Anda di halaman 1dari 28

Samora HACCP Template

OVERVIEW & GUIDE OF THE HACCP WORKSHEETS

Primary Worksheets Secondary Worksheets Comments

Page 1
Registration and approval of the study
MANAGEMENT SHEET

Product and process description, including


Page 2
raw material and end product
PRODUCT DESCRIPTIONS
characteristics

Page A
Recording and filing of supporting
LIST OF SUPPORTING
information
DOCUMENTS

Page 3 Simplified process flow diagram with


FLOW DIAGRAM OPRP and CCP location

Page B
PROCESS FLOW Helps to understand the process
DESCRIPTION

Page C Coding and classifying of the potentially


HAZARDOUS AGENT CODES hazardous agents that need to be
AND CLASSIFICATION considered during the study

Each potential hazard is listed and


Page D
significance is determined with help of
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
severity of health effect and likelihood of
AND DESCRIPTION
appearance

Page E
With help of the decision tree the control
CONTROL MEASURE
measures are categorized to CCP, OPRP
SELECTION AND
or Modification
CATEGORIZATION

Page 4 List and Overview of all identified CCPs


HACCP PLAN INCLUDING and OPRPs with control measures, limits,
OPRPs corrective actions and responsibilities

Overview of verification activities that


Page 5
shows that the CCP's and OPRPs have
VERIFICATION PLAN
been implemented properly

Page F
Evidence that the control measure can
VALIDATION OF CONTROL
achieve the targeted limits
MEASURES

Page G
MODIFICATION(S) AND List of modifications with all details
FOLLOW-UP
MANAGEMENT SHEET

Complete the first section (below) at the start of the HACCP study

HACCP Study No: Version No: HACCP Study Scope


Factory
HACCP study details Tick as appropriate Plant/line
New HACCP study Brand -
Scheduled review Product name Steam
Unscheduled review QMS reference
Study started Date:

Description of scope of study (e.g. module (start and end point) or products included)
Scope of study is covered line of steam generation that is used for process (direct contact to the product)

Scheduled or unscheduled review: Main changes / reasons / causes

HACCP Team Members


Name Responsibility / Role / Expertise Department / Company
HACCP Site Coordinator
HACCP Advisor
HACCP Team Member
HACCP Team Member
HACCP Team Member / Maintenance Planner
Factory HACCP Coordinator / Hygienist
HACCP Advisor / Head of QA

Authorisation for new HACCP study or update to new version

Factory Manager Date:

Complete the section below on completion of the HACCP study

Planned Modification(s) according to HACCP study


Modification No Provisional Control Measure(s) for immediate application Dead-line
Date:
Date:
Date:

HACCP study review HACCP study issue date


Next scheduled review - Date: Study issued Date:

Authorisation of finished study

HACCP Team Leader Date:

Quality Manager Date:

Factory Manager Date:

Page 1 - 2
PRODUCT DESCRIPTIONS
Characteristics of product
Name (product(s), product group(s), line)
Steam (HP & LP)

Type (e.g. raw, refined, ready to eat)


-

Key physical and chemical characteristics (e.g.


-
water activity, pH, ..)
Key processing steps (e.g. drying, heat
-
treatments, freezing)
Other
-

Materials
Raw materials / Ingredients (or attach list with
-
RM numbers)
High risk ingredient(s) (e.g. allergens, microbial
-
risks, foreign body source)
Packaging materials
-

Rework
-

Other (e.g preservatives, processing aids,


-
sevices)

Specifications and Regulatory requirements (food safety related)


Product specifications
-

Product specific regulatory requirements


-

Filling and Packing


Packaging description (e.g. size)
-

Packaging system (e.g. modified atmosphere) -

Claims and Label Information


Instruction for use by consumers (incl. use or
-
storage after opening)
Statements for safe use (e.g. allergen info,
-
special instr. for safe handling)
Other
-

Distribution / Storage / Description


Distribution instructions (e.g. ambient, chilled,
frozen) -

Storage instructions (e.g. ambient, chilled,


frozen) -

Shelf life conditions


-

Other
-

Use by Consumers
Intended use
-

Target group of users and special consumer


-
considerations (e.g. infants, elderly)

Reasonably expected mishandling and misuse -

Page 2 - 3
Flow Diagram

On-site verification (date and sign.): .........................................................


ow Diagram

On-site verification (date and sign.): .........................................................


