Scribd Logo
Unggah

Selamat datang di Scribd!

  • MWB Advertising V Rock Summary Review

    Diunggah oleh

    Rox31
    13 tayangan1 halaman
    The document discusses the case law around whether an anti-oral variation clause in a contract can be varied orally despite the clause prohibiting oral variations. It mentions conflicting Court of Appeal decisions on the issue from 2000 and 2002. The 2016 Globe Motors v TRW Luca case considered this inconsistency, finding it was possible to vary a contract orally despite such a clause, based on a principle from a 1919 US case.

    Deskripsi Asli:

    Consideration - MWB Advertising v Rock Summary Review

    Judul Asli

    MWB Advertising v Rock Summary Review

    Hak Cipta

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Format Tersedia

    DOCX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd

    Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

    Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

    Laporkan Dokumen Ini
    The document discusses the case law around whether an anti-oral variation clause in a contract can be varied orally despite the clause prohibiting oral variations. It mentions conflicting Court of Appeal decisions on the issue from 2000 and 2002. The 2016 Globe Motors v TRW Luca case considered this inconsistency, finding it was possible to vary a contract orally despite such a clause, based on a principle from a 1919 US case.

    Hak Cipta:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Unduh sebagai DOCX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    13 tayangan1 halaman

    MWB Advertising V Rock Summary Review

    Diunggah oleh

    Rox31
    The document discusses the case law around whether an anti-oral variation clause in a contract can be varied orally despite the clause prohibiting oral variations. It mentions conflicting Court of Appeal decisions on the issue from 2000 and 2002. The 2016 Globe Motors v TRW Luca case considered this inconsistency, finding it was possible to vary a contract orally despite such a clause, based on a principle from a 1919 US case.

    Hak Cipta:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Unduh sebagai DOCX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    dari 1

    MWB Advertising v Rock Summary Review

    Cases Mentioned

    Foakes v Beer
    Pinnels Case
    Williams v Roffey Bros
    Collier v MKJ Holdings
    Re. Selectmove

    Can an anti-oral variation clause be varied other than in accordance with the clause

    Conflicting decisions of CoA in United Bank v Asif (2000) compared with World Online
    Telecom v I-Way (2002)
    Inconsistency fully considered in Globe Motors v TRW Luca (2016) (obiter) that it was
    possible to vary a contract orally despite an anti-oral variation clause
    Those who make a contract, may unmake it. The clause which forbids a change, may be
    changed like any other Cardozo J. in Alfred C Beatty v Guggenheim Exploration (1919)

    Law Application Authority

    Anda mungkin juga menyukai