Lampiran 1

INFORMED CONCENT

KUESIONER PENGUMPULAN DATA PENELITIAN

Yang bertandatangan di bawah ini :

Nama : Shifa Nur Aini Badrein

NIP : 201331296

AsalInstansi : Mahasiswa Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Esa Unggul

Berkenaan dengan tugas akhir saya dalam penyusunan skripsi, saya mohon kesediaan
ibu untuk menjadi responden dalam penelitian saya tentang Faktor- Faktor Yang
Berhubungan Dengan Perilaku Deteksi Dini Kanker Leher Rahim Metode Inspeksi Visual
Asetat (IVA) Pada Wanita Usia Subur (WUS) di Wilayah Puskesmas Koordinator Kelurahan
Sawah Besar Jakarta Pusat Tahun 2015.

Semua jawaban yang diberikan dipergunakan untuk keperluan penyusunan skripsi

dengan data yang lain, dan tidak akan mempengaruhi keberadaan ibu serta dijaga
kerahasiaannya.

Atas kesediaan dan perhatiannya saya ucapkan terimakasih.

Jakarta, Juli 2015

Mahasiswa Menyetujui

Shifa Nur Aini Badrein ( Responden)

KUESIONER
 No. Responden :

Tanggal wawancara :

Alamat lengkap : RT....... RW.........

A. Identitas WUS

1 Berapa umur ibu ?

1. < 40 tahun
2. 40 tahun
2 Apa pendidikan terakhir ibu ?
1. SD
2. SMP
3. SMA
4. Perguruan tinggi
3 Apa pekerjan ibu ?
1. PNS
2. Guru/ Dosen
3. Wiraswasta
4. Karyawan Swasta
5. Tidak Bekerja
4 Apakah status perkawinan ibu saat ?
1. Menikah
2. Janda

B. Perilaku Deteksi Dini KankerLeher Rahim Metode IVA

No. Pernyataan Ya Tidak

1 Apakah ibu pernah melakukan pemeriksaan IVA ?
2 Apakah ibu melakukan tes IVA pada usia 30-50 tahun ?
3 Apakah ibu mau melakukan tes IVA secara rutin 1 tahun sekali ?
4 Apakah ibu tidak bersedia melakukan tes IVA karena dilakukan pada
organ reproduksi bagian dalam ?
5 Jika ibu mengalami keputihan yang banyak dan terus menerus dan atau
perdarahan setelah senggama, apakah ibu akan melakukan pemeriksaan
secara untuk deteksi dini kanker leher rahim metode IVA ?
6 Jika ibu mengalami keputihan yang banyak dan terus menerus dan atau
perdarahan setelah senggama, apakah ibu akan melakukan pemeriksaan
IVA secara rutin 1 tahun sekali ?
7 Apakah ibu merasa malu sehingga tidak akan akan periksa IVA ?
8 Jika pemeriksaan IVA dilakukan oleh bidan,perawat, dan dokter
profesional, apakah ibu tetap tidak akan periksa IVA ?
9 Harga pemeriksaan IVA lebih murah dibandingkan dengan pemeriksaan
papsmear yakni Rp. 25.000, apakah ibu akan periksa IVA ?
10 Puskesmas Koordinator Kelurahan Sawah Besar melayani pemeriksaan
IVA, apakah ibu akan melakukan pemeriksaan IVA lebih dini ?
11 Puskesmas Koordinator Kelurahan Sawah Besar melayani pemeriksaan
IVA, apakah ibu akan melakukan pemeriksaan IVA secara rutin 1 tahun
sekali ?

C. Pengetahuan Wanita Usia Subur (WUS) Tentang Deteksi Dini Kanker Leher Rahim
Pernyataan B S
1 Kanker leher Rahim merupakan penyakit adanya sel-sel ganas pada leher
rahim .
2 Gejala kanker leher rahim yang paling utama adalah keputihan yang terus
menerus dan perdarahan setelah senggama.

3 Faktor resiko yang dapat meningkatkan menderita leher rahim

diantaranya wanita dengan ibu atau saudara perempuan yang
menderita kanker leher Rahim,Melakukan hubungan seksual
sebelum usia 20 tahun dan Banyak pasangan seksual.
4 Kanker leher rahim bukan disebabkan oleh virus papilloma.
5 Pencegahan kanker leher rahim diantaranya dengan imunisasi, hubungan
seks yang sehat, periksa IVA atau papsmear.
6 Manfaat melakukan deteksi dini kanker leher rahim adalah hanya untuk
meningkatkan kunjungan puskesmas dan sebenarnya kurang bermanfaat.
7 Jika gejala pra-kanker ditemukan, kejadian kanker leher rahim yang lebih
parah tidak dapat dicegah.