HACCP PLAN INCLUDING OPRPs

Flow
Critical Limits /

(Page C)
CCP No Diagram

Hazard
Code
Hazard Targets Monitoring Corrections
OPRP No Code Step Control measure(s)
description (or Limits if How, frequency, who? Responsibilities
(as in
applicable)
Page 5)
A1 Soft Water Chemical 1x/ shift by boiler operator as
CP CON
Contamination
Total Hardness < 1 ppm
describe in analysis procedure
Boiler Operator

B1 Feed Water Chemical


CP Tank CON
Contamination
Aspect Clear 1x/shift by boiler operator, visual Boiler Operator
B1 Feed Water Chemical 1x/ shift by boiler operator as
CP Tank CON
Contamination
Hardness < 1 ppm
describe in analysis procedure
Boiler Operator
B1 Feed Water Chemical 1x/ shift by boiler operator as
CP Tank CON
Contamination
pH 8-9
describe in analysis procedure
Boiler Operator

B1 Feed Water Chemical 1x/ shift by boiler operator as


CP Tank
CON
Contamination P-Alkalinity max 25 ppm describe in analysis procedure
Boiler Operator
B1 Feed Water Chemical 1x/ shift by boiler operator as
CP Tank CON
Contamination M-Alkalinity max 50 ppm describe in analysis procedure
Boiler Operator

B1 Feed Water Chemical


CP Tank CON
Contamination Temperature 100- 105C 1x/shift by boiler operator, visual Boiler Operator

A2 NALCO 2811 Chemical 1x/ shift by boiler operator as


CP CON
Contamination Sulfit Max. 30 ppm
describe in analysis procedure
Boiler Operator

A4 NALCO 22310
Chemical 1x/ shift by boiler operator as
CP CON
Contamination TDS Max. 2000 uS/cm describe in analysis procedure Boiler Operator

A3 NALCO 2584 Chemical 1x/ shift by boiler operator as


CP CON
Contamination pH in boiler 10.5 -11
describe in analysis procedure
Boiler Operator

A3 NALCO 8507 Chemical 1x/ shift by boiler operator as


CP CON
Contamination pH in boiler 10.5 -11
describe in analysis procedure
Boiler Operator

A5 Condensate
A6 Culinary Steam Chemical
CP CON
Contamination Aspect Clear 1x/shift by boiler operator, visual Boiler Operator

A5 Condensate
Chemical 1x/ shift by boiler operator as
CP A6 Culinary Steam CON
Contamination
Hardness Max. 1 ppm.
describe in analysis procedure
Boiler Operator

A5 Condensate
A6 Culinary Steam Chemical 1x/ shift by boiler operator as
CP CON
Contamination pH 5.0 7.0 describe in analysis procedure
Boiler Operator

A5 Condensate
A6 Culinary Steam Chemical 1x/ shift by boiler operator as
CP CON
Contamination Conductivity Max. 15 uS/cm describe in analysis procedure
Boiler Operator

Page 4 - 6
CP PLAN INCLUDING OPRPs

Verification
Corrective actions
Records (details in
Responsibilities
Page 5)

Boiler Water
Softener Regeneration
LogBook
Boiler Water
Adjust dosing pump 22310
LogBook
Boiler Water
Softener Regeneration
LogBook
Adjust alkalinity booster Boiler Water
dosing pump LogBook
Boiler Water
Softener Regeneration
LogBook
Boiler Water
Softener Regeneration
LogBook
Boiler Water
Adjust LP Steam
LogBook
Boiler Water
Adjust 2811 dosing pump
LogBook

