0 Suka0 Tidak suka

3 tayangan9 halamanlecture summary

Nov 13, 2017

© © All Rights Reserved

DOCX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd

lecture summary

© All Rights Reserved

3 tayangan

lecture summary

© All Rights Reserved

- Inventory Tutus
- Case Study Nike Method Inventory Control
- inventory management of big bazaar(thane)
- inventory assignment
- Inventory Management
- D08540000120114008Session 12_Production Planning and Control
- Sitara Group of Industries Pakistan
- Draft Planning
- EOQ application
- Case Study-V (Game)
- Inventory
- Business FLows_Best Practice
- Design of a Production & Inventory Planning System for the Glass Container Industry
- Lec.4 Demand Forecasting
- Invent
- The Value of Information
- Chap 1 Vartika
- 2011D15
- b44312_29a83364b04be5f6fe783f69e508102e.pptx
- ch03

Anda di halaman 1dari 9

Inventory is one of the dominant costs. Effective inventory management in the supply chain

is to have the correct inventory at the right place at the right time to minimize system costs

while satisfying customer service requirements.

- Raw material inventory

- Work in process inventory

- Finished product inventory

1. Unexpected changes in customer demand. Customer demand has always been hard

to predict. Customer demand changes due to:

i) Short life cycle of an increasing number of products. This implies that historical

data about customer demand may not be available or may be quite limited

ii) Presence of many competing products in the marketplace. Proliferation of

products make it increasingly difficult to predict demand.

2. Presence in many situations of a significant uncertainty in the quantity and quality

of the supply, supplier costs and delivery times

3. Lead times. Even if there is no supply or demand. Need due to delivery lead times

4. Economies of scale offered by transportation companies that encourage firms to

transport large quantities of items and therefore hold large inventories

1) Customer demand, which may be known in advance or may be known in advance or

may be random.

2) Replenishment lead time, which may be known at the time the order is place or may be

uncertain.

3) The number of different products being considered. These products compete on budget

or space and hence the inventory policy of one product

4) Length of planning horizon

5) Cost, including order cost and inventory holding cost.

a) Typically, order cost consists of two components; the cost of the product and the

transportation

b) Inventory holding cost, or inventory carrying cost, consists of

i) State taxes, property taxes

ii) Maintenance costs

iii) Obsolescence cost, which derives from the risk that an item will lose some of its

value because of changes in the market

iv) Opportunity costs, which represent the return on investment that one would

receive had money been invested in something else.

6) Service level requirements,

Illustrates the trade-offs between ordering and storage cost. Consider a warehouse facing

constant demand for a single item. The warehouse orders from the supplier, who is

assumed to have an unlimited quantity of the product.

- Demand is constant at a rate of D items per day

- Order quantities are fixed at Q items per order; that is, each time the warehouse

places an order , it is for Q items

- A fixed cost, K, is incurred every time the warehouse places an order

- An inventory carrying cost, h, also referred to as a holding cost, is accrued per unit

held in inventory per day that the unit is held

- The lead time, the time that elapses between the placement of an order and its

receipt, is zero

- Initial inventory is zero

- The planning horizon is long ( infinite)

to find the optimal order policy that minimizes annual purchasing and carrying costs while

meeting all demand.

We refer to the time between two successive replenishments as a cycle time. Thus, total

inventory cost in a cycle of length T is

+

2

since the fixed costs is charged once per order and holding cost can be viewed as the

product of the per unit, per time holding cost, h; the average inventory level, Q/2 and the

length of the cycle, T

total cost per unit of time

An optimal policy balances inventory holding cost per unit time with setup cost per unit

time. Indeed, setup cost per unit time = KD/Q, while holding cost per unit time = hQ/2 (see

above figure). Thus, as one increases the order quanuty Q, inventory holding costs per unit

of time increase while setup costs per unit of time decrease. The optimal order quanityt is

achieved at the point at which inventory setup cost per unit of time (KD/Q) equals inventory

holding cost per unit of time (hQ/2)

KD hQ

Q 2

2 KD

Q*

h

1) Forecast is always wrong

2) The longer the forecast horizon, the worse the forecast

3) Aggregate forecasts are more accurate

It is more difficult to match supply and demand, and the second one implies that it is even

more difficult if one needs to predict customer demand for a long period of time..