8 Penyakit kanker leher rahim dapat menyebabkan kematian

9 Pemeriksaan untuk mengetahui adanya gejala kanker leher rahim adalah
dengan pemeriksaan IVA dan Papsmear.
10 Pemeriksaan IVA merupakan nama lain dari pemeriksaan kehamilan.
11 Manfaat pemeriksaan IVA adalah mencegah kehamilan.
12 Hasil pemeriksaan IVA disebut negatif artinya tidak ada sel-sel ganas
pada leher Rahim.
13 Pemeriksaan IVA disebut positif artinya iritasi pada leher rahim

14 Seorang wanita mulai melakukan pemeriksaan IVA segera setelah

menikah/ melakukan hubungan seksual.

15 Sebaiknya seorang wanita melakukan pemeriksaan IVA setiap 5 tahun

sekali.
16 Pemeriksaan IVA biayanya lebih murah disbanding jenis pemeriksaan
deteksi dini kanker leher rahim yang lain.

17 Pemeriksaan IVA dilakukan pada organ kewanitaan bagian dalam.

18 Butuh beberapa hari untuk tahu hasil pemeriksaan IVA

19 Pemeriksaan IVA berbahaya.
20 Puskesmas Koordinator Kelurahan SawahBesar menyediakan pelayanan
deteksi dini kanker leher rahim dengan metode IVA.
 D. Keterjangkauan Biaya

1 Berdasarkan penghasilan keluarga , ibu mampu untuk memenuhi pembayaran biaya

pemeriksaan IVA
1) Mampu
2) Tidak mampu
2 Berdasarkan penghasilan ibu secara pribadi , apakah ibu mampu untuk memenuhi
pembayaran biaya pemeriksaan IVA?
1) Mampu
2) Tidak mampu
3 Jika ada sumber penghasilan lain dalam keluarga, apakah ibu mampu untuk
memenuhi pembayaran biaya pemeriksaan IVA ?
1) Mampu
2) Tidak mampu

4 Apakah ibu mampu membayar biaya pemeriksaan IVA di Puskesmas Koordinator

Kelurahan Sawah Besar sebesar Rp.25.000, ?
1) Mampu
2) Tidak mampu
5 Jika dari rumah ke Puskesmas membutuhkan biaya transportasi, Apakah ibu mampu
membayar biaya transportasi tersebut ?
1) Mampu
2) Tidak mampu

E. Dukungan Petugas Kesehatan

1 Apakah petugas kesehatan memberikan penyuluhan kepada ibu tentang pemeriksaan
IVA dalam 2 tahun terakhir ?
1) Ya
2) Tidak
2 Apakah petugas kesehatan mengajak ibu untuk melakukan pemeriksaan IVA dalam 2
tahun terakhir ?
1) Ya
2) Tidak
3 Apakah petugas kesehatan bersedia menjemput ibu untuk melakukan pemeriksan
IVA dalam 2 tahun terakhir ?
1) Ya
2) Tidak
4 Apakah petugas kesehatan memberikan pelayanan datang ke rumah ibu untuk
melakukan pemeriksaan IVA ?
1) Ya
2) Tidak
5 Jika ibu datang berobat ke Puskesmas Koordinator Kelurahan Sawah Besar, apakah
ibu diberikan informasi dan arahan untuk pemeriksaan IVA ?
1) Ya
2) Tidak

6 Jika ibu datang berobat ke instalasi KIA Puskesmas Koordinator Kelurahan Sawah
Besar, apakah ibu diberikan informasi dan arahan untuk pemeriksaan IVA ?
1) Ya
2) Tidak
7 Apakah petugas kesehatan mampu memberikan informasi yang lengkap dan detail
mengenai pemeriksaan IVA ?
1) Ya
2) Tidak

8 Apakah petugas kesehatan baik bidan / dokter meyakinkan jika ibu ragu, takut atau
malu melakukan pemeriksaan IVA ?
1) Ya
2) Tidak
 TABULASI DATA KUESIONER PERILAKU IVA

Responden perilaku IVA 1 perilaku IVA 2 perilaku IVA 3 perilaku IVA 4 perilaku IVA 5 perilaku IVA 6 perilaku IVA 7 perilaku IVA 8 perilaku IVA 9 perilaku IVA 10 perilaku IVA 11
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
10 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1
11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
Uji Statistik Reliabilitas Kuesioner Perilaku IVA

Reliability

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Valid 20 100.0
a
Cases Excluded 0 .0
Total 20 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the

procedure.

