General Rule: Taxes cannot be the subject of compute the amount with reasonable
compensation or set-off. accuracy (CIR v. Isabela Cultural Corporation,
G.R. No. 172231, February 12, 2007).
Rationale:
Immediacy Test
1. Lifeblood theory; If the corporation did not prove an immediate
2. Taxes are not contractual obligations but need for the accumulation of the earnings and
arise out of duty to the government; and profits, the accumulation was not for the
3. The government and the taxpayers are not reasonable needs of the business, and the
mutually creditors and debtors of each other. penalty tax would apply. (The Manila Wine
Merchants vs CIR, GR No. L-26145, Feb. 20,
INCOME TAXATION 1984).
b. With at least 5 years contribution. 3. Living with the taxpayer. A child who is
(Personal Equity and Retirement away for his education is still considered
Account [PERA] Act of 2008); living with the taxpayer;
2. Income from operations of Barangay Micro 4. Dependent upon the taxpayer for chief
Business Enterprise (BMBE Act of 2002); support;
3. Income of PEZA-registered entities (PEZA 5. Unmarried; and
Law); 6. Not gainfully employed.
4. Income of participants in socialized housing
(Urban Development Housing Act of 1992); Additional exemption for persons caring and
and living with PWD
5. Income of duly registered cooperatives from Those caring for and living with qualified PWD,
transactions with members (Cooperative up to the fourth civil degree of consanguinity
Code). or affinity, can claim an additional tax
NOTE: PEZA-registered entities are subject to exemption of P25,000 against their annual
preferential tax rates IN LIEU of ALL national income tax. Provided that the PWD is not
and local taxes. gainfully employed and is chiefly dependent
upon the taxpayer. The maximum number of
Income Tax Exemption of Prizes and Awards allowable dependents are 4 including the PWD,
in Sports Competition if any.
In order to be exempt from income tax, the
sports event must have been sanctioned by a Ordinary and Necessary Expenses
national sports association. The place where the Ordinary connotes a payment which is normal
competition was held is irrelevant. in relation to the business of the taxpayer and
the surrounding circumstances. On the other
Compensation Income Exempt from Income hand, necessary connotes expenditure that is
Tax appropriate or helpful in the development of the
1. Exempt under various international taxpayers business or that the same is proper
agreements; and for the purpose of realizing a profit or minimizing
2. Compensation income falling within the a loss (General Electric vs Collector, CTA Case
meaning of statutory minimum wage No. 1117, July 14, 1963).
under R.A. No. 9504
Tax Arbitrage
Requisites of a private retirement plan to be General Rule: Allowed as deduction from
excluded from gross income taxpayers gross income
a. Employee is at least 50 years old; Exception: As a limitation on the general rule,
b. Has served for at least 10 years; the amount of interest expense shall be reduced
c. The benefit is availed of only once; and by 33% of interest income earned which had
d. Plan is approved by BIR. been subjected to final withholding tax.
recognized that there are now many businesses, difference between the 30% RCIT and the 15%
especially those on 24-hour operations that FWT) against the tax due in its home country.
require employees to be available for
consultation or assignment round the clock. (BIR Tax Treatment of Campaign Contributions
Ruling No. DA-233-07) General Rule: Not included in the taxable
income of the candidate
Benefits from CBA Included as De Minimis
Benefits Requisites for exemption:
Benefits received by an employee by virtue of a 1. must have been utilized to cover a
collective bargaining agreement (CBA) and candidates expenditures;
productivity incentive scheme provided that the 2. used for his/her electoral campaign;
total annual monetary value received from both 3. during the campaign period;
CBA and productivity incentive scheme 4. filed the Statement of Expenditures with the
combined do not exceed P10,000 per COMELEC.
employee, per taxable year. (RR No. 1-2015)
Exceptions:
Taxability of De Minimis Benefits Received in 1. Unulitized/ excess campaign funds subject
Excess of Ceiling to candidates taxable income.
The excess of the de minimis benefits over their 2. Failure to file Statement of Expenditures-
respective ceilings shall be considered as part of entire amount directly subject to income tax.
