min in the beginning of within the rst day and subsequently only minor variations of the con-
each experiment as well as every time they have been opened for sam- centration were observed. This fast response is probably caused by the
pling and pH adjustment. Each experiment was started separately and fact that the inoculum derived from a reactor operated also at pH 7
no temperature, pH or HRT change was made during the experiments. and that no pH adaption was necessary. Generally, results demonstrated
that the mixed microbial consortium can be rapidly adapted to a wide
pH range. In similar experiments also such a fast adaption to other pH
2.2.2. Effect of pH levels has been observed (Jie et al., 2014).
To investigate the effect of pH on the production of butyric acid the Average butyric acid concentrations reached were 2.06, 2.78 and
reactors were operated at pH 5.5, 7 and 9 at 37 C and at an HRT of 2d, 8.52 g/L for fermentations carried out at pH 5.5, 7.0 and 9.0, respectively.
meaning that every day 400 mL of the fermentation broth was with- In the current experiments raising pH did not only provide higher
drawn from the reactor and 400 mL of new diluted food waste was butyric acid concentrations but also total VFA production increased sig-
added. The reactors were operated for 10 HRTs each, resulting in total nicantly (Table 3). At stable VFA production the pH decreased within
fermentation periods of 20 days. one day to the following values: 5.3 (pH-0.2) 0.2, 5.0 (pH-
2.0) 0.3 and 5.9 (pH-3.1) 0.2 for fermentations conducted at
2.2.3. Effect of temperature and HRT pH 5.5, 7.0 and 9.0, respectively. The magnitude of pH decrease correlat-
Inuence of the temperature was investigated at 37, 55, and 70 C. ed with the amount of produced tVFA.
Pre-set temperatures were maintained by an electrical heat jacket Results are conrmed by Jie et al. (2014) who also describe a sharp
with integrated temperature sensor which was connected to a control- increase of VFA production at alkaline conditions, however, using excess
ler ensuring constant temperature levels (0.2 C). Again, three parallel sludge as a substrate. Wang et al. (2014) investigated acidication of
test runs at pH 5.5, 7.0 and 9.0, respectively, were conducted. All other food waste. Although they only tested the pH range 4.06.0 they also re-
conditions were the same as described above. port higher VFA production with rising pH. Also Dahiya et al. (2015) ob-
An additional series of experiments addressed the inuence of a served higher VFA production at alkaline conditions (pH 9 and pH 10).
prolonged HRT on VFA production. To extend the initial HRT of 2 days But in contrast to the results gained here, under such conditions the
to 6 days substrate supply was conducted only every third instead of share of butyric acid decreased and more acetic acid was produced.
each day. In all cases the reactors were operated for 10 HRTs resulting The observed impact of pH on tVFA concentration can be linked to
in total fermentation periods of 20 days and 60 days for reactors run the presence of undissociated VFAs. The lower the pH in the fermenta-
at HRT 2 days and 6 days, respectively. tion broth, the higher the amount of undissociated acids which can per-
Combination of all parameters resulted in 18 single experiments in meate through the cell membrane and subsequently dissociate within
total. the cell (Huang et al., 1986). This causes a decrease of the internal pH
and forces the cell either to increase active excretion or re-
metabolization of the acids. In both cases VFA production is impaired
2.3. Analytical methods (Grupe and Gottschalk, 1992). To check, the concentrations of undisso-
ciated VFAs in the three reactors were calculated at the measured pH
VFAs were monitored daily in the reactors operated at an HRT of (Table 4). Contrary to the absolute concentrations, the concentration
2 days and every 3 days in the experiments conducted at an HRT of of the undissociated acids is the lowest at pH 9. Interestingly, at pH 7.0
6 days. Concentrations of acetic acid, propionic acid, iso-butyric acid, the concentration of undissociated acids were by far the highest sug-
and butyric acid were determined by HPLC analysis as described by gesting that this parameter setting should provide the lowest tVFA con-
Rachbauer et al. (2016). centration. This was not the case and indicates that the amount of
996 U.H. Stein et al. / Science of the Total Environment 598 (2017) 9931000

Fig. 1. Butyric acid concentrations during the fermentations of food waste carried out at three different pH values.