The third principle suggest for instance, that while it is difficult to predict customer demand

for individual SKUs, it is much easier to predict demand across all SKUs, within one product

family

We consider a product that has a short lifecycle and hence the firm has only one ordering

opportunity. Thus, before demand occurs, the firm must decide how much stokc in order to

meet demand. Using historical data, the firm can typically identify a variety of demand

scenarios and determine a likelihood or probability that each of these scenarios will occur.

This model is use to determine the average, or expected, profit for a particular ordering

quantity. It is thus natural for the firm to order the quantity that maximizes the average

profit.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Fixed production cost: $100,000

Variable production cost per unit: $80

During the summer season, selling price: $125 per unit

Salvage value: any swimsuit not sold during the summer season is sold to a discount store

for $20

TWO SCENARIOS

Manufacturer produces 10,000 units while demand ends at 12,000 swimsuits

Profit

= 125(10,000) - 80(10,000) - 100,000

= $350,000

Profit

= 125(8,000) + 20(2,000) - 80(10,000) - 100,000

= $140,000

Compare marginal profit of selling an additional unit and marginal cost of not selling an

additional unit

Marginal profit/unit =

Selling Price - Variable Ordering (or, Production) Cost

Marginal cost/unit =

Variable Ordering (or, Production) Cost - Salvage Value

If Marginal Profit > Marginal Cost => Optimal Quantity > Average Demand

If Marginal Profit < Marginal Cost => Optimal Quantity < Average Demand

Average demand = 13,000 units.

Optimal production quantity = 12,000 units.

Marginal cost = $60.

=> optimal production quantity < average demand

a distributor that faces random demand for a product, and meets that demand with product

ordered from a manufacturer. manufacturer cannot instantaneously satisfy orders placed by

the distributor: there is fixed lead time for delivery whenever the distributor places an

order. 3 reasons why the distributors holds inventory

REASONS

To balance annual inventory holding costs and annual fixed order costs.

To satisfy demand occurring during lead time.

To protect against uncertainty in demand.

TWO POLICIES

Continuous review policy

inventory is reviewed continuously

an order is placed when the inventory reaches a particular level or reorder

point.

inventory can be continuously reviewed (computerized inventory systems are

used)

Periodic review policy

inventory is reviewed at regular intervals

appropriate quantity is ordered after each review.

it is impossible or inconvenient to frequently review inventory and place

orders if necessary.

AVG = Average daily demand faced by the distributor

STD = Standard deviation of daily demand faced by the distributor

L = Replenishment lead time from the supplier to the

distributor in days

h = Cost of holding one unit of the product for one day at the distributor

= service level. This implies that the probability of stocking out is 1

(Q,R) policy whenever inventory level falls to a reorder level R, place an order for Q units

What is the value of R?

Q z STD L

Q

Average inventory = 2

z STD L

STD

RISK POOLING

Risk Pooling suggests that demand variability is reduced if one aggregates demand across

locations. This reduction in variability allows a decrease in safety stock and therefore

reduces average inventory. Essential to understand the concepts of standard deviation and

coefficient of variation of demand. Standard deviation is a measure of how much demand

tends to vary around the average, and coefficient of variation is the ratio of standard

deviation to average demand:

=

standard deviation measures the absolute variability of customer demands, the coefficient

of variation measures variability relative to average demand.

1) Centralizing inventory reduces both safety stock and average inventory in the system

2) The higher the coefficient of variation, the greater the benefit obtained from

centralized systems; that is, the greater the benefit from risk pooling

3) The benefits from pooling depend on the behavior of demand from one market

relative to demand from another.

Trade offs we need to consider:

Safety stock, safety decreases as a firm moves from a decentralized to a centralized system.

