Normal Subjects*
Kevin Gleeson , MD; Douglas F. Eggli, MD; and Steven L. Maxwell, DO, FCCP
Study objective: To determine the within-subject variability and to estimate the quantity of occult
aspiration of nasopharyngeal secretions during sleep in normal humans.
Design: Prospective duplicate full-night sleep studies.
Setting: Pulmonary sleep laboratory, university hospital.
Participants: Ten normal male volunteers aged 22 to 55 years.
Interventions: Two full-night polysomnographic recordings with infusion of 2 mUh radioactive
99
mTc tracer into the nasopharynx through a small catheter during EEG-documented sleep.
Standard lung scans were conducted immediately following final awakening. Aspiration was
defined as the presence of radioactivity in the pulmonary parenchyma on two separate views.
Results: A mean sleep efficiency of 85.72.6% was found with no difference between the two
study nights. A total of 5 of the 10 subjects studied had tracer evident in the pulmonary
parenchyma following final awakening. Three had the tracer apparent following the first-night
study and four had tracer apparent following the second-night study. Thus, two subjects aspirated
on both nights. Comparing the subjects who aspirated with those who did not, no significant
difference could be found for age, time spent in bed, sleep efficiency, apnea-hypopnea index,
arousal plus awakening index, or percent of sleep time spent in a supine position. The quantities
of tracer aspirated were on the order of magnitude of 0.01 to 0.2 mL.
Conclusions: Aspiration measured by this technique occurs commonly in healthy young men
during sleep, is unrelated to sleep quality, and is variable within subjects studied on more than
one occasion. The quantity aspirated is of an order of magnitude likely to contain bacterial
organisms in physiologically significant quantities. (CHEST 1997; 111:1266-72)
Aspiration of upper airway secretions and coloniz- defenses are risk factors for developing bacterial
ing microorganisms is thought to be a major pneumonia with microorganisms colonizing the su-
pathogenic event preceding most cases of bacterial praglottic airways .1
pneumonia acquired outside (community-acquired The most direct evidence supporting the hy-
pneumonia), and especially within, the hospital (nos- pothesis that silent aspiration occurs during sleep
ocomial pneumonia). It is now widely believed that in normal subjects was published in 1978 by
silent aspiration into the intrathoracic airways is a Huxley and coworkers 2 who injected small boluses
common occurrence in normal subjects during sleep. of a solution of 111 In chloride into the noses of 20
Pneumonia is usually prevented by mechanical and normal subjects, and 10 patients with stupor or
immunologic defense mechanisms such as cough, coma, during apparent nocturnal sleep. In 9 of
mucocilia1y escalator clearance, airway and alveolar these 20 subjects, some 111 In was found in lung
phagocytic cells, and immunoglobulins. According to parenchyma the following day. These authors
this theory, circumstances that either increase the noted that those who slept most soundly all aspi-
volume of aspirated secretions or impair normal host rated, with restless sleepers not aspirating, and
concluded that sound sleep was a risk factor for
aspiration of upper airway secretions . In furth er
support of this conclusion, 7 of the 10 patients
*From the Departments of Medicine (Drs. Gleeson and Max- they studied with depressed consciousness aspi-
well) and Radiology (Dr. Eggli), The Milton S. He rshey Medical
Center, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey. rated. In contrast to these results, a second group
Manuscript received October 7, 1996; revision accepted Decem- of investigators , using a slightly different tech-
ber ll. nique, found apparent nocturnal aspiration in only
Reprint requests: Dr. Gleeson, Pulmonary/Critical Care Division,
The Milton S. Hershey M edical Center, The Penns ylvania State 1 of 10 normal subjects, while 10 of 14 patients
University, 500 University Ave, Hershey, PA 17033 with previous community-acquired pneumonia
1/22 416 371 92.7 96.2 1.2 0 14.2 9.8 16.0 26.3 85 74.8 0.019
2125 295 460 54.2 97 0 0 11.7 8.4 21.0 15.7 60.2 72 ..5 0 0
3139 .384 402.5 92.6 93.3 0.2 1.9 13.4 17.1 5.1 5.2 38.3 66.2 0.148 0.044
4/45 341 377 92.3 90.5 19.3 7.9 31.5 24. 9 13.1 .5.3 100 100 O.Oll 0.024
S/34 356.5 362.5 91.6 74.2 0.9 1.3 9.7 26.8 2.8 5.9 37.7 12.3 0 0
6/20 369.5 384 89.9 9 1.5 0 ..5 0.3 15.2 10.4 17.2 14.4 49.3 50.7 0 0
7/57 434 423.5 62.1 75.6 0.9 0.9 27.6 19.7 0 0.6 4.8 30.0 0.031
8/24 343.5 486 85.6 82 2.7 4. 1 16. 1 27.2 8.8 15.3 90.8 72.7 Post
9/32 :390.5 437.5 89 78.2 1.7 3.3 23.5 32.8 10.2 .59.8 36.7
10/42 419 437 99.7 85.7 3.7 0.6 24.9 25.7 8.9 17.1 66.0 20.0 0
Mean SE M 387.9:!:9.2 4 14.2:!: 13.0 85.0:!:4.6 86.4:!:2.7 3. 1:!:1.8 2.0:!:0.8 18.8:!:2.4 19.5:!: 1.8 10.3:!:2.1 10.8:!:2.6 59.2:!:9.0 53.6:!:8.9
34:!:.3.7
*Sleep efficiency time asleep/time in bed (%); % 3/4 sleep-percentage of sleep time spent in stages 3 or 4 sleep.