Boiler Water
Blowdown boiler water
LogBook

Adjust alkalinity booster Boiler Water


dosing pump LogBook
Adjust alkalinity booster Boiler Water
dosing pump LogBook

Boiler Water
Drain condensate
LogBook

Boiler Water
Softener Regeneration
LogBook

Boiler Water
Drain condensate
LogBook

Boiler Water
Drain condensate
LogBook

Page 4 - 7
VERIFICATION PLAN
Verification activity Verification procedure Frequency Responsible Records
(e.g of CCP monitoring or OPRP functioning, (e.g. methods or procedures to use, observations to be (how often is the task to be (who is responsible for (which records should be used)
corrective actions) made or measurements to be taken, actions if there is performed) the task)
a deviation or follow-up)

Water Report
Follow standard analysis procedure.
Total Hardness analysis in soft water 1x/shift Boiler Operator In case deviation: out of norm water
In case deviation: softener regeneration
report
Water Report
Aspect monitoring in boiler feed water Visual monitoring 1x/shift Boiler Operator In case deviation: out of norm water
report
Water Report
Follow standard analysis procedure.
Hardness analysis in feed water 1x/shift Boiler Operator In case deviation: out of norm water
In case deviation: softener regeneration
report
Water Report
Follow standard analysis procedure.
pH monitoring in feed water 1x/shift Boiler Operator In case deviation: out of norm water
In case deviation: adjust dosing pump
report
Water Report
Follow standard analysis procedure.
P-Alkalinity monitoring in feed water 1x/shift Boiler Operator In case deviation: out of norm water
In case deviation: softener regeneration
report
Water Report
Follow standard analysis procedure.
M-Alkalinity monitoring in feed water 1x/shift Boiler Operator In case deviation: out of norm water
In case deviation: softener regeneration
report
Water Report
Visual monitoring in temperature gauge
Temperature monitoring in feed water 1x/shift Boiler Operator In case deviation: out of norm water
In case of deviation: adjust LP Steam control valve
report
Water Report
Follow standard analysis procedure.
Sulfit monitoring in boiler water 1x/shift Boiler Operator In case deviation: out of norm water
In case deviation: adjust dosing pump
report
Water Report
Follow standard analysis procedure.
TDS monitoring in boiler water 1x/shift Boiler Operator In case deviation: out of norm water
In case deviation: blowdown boiler water
report
Water Report
Follow standard analysis procedure.
pH monitoring in boiler water 1x/shift Boiler Operator In case deviation: out of norm water
In case deviation: adjust dosing pump
report
Water Report
Visual monitoring
Aspect monitoring in condensate return 1x/shift Boiler Operator In case deviation: out of norm water
In case of deviation: drain condensate
report

Page 5 - 8
Water Report
Follow standard analysis procedure.
Hardness monitoring in condensate return 1x/shift Boiler Operator In case deviation: out of norm water
In case of deviation: softener regeneration
report
Water Report
Follow standard analysis procedure.
pH monitoring in condensate return 1x/shift Boiler Operator In case deviation: out of norm water
In case of deviation: drain condensate
report
Water Report
Follow standard analysis procedure.
Conductivity monitoring in condensate return 1x/shift Boiler Operator In case deviation: out of norm water
In case of deviation: drain condensate
report

Page 5 - 9
LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Document
No Description: Title, Date of issue
number

1 Samora FSMS Policy

2 Samora Quality Policy

3 ISO -

10

11

12

13

14

Page A - 10
Page A - 11
LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Author / Company / Organisation Filing location

Page A - 12
Page A - 13
PROCESS FLOW DESCRIPTION (Optional)

Process Step
Flow Diagram
Code
(as in
Description
Page 5)
A1 Soft Water

A2 NALCO 2811

A3 NALCO 2584

A3 NALCO 8507

A4 NALCO 22310

A5 Steam Condensate

A6 Culinary Steam

B1 Feed Water Tank

B2 Drum Nalco

B3 Loos Boiler

B4 Maxitherm Boiler

C1 Condensate Tank

C2 Manual Tipping

C3 Dosing Pump

C4 Strainer

C5 Pump 1,2

C6 Steam

C7 Strainer/Steam Trap

C8 Steam Purifier

C9 Desuperheater

Page B - page 14
ESS FLOW DESCRIPTION (Optional)

Details and Technical Data

Soft Water Means Water with Total Hardness Content < 1ppm

(Sulfit) as Oxygen Scavenger to prevent corrosion

Alkalinity Adjuster

Alkalinity Adjuster

(Polymer) as Antiscalant

Condensate return as a steam condensation for water heater 7 desuperheater

Steam with direct contact to product (agglomeration tower)

MS Feed Water Tank complete with deaeration.

