10/23/2017 11:47 PM
Anne Lorentzen
District Clerk
Nueces County, Texas
2017CCV-61972-4
CAUSE NO. __________
I.
NATURE OF ACTION
1. This is a Jones Act wrongful death and survival action filed on behalf of a now
deceased Jones Act seaman, Zachariah Jackson, by his mother and father. At the time of his
death, Zachariah Jackson was unmarried and had no children. Thus, his mother and father are
proper parties to bring this wrongful death and survival action under Texas law and the Jones
II.
2. This claim is maintained under the Jones Act (46 U.S.C. 30104) and/or the
general maritime law of the United States. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to the Savings
to Suitors clause. Moreover, the Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendants since
they are headquartered in Texas, do a substantial amount of business in the State of Texas,
and/or the acts or omissions giving rise to this cause of action occurred in Texas. Further, it is
well-settled that Jones Act cases and cases brought under general maritime law are not
removable. Lackey v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 990 F.2d 202, 207 (5th Cir. 1993).
3. Venue is proper pursuant to Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section
15.0181 & 15.002(a)(1), as all or a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the
4. This case does not fall under the Death on the High Seas Act as the incident
III.
DISCOVERY LEVEL
5. Discovery in this matter may be conducted under Level 2 of the Texas Rules of
Civil Procedure.
IV.
PARTIES
suffered severe injuries, ultimately causing his death, due to Defendants negligent and grossly
negligent acts and omissions more fully developed in the paragraphs below. Therefore, Daniel
Jackson, as the father of the deceased, is entitled to bring his wrongful death claims
individually. Further. Daniel Jackson is entitled to bring Decedents survival claims as the
Virginia.
2
8. Defendant Bouchard Transportation Co., Inc., (Bouchard) is a New York
corporation with a principal office in Melville, New York. This Defendant may be served
through its Chief Executive Officer Morton S. Bouchard III (or any other qualified agent or
representative) at Bouchards Principal Executive Office located at 58 South Service Rd., Suite
150, Melville, New York, 11747. Additionally, this Court has specific personal jurisdiction
over Defendant Bouchard because Plaintiffs claims against Bouchard arise out of Bouchards
V.
FACTS
Bouchard and assigned to work offshore on Bouchards vessel(s). The vessel(s) in question
was owned, operated, and managed by Bouchard. On that date, Zachariah Jackson was killed
when an explosion and fire occurred on the vessel. At the time of the explosion and fire, the
vessel(s) were located on navigable waters off the coast near Port Aransas. Upon information
and belief, the vessel(s) were improperly maintained, dangerous, unseaworthy, and otherwise
unfit for the purpose they were being used for at the time the explosion occurred. At the time
of the explosion, the vessel(s) were located in this County. Further, at all times Zachariah
10. At all relevant times, Plaintiff was assigned to the vessel(s) in question, which
were deployed in navigable waters and where Plaintiff was contributing to and aiding the
3
VI.
CAUSES OF ACTION
11. Plaintiffs hereby incorporate by reference the facts and allegations of the
12. Defendant is negligent, negligent per se, and grossly negligent for the following
reasons:
d. Failure to properly maintain, inspect, and/or repair the Vessel and/or its
equipment;
hazards;
4
o. violating applicable Coast Guard, OSHA, BSEE rules, and/or other
applicable rules and regulations; and
pain, mental anguish, emotional distress, and other medical problems. He eventually died as
a result. Zachariah Jackson has also suffered a loss of future earning capacity.
15. Daniel and Lynda Jackson have lost their son. As a result of the incident,
Plaintiffs have sustained in the past and will continue to sustain in the future:
grossly negligent acts and/or omissions, Zachariah Jackson was killed when a large fire and
explosion occurred on the vessel(s) in question. At the time of filing this lawsuit, the Coast
5
Guard has been unable to locate Zachariah Jacksons body after the large explosion. Plaintiffs
have been damaged in a sum far in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of this
17. Plaintiffs are also entitled to punitive damages because Defendant willfully and
wantonly disregarded Decedents and Plaintiffs safety and rights. Defendant acted with
flagrant and malicious disregard of Decedents health and safety. Defendant was subjectively
aware of the extreme risk posed by the conditions which caused Decedents death, but did
nothing to rectify them. Defendant did so knowing that the conditions posed dangerous and
grave safety concerns. Defendant acts and omissions involved an extreme degree of risk
considering the probability and magnitude of potential harm to Decedent and others.
Defendant had actual, subjective awareness of the risk, and consciously disregarded such risks.
Also, Defendants actions and/or inactions, viewed objectively, subjected Zachariah Jackson
VII.
JURY TRIAL
18. Plaintiffs hereby request a trial by jury on all claims and submits his jury fee
herewith.
19. As this is a claim under the Jones Act, Plaintiffs have the right to a preferential
trial setting pursuant to Texas Government Code, Section 23.101(a)(5). Plaintiffs respectfully
6
VIII.
PRAYER
Plaintiffs pray that this citation issue and be served upon Defendant in a form and
manner prescribed by law, requiring Defendant appear and answer, and that upon final hearing,
Plaintiffs have judgment against Defendant in a total sum in excess of the minimum
jurisdictional limits of this Court, plus pre-judgment and post-judgment interests, all costs of
Court, and all such other relief to which Plaintiffs show they are justly entitled. As required by
Rule 47 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs affirmatively state that they seek
damages in excess of $1,000,000 and pray for relief and judgment, as follows:
Actual damages;
Consequential damages;
Exemplary damages;
Disfigurement;
Costs of court;
Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
Respectfully Submitted,