undissociated acids is not the only inuential factor. Substrate availabil- With view to the other metabolites, the concentrations of propionic
ity may also contribute to the measured strongly enhanced VFA yield at and isobutyric acid were relatively similar in all experiments indepen-
pH 9. According to various authors, the solubilization of the food waste dently of the total VFA amount. Accordingly, their percent share de-
increases with rising pH, thus providing the microorganisms with more creased towards high pH levels.
utilizable substances (Chen et al., 2007; Dinamarca et al., 2003; Jie et al., Other studies link change in VFA pattern and tVFA concentrations to
2014; Kim et al., 2003; Lim et al., 2008). Consequently, this should result the re-metabolization of VFAs in the course of solventogenic activity
in rising tVFA concentrations from acidic over neutral to alkaline condi- (Wang et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2006). Regestein et al. (2015) obtained
tions, similar to the observations in the conducted experiments. results similar to the current study and assumed that at acidic and neu-
Standard deviations were calculated from values during stable pro- tral conditions consumption of butyric acid is favored over the con-
duction of butyric acid (Fig. 1), n = 16, 20 and 17 for pH 5.5, 7.0 and sumption of acetic acid.
9.0, respectively. Though at alkaline pH values butyric acid is the main product, acetic
Table 3 provides also distribution of other VFAs measured during the acid is still produced in large amounts.
fermentations. As shown, higher pH values did not only yield increased In addition to solventogenesis, other re-uptake paths may occur as
concentrations of butyric acid but also the relative portion of butyric the mixed microbial consortia is a complex community in which differ-
acid (butyric acid/tVFA) increased. The percent shares were 28.9%, ent metabolites serve as the substrate for other bacteria, fungi and
27.3% and 46.8% at pH 5.5, 7.0 and 9.0, respectively. Besides butyric archaea.
acid, acetic acid was produced as the prevalent metabolite. Table 4 Total VFA concentrations of 7.19 to 18.19 g/L were reached. In com-
lists the ratio of butyric acid to acetic acid to illustrate which type of parison, Jiang et al. (2013) report tVFA concentrations of 37.1 g/L at
acid is favorably produced. At pH 5.5 and pH 7.0 the formation of acetic pH 7.0, which is about four times higher as the result at pH 7 obtained
acid dominates whereas at pH 9.0 butyric acid is the main product. Jiang here. However, they also used a much higher substrate concentration
et al. (2013) made similar experiments with food waste, however, only in terms of VS content. The corresponding yield was 0.36 g tVFA/g VS
in the pH range 5.07.0. They conrmed that acetic acid is the prevalent fed which is similar to our results providing a yield of 0.41 g tVFA/g VS
product towards more acidic conditions. However, differing to the re-
sults gained in the current study, already at pH 6.0 butyric acid exceeded
acetic acid formation. Table 4
Concentration of dissociated (diss) and undissociated (undiss) acetic acid, butyric acid and
propionic acid during the acidogenesis of food waste at different temperatures and mea-
sured pH values.

