The Wisconsin Music Educators Association convention provided many great sessions on
various elements of music education. While many sessions were directly applicable to band and
provided a great deal of information, one of the most informative and thought provoking was
provided by Stephen Sieck on the topic of respect. The session was about the topic of respect in
general and although he applied many concepts to a choral setting the information is equally as
Dr. Sieck discussed many examples of ways in which educators often fail to serve their
students properly. He started off by assuming that everybody in the room wanted to teach
everyone and respect everyone as guiding principles, two things that I feel every educator needs
to have. Off of these premises he built an argument about how to truly respect our students. He
used a really helpful analogy to explain this point. If we imagine respecting others means treating
others how we would want to be treated we can see a flaw many people encounter. Imagine a
person with no dietary restrictions and a vegetarian, someone who does not eat meat. The person
who is not a vegetarian may love a steak and feel that is a great way to show someone they are
appreciated and gives one to the vegetarian, wanting them to be treated how he would like to be
treated. Not only is this not helpful to the vegetarian, it would also make them feel incredibly
disrespected. He said instead we should realize that everyone is different and they want respect,
but the way that they want respect to be given may be different than how we are used to wanting
it.
The session leader continued his presentation by presenting several key concepts relating
to inequalities in the classroom. Positionality refers to the position of one group to another,
generally in terms of gender, race or identity. He also describes a Dominant Narrative related to
this concept, there is a group that is in a better positon (rich, white, straight men) and their story
is the one most often told. This is clearly evident in the field of music history in which we see
many white male composers yet we would struggle to come up with a list of female composers,
black composers and especially black female composers. One way in which we can counter this
in the music classroom is by making sure that we represent all people in our curriculum. As
directors we can be sure to program female and black composers so that all students can see
Dr. Sieck also discusses heteronormativity which is the idea that the dominant world
view promotes heterosexuality as the norm or preferred sexual orientation. This is prevalent
through the teachers language especially concerning romantic (emotion, not the era) pieces. It is
more inclusive to use phrases such as Why would Shakespeare write this poem for his
beloved? rather than Why would Shakespeare write this poem for the woman he loved? That
is just an example, but whenever text is involved using a gender-neutral term can allow students
to picture themselves in the situation more easily and provide answers more easily and
understand concepts more fully. Professor Sieck also mentioned the importance of pointing out
the fact that some composers are gay, in fact many mainstream composers are but they sexuality
is often glanced over. Franz Schubert, Aaron Copland, Leonard Bernstein, Francis Poulenc, Peter
Illyich Tchaikovsky, Arcangelo Corelli, Samuel Barber and Benjamin Britten were gay, yet that
is rarely mentioned when their works are performed. This little bit of information helps to flush
out their motivations in life and composition, as well as allows students to know there are people
in the field who are like them and makes them feel safe and more powerful.
Finally, on the topic of World Music the speaker cautioned us on our programming. It
is wonderful and important to explore the music from around the world, but it is not an easy
thing to do ethically. In order to program a piece of world music there should be pedagogical
reasons beyond its origins for teaching it otherwise we are using their culture for entertainment.
Simply using another group for entertainment was something done by minstrel groups in black
face through America, something that is highly frowned upon today for moral reasons. It is
necessary we research these pieces to make sure we are avoiding simply using the groups for our
entertainment. Additionally we must understand the text and the connotations of it. For example,
if a foreign exchange student came to America and wanted a piece of music that every American
knew and we said Jingle Bells and they took that back to their land, lifting it up as a piece of
American music and performing it on their summer concert it would not fit with our use of that
song. It would also be upsetting that our country was being known musically for that rather than
other songs that are more impactful to many people. Along these same lines we could pick a
German folk song such as Hoch auf dem gelben Wagen which seems to be a fine choice based
on the music alone. However, looking at the history of the piece, it was used in concentration
camps as the Nazi soldiers forced Jewish concentration camp prisoners to sing it repeatedly. This
would continue for hours, the prisoners being whipped and tortured if the sang notes wrong, sang
too quietly or too loudly, and the duration of singing would leave them often unable to speak
afterwards. A simple folk song like this cannot be programed without serious ethical dilemma
after knowing this piece of information. While this is a vocal piece, other pieces we may find in
the instrumental repertoire could have equally dark pasts we must be aware of.
How do we go about approaching these issues in the classroom? The professor offered
these lists of guidelines and I think they are an excellent summary of all of his points and is a
great tool when planning a program including world music (as well as religious pieces) and