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Cronbach's N of Items
Alpha Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items
.965 .964 11

Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
perilaku_IVA1 .45 .510 20
perilaku_IVA2 .45 .510 20
perilaku_IVA3 .45 .510 20
perilaku_IVA4 .40 .503 20
perilaku_IVA5 .20 .410 20
perilaku_IVA6 .25 .444 20
perilaku_IVA7 .35 .489 20
perilaku_IVA8 .30 .470 20
perilaku_IVA9 .20 .410 20
perilaku_IVA10 .50 .513 20
perilaku_IVA11 .50 .513 20
 Inter-Item Correlation Matrix
perilaku_IVA1 perilaku_IVA2 perilaku_IVA3 perilaku_IVA4 perilaku_IVA5

perilaku_IVA1 1.000 1.000 1.000 .903 .553

perilaku_IVA2 1.000 1.000 1.000 .903 .553
perilaku_IVA3 1.000 1.000 1.000 .903 .553
perilaku_IVA4 .903 .903 .903 1.000 .612
perilaku_IVA5 .553 .553 .553 .612 1.000
perilaku_IVA6 .638 .638 .638 .707 .866
perilaku_IVA7 .811 .811 .811 .899 .681
perilaku_IVA8 .724 .724 .724 .802 .764
perilaku_IVA9 .553 .553 .553 .612 .688
perilaku_IVA10 .704 .704 .704 .816 .500
perilaku_IVA11 .704 .704 .704 .816 .500

Inter-Item Correlation Matrix

perilaku_IVA6 perilaku_IVA7 perilaku_IVA8 perilaku_IVA9 perilaku_IVA10

perilaku_IVA1 .638 .811 .724 .553 .704

perilaku_IVA2 .638 .811 .724 .553 .704
perilaku_IVA3 .638 .811 .724 .553 .704
perilaku_IVA4 .707 .899 .802 .612 .816
perilaku_IVA5 .866 .681 .764 .688 .500
perilaku_IVA6 1.000 .787 .882 .577 .577
perilaku_IVA7 .787 1.000 .892 .419 .734
perilaku_IVA8 .882 .892 1.000 .491 .655
perilaku_IVA9 .577 .419 .491 1.000 .500
perilaku_IVA10 .577 .734 .655 .500 1.000
perilaku_IVA11 .577 .734 .655 .500 1.000

Inter-Item Correlation Matrix

perilaku_IVA11
perilaku_IVA1 .704
perilaku_IVA2 .704
perilaku_IVA3 .704
perilaku_IVA4 .816
perilaku_IVA5 .500
perilaku_IVA6 .577
perilaku_IVA7 .734
perilaku_IVA8 .655
perilaku_IVA9 .500
perilaku_IVA10 1.000
perilaku_IVA11 1.000
 Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Scale Variance Corrected Squared Cronbach's
Item Deleted if Item Deleted Item-Total Multiple Alpha if Item
Correlation Correlation Deleted
perilaku_IVA1 3.60 16.779 .896 . .959
perilaku_IVA2 3.60 16.779 .896 . .959
perilaku_IVA3 3.60 16.779 .896 . .959
perilaku_IVA4 3.65 16.661 .944 . .958
perilaku_IVA5 3.85 18.134 .711 . .965
perilaku_IVA6 3.80 17.642 .790 . .963
perilaku_IVA7 3.70 16.958 .891 . .959
perilaku_IVA8 3.75 17.250 .849 . .961
perilaku_IVA9 3.85 18.450 .615 . .967
perilaku_IVA10 3.55 17.103 .806 . .962
perilaku_IVA11 3.55 17.103 .806 . .962

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

4.05 20.787 4.559 11
CORRELATIONS
/VARIABLES=perilaku_IVA1 perilaku_IVA2 perilaku_IVA3 perilaku_IVA4
perilaku_IVA5 perilaku_IVA6 perilaku_IVA7 perilaku_IVA8 perilaku_IVA9
perilaku_IVA10 perilaku_IVA11 Total_perilakuIVA
/PRINT=ONETAIL NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.