Chemical drum 200 L

Fire tube boiler capacity 10 ton/hour

Water tube boiler capacity 10 ton/hour

2 m3 condensate tank

HP Feed Water Pump

Page B - page 15
HAZARDOUS AGENT CODES AND CLASSIFICATION
Code Hazard Class Hazardous Agent Description

ALLG Alergen Alergen general

CONL Chemical Chemical contamination from lubricant

DTP Chemical Diterpene

FBG Physical Foreign body general

FBM Physical Foreign body metal

HM Chemical Heavy metal

MYM Microbes Mould and Yeast

PATH Microbes Pathogen

SAL Microbes Salmonella

SOD Chemical Sulphur Dioxide

TAMBAHKAN SENDIRI JIKA KURANG

Page C - 16
Page C - 17
Severity of health
effect
Can cause
A
fatality
Can lead to
B
serious illness
Can cause
C
illness
Can cause
D
inconvenience
Almost of no
E
significance
1 2 3 4 5
Unlikely Rare Could Likely Frequent
occur
(<1/2 (1 / year) (1/6 month) (1 / month) (1 / week)
years)
Likelihood of occurrence
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION and DESCRIPTION

Justification
Location of potential hazard Hazard description Hazard assessment
for selection of Hazards and Assesment
Indicate the step (e.g. raw Describe clearly and specifically the hazards that are "reasonably expected" to occur at each step: Class (M, Q1: Based on the hazard description, likelihood of Provide supporting data/references on likelihood of occurrence, information on
material, processing or P, C or A), agent, size, origin, nature, etc. occurrence (before applying the control measure) severity of health effects and acceptabel level in end product.
distribution) at which the hazard and severity of health effects, does this hazard
may be introduced. needs to be controlled, i.e. is it a significant hazard?

Step (description) Hazard Class Origin or source of the Nature of the hazard Acceptable level in Likelihood of Severity of Significant hazard? For each hazard, document why it is or why it is not likely to occur or causing
Flow
Hazard Code
hazard (e.g. where and (e.g. precense, ability end product occurrence adverse health (Yes/No) adverse health effects. For non significant hazards document if it is manged e.g.
Diagra
(Page C)
how it can be to grow, survive, effect For significant hazard, by a PRP, through a specification or Major Allergen Declaration (MAD).
m Code introduced into the formation of toxins or select and categorize Make sure that all haz
(as in product or its toxic chemicals, control measure(s) on
Page environment) migration of Page E.
5) chemicals)

4 A YES 4A
Frequent:
Almost In every week, we found the residual hardness in feed water is out of
norm

Chemical Can cause fatality:


as desicribe in TM
A1 Soft Water CON Contamination C Raw Material Presence
203-11.1
Fatality. It is more about safety consideration. High hardness will cause boiler Code Desc
(Hardness) overheating and may lead to explosion

Counter Measure:
Periodical checking & Softener Regeneration or membrane replacement. In
case needed, do boiler chemical cleaning

4 A YES 4A

Frequent:
Almost In every week, we found the residual hardness in feed water is out of
norm

Can cause fatality:


Chemical
A2 NALCO 2811 CON
Contamination
C Raw Material Presence 20 - 40 ppm Fatality. It is more about safety consideration. High sulfit will cause boiler pipe Code Desc
corrosion and may lead to overhetating or tube explosion

Counter Measure:
Periodical checking & Adjust LP Steam control valve to accelerate the
evaporation of residual sulfit