Table 3 Parameter Acetic acid Butyric acid Propionic acid


Results of the effects of different pH values on acidogenesis of food waste. setting
undiss diss undiss diss undiss diss
pH 5.5 7.0 9.0 [g/L] [g/L] [g/L] [g/L] [g/L] [g/L]

tVFAs [g/L] 7.13 0.66 10.17 0.46 18.19 0.72 37 C, pH 5.5 0.5 1.7 0.5 1.5 0.5 1.4
Acetic acid [g/L] 2.48 0.14 4.87 0.10 6.89 0.22 37 C, pH 7.0 1.7 3.2 1.0 1.7 0.8 1.2
Propionic acid [g/L] 1.87 0.13 1.97 0.15 2.24 0.01 37 C, pH 9.0 0.4 6.5 0.6 7.9 0.2 2.1
iso-Butyric ACID [g/L] 0.72 0.10 0.55 0.11 0.55 0.11 55 C, pH 5.5 1.3 0.9 0.4 0.2 1.0 0.5
Butyric acid [g/L] 2.06 0.03 2.78 0.01 8.52 0.10 55 C, pH 7.0 0.3 1.3 2.2 8.4 0.4 1.5
Butyric acid/acetic acid 0.83 0.17 0.57 0.11 1.24 0.32 55 C, pH 9.0 0.3 2.6 0.5 3.3 0.3 1.8
tVFA [g tVFA/g VS fed] 0.285 0.031 0.406 0.018 0.726 0.016 70 C, pH 5.5 1.1 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.9 0.6
Butyric acid [g Butyric acid/g 0.082 0.003 0.111 0.008 0.340 0.011 70 C, pH 7.0 1.3 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.7
VS fed] 70 C, pH 9.0 0.3 1.8 0.5 2.5 0.3 2.1
U.H. Stein et al. / Science of the Total Environment 598 (2017) 9931000 997

fed at pH 7. The optimum pH value for the production of tVFAs as well as Regarding isobutyric acid it was generally noted that at lower pH
butyric acid, pH 9.0, yielded 0.726 g tVFA/g VS fed, around 80% higher higher concentrations were found. At pH 5.5 and a temperature of
compared to the yield at pH 7.0. With view to butyric acid production 55 C or 70 C, the concentration of the isomeric form even exceeded
the improvement is even more remarkable. The yield at pH 9.0, the butyric acid concentration. In contrast, propionic acid production
0.340 g butyric acid/g VS fed, corresponds to a more than 200% increase was similar throughout all fermentation conditions.
compared to pH 7.0. Some studies report similar observations in terms of increased bu-
Generally, results show that pH adjustment is a simple means to tyric acid formation at higher temperature. Yang et al. (2015) examined
steer complex consortia towards higher butyric acid production. How- a rise of butyric acid concentration at a temperature increase to 55 C
ever, while increase of pH seems to be an effective tool to raise tVFA whereas a further elevation of temperature from 55 C to 70 C resulted
and butyric acid yield it needs to be considered that large amounts of in a sharp decline. Qiu et al. (2016) fermented xylose at 37 C and 55 C
base are required. The associated high costs for chemicals makes this with a mixed microbial consortia. They discovered an enrichment of bu-
option economically less favorable. tyric acid producing microorganisms in the culture as a direct conse-
quence of the temperature increase from mesophilic to thermophilic
3.2. Effect of temperature conditions. It has been stated that elevated temperatures change the
microbial consortia and typically lowers the diversity of the bacterial
As demonstrated by other researchers, higher temperatures might species (Qiu et al., 2016). The lower VFA levels might therefore be ex-
be another means to increase accessibility of the provided substrate plained by a combination of enhanced re-utilization and the lower pro-
for enhanced conversion into VFAs (Jiang et al., 2013). The impact of duction due to declining biodiversity of the mixed culture at higher
temperature on VFA and in particular butyric acid production was stud- temperature. The reduced variety of microorganisms at 55 C provides
ied at the same conditions as before. Besides 37 C, two additional tem- also an explanation for the low tVFA concentrations at pH 5.5 and 9.0.
perature levels were tested, 55 C and 70 C, using inocula specically Such parameter combinations, an elevated temperature and non-
adapted to the respective temperature. Similar to the previous experi- physiological pH conditions, obviously overstress the adaptive capacity
ments parallel test runs were conducted at pH 5.5, 7.0 and 9.0. Maxi- of the microbial consortium.
mum butyric acid concentrations of 10.55 g/L 0.17 and 8.52 g/L As discussed above, undissociated acids might affect VFA production.