1
Quantitation lost.
study nights , linear correlation coefficients were calculated. When the five subjects who aspirated on either
Statistical significance was defined as a p value <0.05. night were compared with the five subjects who did
not aspirate, no significant difference was found for
age (37.46.6 years vs 31.63.8 years; p=0.4), sleep
RESULTS period (398.211.8 min vs 401.214.0 min), sleep
Full-night sleep studies were obtained in duplicate efficiency (83.84.7% vs 85.13.1 %), apnea-hypop-
in 10 subjects with a mean interval of 34.03.7 days nea index (3.92.5 events per hour vs 1.20.5
between studies. Individual subject data for sleep events per hour; p=0.32), arousal plus awakenings
efficiency, apnea-hypopnea index, arousal-awaken- index (20.33.0 events per hour vs 19.13.6 events
ing index, percentage of sleep time spent in stages 3 per hour), percent of sleep time spent in stages 3 and
plus 4, and percent of sleep time spent in supine 4 (9.63.5% vs 11.52.7%), or percentage of sleep
position can be found in Table 1 for both nights, As time spent in supine position (66.314.4% vs
can be asce1tained from Table 1, there is no differ- 46.56.6%; p=0.25).
ence apparent for any of these variables comparing To determine if the quantity of radionuclide aspi-
the hvo study nights, corresponding to statistical rated might be associated with measures of sleep
comparison revealing no significant differences. quality, linear correlation coefficients were calcu-
Therefore, individual subject data not pertaining to a lated between the quantity aspirated and the various
specific study night will be expressed as the mean of parameters of sleep quality. No significant correla-
these two nights. tion was found between the quantity aspirated and
Despite the somewhat cumbersome paraphernalia sleep efficiency, apnea-hypopnea index, arousal-
required for monitoring, the subjects slept reason- awakening index, percent time spent in stages 3 and
ably well with a mean sleep efficiency of 85.72.6%. 4 sleep, percentage of time spent in rapid eye
The intranasal infusion of the 99 mTc was tolerated movement sleep, or percentage of sleep time spent
without apparent difficulty, with all subjects receiv- in supine position.
ing the full 10 mL of suspension during the noctur-
Table 2-Subjects, Location, and Quantitation of
nal study period, Tracer in Lung
Of the 10 subjects studied, 3 had the technetium
tracer evident in lung parenchyma following the first Quantity of
sleep study, and 4 had tracer in the lung following Subject Night Location of Aspirated A spirated
No. Aspirated Tracer Tracer, mL
the second study. Because two subjects had radio-
isotope apparent in lung parenchyma following both 1 2 L midlung 0.019
3 1 R upper lung 0.129
study nights, a total of 5 of the lO subjects aspirated
89 L midlung 0.019
mTc colloid on one study night or the other. The 2 R upper lung 0.024
quantity of radioisotope suspension aspirated, and 2 L midlung 0.020
the location in the lung where it was found, can be 4 1 L midlung 0.011
seen in Table 2. The lung scans obtained in two of 2 R upper lobe 0.023
the patients who aspirated are depicted in Figures 1 7 1 L upper lobe 0.031
8 1 Data lost Data lost
and 2.
t ' '
, .. .
