Food Hydrocolloids
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodhyd
Short Communication
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The effect of different hydrophobic substances on water vapor permeability (WVP) of unmodied sh
Received 15 May 2008 gelatin lms and cross-linked with transglutaminase (TGase) or with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylamino-
Accepted 4 August 2008 propyl) carbodiimide (EDC) was determined. Both unmodied and cross-linked lms were characterized
by very poor water barrier properties. Amaranth oil, rapeseed oil, lanolin, beeswax and ozococerite at
Keywords: concentration of 10% decreased WVP of unmodied gelatin lms by 42, 15, 37, 53 and 36%, respectively.
Fish gelatin
Increasing concentration of these substances up to 60% caused further improving of the water barrier
Hydrophobic substances
properties. Addition of lecithin into lm-forming emulsions prevented separation of lipid layer on the
Transglutaminase (TGase)
1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) lm surface. Among unmodied lms with lecithin and 60% of lipids the highest decrease of WVP was
carbodiimide (EDC) found in case of amaranth oil and beeswax, by 73 and 87%, respectively, in comparison to only-gelatin
Water vapor permeability (WVP) lms. WVP of chemically modied lms in the presence of 60% of beeswax with addition of lecithin was
decreased by about 65%. Enzymatically modied lms with beeswax were very brittle and broke during
analyzes, similarly as those with amaranth oil and lecithin. WVP of enzymatically modied lms with
lecithin and 60% of rapeseed oil and lanolin was respectively, about 60 and 47% lower than that of lms
without hydrophobic substances.
2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0268-005X/$ see front matter 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.08.002
K. Sztuka, I. Koodziejska / Food Hydrocolloids 23 (2009) 10621064 1063
did not improve their water barrier properties (Piotrowska et al., Lipid WVP [g mm/h kPa m2]a
in press). There is also no data in literature about effect of hydro- concentration
Amaranth Rapeseed Lanolin Beeswax Ozocerite
phobic substances on lms cross-linked by TGase or EDC. [%]
oil oil
0 3.60a/u 3.60a/u 3.60a/u 3.60a/u 3.60a/u
10 2.09b/u 3.05b/w 2.27b/x 1.68b/y 2.30b/x
2. Materials and Methods 60 1.18c/uw 2.85b/x 1.31c/u 1.09c/w 1.74c/y
10b 1.96b/uw 2.05c/u 2.59b/x 1.87b/w 2.59b/y
2.1. Materials 60b 0.97c/u 1.90c/w 2.28b/x 0.46d/y 1.52c/z
a
The values for a particular columns and lines followed by different letters (ad)
Fish gelatin was obtained from the Baltic cod skins as described and (uz), respectively, differ signicantly (P < 0.05).
b
by Ko1odziejska, Kaczorowski, Piotrowska, and Sadowska (2004). Films to that additionally lecithin was introduced (10% of hydrophobic substance
EDC was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., Germany. For the mass).
Fish gelatin was dissolved in water at room temperature to Unmodied sh gelatin lms were characterized by very poor
achieve the nal concentration of 5% (w/w). water barrier properties (Table 1). It was shown previously that
Lipids at their melting temperature, declared by the producer WVP for lm of thickens 0.12 mm was about 2.64 g mm/h kPa m2
(amaranth and rape seed oil at room temperature; lanolin at (Piotrowska et al., in press). In this work all lms were 0.16 mm
3237; bees wax 6265; ozocerite 69), and concentrations of 10 thick therefore WVP of unmodied gelatin lm was higher and
and 60% (% of the gelatin mass, w/w) were homogenised with amounted 3.6 g mm/h kPa m2. Much lower WVP of gelatin lms,
gelatin solution for 4 min at 26 000 rpm. In some experiments even in spite of the presence of plasticizer, was obtained by de
homogenisation was conducted additionally in the presence of Carvalho et al. (2008), Bertan et al. (2005). The discrepancy in these
lecithin (10% of the lipids mass, w/w). data may be caused by over two times higher thickness of the lms
To the lm-forming solutions, TGase or EDC was added to the in our experiments, as well as by different conditions used during
nal concentration of 0.2 mg/mL and 30 mM, respectively. As we preparation of the lms.
have shown earlier, these concentrations were the most efcient in Cross-linking gelatin with TGase did not improve considerably
decreasing the gelatin lms solubility (Piotrowska et al., in press). water barrier properties of lms (Tables 1 and 2). Differently, modi-
The lms were formed just after adding of TGase or EDC as cation with TGase of whey proteins isolate, soybean globulin 11S or
described below. The enzymatic and chemical reactions were mixture of these components increased the WVP of lms by about
running during that process. 60% (Yildirim & Hettiarachchy, 1998). On the other hand, de Carvalho
and Grosso (2004) found that WVP of TGase cross-linked bovine
gelatin lms was about 40% lower than that of unmodied lms.
2.3. Film Formation
Cross-linking of sh gelatin lms with EDC decreased WVP from
3.60 to 3.04 g mm/h kPa m2 (Table 3).
In all experiments, 20 g of solutions were cast on a square area
Improving of water barrier properties can be achieved by an
9.5 13.5 cm of a polyester surface and spread manually to the
addition of hydrophobic substances to the lm structure. All tested
outside borders. The lms were dried at room temperature for 24
hydrophobic substances at concentration of 10% decreased WVP of
48 h at 3545% relative humidity (RH). The thickness of the lms
unmodied gelatin lms, particularly amaranth oil and beeswax, by
was measured at ve random locations with a handheld microm-
42 and 53%, respectively (Table 1). Increasing the concentration of
eter. The average thickness of the lms was 0.155 0.005 mm.
Table 2
2.4. Water Vapor Permeability Effect of hydrophobic substances on WVP of lms cross-linked with TGase at
concentration of 0.2 mg/mL
WVP was determined according to the ASTM method E 96-95 Lipid WVP [g mm/h kPa m2]a
(ASTM, 1995). The lms were conditioned for 24 h at 25 C and 50% concentration
Amaranth Rapeseed Lanolin Beeswax Ozocerite
[%]
RH before determination. RH was measured using hygrometer LA8 oil oil
02/96 (Rotronic). Film samples were mounted on cups lled with 0 3.30a/x 3.30a/x 3.30a/x 3.30a/x 3.30a/x
water. The cups were placed at 25 C and 50% RH in a desiccator. 10 2.80b/x 3.40a/y 2.88b/x eb ih
The weight of the cups was measured at 1 h intervals for 9 h. The 60 2.21c/x 2.06b/x 2.29c/x eb ih
10b eb 2.00b/x 2.15c/x eb 2.61b/y
simple linear regression was used to estimate the slope of weight
60b eb 1.37c/x 1.75d/y eb 2.04c/z
loss vs. time plot.
WVP was calculated from: WVP (WVTR L)/Dp; where WVTR Abbreviations: eb, excessively brittle; ih, inhomogeneous.
a
The values for a particular columns and lines followed by different letters (ad)
(Water vapor transmission rate) Slope/Film area [g/m2 h], L and (xz), respectively, differ signicantly (P < 0.05).
lm thickness [mm], Dp partial water vapor pressure difference b
Films to that additionally lecithin was introduced (10% of hydrophobic substance
[kPa] between the two sides of the lm. mass).
1064 K. Sztuka, I. Koodziejska / Food Hydrocolloids 23 (2009) 10621064