Correlations

Notes
Output Created 23-JUL-2015 22:22:39
Comments
G:\SPSS IVA\input reabilitas
Data
validitas perilaku IVA.sav
Active Dataset DataSet1
Filter <none>
Input
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data
20
File
User-defined missing values
Definition of Missing
are treated as missing.
Statistics for each pair of
Missing Value Handling
variables are based on all
Cases Used
the cases with valid data for
that pair.
CORRELATIONS

/VARIABLES=perilaku_IVA1
perilaku_IVA2 perilaku_IVA3
perilaku_IVA4 perilaku_IVA5
perilaku_IVA6 perilaku_IVA7
Syntax
perilaku_IVA8 perilaku_IVA9
perilaku_IVA10
perilaku_IVA11
Total_perilakuIVA
/PRINT=ONETAIL NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.
 Processor Time 00:00:00.13
Resources
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.25

[DataSet1] G:\SPSS IVA\input reabilitas validitas perilaku IVA.sav

Correlations
perilaku_IVA1 perilaku_IVA2 perilaku_IVA3
** **
Pearson Correlation 1 1.000 1.000
perilaku_IVA1 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000
N 20 20 20
**
Pearson Correlation 1.000 1 1.000**
perilaku_IVA2 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000
N 20 20 20
** **
Pearson Correlation 1.000 1.000 1
perilaku_IVA3 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .903 .903 .903
perilaku_IVA4 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 20 20 20
** **
Pearson Correlation .553 .553 .553**
perilaku_IVA5 Sig. (1-tailed) .006 .006 .006
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .638 .638 .638
perilaku_IVA6 Sig. (1-tailed) .001 .001 .001
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .811 .811 .811
perilaku_IVA7 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 20 20 20
** **
Pearson Correlation .724 .724 .724**
perilaku_IVA8 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .553 .553 .553
perilaku_IVA9 Sig. (1-tailed) .006 .006 .006
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .704 .704 .704
perilaku_IVA10 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 20 20 20
** **
Pearson Correlation .704 .704 .704**
perilaku_IVA11
Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000
 N 20 20 20
Pearson Correlation .917** .917** .917**
Total_perilakuIVA
Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000

Correlations
perilaku_IVA4 perilaku_IVA5 perilaku_IVA6
**
Pearson Correlation .903 .553 .638**
perilaku_IVA1 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .006 .001

N 20 20 20
** **
Pearson Correlation .903 .553 .638
perilaku_IVA2 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .006 .001
N 20 20 20
** **
Pearson Correlation .903 .553 .638
perilaku_IVA3 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .006 .001
N 20 20 20
** **
Pearson Correlation 1 .612 .707**
perilaku_IVA4 Sig. (1-tailed) .002 .000
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .612 1 .866
perilaku_IVA5 Sig. (1-tailed) .002 .000
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .707 .866 1
perilaku_IVA6 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000
N 20 20 20
** **
Pearson Correlation .899 .681 .787**
perilaku_IVA7 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .802 .764 .882
perilaku_IVA8 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .612 .688 .577
perilaku_IVA9 Sig. (1-tailed) .002 .000 .004
N 20 20 20
** **
Pearson Correlation .816 .500 .577**
perilaku_IVA10 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .012 .004
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .816 .500 .577
perilaku_IVA11 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .012 .004
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .955 .754 .825
Total_perilakuIVA
Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000

Correlations
 perilaku_IVA7 perilaku_IVA8 perilaku_IVA9
** **
Pearson Correlation .811 .724 .553
perilaku_IVA1 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .006
N 20 20 20
**
Pearson Correlation .811 .724 .553**
perilaku_IVA2 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .006
N 20 20 20
** **
Pearson Correlation .811 .724 .553
perilaku_IVA3 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .006
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .899 .802 .612
perilaku_IVA4 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .002
N 20 20 20
** **
Pearson Correlation .681 .764 .688**
perilaku_IVA5 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .787 .882 .577
perilaku_IVA6 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .004
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation 1 .892 .419
perilaku_IVA7 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .033
N 20 20 20
Pearson Correlation .892** 1** .491**
perilaku_IVA8 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .014
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .419 .491 1
perilaku_IVA9 Sig. (1-tailed) .033 .014
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .734 .655 .500
perilaku_IVA10 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .001 .012
N 20 20 20
Pearson Correlation .734** .655** .500**
perilaku_IVA11 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .001 .012
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .912 .877 .669
Total_perilakuIVA
Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .001