1 C NO 1C
Unlikely:
Maximum daily usage possible: 1.09 ppm
Feed water 64000L/shift
Chemical Dosing pump 7 L/hr, dilution 20 x
A3 NALCO 2584 CON
Contamination
C Raw Material Presence 2 mg/m3
NSF Certified, G5 Standard for direct contact with food
3A YES

Can cause illness:


Caustic may be intolerated for some people

1 C NO

Unlikely:
Maximum daily usage possible: 1.09 ppm
Feed water 64000L/shift
Chemical Dosing pump 7 L/hr, dilution 20 x
A3 NALCO 8507 CON C Raw Material Presence 2 mg/m3
Contamination NSF Certified, G5 Standard for direct contact with food

Can cause illness:


Caustic may be intolerated for some people

4 E NO
Likely:
May occure 1 times/month
Chemical
A4 NALCO 22310 CON C Raw Material Presence 93 ppm Almost no significance:
Contamination
Maximum daily usage possible: 2 ppm
When doesnt dilute: 103 ppm --> 6000 uS/cm. (Won't happen)
NSF Certified, G6 Standard for steam with direct contact with food

A5 Condensate 4 D YES
Likely:
May occure 1 times/month

Can cause inconvinience:


Chemical No foreign
CON C Raw Material Presence Chemical contamination will generate odor and since the steam is culinary
Contamination material
steam, may affect the product aroma

Counter Measure:
Periodical checking of conductivity and drain condensate if out of norm

Page D - 19
B1 4 C NO 4C
Likely:
occurred weekly
Chemical
as desicribe in TM
Feed Water Tank CON Contamination C Raw Material Presence
203-11.1 Can cause inconvinience:
5A YES
(silica, alkalinity, ph)
Chemical contamination will generate odor and since the steam is culinary
steam, may affect the product aroma

B3 1 D NO
Unlikely:
No particles Never happen in the last 2 year
Foreign bodies rusty and particel
Loos Boiler FBG P Contamination >2mm, no sharp
General weld from pipe
particles Can cause inconvinience:
foreing bodies will cause blockage in another strainer

B3 1 C NO
Unlikely:
Never happen in the last 2 year
Chemical
Loos Boiler CON C occurrence of priming Contamination Not presence
Contamination Can cause ilness:
During extraordinary priming, boiler water may be carried over to culinary
steam which contact to product and will cause ingestion problem
B4 1 D NO 1D
Unlikely:
No particles Never happen in the last 2 year
Foreign bodies rusty and particel
Maxitherm Boiler FBG
General
P
weld from pipe
Contamination >2mm, no sharp 3B YES
particles Can cause inconvinience:
foreing bodies will cause blockage in another strainer

B4 1 C NO 1C
Unlikely:
Never happen in the last 2 year
Chemical
Maxitherm Boiler CON
Contamination
C occurrence of priming Contamination Not presence
Can cause ilness:
4B YES
During extraordinary priming, boiler water may be carried over to culinary
steam which contact to product and will cause ingestion problem

C1 1 D NO 1D
Unlikely:
No particles Never happen in the last 2 year
Foreign bodies rusty and particel
Condensate Tank FBG
General
P
weld from pipe
Presence >2mm, no sharp 5B YES
particles Can cause inconvinience:
foreing bodies will cause blockage in another strainer

C2 1 D NO 1D

Unlikely:
No particles Never happen in the last 2 year
Foreign bodies dust and plastic
Manual Tipping FBG
General
P
during handling
Presence >2mm, no sharp 1C NO
particles Can cause inconvinience:
foreing bodies will cause blockage in another strainer

C3 1 C NO 1C
Unlikely:
Never happen in the last 2 year
Chemical
Dosing Pump CON
Contamination
C Over dosing Presence Not presence Can cause ilness: 2C NO
If there is extraordinary problem in dosing pump, the limit flow my be reach
and chemical contamination in case of priming may lead to product
contamination.