" L,t 1 'I
~ " '
1 .,.\~~''" J
'' ' I
, .. ) (
...' ',;,_:
'
.
- II ~L
:.
Anterior Posterior
Second Study
F IGU RE 1 . Shown are th e ante ri or and posterior lung images obtained on study night l (top ) and study
night 2 (bottom ) for subject 4 who aspirated into th e le ft midlung fi eld on ni ght l and the right midlung
fi eld on ni ght 2. M=a cobalt marker at th e sternal notch; S=trace r accumulation in the stom ach;
E=tracer activity in th e esophagus. The regions of tracer aspiration are ci rcled for quantitation.
Two of the five subjects aspirated tracer on both mined by this technique will be observed on addi-
study nights. One of these two aspirated unilaterally tional study nights, as three of the five aspirating
on both nights: on the le ft during study night 1, and subjects aspirated on one night only. Considering
on the right during study night 2. The second subject age, sleep quality, degrees of sleep-disordered
who aspirated on both nights aspirated bilaterally on breathing, and body position, no factors can be
both occasions. Analysis of demographic and sleep identified that predict which subjects will aspirate on
study data again failed to identify any features one or both study nights.
unique to these two subjects that might suggest why The proportion of normal subjects aspirating dur-
aspiration occurred on both study nights (Table 1). ing sleep is comparable to that observed b yHuxley et
aF who found 9 of 20 normal subjects to aspirate
when studied on a single occasion. Huxley and
DISCUSSION
coworkers also suggested that all of their subjects
In this study, we have shown that a suspension of who slept soundly appeared to aspirate, with the
99
mTc-labeled sulfur colloid, which is slowly admin- restless sleepers not aspirating; these observations
istered through the nose during nocturnal sle ep, can were made qualitatively without the benefit of sleep
be found in the pulmonary parenchyma by standard staging. We were unable to confirm these observa-
scanning techniques the following morning in 50% of tions with simultaneous sleep stage monitoring as no
normal subjects studied on two separate nights . The measure of sleep efficiency or tim e spent in any
presence of aspiration in individual subjects on one particular sleep stage appeared to either favor or
study night does not indicate that aspiration deter- protect from nocturnal aspiration.
Anterior Posterior
Second Study
F IGURE 2. Shown are an te lio r and posterior lung mages i obtained on study nights l an d 2 fo r subj ect
3 w ho aspirated bilaterally on both study nights. Image labeli ng is the same as Figme l. A large tracer
signal i sevident in th e righ t micllung field on stu dy ni ght l. Regions of isotope aspi ration are not icrcled
in thi s particular exampfe .
In contrast, Kikuchi et aP found only 1 of 10 found by Kikuchi and coworkers are the relatively
control subjects to aspirate radioactive tracer during older and sicker p atients in their study group. As
nocturnal behavioral sleep. These authors postulated both increasing age5 and chronic medical illness 6
that the technique of injecting a 1-mL solution of reduce sleep quality and duration, it is possible that
radionuclide into the nose over 1 to 2 min, at 30-min these patients slept much more poorly than either
intervals, as employed b y Huxley and coworkers,2 the normal, younger subjects of Huxley et al or our
may have produced an overestimate of the preva- own, with not enough sustained sleep occurring to
lence of nocturnal aspiration and excessive sleep allow aspiration to occur.
disruption. Kikuchi et aP endeavored to overcome It is unlikel~ that our choice of 99 mTc sulfur colloid
these limitations by fixing a gauze packet containing rather than 1 1In chloride as a radioactive tracer
a mixture of 1 11 In chloride, saline solution, and accounts for any differences between our results and
cellulose powder to the subject's te eth with dental those of previous investigations. We chose this com-
adhesive shortly before the subject retired to sleep in pound for several properties that made it pa1ticularly
a hospital room. Because sleep is not documented b y suitable for this study. First, it is insoluble in water
polygraphic variables, and the influence of either and resists absorption through mucous membranes
technique on nocturnal aspiration is not known, it is or the GI tract, properties that in part account for its
impossible to know if these different techniques approval b y the US Food and Drug Administration
account for the different results in these two studies. for oral administration. Second, these same proper-
Other differences possibly accounting for the rela- ties also assure that any radionuclide found in the
tively low (10%) incidence of nocturnal aspiration lung parenchyma had to have been aspirated into