Correlations
perilaku_IVA10 perilaku_IVA11 Total_perilakuIVA
** **
Pearson Correlation .704 .704 .917
perilaku_IVA1 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 20 20 20
 Pearson Correlation .704** .704 .917**
perilaku_IVA2 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 20 20 20
** **
Pearson Correlation .704 .704 .917
perilaku_IVA3 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .816 .816 .955
perilaku_IVA4 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 20 20 20
** **
Pearson Correlation .500 .500 .754**
perilaku_IVA5 Sig. (1-tailed) .012 .012 .000
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .577 .577 .825
perilaku_IVA6 Sig. (1-tailed) .004 .004 .000
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .734 .734 .912
perilaku_IVA7 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 20 20 20
Pearson Correlation .655** .655** .877**
perilaku_IVA8 Sig. (1-tailed) .001 .001 .000
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .500 .500 .669
perilaku_IVA9 Sig. (1-tailed) .012 .012 .001
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation 1 1.000 .844
perilaku_IVA10 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000
N 20 20 20
Pearson Correlation 1.000** 1** .844**
perilaku_IVA11 Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000
N 20 20 20
** ** **
Pearson Correlation .844 .844 1
Total_perilakuIVA
Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000

Correlations
perilaku_IVA1 perilaku_IVA2 perilaku_IVA3
**
Total_perilakuIVA N 20 20 20**

Correlations

perilaku_IVA4 perilaku_IVA5 perilaku_IVA6

** **
Total_perilakuIVA N 20 20 20

Correlations
perilaku_IVA7 perilaku_IVA8 perilaku_IVA9
Total_perilakuIVA N 20 20** 20**

Correlations

perilaku_IVA10 perilaku_IVA11 Total_perilakuIVA

** **
Total_perilakuIVA N 20 20 20

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).
Uji Statistik Variabel Umur Dengan Perilaku IVA

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent
umur * perilaku_IVA 168 100.0% 0 0.0% 168 100.0%

umur * perilaku_IVA Crosstabulation

perilaku_IVA Total
perilaku baik perilaku kurang
Count 9 19 28

Expected Count 11.5 16.5 28.0

>=40 tahun % within umur 32.1% 67.9% 100.0%
% within perilaku_IVA 13.0% 19.2% 16.7%
% of Total 5.4% 11.3% 16.7%
umur
Count 60 80 140
Expected Count 57.5 82.5 140.0
<40 tahun % within umur 42.9% 57.1% 100.0%
% within perilaku_IVA 87.0% 80.8% 83.3%

% of Total 35.7% 47.6% 83.3%

Count 69 99 168
Expected Count 69.0 99.0 168.0
Total % within umur 41.1% 58.9% 100.0%

% within perilaku_IVA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 41.1% 58.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

(2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.107 1 .293
b
Continuity Correction .708 1 .400
Likelihood Ratio 1.132 1 .287
Fisher's Exact Test .400 .201
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.100 1 .294
N of Valid Cases 168

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
 Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for umur (>=40

.632 .267 1.494
tahun / <40 tahun)
For cohort perilaku_IVA =
.750 .424 1.328
perilaku baik
For cohort perilaku_IVA =
1.188 .886 1.591
perilaku kurang
N of Valid Cases 168
Uji Statistik Variabel Pendidikan Dengan Perilaku IVA

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent
pendidikan * perilaku_IVA 168 100.0% 0 0.0% 168 100.0%

pendidikan * perilaku_IVA Crosstabulation

perilaku_IVA Total
perilaku baik perilaku kurang
Count 34 18 52

Expected Count 21.4 30.6 52.0

tinggi % within pendidikan 65.4% 34.6% 100.0%
% within perilaku_IVA 49.3% 18.2% 31.0%
% of Total 20.2% 10.7% 31.0%
pendidikan
Count 35 81 116
Expected Count 47.6 68.4 116.0
rendah % within pendidikan 30.2% 69.8% 100.0%
% within perilaku_IVA 50.7% 81.8% 69.0%

% of Total 20.8% 48.2% 69.0%

Count 69 99 168
Expected Count 69.0 99.0 168.0
Total % within pendidikan 41.1% 58.9% 100.0%

% within perilaku_IVA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 41.1% 58.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

(2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 18.394 1 .000
b
Continuity Correction 16.968 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 18.370 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 18.284 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 168

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.36.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for pendidikan
4.371 2.181 8.763
(tinggi / rendah)
For cohort perilaku_IVA =
2.167 1.542 3.045
perilaku baik
For cohort perilaku_IVA =
.496 .335 .734
perilaku kurang
N of Valid Cases 168
Uji Statistik Variabel Pekerjaan Dengan Perilaku IVA

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent
pekerjaan * perilaku_IVA 168 100.0% 0 0.0% 168 100.0%

pekerjaan * perilaku_IVA Crosstabulation

perilaku_IVA Total
perilaku baik perilaku kurang
Count 21 26 47

Expected Count 19.3 27.7 47.0

bekerja % within pekerjaan 44.7% 55.3% 100.0%
% within perilaku_IVA 30.4% 26.3% 28.0%
% of Total 12.5% 15.5% 28.0%
pekerjaan
Count 48 73 121
Expected Count 49.7 71.3 121.0
tidak bekerja % within pekerjaan 39.7% 60.3% 100.0%
% within perilaku_IVA 69.6% 73.7% 72.0%