C4 1 D NO 1D
Unlikely:
No particles Never happen in the last 2 year
Foreign bodies unproper function of
Strainer FBG
General
P
strainer
Contamination >2mm, no sharp 3C YES
particles Can cause inconvinience:
foreing bodies will cause blockage in another strainer

C5 1 D NO 1D
Unlikely:
No particles Never happen in the last 2 year
Foreign bodies unproper function of
Pump 1,2 CON
General
P
strainer
Contamination >2mm, no sharp 4C YES
particles Can cause inconvinience:
foreing bodies will cause blockage in another strainer (steam stariner)

C6 1 D NO 1D
Unlikely:
Never happen in the last 2 year
No particles
Foreign bodies rusty and particel
Steam FBG
General
P
weld from pipe
Presence >2mm, no sharp
Can cause inconvinience: 2D NO
particles
foreing bodies will settled in the bottom of the pipe, will no carry over to steam
flow

C7 1 D NO 1D
Unlikely:
Never happen in the last 2 year
No particles
Foreign bodies unproper function of
Strainer/Steam Trap FBG
General
P
strainer
Contamination >2mm, no sharp
Can cause inconvinience:
3D NO
particles
foreing bodies will settled in the bottom of the pipe, will no carry over to steam
flow

Page D - 20
C8 No particles 1 D NO 1D
Foreign bodies unproper function of Install standard steam purifier (based on Nestle standard)
Steam Purifier FBG
General
P
steam purifier
Contamination >2mm, no sharp
* Covered in Manufacturing HACCP 4D YES
particles
4E NO
5E YES

Page D - 21
CONTROL MEASURE SELECTION and CATEGORIZATION

Step and Hazard Control Measures Categorization of control measures in


Transfer hazards considered significant in the Select and describe a control measure or combination of control Q1: Based on the likelihood of occurrence (before applying the control meas
hazard assessment in Page D to this worksheet measures capable of preventing, eliminating or reducing the hazard to controlled)? YES: This is a significant hazard. Go to Q2. NO: This is not a si
Page F). an acceptable level.
Q2: Will a subsequent processing step, including expected use by co
an acceptable level? YES: Identify and name subsequent step. NO: G
Document the rationale for the selection, e.g. effectiveness of applied Q3: Are control measures or practices in place at this step, and
control measures alone or in combination against identified hazard YES: Go to Q4. NO: Modify the process or product and go to Q
(refer to documents if possible)?
Q4: Is it possible to establish critical limits for the control
YES: Go to Q5. NO: This hazard is managed by an OPR

Q5: Is it possible to monitor the control measure in


YES: This hazard is managed by the HACCP-plan

Flow
Hazard Code
(Page C)

Diagram
Code Step Hazard Description of control measures Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 CCP / OPRP
(as in
Page 5)
A1 Soft Water

Chemical
CON crosscheck measurement as listed in. Yes No Yes yes no OPRP
Contamination

A2 NALCO 2811

Chemical
CON Sulfit analysis in boiler water as listed in Yes No Yes yes no OPRP
Contamination

A5 Condensate

Chemical
CON Conductivity measurement Yes No Yes yes no OPRP
Contamination

Page E - 22
A6 Culinary
Steam
Chemical
CON crosscheck measurement as listed in Yes No Yes yes no OPRP
Contamination

B1 Feed Water
Tank
Chemical
CON crosscheck measurement as listed in. Yes No Yes yes no OPRP
Contamination

Page E - 23
RE SELECTION and CATEGORIZATION

Categorization of control measures in OPRPs and CCPs. Answer questions Q1 to Q5 as necessary.


Q1: Based on the likelihood of occurrence (before applying the control measure) and the severity of adverse health effects (Page D), is this hazard significant (needs to be
controlled)? YES: This is a significant hazard. Go to Q2. NO: This is not a significant hazard.

Q2: Will a subsequent processing step, including expected use by consumer, guarantee the removal of this Significant Hazard, or its reduction to
an acceptable level? YES: Identify and name subsequent step. NO: Go to Q3.

Q3: Are control measures or practices in place at this step, and do they exclude, reduce or maintain this Significant Hazard to/at an acceptable level?
YES: Go to Q4. NO: Modify the process or product and go to Q1.

Q4: Is it possible to establish critical limits for the control measure at this step?
YES: Go to Q5. NO: This hazard is managed by an OPRP.