0.10 where reached during fermentations at pH 7, 55 C and pH 9, Table 4 provides an overview of the amount of dissociated and undisso-
37 C, respectively. ciated VFAs for all parameter settings examined. Research has been con-
Fig. 2 shows tVFA concentration and the pattern of VFA distribution ducted investigating the inhibitory concentrations of undissociated
at the different fermentation conditions. Contrary to the expectations, VFAs. Keke et al. (2016) published that undissociated butyric acid re-
higher temperatures did not only provide decreasing butyric acid con- duced the VFA production by 60% at concentrations of 1.3 g/L and undis-
centrations but generally resulted in lower tVFA concentrations. sociated acetic acid by 59% at concentrations of 2.0 g/L, respectively. In
However, there was one apparent exemption which did not t to the our experiments all concentrations of undissociated acetic acid were
general pattern. At pH 7.0 and 55 C a remarkable increase of butyric below the value reported. Therefore, in the case of acetic acid, inhibition
acid concentration by 280% was achieved compared to the same exper- effects are assumed to play a minor role. In contrast, butyric acid con-
iment at mesophilic conditions. The raise in butyric acid was over- centrations exceeded the inhibitory concentration in the fermentation
proportional and the parameter setting did not correspond to the fer- conducted at pH 7 and 55 C.
mentation conditions with the highest tVFA concentration (pH 9.0, Taking such inhibitory effects into account, a higher butyric acid con-
37 C). centration might be achievable if permanent removal of VFA is applied.

Fig. 2. VFA distribution during the fermentation of food waste at three different temperatures (37, 55 and 70 C), three different pH values (5.5, 7.0 and 9.0) and an HRT of 2 days.
998 U.H. Stein et al. / Science of the Total Environment 598 (2017) 9931000

Extraction of volatile acids through membranes has been proven to be a does not compensate for the bigger reactor volume required to establish
suitable method (Tugtas, 2014; Zacharof and Lovitt, 2014) but the in- a higher HRT. The corresponding volumetric production rates were
vestment and maintenance costs of such bioreactor setups are much 5.27 g/L d at a HRT 2 days versus 2.17 g/L d at a HRT of 6 days.
higher.

3.3. Effect of hydraulic retention time 4. Conclusions

The nal parameter tested was HRT. Several researchers reported The conducted experiments aimed to inuence the VFA spectrum
enhanced VFA production from food waste at an extended HRT. and concentration in a mixed microbial fermentation of food waste.
Scoma et al. (2013) observed a 64.9% higher concentration when HRT Mixed microbial fermentations provide the signicant technological ad-
was raised from 1 to 5 days whereas a further increase of the HRT vantage that unsterile conditions can be applied which makes the pro-
from 5 to 7 days decreased the VFA concentration by 6.6%. Fang and cess highly attractive from the economic point of view.
Yu (2000) observed increased VFA concentrations when they changed Unfortunately, the wide variety of different microorganisms in-
the HRT within a much shorter interval, namely between 4 h and volved makes impact of different process conditions much less predict-
30 h. Also Han et al. (2016) investigated VFA production using wastewa- able and process optimization is cumbersome. The investigations made
ter from food industry. Under various conditions improvement of VFA in the current study provided certain unexpected effects. While it was
yield with increasing HRT (from 1 to 3 days) was demonstrated. How- conrmed that alkaline conditions can signicantly boost VFA produc-
ever, none of these experiments investigated the impact of HRT, pH tion, the best way to enhance butyric acid was to raise temperature
and a temperature in their combination. Therefore, additional test from mesophilic to thermophilic conditions at pH 7.0. In contrast, such
runs using all previous parameter settings but at a longer HRT (6 instead a benecial effect of higher temperature was not observed at the other
of 2 days) were conducted. Results are shown in Fig. 3. Generally results pH levels. Applying longer HRTs resulted in a further increase of the bu-
conrmed expectations. In most cases the butyric acid concentrations tyric acid concentration, however, at the cost of lower volumetric pro-
were higher at longer HRTs. Exemptions are the fermentations conduct- duction rate or in other words the need for more reactor volume.