The amount of decrease a number of parameters

Service level when the centralized and decentralized systems have the same total safety

stock, the service level provided by the centralized system is higher

Overhead costs typically these costs are much greater in a decentralized system

Customer lead time. Since the warehouses are much closer to the customers in a

decentralized system, response time is much shorter

Transportation costs. The impact on transportation costs depends on the specifics of the

situation

FORECASTING

1 Forecast is always wrong

2 The longer the forecast horizon, the worse the forecast

3 Aggregate forecasts are more accurate

Forecasting is a critical tool. Forecasts arent just for inventory decision making; decisions

about whether to enter a particular market at all, about whether to expand production

capacity, or about whether to implement a given promotional plan can all benefit from

effective forecasting

- Qualitative primarily subjective, rely on judgement (JUDGEMENT METHODS)

- Time series use historical demand only, best with stable demand

- Causal relationship between demand and some other factor

- Simulation imitate consumer choices that give rise to demand

Time series methods use a variety of past data to estimate future data,

Common time series methods

Moving average each forecast is the average of some number of previous demand points.

Select the number of points in the moving average so that the effect of irregularities in the

data is minimized

Exponential smoothing each forecast is a weighted average of the previous forecast and

the last demand point. This method is similar to the moving average, except that it is a

weighted average of all past data points.

Methods for data with trends the previous two approaches assume that there is no trend

in the data. If there is a trend, methods such as regression analysis and holts method are

more useful, as they specifically account for trends in the data. Regression analysis fits a

straight line to data points, while holts method combines the concept of exponential

smoothing with the ability to follow a linear trend in the data.

Methods for seasonal data a variety of techniques account for seasonal changes in

demand. For example, Seasonal decomposition methods remove the seasonal patterns

from the data and then apply the approaches listed above on these edited data. Similarly

winters method is a version of exponential smoothing that accounts for trends and

seasonality.

JUDGEMENT METHODS

Judgment methods strive to assemble the opinions of a variety of experts in a systematic

way.

Panels of experts can be assembled in order to reach a consensus. This approach assumes

that by communicating and openly sharing information. A superior forecast can be agreed

upon. These experts can be external experts or internal experts.

The Delphi method is a structured technique for reaching a consensus with a panel of

experts without gathering them in a single location. Indeed, the technique is designed to

eliminate the danger of one or a few strong willed individuals dominating the decision-

making process. Each member of the group of experts is surveyed for his or her opnion,

typically in writing. The opinions are compiled and summarized and each individual is given

the opportunity to change his or her opinion after seeing the summary. This process is

repeated until a consensus is achieved

- Forecasting module is core supply chain software

- Can be used to determine forecasting methods for the firm and by product

categories and markets

- Real time updates help firms respond quickly to changes in marketplace

- Facilitate demand planning

- Inventory TutusDiunggah olehJharr699
- Case Study Nike Method Inventory ControlDiunggah olehXiao Yun Yap
- inventory management of big bazaar(thane)Diunggah olehAniket Patil
- inventory assignmentDiunggah olehapi-413335890
- Inventory ManagementDiunggah olehsalilkotia
- D08540000120114008Session 12_Production Planning and ControlDiunggah olehSagita Simanjuntak
- Sitara Group of Industries PakistanDiunggah olehUmer Ehsan
- Draft PlanningDiunggah olehadnan79
- EOQ applicationDiunggah olehNAZMUL HAQUE
- Case Study-V (Game)Diunggah olehJoju Johny
- InventoryDiunggah olehumar
- Business FLows_Best PracticeDiunggah olehKassem Fares
- Design of a Production & Inventory Planning System for the Glass Container IndustryDiunggah olehJuan Cajas
- Lec.4 Demand ForecastingDiunggah olehHamza Bashir
- InventDiunggah olehBasavaraj Asaraddi
- The Value of InformationDiunggah olehYatiraj Gharse
- Chap 1 VartikaDiunggah olehhi_thatsnidhi
- 2011D15Diunggah olehSmit Shah
- b44312_29a83364b04be5f6fe783f69e508102e.pptxDiunggah olehpravanthbabu
- ch03Diunggah olehChristine Joyce Enriquez
- Results AnalysisDiunggah olehRT1234
- Assignment 2 Report(Team G)Diunggah olehvundavilliravindra
- operationsDiunggah olehapi-270697924
- Standalone Financial Results, Limited Review Report for June 30, 2016 [Result]Diunggah olehShyam Sunder
- Chapter 7 Test QuizDiunggah olehDonna
- fisher01.docDiunggah olehjuan manco
- Standard Costing and Variance AnalysisDiunggah olehShaira Unggad
- Aggregate PlanningDiunggah olehCHARU SURYAVANSHI
- AGGREGATE PLANNING TEXTILE INDUSTRY.pdfDiunggah olehalegabipacheco
- MATERI LAB 1 - HOBO.pdfDiunggah olehMuhamad Rizki Pratama