Q5: Is it possible to monitor the control measure in such a way that corrective actions can be taken immediately when there is a loss of control?
YES: This hazard is managed by the HACCP-plan (CCP). NO: This hazard is managed by an OPRP.

Justification Provide supporting evidence that that slelected control measure(s) and target/critical limits will
adequately control the hazard.

Q1: Yes , see Page D


Q2: No:
Q3: Yes
Q4: Yes
Q5: No,periodical checking as per limit standard in .

Q1: Yes , see Page D


Q2: No:
Q3: Yes
Q4: Yes
Q5: No,periodical checking as per limit standard in .

Q1: Yes , see Page D


Q2: No:
Q3: Yes
Q4: Yes
Q5: No,1x/shift periodical checking

Page E - 24
Q1: Yes , see Page D
Q2: No:
Q3: Yes
Q4: Yes
Q5: No,periodical checking as per limit standard in.

Q1: Yes , see Page D


Q2: No:
Q3: Yes
Q4: Yes
Q5: No,periodical checking as per limit standard in.

Page E - 25
VALIDATION OF CONTROL MEASURES
The HACCP team has to provide, or ask for, evidence that selected control measures are capable of achieving the intended control for identified hazards.
The HACCP Team Leader shall provide answers to the following questions:
- Have potential hazards been correctly identified as significant or not?
- Are applied control measures capable of reducing the significant hazards to acceptable level?
- Are Critical limits correct and appropriate?
- Will the Corrections restore products safety control?

Hazardous agent Step Significant? EVIDENCE, that necessary prerequisite programs prevent this potential hazard Assessment Control Critical Limits Corrections
from becoming significant are in place measure

Soft Water Total Softener


Yes As describe in WATER HACCP X < 1 ppm
Chemical Contamination Hardness regeneration
Adjust Dosing
X Aspect Clear
Chemical Contamination Pump
Softener
X Hardness < 1 ppm
Chemical Contamination regeneration
Adjust Dosing
X pH 8-9
Chemical Contamination Pump
Feed Water Tank No Periodical checking of feed water quality as listed in.
Softener
X P-Alkalinity max 25 ppm
Chemical Contamination regeneration
Softener
X M-Alkalinity max 50 ppm
Chemical Contamination regeneration
Adjust LP
X Temperature 100- 105C
Chemical Contamination Steam to FWT
NALCO 2811 Sulfit Analysis in boiler water as listed in.. (what document/ Adjust Dosing
Yes X Sulfit Max. 30 ppm
Chemical Contamination manual/ iso standard/ boiler manual) Pump
NALCO 22310 TDS Measurement in boiler water as listed in.. (what Max. 2000
No X TDS Blowdown
Chemical Contamination document/ manual/ iso standard/ boiler manual) uS/cm
NALCO 2584 Adjust Dosing
No Periodical checking of boiler water PH X pH in boiler 10.5 -11
Chemical Contamination Pump
NALCO 8507 Adjust Dosing
No Periodical checking of boiler water PH X pH in boiler 10.5 -11
Chemical Contamination Pump

X Aspect Clear Drain


Chemical Contamination Condensate
*Include Culinary steam
Chemical Contamination Periodical checking of condensate aspects as approved.. X Hardness Max. 1 ppm. Drain
condensate Yes
(what document/ manual/ iso standard/ boiler manual)
Chemical Contamination *Steam sampling under X pH 5.0 7.0 Drain
MFG QMS

Page F -26
Condensate
*Include Culinary steam
Periodical checking of condensate aspects as approved..
condensate Yes
*Steam sampling under (what document/ manual/ iso standard/ boiler manual)
MFG QMS
Max. 15
X Conductivity Drain
Chemical Contamination uS/cm

Page F -27
MODIFICATION(s) AND FOLLOW-UP
Step Hazard description Modification Provisional Control Measure(s)
No Description Hazard Agent Modifi- Recommended modification and confirmation of Limit date Immediate measures to be applied while
Code cation Center of Excellence for action. modifications are not yet implemented.
No

Page G - 28

Anda mungkin juga menyukai