Anda di halaman 1dari 6

LEMBAGA PEPERIKSAAN MALAYSIA KEMENTERIAN PELAJARAN MALAYSIA

PELAPORAN ULBS BAHASA INGGERIS SPM 2017

LAPORAN KETUA PENTAKSIR SEKOLAH ZON KOTA SETAR

NAMA SEKOLAH

SEKOLAH MENENGAH KEBANGSAAN JABI

KOD SEKOLAH

KEAB001

NOMBOR PUSAT

KD104

NOMBOR TELEFON SEKOLAH

047876755

BILANGAN CALON

151

NAMA KETUA PENTAKSIR SEKOLAH

AZRUL HISHAM BIN AZARNUDIN

1.

PRESTASI KESELURUHAN CALON BERDASARKAN SKOR

LEVEL

SCORE

TOTAL NO. OF CANDIDATES

EXCELLENT

26-30

0

GOOD

21-25

8

SATISFACTORY

16-20

39

WEAK

11-15

61

VERY WEEK

5-10

43

GRAND TOTAL

151

2. KOMEN TENTANG PENTAKSIRAN

2.1 Model:

2.1.1 Model yang digunakan oleh pelajar:

Students have to do both models 1 and 2 in Form 4 but in Form 5, when they are given a choice, model 4 (group) is their preference.

2.1.2 Kesesuaian model dengan pelajar

All models are suitable. Even though Model 1 tends to encourage students to memorize, students are comfortable and able to carry out the task without many problems. They have freedom to choose their own topic and they can express it well.

2.2 Konstruk (Kekuatan, Kelemahan dan Kesilapan)

2.2.1 Give appropriate response/Converse on a topic effectively

a. Strengths Proficient candidates were able to give detail and appropriate responses especially the topics that are familiar to them. The topics often discussed were on people and family.

b. Weaknesses Weak candidates often gave irrelevant responses and very limited development of ideas. Most of them could not give immediate response by using English language due to lack of confidence and less exposure to the language. There were many incomplete sentences that made their presentation dull. Some candidates did not even response as they did not prepare for the test and they tend to depend on their mother tongue language.

c. Errors Candidates often gave irrelevant answers, mixed with mother tongue language and uncompleted sentences.

2.2.2 Speak fluently using correct and acceptable pronunciation

a. Strengths Candidates spoke fluently only in simple sentences.

b. Weaknesses Weak candidates struggled with the pronunciation. Mother tongue influence could be detected. The weak candidates made frequent errors in pronunciation due to lack of practice and exposure to the language. Some candidates did not speak up due to lack of confidence especially in front of their classmates. They were afraid that their friends will make fun of them.

c. Errors Candidates were influenced by mother by mother tongue language.

2.2.3 Speak Coherently

a. Strengths Only good students scored good marks for this construct since they understood their task and most importantly they were well prepared.

b. Weaknesses Weak candidates could not remember their lines as they did not prepare well. Some candidates could not even sustain their flow of ideas due to very limited vocabulary.

c. Errors Candidates had difficulties in maintaining their flow of ideas due to limited vocabulary and weak in constructing sentences.

2.2.4 Speak the language using a wide range of appropriate vocabulary within context.

a. Strengths Good candidates use precise vocabulary and expressions appropriately and effectively.

b. Weaknesses Weak candidates lacked of vocabulary. Their sentences were too simple. Weaker students were unable to produce the words until they needed help from the teacher.

c. Errors Candidates lacked of vocabulary

2.2.5 Speak using correct grammar

a. Strengths Good candidates were able to use correct grammar in simple sentence structures. Some good students prepared well and they used scripts which were taken from books and other resources. Thus, the problems of making grammatical errors were minimized.

b. Weaknesses Weak candidates made consistent grammatical errors that disrupt meanings. They were not bothered to do any preparation. Many of the students tend to fall for simple sentences. They tend to translate directly from mother tongue language.

c. Errors Common errors include mother tongue language and slang.

2.2.6 Kriteria Penskoran

Indicators

SCORE

LEVEL

C1 converse on the topic effectively/give appropriate response

26-30

EXCELLENT

C2 speak fluently using correct and acceptable pronunciation

21-25

GOOD

C3 speak coherently

16-20

SATISFACTORY

C4 Speak using a wide range of appropriate vocabulary within context

11-15

WEAK

C5 Speak using correct grammar

5-10

VERY WEEK

3. SARANAN KEPADA CALON

Candidates must attempt to response and converse

They have to be mentally prepared

They need to do extra reading so they can converse effectively

They need to listen and speak English language so that simple and common expressions will not be a problem to them. Besides, they will be more confidence with the language

They must equip themselves with common words in English

4. SARANAN KEPADA GURU

Teachers must emphasis on the important of ULBS

They should make it clear to the candidates all five constructs in ULBS so that the candidates are aware of what they should focus on

Teachers must expose more English language inputs to the students

Teachers should build the positive attitude towards English language among students

Teachers should provide the candidates with common English expressions, phrases and the vocabulary lists

Teachers should create more opportunities for the students to practice speaking English language

5.

ISU DAN SARANAN PENAMBAHBAIKAN ULBS

Some candidates did not bother to do the preparation

Some candidates did not take ULBS seriously though being informed on the importance of it

In some cases, the candi9dates did not bother to attend the test on the given date because they were absented from school

Monitoring and coordination of these assessments should be taken seriously to ensure the assessment are done correctly

There is a need to have a formal briefing on the important of ULBS to the candidates by the administrators as well as PPD coordinators.

6. HAL HAL LAIN

To have a better result, candidates should be assessed by teachers from other schools

Laporan disediakan oleh:

(AZRUL HISHAM BIN AZARNUDIN)

KETUA PENTAKSIR SEKOLAH

Tarikh: 17.08.2017