Republic of the Philippines

7th Judicial Region

REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Branch 3
City of Tagbilaran

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,

Plaintiff,
Crim. Case No. 17212
For: Rape
- versus -

RENATO DICO y CAMPANIA,

Accused.
x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -/

PRE-TRIAL ORDER

As part of the pre-trial proceedings of these instant cases, the Court hereby
adopts the minutes of the preliminary conference conducted by the Branch Clerk
of Court of this Court on June 2, 2015, which include the marking of
documentary exhibits and list of witnesses as follows:

Documentary Exhibits for the prosecution:

1. Exh. A Sworn Statement of Leizel Sumayaya

2. Exh. B - Affidavit of Agapita D. Sumiyaya
3. Exh. C Trauma Sheet
4. Exh. D Certificate of Live Birth of Liezel D. Sumiyaya
5. Exh. E Police Report Entry No. 68
6. Exh. F Affidavit of Victor Sanchez

Documentary Exhibits for the Defense:

Reserved

Witnesses for the Prosecution:

1. Leizel D. Sumiyaya Sitio Redland, Brgy. Bacani, Clarin, Bohol

2. Agapita D. Sumiyaya Sitio Redland, Brgy. Bacani, Clarin, Bohol
3. Dr. Reina Jane Villaflor-Demandante MHO, Clarin, Bohol
4. PInsp Jesus C. Daplin PNP, Clarin, Bohol
5. Victor Sanchez, Jr. Bacani, Clarin, Bohol
6. Reserved.

Witnesses for the Defense:

1. Renato C. Dico BDJ, Tagbilaran City

2. Reserved.

Page 1 of 2
 Both parties have no proposals for admission and stipulation of facts.

AGREED TRIAL DATES:

March 22, 2016 and April 19, 2016 both at 9:00 oclock in the morning.

Let it be stressed that no evidence shall be allowed to be presented and

offered during the trial in support of a partys evidence-in-chief other than those
that had been identified and pre-marked during the preliminary conference and
pre-trial. Any other evidence not indicated or listed shall be considered waived
by the parties. However, the Court, in its discretion, may allow the introduction
of additional evidence in the following cases: (a) those to be used on cross-
examination or re-cross-examination for impeachment purposes; (b) those
presented on re-direct examination to explain or supplement the answers of a
witness during the cross-examination; (c) those to be utilized for rebuttal or
sur-rebuttal purposes; (d) those not available during the pre-trial proceedings
despite due diligence on the part of the party offering the same.

It is to be understood that the testimony of a particular witness of either

party should be completed on the scheduled date of hearing allotted to a
particular witness under the One-day Examination of Witness Rule. The Court
however, has the discretion on whether or not to extend the direct and/or cross-
examination of witnesses for good cause shown.

This pre-trial Order shall bind the parties, limit the trial to matters not
disposed of and control the course of the action during the trial.

SO ORDERED.

City of Tagbilaran, February 9, 2016.

LEO MOISES LISON

Presiding Judge

LML/lnib

Page 2 of 2