- Chapter 11 Motivating and Leading MGMT2341Diunggah olehJeremy Rusli
- Lecture 7 Week 7 MGMT3308Diunggah olehJeremy Rusli
- Week 9 Procurement MGMT3308Diunggah olehJeremy Rusli
- Week 12 Customer Value MGMT3308Diunggah olehJeremy Rusli
- Week 11 Supply Chain Management Coordinate Product and Supply Chain Design MGMT3308Diunggah olehJeremy Rusli
- Week 2 Supply Chain Management MGMT3308Diunggah olehJeremy Rusli
- Week 10 Global Logistics and Risk Management MGMT3308Diunggah olehJeremy Rusli
- Lecture 1 MGMT3308Diunggah olehJeremy Rusli
- Week 8 Lecture Distribution Strategies and Strategic Alliances MGMT3308Diunggah olehJeremy Rusli
- Week 6 Lecture MGMT3308Diunggah olehJeremy Rusli
- Chapter 3 MGMT3308Diunggah olehJeremy Rusli
- Week 5 Supply Contracts MGMT3308Diunggah olehJeremy Rusli
- Chapter 5 MGMT2341Diunggah olehJeremy Rusli
- Chapter 9 Week 10Diunggah olehJeremy Rusli
- Chapter 10 Developing a Global Management TeamDiunggah olehJeremy Rusli
- Strat Mgmt LEGODiunggah olehJeremy Rusli

- Amjad Khan vs the State on 20 MarchDiunggah olehArpan Kamal
- Mach 3+ Nasa UsafDiunggah olehjcljcljcl
- The Liability of Bailees in Contracts of BailmentDiunggah olehShirat Mohsin
- Top 10 Basic Network Troubleshooting ToolsDiunggah olehLouie J. Ubay
- Chapter 3 HRM.pptDiunggah olehTayyab Zahir Sheikh
- Fire ExtinguisherDiunggah olehDibinraj CR
- Interrupts and ExceptionsDiunggah olehProdip Kundu
- Mahindra LogisticsDiunggah olehSaksham Sharma
- AD202Diunggah olehloliveir8556
- Simpow All Modules WebDiunggah olehRocio Macedo Pereira
- UT Dallas Syllabus for psci6320.001.09s taught by Stephanie Newbold (spn061000)Diunggah olehUT Dallas Provost's Technology Group
- CCNA Security Data SheetDiunggah olehHarrison Hayes
- Assure n Addie ModelDiunggah olehzazamao
- sstarDiunggah olehPhil Devitt
- Imperialism - LazearDiunggah olehDat Nguyen
- D 646 - 96 R01 _RDY0NG__.pdfDiunggah olehLukas Jackes
- 60146Diunggah olehShahinAsadifard
- 2201 october p1 dk 13 17Diunggah olehapi-235820714
- 978-3-95553-369-4-Facade_Construcion_Manual_2017Diunggah olehRohan Kulkarni
- BP ~ Revised PIP Case 12-F-0410: Application of Cape Vincent Wind Power, LLC,Diunggah olehpandorasboxofrocks
- OFM_MigrationGuideDiunggah olehnelson_zambrano_29
- TLM TODAY July - Sept 2015 IssueDiunggah olehJacob Oommen
- Insurance AwarenessDiunggah olehsunayna
- JLIS Volume 23 Issue 2Diunggah olehJournal of Law, Information & Science
- BN 150 Manual - Installation BN150 Iss01Diunggah olehTaufik
- Csv LeerDiunggah olehAll Catholic
- 74ls74Diunggah olehMich Vellve
- Safety Statements by British Ministry of Defence regarding Operational Berth Safety - DNSR RedactedDiunggah olehThe Guardian
- SiebDiunggah olehashay
- AMA vs. Austria.docxDiunggah olehMichelle Montenegro Araujo

## Lebih dari sekadar dokumen.

Temukan segala yang ditawarkan Scribd, termasuk buku dan buku audio dari penerbit-penerbit terkemuka.

Batalkan kapan saja.