Anda di halaman 1dari 5

CRITICAL APPRAISAL

IDENTITAS
Judul artikel
Penulis
Publikasi

CRITICAL APPRAISAL
Guidelines :
1. Critically appraised Topic (CAT) Checklist and Guide Questions Sullivan 2008
(EBP@NUHS)
2. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II Instrumen, The Agree
Research Trust, May 2008 (modification worksheet)

Appraisal Checklist and Guide Questions


Study Objectives and hypothesis
1 2 3 4
Komentar

1. Tujuan dari penelitian

2. Signifikansi studi dijelaskan secara rinci

Study design
1 2 3 4
Komentar

1. Desain penelitian

2. Tujuan dan kebermaknaan penelitian

3. Sampel yang digunakan

4. Pengumpulan data

5. Analisis data
Methods : Subjects/Participants/Patient/Population
Population/Subjects/Sample 1 2 3 4
Selection/Inclusion &exclusion criteria/recruitment study site and 1 2 3 4
circumstances
Baseline diffrences 1 2 3 4
What is/are the sample size, number participants ? Was the 1 2 3 4
sample size adequate to support the measurement of outcomes
Is the sample size (population numbered) large enough to 1 2 3 4
analyze statistically
Was the rationale for choosing the sample size ? 1 2 3 4
Follow up/Accountability 1 2 3 4
Ethical Approval 1 2 3 4
Komentar
Jurnal ini adalah pilot study yang berarti merupakan study pendahuluan sebelum study untuk
populasi yang lebih besar. Berdasarkan jurnal di ketahui digunakan 70 sample yang sudah
memenuhi untuk pilot study.
Ditunjukan pula kriteria ekslusi dan inklusi yang jelas pada methodnya secara rinci dalam method.
Follow up dilakukan dengan tepat dalam jurnal dengan alat pengukuran yang sama.
Study ini dilakukan dengan ethical approval.
Methods : Intervention
Description of intervention 1 2 3 4
Comparison/Placebo/Control intervention 1 2 3 4
Randomization 1 2 3 4
Blinding : study subjects/participants (masking) 1 2 3 4
Blinding : investigators, researchers, administrators selecting, 1 2 3 4
randomizing or allocating

Komentar

Methods : Outcomes, measurements, observation


Outcomes measured 1 2 3 4
Are outcomes valid ? 1 2 3 4
Does the measurement tool match of the outcome 1 2 3 4
Are measurements reliable 1 2 3 4
Are measurements reproducible 1 2 3 4
Komentar

Methods : Analysis and Validity


Is the analysis valid and sufficient ? 1 2 3 4
Is the trial or experiment also being used to test new methods of 1 2 3 4
measurement and analysis ?
Komentar

Key result
Are the basic data adequately decribes ? 1 2 3 4
Are tables and graphs readable and clear ? 1 2 3 4
Does the data presented match the text 1 2 3 4
Komentar

Statistical significance
Describe the statistical methods. Do they seem adequate for this 1 2 3 4
study design
How p values been calculated 1 2 3 4
Have p values been stated and interpreted appropriately 1 2 3 4
Have confidence interval (CI) been calculated, stated correctly, 1 2 3 4
matching the data and have they been interpreted adequately and
correctly ?
Do the authors conclusions and discussion reflect the calculated 1 2 3 4
statistic, including the mean, p values or CI ?
Komentar

Overall, is the study valid ?


Assess the overall validity of the study considering the aspects 1 2 3 4
already appraised
Was systematic bias avaioded or minimized ? 1 2 3 4
Were the outcomes measured the same as those stated in the 1 2 3 4
study objectives ? Were the outcomes appropriately described in
the title of paper
Komentar

Authors conclusions
Do the authors conclusions match the data, analysis and 1 2 3 4
statistical significance ?
Komentar

Kesimpulan
Komponen CA Jumlah Skor Skor Prosen
pertanyaan max capaian tase
Study Objectives and hypothesis -
Study design -
Methods : 32
Subjects/Participants/Patient/Population
Methods : Intervention 20
Methods : Outcomes, measurements, 20
observation
Methods : Analysis and Validity 8
Key result 12
Statistical significance 20
Overall, is the study valid ? 12
Authors conclusions 4
Prosentase capain 128
Berdasarkan telaah kritis di atas, artikel penelitian ini dikategorikan sebagai penelitian
yang ......... (>64 dikatakan jurnal tersebut merupakan jurnal yang baik)