ed at 37 C, pH 9.0 and 55 C, pH 9.0. The decrease in concentration of Generally, it was clearly demonstrated that the right combination of
butyric acid in these experiments were 39% (37 C, pH 9.0) and 4% temperature and pH strongly increases butyric acid yield. The identied
(55 C, pH 9.0), respectively. The reduction at 70 C and pH 5.5 is negli- optimum parameter setting has an additional advantage. While adjust-
gible and within the experimental error. The highest ascent in relative ment to pH 9 requires high amounts of costly chemicals a raise in tem-
as well as absolute values, from 2.78 g/L to 5.52 g/L, was achieved in perature can be easily implemented. Moreover, temperature control is
the fermentation conducted at 37 C, pH 7.0. Looking at the conditions an immanent tool of every fermentation process, and therefore it is a
that provided the best results at a HRT of 2 days (pH 7.0, 55 C), an in- simple, yet effective way to steer acidogenic fermentations towards en-
crease of 23.2% was achieved. hanced butyric acid production.
The butyric acid concentration raised from 10.55 g/L even further to
13.00 g/L. With rising butyric acid concentration the yield increased as
well from 0.422 g butyric acid/g VS to 0.520 g butyric acid/g VS. Author contributions
The higher concentration achieved in such a way is obviously prefer-
able with respect to efcient substrate utilization. However, with view The Manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All
to volumetric productivity the increase in butyric acid concentration authors have given approval to the nal version of the manuscript.

Fig. 3. Effect of the HRT on the butyric acid concentrations during fermentations of food waste at three different temperatures (37, 55 and 70 C), three pH values (5.5, 7.0 and 9.0) and two
hydraulic retention times (2 and 6 days).
U.H. Stein et al. / Science of the Total Environment 598 (2017) 9931000 999

Funding source Kim, M., Gomec, C.Y., Ahn, Y., Speece, R.E., 2003. Hydrolysis and acidogenesis of particu-
late organic material in mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Environ.
Technol. 24:11831190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593330309385659.
This scientic work was funded by the Austrian Climate and Energy Kim, J.K., Oh, B.R., Chun, Y.N., Kim, S.W., 2006. Effects of temperature and hydraulic reten-
Fund (Energy Mission Austria, 838708). tion time on anaerobic digestion of food waste. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 102:328332. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1263/jbb.102.328.
Kim, W., Shin, S.G., Lim, J., Hwang, S., 2013. Effect of temperature and hydraulic retention
Acknowledgements time on volatile fatty acid production based on bacterial community structure in an-
aerobic acidogenesis using swine wastewater. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 36:791798.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00449-013-0905-7.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of our col- Kumar, S.V., Saravanan, D., Kumar, B., Jayakumar, A., 2014. An update on prodrugs from
leagues from the biogas group, the water group at IFA-Tulln and all oth- natural products. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med.]>Asian Pac J Trop Med 7:S54S59.
er involved third parties. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1995-7645(14)60203-0.
Li, J., Jiang, M., Chen, K., Shang, L., Wei, P., Ying, H., Ye, Q., Ouyang, P., Chang, H., 2010. En-
hanced production of succinic acid by Actinobacillus succinogenes with reductive car-
References bon source. Process Biochem. 45:980985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2010.
03.001.
