Governance has been defined to refer to structures and processes that are designed to ensure accountability,
transparency, responsiveness, rule of law, stability, equity and inclusiveness, empowerment, and broad-based
participation. Governance also represents the norms, values and rules of the game through which public affairs
are managed in a manner that is transparent, participatory, inclusive and responsive. Governance therefore
can be subtle and may not be easily observable. In a broad sense, governance is about the culture and
institutional environment in which citizens and stakeholders interact among themselves and participate in
public affairs. It is more than the organs of the government.
Often there is a tendency to equate governance with management, the latter primarily referring to the planning,
implementation and monitoring functions in order to achieve pre-defined results. Management encompasses
processes, structures and arrangements that are designed to mobilize and transform the available physical,
human and financial resources to achieve concrete outcomes. Management refers to individuals or groups of
people who are given the authority to achieve the desired results. Governance systems set the parameters
under which management and administrative systems will operate. Governance is about how power is
distributed and shared, how policies are formulated, priorities set and stakeholders made accountable
PAMARINTA GOVERNANCE
Pamarinta= governance
The two typical Tausug Pamarinta (Governance):
1. BANUWA PARINTA
2. SULTANATE PARINTA
The BANUA PARINTA refers to the community (kawman) Adat (custom or indigenous) type of
governance. The SULTANATE PARINTA refers to the states type of governance. The Sulu
Sultanate covers Mindanao, Sulu, Palawan and Sabah. The B.A.N.U.W.A. Pamarinta refers to:
Baugbug-based governance
Adat law justice system
Nakurah-tindug peoples vanguards
Ummah-coholic advocacy
Wajib-faithful adherence
Adlaw-akhirat destined ibadat
Governance to Indigenous Peoples
International agencies like the World Bank and Asian Development Bank are promoting the concept
of "good governance" in the Pacific islands. But indigenous societies in the region have their own ways of
governing family and community.
Governance in the indigenous concept is linked to a belief system that supervises and monitors
peaceful co-existence of everyone and everything that share the multi-dimensional natural world that we
live in. This is done in accordance with the natural laws of society, which are based on our indigenous
creation stories and the protocols that have been made by human beings.
The leader takes responsibility to compensate for breaches of the peace on behalf of his community
members. Truth and justice are prerequisites for good governance, social security, economic self-reliance
and political stability. Quality leadership, authority and good governance is measured by the ability to uphold
cohesive community spirit, with a state of peace and feelings of social security, economic self-reliance and
political stability.
Collective ownership
One of the fundamental characteristics of indigenous communities is their collective ownership and
responsibility to everything.
Conclusion
Indigenous governance is, above all, a series of dynamics and forces that flow between two or more views
of the world, in a constant flux and change, achieving or losing balance, which aims at maintaining unity
and an Indigenous ethnic conscience based on consensus and respect. It operates both internally and
externally within a wider global system that contains them. Internal Indigenous governance refers to the
role that traditional leaders should play as advisors and companions of their peoples. Management and
administration are secondary for Indigenous governments. Their main duty is to know of the conflicts and
problems that affect social control and regulation; the relations with nature, spirituality and the sacred; the
material and spiritual control over their lands and strategies for survival and the future.
External governance aims at the defence of self-determination (or self-government); the creation and
maintenance of mechanisms of intermediation and contact for dialogue and negotiation with national
societies and governments; to democratic representation and participation (in legislative or executive
domains); the control of natural resources (use, conservation, and exploitation), to the possession and
ownership of land and territory; to the development of a chosen way of life and society and the definition of
how and to what extent to integrate to capitalist development and the market economy. Indigenous
governments have existed within national governments that disown them but make them a part of them.
INDIGENOUS GOVERNANCE
Indigenous governance, patterns and practices of rule by which indigenous people govern themselves in
formal and informal settings.
Indigenous peoples are the original inhabitants of geographic regions. The term indigenous peoples is often
used to refer to those native inhabitants who were dispossessed of their land by outside peoples, either by
conquest, occupation, settlement, or some combination of the three. The term most commonly refers to
those peoples subjugated since the late 15th century by European powers and their colonies. Indigenous
governance refers to the myriad ways in which these peoples have governed themselves or continue doing
so despite the fact of colonization.
1. Practices that take place independent of, or prior to, colonization by an external political entity. Indigenous
peoples had already existing forms of political community before their domination and exclusion by foreign
peoples. In many cases, these forms of governance continue and constitute an important part of the
political lives of indigenous peoples. These forms of governance may include traditional institutions;
diplomatic practices in relation to other indigenous peoples; internal differentiation
and collective organization of, for example, clans, families, bands, or tribes; and ceremonial activities.
2. Practices that take place in coordination with, or formally sanctioned by, the colonial power. In many cases,
indigenous peoples accommodated themselves to, and integrated themselves into, the political structures
of the colonial power, either by force or by choice or both. The governance of indigenous peoples has
historically been channeled into structures that typically continue to be controlled by the colonial power,
formally and informally. Examples of such governance practices may include band-councils, quasi-judicial
adjudicative panels, formal legal challenges, participation within the governing institutions of the colonial
power (e.g., sitting in elective office of a legislative body of a colonial power), and treaty negotiations.
3. Practices that are specifically developed and exercised in opposition to colonial power. Indigenous peoples
have resisted colonialism and have practiced political governance to counteract the negative effects of
exploitation and domination. These forms of resistance may include the organization and coordination of
movements toward decolonization, antiracist activism, and warrior societies.
Indigenous governance practices often take on more than one of these dimensions simultaneously,
such as working within structures formally sanctioned by the colonial power but also simultaneously
modifying and resisting them. Furthermore, because indigenous governance is a set of practices that is
always changing with the needs of indigenous peoples and with the colonial setting itself, it cannot be
formalized as consisting of any particular one of these relationships, institutions, or goals.