% of Total 28.6% 43.5% 72.0%

Count 69 99 168
Expected Count 69.0 99.0 168.0
Total % within pekerjaan 41.1% 58.9% 100.0%

% within perilaku_IVA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 41.1% 58.9% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

(2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .351 1 .553
b
Continuity Correction .175 1 .676
Likelihood Ratio .350 1 .554
Fisher's Exact Test .602 .337
Linear-by-Linear Association .349 1 .555
N of Valid Cases 168

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19.30.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for pekerjaan

1.228 .622 2.426
(bekerja / tidak bekerja)
For cohort perilaku_IVA =
1.126 .765 1.658
perilaku baik
For cohort perilaku_IVA =
.917 .683 1.231
perilaku kurang
N of Valid Cases 168
Uji Statistik Status Perkawinan Dengan Perilaku IVA

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
status_perkawinan *
168 94.9% 9 5.1% 177 100.0%
perilaku_IVA

status_perkawinan * perilaku_IVA Crosstabulation

perilaku_IVA

perilaku baik perilaku kurang

Count 65 93
Expected Count 64.9 93.1
menikah % within status_perkawinan 41.1% 58.9%

% within perilaku_IVA 94.2% 93.9%

% of Total 38.7% 55.4%
status_perkawinan
Count 4 6
Expected Count 4.1 5.9

janda % within status_perkawinan 40.0% 60.0%

% within perilaku_IVA 5.8% 6.1%
% of Total 2.4% 3.6%
Count 69 99

Expected Count 69.0 99.0

Total % within status_perkawinan 41.1% 58.9%
% within perilaku_IVA 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 41.1% 58.9%

status_perkawinan * perilaku_IVA Crosstabulation

Total

Count 158
Expected Count 158.0
menikah % within status_perkawinan 100.0%
status_perkawinan % within perilaku_IVA 94.0%

% of Total 94.0%
Count 10
janda
Expected Count 10.0
 % within status_perkawinan 100.0%

% within perilaku_IVA 6.0%

% of Total 6.0%
Count 168
Expected Count 168.0
Total % within status_perkawinan 100.0%

% within perilaku_IVA 100.0%

% of Total 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
(2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .005 1 .943
Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .005 1 .943
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .608
Linear-by-Linear Association .005 1 .944
N of Valid Cases 168

a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.11.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for
status_perkawinan 1.048 .285 3.863
(menikah / janda)
For cohort perilaku_IVA =
1.028 .471 2.247
perilaku baik
For cohort perilaku_IVA =
.981 .582 1.654
perilaku kurang
N of Valid Cases 168
Uji Statistik Variabel Pengetahuan Dengan Perilaku IVA

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent
pengetahuan * perilaku_IVA 168 100.0% 0 0.0% 168 100.0%

pengetahuan * perilaku_IVA Crosstabulation

perilaku_IVA
perilaku baik perilaku kurang
Count 29 15

Expected Count 18.1 25.9

pengetahuan baik % within pengetahuan 65.9% 34.1%
% within perilaku_IVA 42.0% 15.2%
% of Total 17.3% 8.9%
pengetahuan
Count 40 84
Expected Count 50.9 73.1
pengetahuan kurang % within pengetahuan 32.3% 67.7%
% within perilaku_IVA 58.0% 84.8%

% of Total 23.8% 50.0%

Count 69 99
Expected Count 69.0 99.0
Total % within pengetahuan 41.1% 58.9%

% within perilaku_IVA 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 41.1% 58.9%

pengetahuan * perilaku_IVA Crosstabulation

Total

Count 44
Expected Count 44.0

pengetahuan baik % within pengetahuan 100.0%

% within perilaku_IVA 26.2%
pengetahuan % of Total 26.2%
Count 124

Expected Count 124.0

pengetahuan kurang
% within pengetahuan 100.0%
% within perilaku_IVA 73.8%
 % of Total 73.8%
Count 168

Expected Count 168.0

Total % within pengetahuan 100.0%
% within perilaku_IVA 100.0%
% of Total 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
(2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 15.195 1 .000
b
Continuity Correction 13.836 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 15.105 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 15.104 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 168