Agler, M.T., Wrenn, B.A., Zinder, S.H., Angenent, L.T., 2011. Waste to bioproduct conver- Li, X., Shi, Z., Li, Z., 2014. Increasing butanol/acetone ratio and solvent productivity in ABE
sion with undened mixed cultures: the carboxylate platform. Trends Biotechnol. fermentation by consecutively feeding butyrate to weaken metabolic strength of bu-
29:7078. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.11.006. tyrate loop. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 37:16091616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/
Angenent, L.T., Karim, K., Al-Dahhan, M.H., Wrenn, B.A., Domguez-Espinosa, R., 2004. Pro- s00449-014-1133-5.
duction of bioenergy and biochemicals from industrial and agricultural wastewater. Lim, S.J., Kim, B.J., Jeong, C.M., dal rae Choi, J., Ahn, Y.H., Chang, H.N., 2008. Anaerobic or-
Trends Biotechnol. 22:477485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.07.001. ganic acid production of food waste in once-a-day feeding and drawing-off bioreac-
Ben Akacha, N., Gargouri, M., 2015. Microbial and enzymatic technologies used for the tor. Bioresour. Technol. 99:78667874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.06.
production of natural aroma compounds: synthesis, recovery modeling, and 028.
bioprocesses. Food Bioprod. Process. 94:675706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp. Lin, C.S.K., Pfaltzgraff, L.A., Herrero-Davila, L., Mubofu, E.B., Abderrahim, S., Clark, J.H.,
2014.09.011. Koutinas, A.A., Kopsahelis, N., Stamatelatou, K., Dickson, F., Thankappan, S.,
Boukov, A., Dohnyos, M., Schmidt, J.E., Angelidaki, I., 2005. Strategies for changing tem- Mohamed, Z., Brocklesby, R., Luque, R., 2013. Food waste as a valuable resource for
perature from mesophilic to thermophilic conditions in anaerobic CSTR reactors the production of chemicals, materials and fuels. Current situation and global per-
treating sewage sludge. Water Res. 39:14811488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. spective. Energy Environ. Sci. 6:426464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2ee23440h.
watres.2004.12.042. Liu, C.M., Wu, S.Y., 2016. From biomass waste to biofuels and biomaterial building blocks.
Cao, Y., Li, H., Zhang, J., 2011. Homogeneous synthesis and characterization of cellulose ac- Renew. Energy 96:10561062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.12.059.
etate butyrate (CAB) in 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (AmimCl) ionic liquid. Loizidou, M., 2015. Waste management and symbiosis for waste valorization. Waste Bio-
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50:78087814. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie2004362. mass Valoriz. 6:623624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12649-015-9432-x.
Chang, W.-L., 2010. Acetone-butanol-ethanol Fermentation by Engineered Clostridium Mutschlechner, O., Swoboda, H., Gapes, J.R., 2000. Continuous two-stage ABE-
beijerinckii and Clostridium tyrobutyricum. (Thesis). http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ fermentation using Clostridium beijerinckii NRRL B592 operating with a growth rate
CBO9781107415324.004. in the rst stage vessel close to its maximal value. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2,
Chen, Y., Jiang, S., Yuan, H., Zhou, Q., Gu, G., 2007. Hydrolysis and acidication of waste ac- 101105.
tivated sludge at different pHs. Water Res. 41:683689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. Patkov, P., Lipovsk, J., kov, H., Fotov, J., Rychtera, M., Melzoch, K., 2009. Exploita-
watres.2006.07.030. tion of food feedstock and waste for production of biobutanol. Czech J. Food Sci. 27,
Dahiya, S., Sarkar, O., Swamy, Y.V., Venkata Mohan, S., 2015. Acidogenic fermentation of 276283.
food waste for volatile fatty acid production with co-generation of biohydrogen. Qiu, C., Zheng, Y., Zheng, J., Liu, Y., Xie, C., Sun, L., 2016. Mesophilic and thermophilic
Bioresour. Technol. 182:103113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.007. biohydrogen production from xylose at various initial pH and substrate concentra-
Dinamarca, S., Aroca, G., Chamy, R., Guerrero, L., 2003. The inuence of pH in the hydro- tions with microora community analysis. Energy Fuel 30:10131019. http://dx.
lytic stage of anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of urban solid waste. Water doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02143.
