Anova: Single Factor

SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Standard Paper 5 112.39 22.478 2.66437
Treatment 1 5 104.38 20.876 0.99503
Treatment 2 5 87.63 17.526 11.28033
Treatment 3 5 145.24 29.048 19.42472

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F
Between Groups 351.26772 3 117.08924 13.629112644
Within Groups 137.4578 16 8.5911125

Total 488.72552 19
 P-value F crit
0.0001131977 3.2388715175
 Standard Paper Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3
20.89 21.3 11.65 29.74
22.10 20.75 18.19 27.38
25.23 19.42 19.9 36.38
22.32 22.16 18.45 26.36
21.85 20.75 19.44 25.38

Anova: Single Factor for Absorprtive Property

SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Standard Paper 5 112.39 22.478 2.66437
Treatment 1 5 104.38 20.876 0.99503
Treatment 2 5 87.63 17.526 11.28033
Treatment 3 5 145.24 29.048 19.42472

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value
Between Groups 351.26772 3 117.08924 13.62911 0.000113
Within Groups 137.4578 16 8.5911125

Total 488.72552 19
 Conclusion: reject the Null Hypothesis. There is a
significant difference in the absorptive capacity of
the decorative paper treated with varying amounts
of water lily fibers and used paper. It means that the
amount of water lily fiber and used paper affects
the absoptive capacity of the decorative paper.
However, a post-statictical analysis must be
executed to determine which treatment showed the
difference.

F crit
3.238872
TUKEY TEST HONEST SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE (Post-Stat/

TREATMENT PAIRS
Standard Vs Treatment 1
Standard Vs Treatment 2
Standard Vs Treatment 3
Treatment 1 Vs Treatment 2
Treatment 1 Vs Treatment 3
Treatment 2 Vs Treatment 3

Side comment:

if in the result of ANOVA, it was found to be a significant difference, it is

essential to identify which variable/s maked the difference. To identify
this, TUKEY TEST can be used. In your work, you have to identiy,
statistically, which treatment is the most effective/absoorbent.
T SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE (Post-Stat/PSOT-HOC)

TUKEY HSD Q STAT TUKEY HSD P-VALUE TUKEY HSD INFERFENCE

1.2221 0.804787 insignificant
3.7778 0.0716637 insignificant
5.0122 0.012946 * p<0.05
2.5557 0.306131 insignificant
6.2343 0.0022382 ** p<0.01
8.79 0.0010053 ** p<0.01

INTERPRETATION

Based on the Post Statistical Treatment done, three out of the 6 comparative pairs show
significant diference. These treatment pairs are Standard-Treatment 3, Treatment 1-Treatment
3 and Treatment 2-Treatment 3 respectively. Comparing the mean of the treatments with the
absorbency of the standard paper, only treatment 3 shows significance. It suggested that
treatment 3 containing (.. pls enter the desciption of Treatment 3.. ex. half cup of water lily
and half cup of used paper) is more absorbent that the standard/factory made paper.
However, treatment 1 and 2 showed insignificant difference with the standard. therefore, it
suggested that the absobing capacity of the standard, Treatment 1 and Treatment 2 are
statistically the same.
 tive pairs show
eatment 1-Treatment
treatments with the
t suggested that
lf cup of water lily
made paper.
ndard. therefore, it
reatment 2 are