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 18.07.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for pengetahuan
(pengetahuan baik / 4.060 1.960 8.410
pengetahuan kurang)
For cohort perilaku_IVA =
2.043 1.466 2.848
perilaku baik
For cohort perilaku_IVA =
.503 .328 .772
perilaku kurang
N of Valid Cases 168
Uji Statistik Variabel Keterjangkauan Biaya Dengan Perilaku IVA

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent
keterjangkauan_biaya *
168 100.0% 0 0.0% 168 100.0%
perilaku_IVA

keterjangkauan_biaya * perilaku_IVA Crosstabulation

perilaku_IVA
perilaku baik perilaku kurang

Count 55 53
Expected Count 44.4 63.6
% within
mampu 50.9% 49.1%
keterjangkauan_biaya

% within perilaku_IVA 79.7% 53.5%

% of Total 32.7% 31.5%
keterjangkauan_biaya
Count 14 46
Expected Count 24.6 35.4

% within
tidak mampu 23.3% 76.7%
keterjangkauan_biaya
% within perilaku_IVA 20.3% 46.5%
% of Total 8.3% 27.4%
Count 69 99

Expected Count 69.0 99.0

% within
Total 41.1% 58.9%
keterjangkauan_biaya
% within perilaku_IVA 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 41.1% 58.9%

keterjangkauan_biaya * perilaku_IVA Crosstabulation

Total

Count 108
Expected Count 108.0

keterjangkauan_biaya mampu % within keterjangkauan_biaya 100.0%

% within perilaku_IVA 64.3%
% of Total 64.3%
 Count 60

Expected Count 60.0

tidak mampu % within keterjangkauan_biaya 100.0%
% within perilaku_IVA 35.7%
% of Total 35.7%
Count 168

Expected Count 168.0

Total % within keterjangkauan_biaya 100.0%
% within perilaku_IVA 100.0%
% of Total 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
(2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 12.133 1 .000
b
Continuity Correction 11.020 1 .001
Likelihood Ratio 12.636 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .001 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 12.061 1 .001
N of Valid Cases 168

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 24.64.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for
keterjangkauan_biaya 3.410 1.681 6.916
(mampu / tidak mampu)
For cohort perilaku_IVA =
2.183 1.331 3.579
perilaku baik
For cohort perilaku_IVA =
.640 .505 .812
perilaku kurang
N of Valid Cases 168
Uji Statistik Variabel Dukungan Petugas Kesehatan Dengan Perilaku IVA

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
dukungan_petugas *
168 100.0% 0 0.0% 168 100.0%
perilaku_IVA

dukungan_petugas * perilaku_IVA Crosstabulation

perilaku_IVA

perilaku baik perilaku kurang

Count 30 6
Expected Count 14.8 21.2
dukungan baik % within dukungan_petugas 83.3% 16.7%

% within perilaku_IVA 43.5% 6.1%

% of Total 17.9% 3.6%
dukungan_petugas
Count 39 93
Expected Count 54.2 77.8

dukungan kurang % within dukungan_petugas 29.5% 70.5%

% within perilaku_IVA 56.5% 93.9%
% of Total 23.2% 55.4%
Count 69 99

Expected Count 69.0 99.0

Total % within dukungan_petugas 41.1% 58.9%
% within perilaku_IVA 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 41.1% 58.9%

dukungan_petugas * perilaku_IVA Crosstabulation

Total

Count 36
Expected Count 36.0
dukungan baik % within dukungan_petugas 100.0%
dukungan_petugas % within perilaku_IVA 21.4%

% of Total 21.4%
Count 132
dukungan kurang
Expected Count 132.0
 % within dukungan_petugas 100.0%

% within perilaku_IVA 78.6%

% of Total 78.6%
Count 168
Expected Count 168.0
Total % within dukungan_petugas 100.0%

% within perilaku_IVA 100.0%

% of Total 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
(2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 33.812 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 31.626 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 34.833 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 33.611 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 168

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.79.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for

dukungan_petugas
11.923 4.598 30.920
(dukungan baik / dukungan
kurang)
For cohort perilaku_IVA =
2.821 2.087 3.812
perilaku baik
For cohort perilaku_IVA =
.237 .113 .495
perilaku kurang
N of Valid Cases 168
Uji Statistik Regresi Logitik

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

a
Unweighted Cases N Percent
Included in Analysis 168 100.0
Selected Cases Missing Cases 0 .0

Total 168 100.0

Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 168 100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of

cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value
perilaku baik 0
perilaku kurang 1