Sci. Technol. 48, 249254. Rachbauer, L., Voitl, G., Bochmann, G., Fuchs, W., 2016. Biological biogas upgrading capac-
El-Shafee, E., Saad, G.R., Fahmy, S.M., 2001. Miscibility, crystallization and phase structure ity of a hydrogenotrophic community in a trickle-bed reactor. Appl. Energy 180:
of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/cellulose acetate butyrate blends. Eur. Polym. J. 37: 483490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.109.
20912104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-3057(01)00097-0. Regestein, L., Doerr, E.W., Staaden, A., Rehmann, L., 2015. Impact of butyric acid on buta-
Fang, H.H.P., Yu, H., 2000. Effect of HRT on mesophilic acidogenesis of dairy wastewater. nol formation by Clostridium pasteurianum. Bioresour. Technol. 196:153159. http://
J. Environ. Eng. 126:11451148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733- dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.085.
9372(2000)126:12(1145). De la Rubia, M.A., Riau, V., Raposo, F., Borja, R., 2012. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of
Foley, J.A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K.A., Cassidy, E.S., Gerber, J.S., Johnston, M., Mueller, sewage sludge: focus on the inuence of the start-up. A review. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol.
N.D., O'Connell, C., Ray, D.K., West, P.C., Balzer, C., Bennett, E.M., Carpenter, S.R., Hill, J., 33:113. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2012.726962.
Monfreda, C., Polasky, S., Rockstrm, J., Sheehan, J., Siebert, S., Tilman, D., Zaks, D.P.M., Scoma, A., Bertin, L., Fava, F., 2013. Effect of hydraulic retention time on biohydrogen and
O'Connell, C., 2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337342. http://dx. volatile fatty acids production during acidogenic digestion of dephenolized olive mill
doi.org/10.1038/nature10452. wastewaters. Biomass Bioenergy 48:5158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2013. FAOSTAT: FAO Statistical 2012.10.028.
Programme of Work. Faostat. Shu, C., Cai, J., Huang, L., Zhu, X., Xu, Z., 2011. Biocatalytic production of ethyl buty-
Grupe, H., Gottschalk, G., 1992. Physiological events in Clostridium acetobutylicum during rate from butyric acid with immobilized Candida rugosa lipase on cotton cloth.
the shift from acidogenesis to solventogenesis in continuous culture and presentation J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 72:139144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2011.
of a model for shift induction. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 38963902. 05.011.
Han, G., Shin, S.G., Lee, C., Jo, M., Hwang, S., 2016. Mesophilic acidogenesis of food waste- Stenmarck, ., Jensen, C., Quested, T., Moates, G., 2016. Estimates of European Food Waste
recycling wastewater: effects of hydraulic retention time, pH, and temperature. Appl. Levels.
Biochem. Biotechnol. 180:980999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12010-016-2147-z. Talukdar, P.K., Olgun-Araneda, V., Alnoman, M., Paredes-Sabja, D., Sarker, M.R., 2015. Up-
Heidor, R., Ortega, J.F., de Conti, A., Ong, T.P., Moreno, F.S., 2012. Anticarcinogenic actions dates on the sporulation process in Clostridium species. Res. Microbiol. 166:225235.
of tributyrin, a butyric acid prodrug. Curr. Drug Targets http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2014.12.001.
138945012804545443. Tashiro, Y., Takeda, K., Kobayashi, G., Sonomoto, K., Ishizaki, A., Yoshino, S., 2004. High bu-
Hosseini, S.E., Wahid, M.A., 2016. Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable tanol production by Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4 in fed-batch cul-
energy resources: promising green energy carrier for clean development. Renew. ture with pH-Stat continuous butyric acid and glucose feeding method. J. Biosci.