13th Month Pay and Other Benefits and will be
subject to tax only on the excess over the NOTE: Purchases of goods and services given
P82,000.00 ceiling (RR No. 10-2008 in relation as campaign contribution to political parties and
to RA No. 10653, March 2015). candidates- contributors and supporters are
subject to 5% withholding tax (RR No. 08-2009)
De Minimis Value in Relation with Balikbayan
Boxes Final Withholding Tax and Creditable
Under RA 10863, residents of the Philippines, Withholding Tax
OFWs or other Filipinos while residing abroad or Similarities:
upon their return to the Philippines shall be 1. Liability of the tax rests primarily on the
allowed to bring in or send to their families or payor as a withholding agent; and
relatives in the Philippines balikbayan boxes 2. Failure to withhold/ underwithholding,
which shall be exempt from applicable duties the deficiency tax shall be collected from
and taxes imposed under the NIRC of 1997, as the withholding agent.
amended:
Distinctions:
Provided, That balikbayan boxes shall contain Final Withholding Creditable
personal and household effects only and Tax Withholding Tax
shall neither be in commercial quantities nor The amount of income
intended for barter, sale or for hire and that the Taxes withheld on
tax withheld by the
FCA value of which shall not exceed one certain income
hundred fifty thousand pesos (150,000.00); withholding agent is
payments are intended
constituted as a full
to equal or, at least,
Provided, Further, That every three (3) years and final payment of
approximate the tax
after the effectivity of this Act, the Secretary of the income tax due
Finance shall adjust the amount herein stated to due of the payee on
from the payee of the
its present value using the CPI as published by said income.
said income.
the PSA;
The income recipient
Provided, Finally, That residents of the is still required to file
The payee is not
Philippines, OFWs or other Filipinos can only an ITR to report the
required to file an
avail of this privilege up to three (3) times in income and/or pay the
a calendar year. Any amount in excess of the income tax return for
difference between the
allowable non-dutiable value shall be subject to the particular income.
tax withheld and the
the applicable duties and taxes.
tax due on the income.
Tax Effect of De Minimis Benefits to
Employers When is the gain (or loss) from the transfer
De minimis benefits shall be treated as of property to a corporation in exchange for
deductible expense of the employer. shares NOT recognized under Section 40 (C)
on Tax-Free Exchange?
Tax Sparing Rule 1. Property (excludes cash and services)
The tax due of 30% which should otherwise be is transferred to a corporation;
imposed on dividends could be reduced to 15%, 2. In exchange for stock or unit of
subject to the condition that the country of participation in such corporation;
residence of the recipient of the dividends allows 3. Transferors (not more than five) gain
a credit of 15 percent (representing the control of the transferee corporation
(i.e., gain 51% of all classes of stock
entitled to vote)
A: Advertising if generally of two kinds: (1) Q: What is the interest arbitrage rule?
advertising to stimulate the current sale of A: The taxpayer's allowable deduction for
merchandise or use of services and (2) interest expense shall be reduced by 33% of the
advertising designed to stimulate the future sale interest income. Such limit was legislated
of merchandise or use of services. The second specifically to address the tax arbitrage arising
type involves expenditures incurred, in whole or from the difference between the 20% final tax on
in part, to create or maintain some form of interest income and the 30% regular corporate
goodwill for the taxpayers trade or business or income tax rate (RCIT) under which interest
for the industry or profession of which the expense can be claimed as a deduction.
taxpayer is a member. If the expenditures are for
the advertising of the first kind, then, except as Q: What is a Net Operating Loss Carry-Over
to the question of the reasonableness of (NOLCO)?
amount, there is no doubt such expenditures are A: NOLCO is the excess of allowable deduction
deductible as business expenses. If, however, over gross income of the business in a taxable
the expenditures are for advertising of the year which shall be carried over as a deduction
second kind, then normally they should be
from gross income for the next 3 consecutive
spread out over a reasonable period of time.
(The Tang Case Commissioner vs General taxable years immediately following the year
Foods, GR No. 143672, April 24, 2003) of such loss.
from the expiration of the 120-day period shall accrue and shall be
without any action from the CIR; and paid to such city or
4. All taxpayers, however, can rely on BIR municipality
Ruling No. DA-489-03 from the time of its
issuance on 10 December 2003 up to its If the business has factories, project offices,
reversal by the Court in Aichi on 6 October plants, and plantations, the following sales
2010, as an exception to the mandatory and
allocations shall be made:
jurisdictional 120+30 day periods.
(Mindanao II Geothermal Partnership v. CIR, 1. If the factory and plantation is located in the
and Mindanao I Geothermal Partnership v. same city or municipality:
CIR, G.R. Nos. 193301 and 194637, March 30% recorded where the principal
11, 2013) office is located; and
70% recorded where the factory,
Proof of Input VAT claim project office, plant, or plantation is
1. VAT invoice for purchase of goods or located.
properties
2. VAT official receipts for exchange of 2. If the factory and plantation is located in
services. different cities or municipalities:
30% recorded where the principal
Case Law office is located; and
The failure to indicate the words zero-rated 70% shall be divided as follows:
on the invoices and receipts issued by a o 60% where the factory is located;
taxpayer would result in the denial of the and
claim for refund or tax credit. (Eastern o 40% where the plantation is located
Telecom Phils. vs. CIR, G.R. No. 183531
dated March 25, 2015) 3. If the business has 2 or more factories,
project offices, plants, and plantations
DOCUMENTARY STAMP TAX located in different localities:
30% recorded where the principal
Q: Who is liable to pay DST? office is located; and
A: Either party to the transaction may be liable 70% shall be prorated among the
for the DST. If one party is exempt, the other localities where the factories, project
offices, plants, and plantations are
party who is not exempt shall be directly liable
located in proportion to their respective
for the DST. (Sec. 173, NIRC; Sec. 2, RR 9-00) volumes of production
Q: Are instructional letters and vouchers subject NOTE: The foregoing sales allocation shall be
to DST? applied irrespective of whether or not sales are
made in the locality where the factory, project
A: Yes. Instructional letters as well as the
office, plant, or plantation is located.
journal vouchers evidencing advances extended
to affiliates qualify as loan agreements upon
which DST may be imposed. (CIR vs. Filinvest, REAL PROPERTY TAXATION
G.R. No. 163653, July 19, 2011)
Real Property Taxes for Properties Owned by
LOCAL BUSINESS TAX the Government
General Rule: Real property owned by the
Situs of Business Taxes Republic of the Philippines or any of its political
subdivisions is exempt from payment of real
The place where the sales would be recognized
property tax.
and the tax would be paid shall depend on
whether or not the business maintains a branch Exception: When the beneficial use thereof has
or sales outlet: been granted, for consideration or otherwise, to
a taxable person. (Sec. 234[a], LGC)
Authority of Revenue Officer to audit limited proceeding shall be entertained in court after the
to years indicated in the LOA expiration of the 2 year period.
Based on Sec. 30 of the Tax Code, there must
be a grant of authority before any revenue TAX REMEDIES RPT
officer can conduct an examination or
assessment. Equally important is that the Erroneous Assessment vs. Illegal
revenue officer so authorized must not go Assessment of RPT
beyond the authority given. In the absence of Erroneous Illegal Assessment
such an authority, the assessment or
Assessment
examination is a nullity. (CIR vs. Sony, G.R. No.
178697 dated Nov. 17, 2010) Presupposes that the An assessment is
taxpayer is subject to illegal if it was made
Remedy to Question the Adverse Ruling of the tax but is disputing without authority under
the Secretary of Finance in the Exercise of the correctness of the the law.
its Power of Review Under Section 4 amount assessed. The
There is no provision in law that expressly taxpayer claims that
provides where exactly the ruling of the
the local assessor
Secretary of Finance under the adverted NIRC
provision is appealable to. However, We find erred in determining
that Sec. 7(a)(1) of RA 1125, as amended, any of the items for
addresses the seeming gap in the law as it vests computing the real
the CTA, albeit impliedly, with jurisdiction over property tax.
the CA petition as other matters arising under The taxpayer must The taxpayer may
the NIRC or other laws administered by the BIR. directly resort to
exhaust the
Accordingly, reviews by the Secretary of judicial action without
Finance pursuant to Sec. 4 of the NIRC are administrative
paying under protest
appealable to the CTA. (Philippine American Life remedies provided
the assessed tax and
and Gen. Insurance vs. SOF and CIR, GR under the LGC before filing an appeal with
No.210987, November 24, 2014) resorting to judicial the Local and Central
action. The taxpayer Board of Assessment
Case Law must first pay the real Appeals. The taxpayer
A "decision" differs from an "assessment" property tax under shall file a complaint
protest. Should the for injunction before
and failure of the FDDA to state the facts
the RTC to enjoin the
and law on which it is based renders the taxpayer find the
LGU from collecting
decision void - but not necessarily the action on the protest real property taxes.
assessment. RR No. 12-99 where it is stated unsatisfactory, the The party unsatisfied
that failure of the FDDA to reflect the facts taxpayer may appeal with the decision of the
and law on which it is based will make the with the LBAA within RTC shall file an
decision void does not extend to the 60 days from receipt of appeal, not a petition
the decision on the for certiorari, before
nullification of the entire assessment. Tax
the CTA, the complaint
laws may not be extended by implication protest. If the taxpayer being a local tax case
beyond the clear import of their language, is still unsatisfied after decided by the RTC.
nor their operation enlarged so as to appealing with the The appeal shall be
embrace matters not specifically provided. LBAA the taxpayer filed within fifteen (15)
(CIR vs. Liquigaz Philippines, G.R. No. may appeal with the days from notice of the
215534 dated April 18, 2016) CBAA within 30 days trial courts decision.