Categorical Variables Codings

Frequency Parameter
coding
(1)
pengetahuan baik 44 1.000
pengetahuan
pengetahuan kurang 124 .000
mampu 108 1.000
keterjangkauan_biaya
tidak mampu 60 .000
tinggi 52 1.000
pendidikan
rendah 116 .000
dukungan baik 36 1.000
dukungan_petugas
dukungan kurang 132 .000
Block 0: Beginning Block

a,b
Classification Table
Observed Predicted
perilaku_IVA Percentage

perilaku baik perilaku kurang Correct

perilaku baik 0 69 .0
perilaku_IVA
Step 0 perilaku kurang 0 99 100.0
Overall Percentage 58.9

a. Constant is included in the model.

b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant .361 .157 5.299 1 .021 1.435

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

dukungan_petugas(1) 33.812 1 .000

keterjangkauan_biaya(1) 12.133 1 .000
Variables
Step 0 pendidikan(1) 18.394 1 .000
pengetahuan(1) 15.195 1 .000

Overall Statistics 47.716 4 .000

Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square df Sig.
Step 52.515 4 .000
Step 1 Block 52.515 4 .000

Model 52.515 4 .000

Step -1.939 1 .164
a
Step 2 Block 50.576 3 .000
Model 50.576 3 .000

a. A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the

Chi-squares value has decreased from the previous step.
 Model Summary
Step -2 Log likelihood Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Square Square
a
1 174.997 .268 .362
a
2 176.935 .260 .350

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because

parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step Chi-square df Sig.
1 6.617 6 .358
2 4.027 4 .402

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

perilaku_IVA = perilaku baik perilaku_IVA = perilaku kurang Total

Observed Expected Observed Expected

1 16 16.635 2 1.365 18
2 10 10.972 4 3.028 14
3 14 11.796 5 7.204 19

4 9 8.190 10 10.810 19
Step 1
5 1 .405 0 .595 1
6 13 12.911 33 33.089 46
7 0 2.355 9 6.645 9

8 6 5.736 36 36.264 42
1 14 13.993 1 1.007 15
2 11 12.351 4 2.649 15
3 17 14.150 7 9.850 24
Step 2
4 20 19.807 42 42.193 62
5 1 2.867 8 6.133 9
6 6 5.832 37 37.168 43
 Classification Tablea
Observed Predicted

perilaku_IVA Percentage
perilaku baik perilaku kurang Correct

perilaku baik 40 29 58.0

perilaku_IVA
Step 1 perilaku kurang 11 88 88.9

Overall Percentage 76.2

perilaku baik 42 27 60.9
perilaku_IVA
Step 2 perilaku kurang 12 87 87.9
Overall Percentage 76.8

a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig.

dukungan_petugas(1) -2.242 .511 19.260 1 .000

keterjangkauan_biaya(1) -.903 .431 4.394 1 .036

a
Step 1 pendidikan(1) -.633 .453 1.947 1 .163
pengetahuan(1) -.827 .467 3.142 1 .076
Constant 1.844 .370 24.844 1 .000
dukungan_petugas(1) -2.296 .512 20.155 1 .000

a
keterjangkauan_biaya(1) -1.096 .405 7.320 1 .007
Step 2
pengetahuan(1) -1.091 .422 6.689 1 .010
Constant 1.852 .369 25.134 1 .000

Variables in the Equation

Exp(B) 95% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower Upper
dukungan_petugas(1) 2.106 1.262 8.397
keterjangkauan_biaya(1) 3.405 1.366 9.325
a
Step 1 pendidikan(1) .912 .324 2.569
pengetahuan(1) 3.437 1.285 8.031
Constant 6.435
dukungan_petugas(1) 2.385 1.280 8.434

a
keterjangkauan_biaya(1) 3.436 1.462 8.057
Step 2
pengetahuan(1) 3.674 1.332 7.295
Constant 6.583

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: dukungan_petugas, keterjangkauan_biaya, pendidikan, pengetahuan.

 Model if Term Removed
Variable Model Log Change in -2 df Sig. of the
Likelihood Log Likelihood Change

dukungan_petugas -99.447 23.897 1 .000

keterjangkauan_biaya -89.770 4.544 1 .033
Step 1
pendidikan -88.468 1.939 1 .164
pengetahuan -89.056 3.115 1 .078
dukungan_petugas -101.139 25.342 1 .000

Step 2 keterjangkauan_biaya -92.396 7.857 1 .005

pengetahuan -91.851 6.767 1 .009

Variables not in the Equation

Score Df Sig.
Variables pendidikan(1) 1.971 1 .160
Step 2a
Overall Statistics 1.971 1 .160

a. Variable(s) removed on step 2: pendidikan.