Sust. Energ. Rev. 57:850866. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.112. Bioeng. http://dx.doi.org/10.1263/jbb.98.263.
Huang, L., Forsberg, C.W., Gibbins, L.N., 1986. Inuence of external Ph and fermentation Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., Befort, B.L., 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable in-
products on Clostridium acetobytylicum intracellular Ph and cellular distribution of tensication of agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108:20260. http://dx.doi.org/10.
fermentation products. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 51, 12301234. 1073/pnas.1116437108.
Jang, Y.S., Kim, B., Shin, J.H., Choi, Y.J., Choi, S., Song, C.W., Lee, J., Park, H.G., Lee, S.Y., 2012. Tugtas, A.E., 2014. Recovery of volatile fatty acids via membrane contactor using at
Bio-based production of C2-C6 platform chemicals. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 109: membranes: experimental and theoretical analysis. Waste Manag. 34:11711178.
24372459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.24599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.01.020.
Jiang, J., Zhang, Y., Li, K., Wang, Q., Gong, C., Li, M., 2013. Volatile fatty acids production Uckun Kiran, E., Trzcinski, A.P., Liu, Y., 2015. Platform chemical production from food
from food waste: effects of pH, temperature, and organic loading rate. Bioresour. wastes using a biorenery concept. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 90:13641379.
Technol. 143:525530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.025. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4551.
Jie, W., Peng, Y., Ren, N., Li, B., 2014. Volatile fatty acids (VFAs) accumulation and micro- United States, A.E.P, 2015. Sustainable Management of Food Basics [WWW Document].
bial community structure of excess sludge (ES) at different pHs. Bioresour. Technol. Sept. 14, 2015. http://www.epa.gov/sustainable-management-food/sustainable-
152:124129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.011. management-food-basics#what.
Keke, X., Yan, Z., Chenghong, G., Yogananda, M., Wun, J.N., 2016. Impact of undissociated Wang, K., Yin, J., Shen, D., Li, N., 2014. Anaerobic digestion of food waste for volatile fatty
volatile fatty acids on acidogenesis in a two-phase anaerobic system. J. Environ. Sci. acids (VFAs) production with different types of inoculum: effect of pH. Bioresour.
42:196201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.06.015. Technol. 161:395401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.088.
1000 U.H. Stein et al. / Science of the Total Environment 598 (2017) 9931000

Xu, S.Y., Lam, H.P., Karthikeyan, O.P., Wong, J.W.C., 2011. Optimization of food waste hy- Zacharof, M.P., Lovitt, R.W., 2014. Recovery of volatile fatty acids (VFA) from complex
drolysis in leach bed coupled with methanogenic reactor: effect of pH and bulking waste efuents using membranes. Water Sci. Technol. 69:495503. http://dx.doi.
agent. Bioresour. Technol. 102:37023708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech. org/10.2166/wst.2013.717.
2010.11.095. Zhang, C., Yang, H., Yang, F., Ma, Y., 2009. Current progress on butyric acid production by
Yang, M., Kuittinen, S., Zhang, J., Vepslinen, J., Keinnen, M., Pappinen, A., 2015. Co- fermentation. Curr. Microbiol. 59:656663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00284-009-
fermentation of hemicellulose and starch from barley straw and grain for efcient 9491-y.
pentoses utilization in acetone-butanol-ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. Zhao, J.-H., Zhang, B., Cai, W.-M., 2006. Inuence of temperature on hydrolysis and
179:128135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.005. acidogenesis of kitchen wastes in two-phase anaerobic digestion. Huan Jing Ke Xue
Yasin, N.H.M., Mumtaz, T., Hassan, M.A., Abd Rahman, N., 2013. Food waste and food pro- 27:16821686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593332608618563.
cessing waste for biohydrogen production: a review. J. Environ. Manag. 130:375385.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.09.009.

Anda mungkin juga menyukai