The CTAs decision
from receipt of the
may then be appealed
TAX REMEDIES LOCAL TAXATION Local Boards before the SC through
decision. The decision a petition for review on
Payment Under Protest of the CBAAis certiorari under Rule
Payment under protest is applicable only if the appealable before the 45 of the Rules of
issue is anchored on the correctness, CTA En Banc. The Court raising pure
reasonableness or excessiveness of an questions of law.
CTAs decision may
assessment. It is not applicable nor required
when the taxpayer is questioning the very then be appealed
authority and power of the assessor to impose before the SCthrough
the assessment and the treasurer to collect the a petition for review on
tax. certiorari under Rule
45 of the Rules of
Claim for Tax Refund/Credit Court raising pure
A taxpayer must file a written claim within 2
questions of law.
years from the date of the payment of the tax
with the local treasurer or from the date the
taxpayer is entitled to refund. No case or Remedy to Question the Legality or Validity
of Assessment
If the only issue is the legality or validity of the and household effects that shall neither be in
assessment a question of law direct commercial quantities nor intended for barter,
recourse to the RTC is warranted. In the case at sale or for hire sent by Qualified Filipino While
bar, the claim of petitioner essentially questions
Abroad (QFWA) and shall not exceed P150,000.
the very authority and power of the Municipal
Assessor to impose the assessment and of the
Municipal Treasurer to collect the real property QFWA can send to their families or relatives in
tax with respect to the machineries and the Philippines balikbayan boxes which shall be
equipment. Certainly, it does not pertain to the exempt from payment of duties and taxes, up to
correctness of the amounts assessed but 3 times in a calendar year
attacks the validity of the assessment of the
taxes itself. (Napocor v. Municipal Government
CTA JURISDICTION
Of Navotas, et al, G.R. No. 192300. November
24, 2014)
Jurisdiction of CTA Division
TAX REMEDIES TARIFF AND CUSTOMS
(1) Exclusive original or appellate jurisdiction to
review
Automatic Review a. Decisions of
Decisions of the Collector of Customs in seizure i. CIR on matters arising under NIRC
and protest cases are subject to review by the ii. RTC in the exercise of their original
Commissioner upon appeal as provided under jurisdiction (Note: Decisions of RTC in the
existing laws; provided, however, that where a exercise of their appellate jurisdiction are
decision of the Collector Customs in such appealable to CTA en banc)
seizure and protest cases is adverse to the iii. COC on matters arising under customs
government, it shall automatically be reviewed laws
by the Commissioner of Customs. (CMO No. 20- iv. SOF on customs cases elevated to him
87) for review from decisions of the COC
v. Secretary of Trade and Industry in
Returning residents case of non-agricultural product
Refer to nationals who have stayed in a foreign vi. Secretary of Agriculture in case of
country for a period of at least 6 months. agricultural product
b. Inaction of CIR on assessments and
Conditions for exemptions from tax and refunds
duties
(2) Exclusive original jurisdiction over
Returning residents shall have tax and duty a. Criminal offenses arising from violations
exemption on personal and household effects. of the NIRC or TCC where principal amount
Provided, that: claimed (exclusive of charges and penalties is
(1) It shall not be in commercial quantities; P1,000,000 or more
(2) It is not intended for barter, sale or for hire; b. Tax collection cases on final and
and executory assessments where principal amount
(3) It does not exceed the FCA or FOB value claimed (exclusive of charges and penalties) is
limit of: P1,000,000 or more;
a. P350,000 those who stayed in a
foreign country for at least 10 years (3) Exclusive appellate jurisdiction over appeals
and not availed of this privilege from the judgments of the RTC in their original
within 10 years prior to returning jurisdiction
residents arrival. a. Criminal offenses arising from violations
b. P250,000 those who stayed in a of the NIRC or TCC where principal amount
foreign country for at least 5 but not claimed (exclusive of charges and penalties) is
more than 10 years and not availed less than P1,000,000 or where there is no
of this privilege within 5 years prior specified amount claimed;
to returning residents arrival. b. Tax collection cases within its territorial
c. P150,000 those who stayed in the jurisdiction (less than P1,000,000 or where
foreign country for less than 5 years there is no specified amount claimed)
and not availed of this privilege
within 6 months prior to returning Jurisdiction of CTA En Banc
residents arrival. Exclusive appellate jurisdiction to review the
decisions, resolutions or orders of
Balikbayan box
Refers to a corrugated box or other container or (1) CTA Division in the exercise of its
appellate jurisdiction (on MR/MNT)
receptacle up to a maximum volume of 200,000
over:
cubic centimeters without regard as to shape or i. Decisions of BIR, BOC, DOF, DTI,
receptacle. DA;
ii. Local tax cases decided by the
For purposes of duty tax and exemption, the RTC in the exercise of their original
Balikbayan box should contain only personal jurisdiction; and